Mikhail V. Medvedev (KU) Students (at KU): Simulations: Sarah - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

mikhail v medvedev ku
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Mikhail V. Medvedev (KU) Students (at KU): Simulations: Sarah - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

"Kinetic Modeling of Astrophysical Plasmas" Krakow, October 7, 2008 bonus: nus: CRs + B B-fiel elds ds in a Foreshoc eshock Mikhail V. Medvedev (KU) Students (at KU):


slide-1
SLIDE 1

"Kinetic Modeling of Astrophysical Plasmas" Krakow, October 7, 2008

Mikhail V. Medvedev (KU)

Students (at KU): Sarah Reynolds, Sriharsha Pothapragada

Simulations:

Ken-Ichi Nishikawa (U. Alabama, Huntsville) Anatoly Spitkovsky (Princeton) Luis Silva and the Plasma Simulation Group (Portugal) Aake Nordlund and his group (Niels Bohr Institute,

Copenhagen, Denmark)

Theory: Davide Lazatti and his group at U.Colorado Boulder

bonus: nus: CRs + B B-fiel elds ds in a Foreshoc eshock

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation: ubiquitous Weibel – sub-Larmor-scale fields

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Weibel shock: 2D PIC e-p, Γ=15

(Simulation by Spitkovsky)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Magnetized outflow: reconnection

Small-scale field generation (Weibel instability) at a reconnection site

Non-relativistic electron-positron pair plasma (Swisdak, Liu, J. Drake, ApJ, 2008) Relativistic electron-positron pair plasma (Zenitani & Hesse, PoP, 2008)

…see talks at this conference

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Jitter radiation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Radiation in random fields

wj ~ g2 c/l ws ~ g2 wH … independent of g 2

mc eBl   

 

(Medvedev, 2000, ApJ)

Deflection parameter:

d

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Jitter regime

When d << 1, one can assume that  particle is highly relativistic ɣ>>1  particle’s trajectory is piecewise-linear  particle velocity is nearly constant r(t) = r0 + c

c t

 particle experiences random acceleration w┴(t) e- v = const w┴(t) = random

(Medvedev, ApJ, 2000; 2006)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Jitter radiation. Theory

The dominant contribution to the integral comes from small angles

Small-angle approximation Lienard-Wichert potentials Spectral power

(Landau & Lifshitz, 1963; Medvedev, ApJ, 2000)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Jitter radiation. Theory (cont.)

where

Fourier image of the particle acceleration from the 3D “(vxB) acceleration field”

Lorentz force B-field spectrum Ensemble-averaged acceleration spectrum

(Landau & Lifshitz, 1963; Medvedev, ApJ, 2000; Fleishman, ApJ, 2006, Medvedev, ApJ, 2006)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Radiation vs Θ

B-field is anisotropic: B=(Bx , By) is random, Bz=0

(Medvedev, Silva, Kamionkowski 2006; Medvedev 2006)

n z x v

Θ

  • bserver
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Face-on view

(credit: Hededal, Haugbolle, 2005)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Oblique view

(credit: Hededal, Haugbolle, 2005)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Spectra vs. viewing angle

(Medvedev 2006; S. Reynolds, S. Pothapragada, Medvedev, in prep.)

n1 n0 n-h n-h-1 Log Fν Log ν

synch.

<Bk

2> ~ k-η

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Jitter spectra from 3D PIC

(Hededal, PhD thesis 2005)

Bulk Lorentz factor = 15 PDF:Thermal +non-thermal (p=2.7) 1/3 (synch.)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Synchrotron “Line of Death”

P(ω) ~ ω+1

(Kaneko, et al, ApJS, 2006)

(Medvedev, 2000)

Statistics is large: About 30% of over 2700 GRBs violate synchrotron limit at low energies

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Non-synchrotron GRB spectra

GRB 970111 soft photon index violates synchrotron limit for the entire burst Some GRBs cannot be synchrotron

(Beppo-SAX observatory: Frontera, et al., ApJ, 2000)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Multi-peak prompt GRB

(Kaneko, et al. ApJS 2006; PhD thesis)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Multi-peak prompt GRB

(Kaneko, et al. ApJS 2006; PhD thesis)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Multi-peak prompt GRB

(Kaneko, et al. ApJS 2006; PhD thesis)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Multi-peak prompt GRB

(Kaneko, et al. ApJS 2006; PhD thesis)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Multi-peak prompt GRB

(Kaneko, et al. ApJS 2006; PhD thesis)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Multi-peak prompt GRB

(Kaneko, et al. ApJS 2006; PhD thesis)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Jet viewing angle effect

Jet axis To observer Surfaces of equal times Jet opening angle

Θobs Θjet

slide-24
SLIDE 24

“Tracking” GRBs

~1/γ

t1 , bright,

high Epeak, α~0 Θ~Θlab~0

t2 , intermediate

α~ -2/3 aberration

t3 , faint,

low Epeak, α~ -1 Θ~π/2, Θlab~1/γ

Also, “hardness – intensity” correlation ; Also, “tracking behavior”

flux α

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Single pulse: F & alpha “lightcurves”

Fν ~ να

No synch nch allow

  • wed

ed

α

Flux @ Epeak

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Prompt spectral variability

Fν ~ να

R/(2Γ2c) α=1/3

a single pulse

(Medvedev, 2006) (Pothapragada, Reynolds, Medvedev, in prep) high-latitude prompt

Polarization may be expected, if jet is misaligned

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Model lightcurves

Thin shells Thick shells

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Flux @ Epeak vs alpha -correlation

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Are shock simulations relevant for GRBs?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cooling & Weibel time-scales

Synchrotron cooling time Electron/proton dynamical time Inside the ejecta: Downstream an internal shock: from simulations

slide-31
SLIDE 31

shock

Cooling & Weibel time-scales

prompt prompt, large Γ-internal

(Medvedev & Spitkovsky, in prep)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

shock

Cooling & Weibel time-scales

afterglow, strong explosion afterglow

(Medvedev & Spitkovsky, in prep)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Bonus: Self-similar foreshosk model with CR generated B-field

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The model

y x x=0 downstream

B(γ(x))

nCR γ nCR γ nCR γ λ(γ) B B B γ1 γ2 > γ1 γ3> γ2 λ(γ) λ(γ) x1 x2>x1 x3>x2

(Medvedev & Zakutnyaya, in prep)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Self-similar foreshock

Assume steady state and neglect nonlinear effects:

  • effect of pre-conditioning of upstream on Weibel instability
  • nonlinear feedback of B-fields on
  • CR distribution function
  • Shock structure
  • CR acceleration
  • time evolution of generated fields

Valid at B-field spectrum near a shock

(Medvedev & Zakutnyaya, in prep)

Typical field:

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Conclusions

  • Magnetic field with small spatial coherence length are ubiquitous. They

form due to the Weibel-type instability via the current filament formation

  • Radiation emitted by electrons in Weibel-generated magnetic fields –

Jitter radiation – has spectral properties that make it more favorable over synchrotron models. The Weibel+Jitter shock model can be tested against GRB data: e.g., spectral variability and afterglow lightcurves

  • A model of a self-similar foreshock magnetized by streaming CRs is

presented, but more understanding is needed on B-field evolution and acceleration/heating larger and longer PIC simulations are needed

  • More understanding is still needed for external shocks of afterglows

(Weibel vs vorticity models, post-shock turbulence) and prompt emission (magnetized outflows)