KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING at Tysons Corner McLean, Virginia Brooke Helgesen Advisor: Dr. Chimay Anumba Construction Management
KAISER PERMANENTE PRESEN SENTATION TION OUTLINE TLINE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING • Project Background at Tysons Corner • Analysis 1-IPD • McLean, Virginia Coffer Design Overview • IPD Case Study • Cost/ Schedule Impact • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System • System Design • Cost/Schedule Impact • Benefit Analysis • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting • FLEX SLS System • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth • Feasibility Analysis • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces • Health Benefit Research • Design Layout Brooke Helgesen • Final Conclusions Advisor: Dr. Chimay Anumba • Acknowledgements Construction Management
KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER Proj oject ect Backg kgrou ound nd McLean, VA McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Brooke Helgesen Construction Management LOCATION TION: Presen entatio tation Outlin ine: 8008 West Park Drive McLean , VA • Project Background • Analysis 1-IPD COST: • IPD Case Study $44,078,649 • Coffer Design Overview • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System CONSTRUC UCTIO TION DATES: S: • System Design March 16, 2011- May 8, 2012 • Cost/Schedule Impact • Benefit Analysis SIZE: E: • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting Kaiser 241,175 SF • FLEX SLS System Permanente MOB • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth N FUNCT CTION ION: : • Feasibility Analysis Short term care Medical Office Building: • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces • Health Benefit Research SCOPE PE OF WORK: • Design Layout Renovation & Construction of Mechanical Tower Addition • Final Conclusions • Acknowledgements
KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER In Inte tegrated rated Proj oject ect Deliver ery McLean, VA McLean, VA Anal alysis ysis 1- IPD PD Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Design Bid Build IPD Delegated risk Shared risk Presen entatio tation Outlin ine: • Project Background IPD D vs. DESIGN SIGN-BID BID-BUILD UILD • Analysis 1-IPD Uncertainties not foreseeable Uncertainties more predictable • IPD Case Study • Coffer Design Overview • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System GOAL: To research and compare the costs and risks GO Hidden costs: increased claims/ disputes, Upfront Cost: Adequate planning • System Design of IPD versus Design Bid Build specifically for the change orders, reputation, etc. minimizes change orders, disputes, etc. • Cost/Schedule Impact • Benefit Analysis coffer design issue on the Kaiser Permanente Project. • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting Limits cooperation, coordination, innovation Promotes teamwork and more ideas • FLEX SLS System • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth • Feasibility Analysis Contract documents are known from the Lack of contract documents that spell • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces beginning although not always accurate. out in detail what happens in failed • Health Benefit Research events • Design Layout • Final Conclusions Everyone has their own risk/ goals. Built on trust/ must have good team • Acknowledgements
KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER Ca Case St Study: y: The he H Hou ouse se of of Templ mple e of of Sc Scot otti tish sh Rite McLean, VA McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Brooke Helgesen Construction Management The House of Temple Project: IPD Presen entatio tation Outlin ine: LESS SSONS ONS LEAR ARNE NED D about out IPD: • Project Background $2-3 million: • Analysis 1-IPD Upfront cost • IPD Case Study • Save money & time Putting team Construction Generating Contract Investigation • Coffer Design Overview together (Everyone) “Real” Design (Everyone) • More enjoyable atmosphere • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System (Owner) (Future-Approx. (Everyone) (1 year) • System Design (1.5 years) 24 months) (Currently) • Prom omotes otes inn nnovat ation on an and ideas as! Price increase 3-4% • Cost/Schedule Impact • Benefit Analysis • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting The House of Temple Project: Design-Bid-Build • FLEX SLS System (Hypothetical) • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth $ 7-8 million: Change • Feasibility Analysis Orders How could this help Kaiser Permanente Project?... • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces Bid Phase Design Phase Buyout of Construction • Health Benefit Research (Owner / (Owner/ subcontractors (Owner, Architect, GC, Subcontractors) • Design Layout Architect) Architect) (Owner, (24 months plus time for $7-8 million • Final Conclusions (Approx. 3 (Approx. 1 year ) Architect, GC) worth of change orders) months) • Acknowledgements
KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER Coffer Co r Design ign Ov Overview iew McLean, VA McLean, VA Anal alysis ysis 1- IPD PD Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Brooke Helgesen Construction Management ISSUE: SUE: Fire Rating the Waffle Slab Coffers Presen entatio tation Outlin ine: • Project Background COST T IMPACT CT: • Analysis 1-IPD • Lost labor hours • IPD Case Study • Extra materials • Coffer Design Overview • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System • Removal/ re-installation • System Design • Repeat inspections • Cost/Schedule Impact Total: al: $250, 0,000 000 • Benefit Analysis • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting SCHEDU HEDULE E IMPACT CT: • FLEX SLS System • Delayed: track installation, MEP overhead, interior wall framing • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth • Coffer production dropped: • Feasibility Analysis • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces 25 coffers per day per man to • Health Benefit Research 16 /day/ man • Design Layout Total: al: 5 Month nth Process cess • Final Conclusions • Acknowledgements
KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER Conc Co nclus lusions ions McLean, VA McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Presen entatio tation Outlin ine: IPD could have helped to: • Project Background • Analysis 1-IPD • • Better understand severity of coffer IPD Case Study • Coffer Design Overview • Early detection of coffer design issue using IPD design issue • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System could have saved a: • System Design • Integrate project team early on to • Cost/Schedule Impact 5 m month & $250,000 proces cess increase communication • Benefit Analysis • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting • Allocate accurate amount of money for • FLEX SLS System coffer activity • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth • Feasibility Analysis • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces • Health Benefit Research • Design Layout • Final Conclusions • Acknowledgements
KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER Curtain Cu tain Wall l Façade ade Re-desig esign n McLean, VA McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Presen entatio tation Outlin ine: SOLUTION UTION PROBLEM BLEM IDENTIFICA ENTIFICATION TION • Project Background • Unforeseen water infiltration from cracks in existing • Analysis 1-IPD • • Removal of existing precast panels and glazing IPD Case Study 1980’s precast panels & leaks in existing glazing. • Coffer Design Overview • Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System • System Design • Installation of Curtain Wall System for: • Cost/Schedule Impact • Improved water protection • Benefit Analysis • Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting • Increased day-lighting • FLEX SLS System • Updated aesthetic appeal • Lighting/ Electrical Breadth • Feasibility Analysis • Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces • Health Benefit Research • Design Layout • Final Conclusions • Acknowledgements
Recommend
More recommend
