Misinformation as a Source of NIH Collaboratory Complication for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

misinformation as a source of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Misinformation as a Source of NIH Collaboratory Complication for - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Misinformation as a Source of NIH Collaboratory Complication for Clinical Trials Grand Rounds Dr. Brian Southwell bsouthwell@rti.org brian.southwell@duke.edu Is misinformation a prime suspect for clinical trial refusal or treatment


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NIH Collaboratory Grand Rounds Misinformation as a Source of Complication for Clinical Trials

  • Dr. Brian Southwell

bsouthwell@rti.org brian.southwell@duke.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Is misinformation a prime suspect for clinical trial refusal

  • r treatment

avoidance?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Does misinformation reduce clinical trial participation?

  • Information reach – lack of information – is

major concern:

  • Many patients willing to enroll yet few

invited (DasMahapatra et al., 2017)

  • Misinformation also likely discourages trial

participation.

Source: DasMahapatra et al. (2017). Clinical trials from the patient perspective: survey in an online patient community. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17: 166. doi: 10.1186/s12913- 017-2090-x

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Cleveland Clinic dispels key myths, including:

  • “Informed consent exists primarily to

protect researchers’ legal interests”

  • “Clinical research patients are taking

sugar pills”

  • “You need to live near a major

hospital to participate”

Source: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/10-biggest-cancer-clinical-trial-myths-busted/

Misinformation about clinical trials?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Misinformation and distrust of treatment?

  • Example: Navar (2019) warns of inaccurate online claims that statins cause

memory loss, cataracts, pancreatic dysfunction, Lou Gehrig disease, and cancer.

Source: Navar, A. M. (2019). Fear-based medical misinformation and disease prevention: From vaccines to statins. JAMA Cardiology. Available online: doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1972

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Misinformation and distrust of treatment?

  • Example: Navar (2019) warns of inaccurate online claims that statins cause

memory loss, cataracts, pancreatic dysfunction, Lou Gehrig disease, and cancer.

Source: Navar, A. M. (2019). Fear-based medical misinformation and disease prevention: From vaccines to statins. JAMA Cardiology. Available online: doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1972

slide-7
SLIDE 7

From whence does misinformation arise?

Questionable websites attempting to sell products...

slide-8
SLIDE 8

From whence does misinformation arise?

But also health education from advocacy organizations…

slide-9
SLIDE 9

From whence does misinformation arise?

And even through diffusion of conventional journalism...

slide-10
SLIDE 10

From whence does misinformation arise?

Brody mentions FDA reference to risk of reversible memory loss but puts it in appropriate context.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Do we misunderstand misinformation?

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Do we misunderstand misinformation?

:

  • Misinformation is not all equal in consequence.
  • New media platforms differ from old in authorship,
  • versight, and algorithms.
  • Misinformation can have indirect effects aside from

acute, short-term ones.

  • Misinformation correction may itself have unintended

consequences.

  • System-level challenges warrant system-level, future-
  • riented remedies.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Avoid using sentences that will already be used when talking

Emerging literature on misinformation highlights

  • ur own humanity.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Do we misunderstand

  • ur own

vulnerabilities?

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Do we misunderstand

  • ur own

vulnerabilities?

15

We need social connection. We need hope for future. The lack of either affords

  • pportunity for medical

misinformation effect.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Image: The Australian Women’s Weekly

slide-17
SLIDE 17

“Anti-vaccination activists have enjoyed particular success in communities whose cultural isolation makes them easy prey for misinformation.”

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Our multifaceted vulnerabilities

biased toward acceptance reasons why we share regulatory approach

  • Correction is hard

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Was Spinoza right?

Images sources: Encyclopædia Britannica and biography.com

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Why do people share misinformation?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Why do people share misinformation?

Some possibilities other than malice:

  • Accidental or unintended spread
  • Our needs for social bonding
  • Information seeking and efforts for validation
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Why rumors spread

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Why rumors spread

  • Discomfort of uncertainty
  • Lack of corrective information
  • Also: information as potential

relationship currency

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Might emotions make us vulnerable?

  • Yes.
  • Anger encourages inaccurate information acceptance.

Example: Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: how anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65, 699-719.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Our reactive regulatory tendency doesn’t guarantee misinformation won’t appear

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Studies support some corrective potential…

  • Aikin et al. (2015). Journal of Communication.
  • Aikin et al. (2017). Research in Social and Administrative

Pharmacy.

  • Bode & Vraga. (2015). Journal of Communication.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Studies support some corrective potential…

  • Aikin et al. (2015). Journal of Communication.
  • Aikin et al. (2017). Research in Social and Administrative

Pharmacy.

  • Bode & Vraga. (2015). Journal of Communication.

… direct rebuttal and large-scale exposure needed.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Is misinformation culprit? Are we partly culpable?

Are we vulnerable to medical misinformation?

  • Yes

Is misinformation ever sown for others’ gain?

  • Yes

Is misinformation sharing between patients illogical or malicious?

  • Not necessarily

Is there a path forward?

  • Yes
slide-29
SLIDE 29

What if…

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What if…

  • we find (and share) misinformation when earnestly searching for

answers?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What if…

  • we find (and share) misinformation when earnestly searching for

answers?

  • we would turn to peer-reviewed research if it was accessible,

available, and trusted?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

What if…

  • we find (and share) misinformation when earnestly searching for

answers?

  • we would turn to peer-reviewed research if it was accessible,

available, and trusted?

  • we could inoculate people against inaccurate sources while

acknowledging common questions and concerns?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What do we need to do?

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

What do we need to do?

  • Consider interaction of human psychology, news norms, governance,

and health systems.

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

What do we need to do?

  • Consider interaction of human psychology, news norms, governance,

and health systems.

  • Monitor and seek to understand – rather than prejudge – patient

information environments.

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

What do we need to do?

  • Consider interaction of human psychology, news norms, governance,

and health systems.

  • Monitor and seek to understand – rather than prejudge – patient

information environments.

  • Build and maintain trust between health care systems and patients

by acknowledging shared interests.

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Let’s connect.

  • Dr. Brian Southwell

brian.southwell@duke.edu bsouthwell@rti.org @BrianSouthwell