minneapolis water works
play

Minneapolis Water Works Gina Sternberg MnTAP Supervisor: Karl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Neutralization Optimization Minneapolis Water Works Gina Sternberg MnTAP Supervisor: Karl DeWahl Company Supervisors: Annika Bankston, Steve Bros Facility Background Minneapolis Water provides tap water to Minneapolis and surrounding


  1. Neutralization Optimization Minneapolis Water Works Gina Sternberg MnTAP Supervisor: Karl DeWahl Company Supervisors: Annika Bankston, Steve Bros

  2. Facility Background • Minneapolis Water provides tap water to Minneapolis and surrounding communities • Produces ~57 million gallons of water per day • Columbia Heights Membrane Plant • Ultrafiltration to remove impurities • Uses hollow fiber membranes

  3. Project Background: Backwashes • Backwashes clean filters • 2 types of chemically enhanced backwashes (CEB) • CEB1: Sodium hypochlorite (bleach) • Sterilizes filter membranes • CEB2: Sodium bisulfite (SBS) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) • Removes fouling, particularly ferric chloride coagulant

  4. Project Background: Neutralization • Chemical backwashes produce waste • Neutralization process: • Completely automated • Waste is sent to neutralization tank after backwash • Raw chemicals added to neutralize harmful reactions • Neutralized waste eventually added back in Mississippi River • Limits: • pH = 5.4-8.8 • ORP = 200-500 mV

  5. Motivations for Change Annual Neutralization Chemical Use • $30,000 a year on neutralization (thousands of gallons) chemicals 18 chemical use (thousand gal) 16 • More neutralization chemicals 14 means more salts in the water 12 10 • Salts a concern, though discharge is 8 within permit 6 4 2 • 40,000 lbs Na+ per year added to 0 water from neut chems NaOH SBS Bleach

  6. Project Overview • Goal: to Reduce Raw Chemicals Used in Neutralization • Areas of interest: • Major: • Self-neutralization – complete • Minor: • Tank mixing – complete • Sources of variability in neutralization – complete • Re-examine ORP limits – progress, incomplete https://www.brandonhall.com/totaltech/images/tt-overview-icon-1.png

  7. Self-Neutralization • CEB2 (sodium bisulfite and HCl) always followed by CEB1 (bleach) • Currently, each wash is neutralized separately • Self-Neutralization • Add CEB2 and CEB1 together to partially neutralize before adding raw chemicals

  8. Current Method: SBS NaOH CEB1 (bleach) Neutralized Waste Neutralization Tank “A” Neutralized Waste Neutralization CEB2 (SBS) Tank “B ” SBS Bleach NaOH

  9. Self-Neutralization: SBS NaOH CEB2 (SBS) Neutralization Neutralized Waste CEB1 (Bleach) Tank “A ”

  10. Findings Annual Chemical Use (thousands of gallons) • Full scale tests succeeded 20 chemical use (thousand gal) • Reduces raw chemical demand 15 • Requires no new equipment • Requires a self-neutralization routine 10 to be programmed 5 • Around 1,500 self-neutralizations per year possible 0 NaOH SBS Bleach • Savings: $12,000 a year Currently Used Used with Self-Neut

  11. Findings: Summary Waste reduction Change Type Waste reduced Implementation Cost savings Payback Status option (per year) cost (per year) period 34,000 lbs SBS Self- Procedure 80,000 lbs Bleach $2,200 $12,000 2.2 months Planned 2018 Neutralization change 26,000 lbs NaOH

  12. Tank Mixing • Mixing a concern with self-neutralization • Two batches at once = larger volume to mix Tank Inlet (not part of mixing) Outlet Intake

  13. Findings • Mixing appears adequate • Surface visibly disturbed by mixing • Measurements relatively constant as tank empties • Self-neutralization requires more mixing time • ~6 min for pH to stabilize, much longer for ORP • 10 minutes recommended to mix self-neut batch • Recommendation: Perform maintenance on system to ensure no blockages

  14. Findings: Summary Waste reduction Change Type Waste reduced Implementation Cost savings Payback Status option (per year) cost (per year) period 430 lbs SBS Maintenance on Procedure Planned Sept 300 lbs Bleach $800 $90 8.9 years Tank Mixing change 2017 290 lbs NaOH

  15. Sources of Variability • With more consistency, more efficiency is possible • No correlations between initial and final conditions found • Tank Level • Unit distance from neut tank • Starting ORP and pH in tank • Potential source: • Pumps for same chemical calibrated differently • Recommendation: Recalibrate pumps, particularly bleach and NaOH

  16. NaOH Pumps Neutralization Pumps 120 Flow Rate (gal/hr) Pump 1 100 Pump 2 80 60 Pump 3 40 Bleach Pumps 20 250 0 Flow Rate (gal/hr) 200 0 50 100 Pump Stroke 150 SBS Pumps Pump 4 100 80 Flow Rate (gal/hr) Pump 3 50 60 Pump 1 0 40 Pump 2 0 20 40 60 80 20 Pump Stroke Pump 3 0 0 50 100 Pump Stroke

  17. Pump Recalibration Summary Waste reduction Change Type Waste reduced Implementation Cost savings Payback Status option (per year) cost (per year) period Recalibrate Procedure 1 year, 4 Planned late 4,000 lbs NaOH $400 $300 Pumps change months 2017

  18. Summary Table Waste reduction Change Type Waste reduced Implementation Cost savings Payback Status option (per year) cost (per year) period 34,000 lbs SBS Self- Procedure 80,000 lbs Bleach $2,200 $12,000 2.2 months Planned 2018 Neutralization change 26,000 lbs NaOH Recalibrate Procedure 1 year, 4 Planned late 4,000 lbs NaOH $400 $300 Pumps change months 2017 430 lbs SBS Maintenance on Procedure Planned Sept 300 lbs Bleach $800 $90 8.9 years Tank Mixing change 2017 290 lbs NaOH

  19. Future Work • Continue investigating ORP • Determine new limits? • Changes in ORP from exposure to air? • Follow-up on pump recalibration

  20. Personal Benefits • Balancing independent work vs asking for help • Planning steps toward a complex goal • Designing experiments • Learning to get the information I need from the data I have

  21. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend