meshless methods for the reissner mindlin plate problem
play

Meshless methods for the Reissner-Mindlin plate problem based on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Meshless methods for the Reissner-Mindlin plate problem based on mixed variational forms J. S. Hale 31st October 2012 Universidad de Chile J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 1 Overview J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates


  1. Meshless methods for the Reissner-Mindlin plate problem based on mixed variational forms J. S. Hale 31st October 2012 Universidad de Chile J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 1

  2. Overview J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 2 ▶ Meshless numerical methods ▶ Similarities with �nite element methods ▶ Differences with �nite element methods ▶ Reissner-Mindlin plate problem ▶ Physics of the problem ▶ Scaling ▶ The Kirchhoff limit ▶ Shear-locking ▶ Numerical demonstration in 1D ▶ Why does it happen? ▶ What are the potential solutions? ▶ Mixed variational form ▶ Projection Operator ▶ Stability ▶ Results

  3. Meshless numerical methods . Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale (1) 1 i i . Theorem (Partition of Unity, Babuška and Melenk 1993) . . mesh-less numerical method. perspective, there is very little difference between a mesh-based and a Well, of course, there is no mesh. But really, at least from a mathematical . . What’s the difference with Finite Element Methods? 3

  4. Meshless numerical methods . Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale (1) i . . Theorem (Partition of Unity, Babuška and Melenk 1993) . mesh-less numerical method. perspective, there is very little difference between a mesh-based and a Well, of course, there is no mesh. But really, at least from a mathematical . . What’s the difference with Finite Element Methods? 3 ∑ ϕ i = 1

  5. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Domain J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  6. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Seed with nodes J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  7. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Mesh J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  8. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Reference Mesh F Figure : Construct basis J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  9. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Support de�ned by mesh J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  10. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Meshless; support no longer de�ned by mesh J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  11. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Give a node a support area J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  12. Meshless numerical methods So, meshless methods just use different techniques to construct the Partition of Unity, or basis, to approximate the functions within the domain. Figure : Give every node a support area J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 4

  13. u i 2 w i p T a i ln Maximum-Entropy (Sukumar, M. Ortiz and Arroyo) Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale w i i 1 i N min Entropy functional maximisation . . Construct a meshless PU . Typically by minimisation or convex optimisation process. 1 i N 2 1 a min Quadratic Weighted Least-Squares Minimisation . . Moving Least-Squares (Shepard, Lancaster and Salkauskas) . 5

  14. i ln Construct a meshless PU Maximum-Entropy (Sukumar, M. Ortiz and Arroyo) Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale w i i 1 i N min Entropy functional maximisation . . . Typically by minimisation or convex optimisation process. N 2 1 a min Quadratic Weighted Least-Squares Minimisation . . Moving Least-Squares (Shepard, Lancaster and Salkauskas) . 5 ∑ w i [ p T a − u i ] 2 i = 1

  15. Construct a meshless PU . Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale w i N min Entropy functional maximisation . . Typically by minimisation or convex optimisation process. Maximum-Entropy (Sukumar, M. Ortiz and Arroyo) 5 min . Moving Least-Squares (Shepard, Lancaster and Salkauskas) . Quadratic Weighted Least-Squares Minimisation . a 1 2 N ∑ w i [ p T a − u i ] 2 i = 1 ( ϕ i ) ∑ ϕ i ln φ i = 1

  16. FE Figure : Finite Element ( P 1 ) basis functions on unit interval Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale 6 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 φ 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x

  17. MLS Figure : Moving Least-Squares basis functions on unit interval Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale 7 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 φ 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x

  18. MaxEnt Figure : Maximum-Entropy basis functions on unit interval Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale 8 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 φ 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x

  19. C 0 easy, C 1 hard Summary local, higher-bandwidth Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale sometimes yes Kronecker delta approximant interpolant Character up to C Continuity rational polynomial Integration local, lower-bandwidth . Support support mesh Connectivity global local element + map Space Mesh-less Mesh-based Property What are the key differences between a mesh-based and a mesh-less PU? . . Question 9

  20. Summary . Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale sometimes yes Kronecker delta approximant interpolant Character Continuity rational polynomial Integration local, higher-bandwidth local, lower-bandwidth Support Mesh-less Question . . What are the key differences between a mesh-based and a mesh-less PU? Property Mesh-based Space support local element + map global Connectivity mesh 9 up to C ∞ C 0 easy, C 1 hard

  21. V h such that for all v Solving the problem V Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale fv dx v dx u h V h : Find u h . . Poisson Problem (Discrete Form) . Step 2: Construct a suitable Partition of Unity V h Step 1: Begin with the weak (variational) form of your problem fv dx . . Poisson Problem (Weak Form) . 10 Find u ∈ V such that for all v ∈ V where V ≡ H 1 0 (Ω) : ∫ ∫ ∇ u · ∇ v dx = Ω Ω

  22. Solving the problem fv dx Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale fv dx . . Poisson Problem (Discrete Form) . Step 1: Begin with the weak (variational) form of your problem 10 . . . Poisson Problem (Weak Form) Find u ∈ V such that for all v ∈ V where V ≡ H 1 0 (Ω) : ∫ ∫ ∇ u · ∇ v dx = Ω Ω Step 2: Construct a suitable Partition of Unity V h ⊂ V Find u h ∈ V h such that for all v ∈ V h : ∫ ∫ ∇ u h · ∇ v dx = Ω Ω

  23. Solving the problem J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 11 straightforward manner as with �nite elements we cannot enforce Dirichlet (essential) boundary conditions in a Problem 1: Typically for a meshless PU we do not have V h ⊂ V ≡ H 1 0 (Ω) so 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 φ 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x

  24. W h such that for all v Solving the problem v dx Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale problems Problem 2: More unknowns, non positive-de�nite matrix, possible stability 0 ds u h fv dx h v ds u h Step 3a: Modify the weak form of the problem to enforce boundary conditions W h : V h V h h Find u h . . Poisson Problem (Discrete Form + Constraint) . 12

  25. Solving the problem Step 3a: Modify the weak form of the problem to enforce boundary conditions Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale problems Problem 2: More unknowns, non positive-de�nite matrix, possible stability fv dx 12 . . Poisson Problem (Discrete Form + Constraint) . Find ( u h , λ h ) ∈ V h × W h such that for all ( v , γ ) ∈ V h × W h : ∫ ∫ ∫ ∇ u h · ∇ v dx + λ h v ds = Ω Γ Ω ∫ u h γ ds = 0 Γ

  26. Solving the problem J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 13 Step 3b: Use Maximum-Entropy basis functions V h ⊂ V ≡ H 1 0 (Ω) 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 φ 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0 x

  27. j dx i f dx Solving the problem A ij Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale b i i where Step 4: Substitute in trial and test basis functions b Au . . Poisson Problem (Linear System Form) . 14

  28. Solving the problem where Meshless mixed methods for plates J. S. Hale Step 4: Substitute in trial and test basis functions 14 . . Poisson Problem (Linear System Form) . Au = b ∫ A ij = ∇ ϕ i · ∇ ϕ j dx Ω ∫ b i = ϕ i f dx Ω

  29. Solving the problem J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 15

  30. The Reissner-Mindlin Problem J. S. Hale Meshless mixed methods for plates 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend