[PPT] - MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING at Tysons Corner McLean, Virginia Brooke PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING at Tysons Corner

McLean, Virginia Brooke Helgesen

Advisor: Dr. Chimay Anumba

Construction Management

SLIDE 2

PRESEN SENTATION TION OUTLINE TLINE

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
Coffer Design Overview
IPD Case Study
Cost/ Schedule Impact
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

Brooke Helgesen

Advisor: Dr. Chimay Anumba

Construction Management

KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING at Tysons Corner

McLean, Virginia

SLIDE 3

LOCATION TION:

8008 West Park Drive McLean , VA

COST:

$44,078,649

CONSTRUC UCTIO TION DATES: S:

March 16, 2011- May 8, 2012

SIZE: E: 241,175 SF FUNCT CTION ION: :

Short term care Medical Office Building:

SCOPE PE OF WORK:

Renovation & Construction of Mechanical Tower Addition

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Proj

ject

ect Backg kgrou

und

nd

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

N

Kaiser Permanente MOB

SLIDE 4

Anal alysis ysis 1- IPD PD

IPD D vs. DESIGN SIGN-BID BID-BUILD UILD

Design Bid Build IPD

Delegated risk Shared risk Uncertainties not foreseeable Uncertainties more predictable Hidden costs: increased claims/ disputes, change orders, reputation, etc. Upfront Cost: Adequate planning minimizes change orders, disputes, etc. Limits cooperation, coordination, innovation Promotes teamwork and more ideas Contract documents are known from the beginning although not always accurate. Lack of contract documents that spell

ut in detail what happens in failed

events Everyone has their own risk/ goals. Built on trust/ must have good team

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

In Inte tegrated rated Proj

ject

ect Deliver ery

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

GO GOAL: To research and compare the costs and risks

f IPD versus Design Bid Build specifically for the

coffer design issue on the Kaiser Permanente Project.

SLIDE 5

The House of Temple Project: Design-Bid-Build (Hypothetical)

Design Phase (Owner/ Architect) (Approx. 1 year) Bid Phase (Owner / Architect) (Approx. 3 months) Construction (Owner, Architect, GC, Subcontractors) (24 months plus time for $7-8 million worth of change orders) Buyout of subcontractors (Owner, Architect, GC)

$7-8 million: Change

Orders

Investigation (Everyone) (1 year) Price increase 3-4% Putting team together (Owner) (1.5 years) Generating Contract “Real” Design (Everyone) (Currently) Construction (Everyone) (Future-Approx. 24 months) $2-3 million: Upfront cost

The House of Temple Project: IPD

LESS SSONS ONS LEAR ARNE NED D about

ut IPD:
Save money & time
More enjoyable atmosphere
Prom
motes
tes inn

nnovat ation

n an

and ideas as!

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Ca Case St Study: y: The

he H Hou

use

se of

f Templ

mple e of

f Sc

Scot

tti

tish sh Rite

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

How could this help Kaiser Permanente Project?...

SLIDE 6

Anal alysis ysis 1- IPD PD

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Co Coffer r Design ign Ov Overview iew

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

COST T IMPACT CT:

Lost labor hours
Extra materials
Removal/ re-installation
Repeat inspections

Total: al: $250, 0,000 000 SCHEDU HEDULE E IMPACT CT:

Delayed: track installation, MEP overhead, interior wall framing
Coffer production dropped:

25 coffers per day per man to 16 /day/ man Total: al: 5 Month nth Process cess ISSUE: SUE: Fire Rating the Waffle Slab Coffers

SLIDE 7

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Co Conc nclus lusions ions

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Better understand severity of coffer

design issue

Integrate project team early on to

increase communication

Allocate accurate amount of money for

coffer activity IPD could have helped to:

Early detection of coffer design issue using IPD

could have saved a: 5 m month & $250,000 proces cess

SLIDE 8

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Cu Curtain tain Wall l Façade ade Re-desig esign n

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

PROBLEM BLEM IDENTIFICA ENTIFICATION TION

Unforeseen water infiltration from cracks in existing

1980’s precast panels & leaks in existing glazing.

SOLUTION UTION

Removal of existing precast panels and glazing
Installation of Curtain Wall System for:
Improved water protection
Increased day-lighting
Updated aesthetic appeal

SLIDE 9

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Cu Curtain tain Wall l Façade ade Re-desig esign n

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

SYSTE TEM M DESIGN SIGN

Kawneer 1600 System 1 Curtain Wall

INST STAL ALLA LATION TION West & East Facades: 11,584 SF About 27% of Building Surface Area North & South Facades: 22,708 SF About 53% of Building Surface Area Total al: : 34,292 ,292 SF SF About 81.3% Building Surface Area CURTAIN AIN WALL LL COVERA VERAGE: GE:

Crane & swing stage at every floor
Anchor to concrete slab at each level

SLIDE 10

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Ar Archit hitect ectural ural El Elevations ations

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

30% Increase

f Exterior

Glass

West East North South

PREVIOU IOUS S WESTERN RN FACA CADE DE PROPOS OSED CURTAIN AIN WALL ELEV .A .ATIONS TIONS

SLIDE 11

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Cu Curtain tain Wall l Façade ade Re-desig esign n

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

COST IMPACT SCHEDUL ULE E IMPACT

Curtain Wall 1600 System Total al=$2 $2,440,980 ,440,980 Comparison to Precast Injections/Glazing Replacement: Total al=$2 $2,038,860 ,038,860 Shop drawings: 8 weeks Fabrication: 8-10 weeks Removal: 120 days Replacement/Installation: 140 days $402,120 cost difference 7 Month Duration. No Significant Impact September 6, 2010- April 4 2011 *7 Month nth durat ratio ion n befor

re

e project

ject

constr nstruction uction begins* gins*

SLIDE 12

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Co Conc nclus lusions ions

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

CONCL CLUS USIONS IONS FOUND ND FOR R CURTAIN AIN WALL LL

30% Increase of glass & day-lighting
$402,120 cost increase
No schedule impact
Updated & improved aesthetic appeal
Increased water infiltration protection

SLIDE 13

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

PROBLEM BLEM IDENTIFICA ENTIFICATION TION

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temporar

rary

y Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

SOLUTION UTION

Lack of sustainable features
High energy demand of the building systems
Increased cost associated with maintenance
f temporary lighting during construction
Switch all temporary lighting from

Fluorescent to energy saving LED’s

Analyze power consumption, cost

savings, and feasibility of this change

SLIDE 14

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED FLE LEX X SL SLS Com S Components

nents

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

POWER WER SUPPL PLY

450W transformer.
110-265VAC input
Outputs 24VDC
Can utilize 2 simultaneous bus lines

24 VDC Bus Line T-Connector & Module AC/DC Transformer & Power Supply Box Input Voltage 15 ft. 10 ft. 2000 lumens=8fc

LED D MODUL DULE

2000 “focused” lumens
8 fc @ 15 ft. spacing on center. 10 ft. mounting

height.

Lumen Maintenance: 70% at 50,000 hours

T-CONNECT ONNECTOR OR & 24VDC VDC BUS LINE NE

Easy and quick-to-install T-Splice
125’ length 12 gauge wire standard

SLIDE 15

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temporar

rary

y Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management LED LED Incandes desce cent nt Metal al Halide de Fluores escen cent t Durabil ability ity Solid State circuitry, not affected by vibration and

impact. No filament, no

glass to break Easily damaged by vibration or impact causing failure Easily damaged by vibration or impact causing failure Easily damaged by vibration or impact causing failure Lifeti time me Minimum 50,000 hours at 70% lumen maintenance 50% failure rate at 2,000 hours for typical 75 Watt bulb 10,000-15,000 hours is common Typically 24,000 hours Efficacy Emit 100 lm/W Emit 15 lm/W. Emit 65+ lm/W range. Emit 48+ lm/W range. Photometric Graph- LED Flex SLS System Photometric Graph-F32T8 Fluorescent, 2 lamps, 2900 lumens/lamp

100 Degree Spread 360 Degree Spread

SLIDE 16

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temporar

rary

y Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Flex LED Incandescent Metal Halide Compact Fl. Power er Consu nsumption ption 16,764 W 246,580 W 119,340 W 104, 800 W

Electricity cost of $.14/kWh
Project Duration=13 months

50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 Flex LED Incandescent Compact Flourescent Metal Halide

Power Cost for Total Project

POWER WER CONSU SUMP MPTI TION ON

SLIDE 17

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temporar

rary

y Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management Breakdown of Total Cost per system (13 month duration) Total Cost Breakdown Flex LED Incandescent Metal Halide Compact Fluorescent Component 155,034 43,750 37,500 43,750 Install/uninstall 21,829 37,500 62,500 37,500 Maintenance 30,469 153,563 82,875 120,335 Power 21,968 327,600 158,545 126,329 Total 198,832 562,413 341,420 325,314

100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 Flex LED Incandescent Metal Halide Compact Fluorescent

System Cost Summary

Power Maintenance Install/ Uninstall Component

COST T COMPON PONENTS ENTS CONSIDER SIDERED: D:

SLIDE 18

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temporar

rary

y Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

100000 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 Flex LED Incandescent Metal Halide Compact Flourescent

First vs. Second Total Project Cost

First Project Total Cost Second Project Total Cost

Largest first to second

project cost difference

SLIDE 19

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Li Light hting/ ng/ El Electr ctrical ical Breadt adth h

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Analyze further benefits of LED FLEX SLS System

ver Fluorescent lighting with a lighting layout and

power plan for the Kaiser Tysons Project. GO GOAL: L: LED Layout Fluorescent Layout

SLIDE 20

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Li Light hting/ ng/ El Electr ctrical ical Breadt adth h

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LED D FLEX EX Power er Plan n Fluor uorescent escent Power er Plan

ASSUMPTIONS:

LED Module

Spacing: 15 ft

8 kits per floor=

120 Modules per floor ASSUMPTIONS:

20’ spacing on

center

27440SF/ 400

SF= 70 Fixtures needed

3 Ckts needed

3rd 2nd 1st Lower Level Basement

SCHEMATI TIC C PLAN

SLIDE 21

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temporar

rary

y Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Cost savings of $ $12,600 12,600

From

m reduc

ductio ion n in wirin ring g needed eded

Light hting/ ng/ Elect ctri rical cal Breadt adth h Resu sults: s:

SLIDE 22

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

LE LED Temp. Li Light hting ing

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

CONCL CLUS USIONS IONS  Cost: st:

Reduces labor and maintenance costs
Power savings cost for whomever is paying electric
Reduces layout cost

 Safety ety  Sustainabili stainability

It is recommended to use the FLEX SLS LED System

SLIDE 23

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Gr Green n Roo

of Terrac

races es

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

GOAL: Utilize the 3 exterior terraces as Green Roof space to add value for the owner and benefit patients.

Provide patient views/access to nature to

promote healing

Add value and sustainable features to the

design of the building

Further promote Kaiser Permanente as

an innovative healthcare facility EXPECT CTED ED BENEFIT EFITS:

SLIDE 24

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Resear arch: He h: Health Be lth Benef nefits its

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Quicker patient recovery process
Patients needed less medication
Less unfavorable assessments
Reduces transmission of sound by about 40 decibels
Reduces stress for patients, staff, and families.
Increases productivity of workforce
Increases job satisfaction of workforce
Decreases employee sick days

Resu sults s of

f G

Green n Roo

of H

Heal alth h Bene nefit t Rese sear arch h

St Elizabeth Hospital in Appleton, Wisconsin

SLIDE 25

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Gr Green n Roo

of Terrac

races es

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Dead Load (Concrete Slab) = 150 psf Live Load for Assembly Areas (Non Reducible) = 100 psf Snow Load= 18 psf Total al Load ad= = 268 psf St Struct ctura ural l Loa

ad +

+ LiveRoof

of Loa
ad

Percent cent Cha hang nge Extensive: 268 psf + 15 psf= 283 psf 5% LIVE E ROO OOF SYSTE TEM: MOD ODULAR LARIZ IZED ED LITE TE ROO OOF

SLIDE 26

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Desig ign n La Layou

ut

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Second Level Terrace: 1,290 SF Lower Level Terrace: 3,248 SF First Level Terrace: 3,960 SF

Total al: 8,500 SF

SLIDE 27

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Gr Green n Roo

of Terrac

races es

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

8, 500 SF X $16/SF = $136,000 $136,000 COS OST CON ONCLUSION USION

Typical payback period of

14 years from energy savings It is recommended to utilize Green Roof Terraces when comparing cost of $136,000 to the many benefits such as the healing process, sustainability, and quality offered. SCHEDU EDULE LE

8 day duration to complete

the 3 Green Roof Terraces

SLIDE 28

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

CO CONCL CLUSION USIONS S

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Anal alysis ysis 1: Inte tegrated rated Proje ject ct Deli liver ery

Help cost & time lost from coffer design issue
Early collaboration/more enjoyable/ innovative

Anal alysis ysis 2: Curtain ain Wall l Façade de Re-des design gn

$402, 120 cost increase
No schedule impact
Improved aesthetics
Increase water infiltration protection

Anal alysis ysis 4: Green en Roof Terraces races

Cost: $136000
Health benefits
Sustainable feature

Anal alysis ysis 3: LED D Tempo porar rary y Lightin ghting g

Cost savings: $165, 842
Saves 88,036 Watts
Ease of installation
Safety

Implement Implement Implement Implement

SLIDE 29

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements

KAISE ISER R PERMANENT RMANENTE E MOB at t TY TYSONS ONS CORNER RNER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Ac Ackno nowledg wledgeme ement nts

KAISE ISER R PERMANENTE MANENTE MOB at TYSONS ONS CORNER NER

McLean, VA Brooke Helgesen Construction Management

Dr. Chimay Anumba

AE Faculty Family & Friends!

Thank ank you! u!

SLIDE 30

Ana nalysis ysis 3- LE LED Temp mp Li Ligh ghti ting ng

Presen entatio tation Outlin ine:

Project Background
Analysis 1-IPD
IPD Case Study
Coffer Design Overview
Analysis 2- Curtain Wall System
System Design
Cost/Schedule Impact
Benefit Analysis
Analysis 3- LED Temp. Lighting
FLEX SLS System
Lighting/ Electrical Breadth
Feasibility Analysis
Analysis 4- Green Roof Terraces
Health Benefit Research
Design Layout
Final Conclusions
Acknowledgements