Mee eeting ing t the C e Chal allenges enges
- f
- f F
Fluid-Str tructu ture I Interacti tion
Alan Mueller, Chief Technology Officer
Mee eeting ing t the C e Chal allenges enges of of F - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Mee eeting ing t the C e Chal allenges enges of of F Fluid-Str tructu ture I Interacti tion Alan Mueller, Chief Technology Officer What at is F is FSI SI? Air Interac action wit ith a a Flexible S Structure What at is F is
Mee eeting ing t the C e Chal allenges enges
Fluid-Str tructu ture I Interacti tion
Alan Mueller, Chief Technology Officer
Air Interac action wit ith a a Flexible S Structure
What at is F is FSI SI?
Water/Air I Interac actio ion with a a Structure
What at is F is FSI SI?
Vortex Induced V Vib ibrat ation an and Gal allo loping
What at is F is FSI SI?
4
Aeroelas astic F Flutter
What at is F is FSI SI?
5
Hyd Hydroplan aning
What at is F is FSI SI?
6
Gulp ulping ng
What at is F is FSI SI?
7
Ask 20 en engi gineers “What is FSI SI?” and d you will likely ge get 2 20 di different answe wers There is not simply one ap approac ach v valid alid for al all FSI problems The an anal alyst must be presented wit ith a a ran ange of options an and chose the most suitab able
What at is F is FSI SI?
8
Map Mappin ing d dat ata a techniques
– Finding neighbors and interpolating
Protocols a and format ats f for exchan anging data
– Getting data from Code A to Code B
Coupling methods
– Algorithms for accuracy, stability
Dynam amic ic fluid mesh evolu lutio ion
– Topology changes in the fluid domain
Valid alidat ation of F FSI r result lts
The The C Cha hallenges of
9
10
Sea Searching g for opposing n nei eighbors Interpola latin ing source s stencil dat ata a on a a tar arget point
– Source and targets may be face or vertex
Often en requires i integr egration (quadratures es)
– intensive extensive variables
force
heat
– FEA nodal loads: integration of intensive variables against the shape function.
The The 3 3 steps of
Mapping”
11
Sear arch r requir ires l lit ittle user in intervention The sear arch exclu ludes potentia ial l neig ighbors bas ased o
proximit ity an and
ion Critic ically y importan ant for s sheet metal al parts
– resolve ambiguities of poor geometry – thin solid parts may be on the wrong side of the fluid surface
Par aral alle lel Map Mappin ing is is a a must!
– Takes advantage of distributed memory
So Source N Neig ighbor Se Sear arch I Impe perative
12
Co Co-Simulation
Vehi hicle The Thermal Ma Management
Mappi apping D Disp isplac acement in in Low w Y+ Pr Prism M Mesh shes
14 C0 continuous mapping very important for low y+ meshes Otherwise very easy for morpher to invert high aspect ratio cells in prism layer
The The C Cha hallenges of
15
File e Based ed Transfer er: Imp mport/Map/Export
– Data exchange via files on a hard-disk – CAE codes need not be resident in memory – Often called “Loose Coupling” – User responsible for exchange synch
Socket Based ed Transfer er: Co-Sim imulat atio ion API
– CAE code and STAR-CCM+ in memory – Data exchanged via sockets – API controls exchange synchronization
Metho hods f for E Excha hanging D Data
16
Coup upling ng via Abaqus us Co-Sim imulat atio ion API of SIMULIA
– Manages Coupling Synchronization/Exchange/Mapping – Abaqus v6.12/STAR-CCM+ v7.04 (implicit coupling)
STA TAR-CCM CCM+ Abaq aqus (explic icit it o
andar ard)
– Initial geometry – Pressure(relative or absolute pressure) – Shear traction – Surface heat flux
Ab Abaqus s STA TAR-CCM CCM+
– Displacement, velocity – Temperature
Ab Abaqu qus/STAR-CCM CM+ C Co-Sim Simulat atio ion
17
Ab Abaqu qus/STAR-CCM CM+ C Co-Sim Simulat atio ion I Interfac ace
18 Hit the Step or Run button to commence the co-simulation
The The C Cha hallenges of
19
Tw Two-way y couplin ling f for ae aeroelas astic or hydroela lastic ic equilib ibriu ium On One way y stat atic ic coupling for thermal stresses
– structural temperature computed by CFD CHT
On One way y dyn ynamic c couplin ing
– Loads only go from fluid to structure – Loads only go from structure to fluid
Two way dynam amic ic c coupling
– explicit (exchange once per time step) – or implicit (multiple exchange per time step)
Degre rees o
ling
20
The The C Cha hallenges of
21
Completely def define a go good quality fluid d mes mesh
– Using as little user intervention as possible
Op Options w within STAR-CCM CCM+
– Rigid body motion, sliding interfaces – Morphing – User Defined Motion
Over erset Mes esh
Dyn ynamic Me Mesh E h Evol
22
Overs rset Me Mesh Mo h Motion a and F Flu luid F Flo low : : Stop V Valv lve
24
AeroElast astic ic Predic dictio ion Work rksho hop: H : HIRENASD
2.3M cells 53K nodes
Stat atic ic Structure, Steady air airflow at at deformed shap ape Ma=0.8, Re=23.5x106, q/E=0.48x10-6
Aerodynamic amic E Equil ilib ibriu ium m at d different A AOA
Wing Tip Displacement Lift Coefficient
Cp Cp: AO AOA 2°
FUN3D STAR-CCM+/Abaqus
Cp Cp: AOA AOA 2°, S Stat atio ion 7
x/c
STAR-CCM+/Abaqus NASA FUN3D
Wi Wind nd-off Vibrat atio ion M Modes : s : Abaqus s vs vs Experi riment
f=25.55 Hz (26.25) f=80.25 Hz (78.20) f=106.20 Hz f=160.35 Hz (165.25)
AeroElast astic ic Predic dictio ion Work rksho hop: : Forced V d Vibrat atio ion o
2nd
nd Flap Be
ap Bending M Mode de
Magnitude Wing Tip Response
Phase
Fluid id-Elast astic ic I Inst stab abil ilit ities i s in a Tube B Bundle Weaver & & Ab Abd-Rabbo bbo, “A “A Flow Visual aliz izat atio ion S Study dy o
are A Array o
Tubes i in Water r Cr Crossflow”
31 HydroDynamic Damping: Simulation vs Measured Vibration RMS vs Inlet Velocity: Simulation vs Measured Tube Bundle Vorticity
Co Co-Simu Simulat ation D DOT T Tank I Impact
32
Experimental Test Impact
DOT T Tan ank I Impac pact Sim Simulations
33
Von Mises Stress (Abaqus Explicit) STAR-CCM+ Pressure
34
DOT Tank Impact Comparisons
Map Mappin ing D Dat ata a Techniques Procedu edures es f for Exchangi ging Data Coupling Methods Dyn ynamic Flu luid id Me Mesh Evolution Valid alidat ations
The The C Cha hallenges of
35
Than ank Y You For Y Your A Attention & & Enjo joy
36