Melbourne Metro Ground Movement and Land Stability Future Development Loading
Presentation to the Inquiry / Advisory Committee by Anthony Bennett 31st August 2016
1
Melbourne Metro Ground Movement and Land Stability Future - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Melbourne Metro Ground Movement and Land Stability Future Development Loading Presentation to the Inquiry / Advisory Committee by Anthony Bennett 31 st August 2016 1 Ground Movement and Land Stability & Future Development Loading Common
Presentation to the Inquiry / Advisory Committee by Anthony Bennett 31st August 2016
1
2
Excavation for Melbourne Metro Construction Future Loading on Melbourne Metro
Ground movement effects from Melbourne Metro
Existing Building Future Building Loading effects towards Melbourne Metro
3
4
Geological Long Section - Prior to updated geological information
Maribyrnong River, Moonee Ponds Creek, and Yarra River
Magnitude and shape of settlement is related to:
Exaggerated settlement profile
5
Tunnelling induced ground movement
transmitted to surface and forms settlement trough
advance of the face
excavation, excavated in stages
6
Open excavation related ground movement
corresponding vertical movement
7
Settlement Groundwater draw down Soil groundwater
8
Potential Zone of Influence Combines movements from excavation sources Potential Zone of Influence Excavation induced – 5 mm Consolidation induced – 10 mm
9
10
11
Equivalent system for infrastructure and underground utilities
12
CLASSIFICATION BY CHARACTERISTIC SURFACE MOVEMENT (AS 2870‐2011) ‐ EXTRACT Characteristic surface movement (ys) (mm) Site classification Classification based on Site Reactivity A Most sand and rock sites with little or no ground movement from moisture changes 0 < ys ≤ 20 S Slightly reactive clay sites, which may experience only slight ground movement from moisture changes 20 < ys ≤ 40 M Moderately reactive clay or silt sites, which may experience moderate ground movement from moisture changes 40 < ys ≤ 60 H1 Highly reactive clay sites, which may experience high ground movement from moisture changes etc.
13
CLASSIFICATION OF NORMAL SITES BY INTERPRETATION OF FOOTING PERFORMANCE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS (AS 2870‐2011) ‐ MASONRY Performance of walls of existing buildings on lightly stiffened strip footing or slab on ground. Site Classification Damage Category 0 to Category 1 S or M Damage often Category 1, but rarely Category 2 M or H1 CLASSIFICATION OF DAMAGE WITH REFERENCE TO WALLS (AS 2870‐2011) Description of typical damage and required repair
Damage category Hairline cracks < 0.1 mm 0 ‐ Negligible Fine cracks that do not need repair < 1 mm 1 ‐ Very slight Cracks noticeable but easily filled. Doors and windows stick slightly < 5 mm 2 ‐ Slight etc.
14
CBD North entrance Existing Melbourne Central Station CBD North Cavern Melbourne Metro tunnels MURL tunnels
15
EPRs set up procedures which:
current ground and groundwater movements
16
17
Evaluation objective Key Legislation
Built environment: To protect and enhance the character, form and function of the public realm and surface structures, having buildings within and adjacent to the project alignment, and particularly in the vicinity of project regard to the existing and evolving urban context. Planning and Environment Act 1987 Social, community, land use and business: To manage the effects on the social fabric of the community in the area of the project, including with regard to land use changes, community cohesion, business functionality and access to services and facilities, especially during the construction phase. Environment Protection Act 1970 and State Environment Protection Policies Planning and Environment Act 1987 Transport Integration Act 2010 18
Derivation of the extent of the DDO
19
unloading)
20
21
Process for assessment under the DDO
but strongly recommended – can include information exchange to assist in preparation of permit application
conditions
22
23
24
EES stage ground model Updated ground model CBD North CBD North CBD South CBD South
25
26