Method For The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity For Non- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

method for the estimation of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Method For The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity For Non- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

University of KwaZulu Natal Chemical Engineering A New Group Contribution Method For The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity For Non- Electrolyte Organic Compounds Onellan Govender 205502080 Experimentation Verses Prediction 2 Thermal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A New Group Contribution Method For The Estimation Of Thermal Conductivity For Non- Electrolyte Organic Compounds

Onellan Govender 205502080

University of KwaZulu Natal Chemical Engineering

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Experimentation Verses Prediction

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Thermal Conductivity Required for

 Equipment design  Cost-effective and safe

plant design

 Simulation packages  Scale up  Calculation of transfer

coefficients and dimensionless numbers

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Thermal Conductivity Required for

 Equipment design  Cost-effective and safe

plant design

 Simulation packages  Scale up  Calculation of transfer

coefficients and dimensionless numbers

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Previous Work Done

 Normal boiling point (Rarey and Cordes 2002

and Nannoolal et al. 2004)

 Critical property data (Nannoolal et al. 2007)  Vapour pressures (Nannoolal et al. 2008 and

Moller et al. 2008)

 Liquid viscosity (Nannoolal et al. 2009)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current Work

 Bruce Moller – Gamma infinity in water,

alkanes, alcohols

 Eugene Olivier – Surface Tension  Onellan Govender –Thermal Conductivity

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Thermal Conductivity - λ

 Theoretical Contributions and

Considerations

 Critical Enhancement

( , ) ( ) ( , ) ( , )

n

  • n

c n

T T T T            

q

J  

8

λ (W/m.K)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Thermal Conductivity of Propane as f(T,P)

( , ) ( ) ( , ) ( , )

n

  • n

c n

T T T T            

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Critical Enhancement

Selected isotherms for CO2 depicting the critical enhancement phenomenon (Mathias et al. 2002)

10

Factor of 16 Tc + 0.25K Tc + 0.33K Tc + 0.74K Tc + 2.09K

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Experiments and Data Correlation Prediction Models

Corresponding States General Correlations Family Methods Group Contribution Method

Correlation and Prediction

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

General Correlation Methods

 Sato and Reidel (1977)  Lakshmi and Prasad (1992)

Family Methods

 Latini et al. (1977)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

0.08 0.09 0.1 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 200 250 300 350 400 450

Thermal Conductivity (W/(m.K)) Temperature (K)

Thermal Conductivity of Octane as f(T) at 1atm

Lakshmi & Prasad Sato & Riedel Experimental Data Linear (Experimental Data)

General Correlation Methods

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

0.1 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320

Thermal Conductivity (W/(m.K)) Temperature (K)

Thermal Conductivity of Methylcyclopentane as f(T) at 1atm

Lakshmi & Prasad Sato & Riedel Experimental Data Linear (Experimental Data)

General Correlation Methods

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Previous Group Contribution Methods

 Sakiadis and Coates (1955 , 1957)  Robbins & Kingrea (1962)  Nagvekar & Daubert (1987)  Assael, Charitidou & Wakeham (1989)  Sastri and Rao (1993)  Rodenbush, Viswanath & Hsieh (1999)  Sastri and Rao (1999)

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Literature Review & Method Test

16

Methods Sato & Riedel (1997) Nagvekar & Daubert (1987) Lakshmi & Prasad (1992) Sastri & Rao (1993)

RMD (%) 19.81 16.64 23.41 14.11 Number of Components 500 322 500 469

Component Classes

Hydrocarbons Oxygen Compounds Ethers Aldehydes Aromatic Hydrocarbons Carboxylic Acids Esters Nitrogen Compounds Halogen Compounds Alcohols Ketones Amines

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Data Filtration and Validation

Figure : Data points for n-butane

(1atm isobar; 135.75 < T (K) < 272.65)

17

DDB – 100 515 data points for 876 components

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Data Filtration and Validation

Figure : All experimental data points for n-butane

(135.75 < T (K) < 423.61; 101.325 < P (kPa) < 70000)

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Model Idea

( , ) ( ) ( ) ( 101.3 )

Ref Ref

T P T f T T g P kPa       

 

REF REF P

T T T           

 

 

101.325

P REF

P P T T P T                          

19

Reference Value Separate group contributions for the 3 parts Temperature Dependence Pressure Dependence

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Software Development

 The DDB (Artist)  Microsoft Office  SQL & ADO

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Future Work

 Select a regression model and determine empirical

parameters for all compounds

 Evaluation & definition of structural groups  Regression for structural or bond contributions  Testing using a test set of thermal conductivity data  Optimisation of structural or bond contributions

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary

22

Importance of prediction methods Thermal Conductivity Review of available prediction methods Evaluation of methods Filtration and validation of data from DDB Software Work left to be done

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Acknowledgements

 Prof. D. Ramjugernath from UKZN  Prof. J. Rarey and Prof. J. Gmehling from Oldenburg

University

 Bruce Moller and Eugene Olivier  DDBST Software and Separation Technology  South African NRF and German DLR (BMBF)

23