Metaphor Detection
through
Term Relevance
1
Metaphor Detection through Term Relevance Marc Schulder Eduard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Metaphor Detection through Term Relevance Marc Schulder Eduard Hovy Saarland University Carnegie Mellon University 1 Metaphor Detection And yet we stand together as we did two centuries ago. 2 Metaphor Detection And yet we
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
5
See also Sporleder & Li (2009)/Li & Sporleder(2010)
6
(Web Corpus)
(Metaphor Corpus)
7
yes yes no no
8
8
8
9
yes yes no no
10
yes yes no no
11
yes yes no no
12
13
14
14
pass law regulate debate parliament
14
14
budget tax spend plan finances
14
14
15
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
23 % 60 % 17 %
0 metaphors 1 metaphor 2+ metaphors
17
23 % 60 % 17 %
0 metaphors 1 metaphor 2+ metaphors
18
19
19
budget tax spend plan finances
19
budget tax spend plan finances
19
document frequency > δ domain relevance > 𝜹
budget tax spend plan finances
20
document frequency > δ domain relevance > 𝜹 literal metaphor literal
yes yes no no
20
document frequency > δ domain relevance > 𝜹 literal metaphor literal
yes yes no no
𝜹=0.02 ; δ=0.1
21
document frequency > δ literal literal
yes yes no no
𝜹=0.02 ; δ=0.1
legislative relevance > 𝜹 economy relevance > 𝜹 ... literal
yes no
metaphor
22
document frequency > δ domain relevance > 𝜹 literal metaphor literal
yes yes no no
𝜹=0.02 ; δ=0.1
22
document frequency > δ domain relevance > 𝜹 literal metaphor literal
yes yes no no
𝜹=0.02 ; δ=0.1
𝜹=0.01 ; δ=0.1
23
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 F1 Precision Recall
.591 .245 .346 .478 .276 .350 1.000 .142 .249
All Metaphor Manual Seeds Gold Seeds
24
25
25
26
0.25 0.5 0.75 1 F1 Precision Recall
.263 .640 .373 .230 .654 .340 .130 .683 .219 .108 .706 .187
CRF: Basic CRF: Relev CRF: PosLex CRF: PosLex + Relev All Metaphor Manual Seeds
27
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 F1 Number of Training Sentences Models CRF Basic CRF PosLex Threshold + Relevance + Relevance Baseline
28
0 % 25 % 50 % 75 % 100 % 125 % 150 % 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 0 % 25 % 50 % 75 % 100 % 125 % 150 % Relative Gain Number of Training Sentences Models CRF Basic CRF PosLex
29