measuring the angle at a super b factory
play

Measuring the angle at a Super B factory Katherine George Queen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measuring the angle at a Super B factory Katherine George Queen Mary, University of London Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 1 Overview o Measurements of sin2, cos2, and limits on from : o


  1. Measuring the angle ß at a Super B factory Katherine George Queen Mary, University of London Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 1

  2. Overview o Measurements of sin2ß, cos2ß, and limits on ß from : o ß from charmonium, o ‘Complementary measurements’ of ß from ‘open-charm’ and other charmonium, o ‘alternative measurements’ of ß from penguins. and extrapolation to higher luminosities. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 2

  3. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß (More details in following slides …) Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 3

  4. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 4

  5. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 5

  6. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium charm b � cc d or charmonium Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 6

  7. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium charm b � cc d b � ss & s b � sd d or charmonium penguin dominated Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 7

  8. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium charm b � cc d b � ss & s b � sd d or charmonium penguin dominated Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Increasing sensitivity to new physics Increasing tree diagram contribution Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 8

  9. Sin2ß from b → ccs decays Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 9

  10. Sin2ß from b → ccs stat. syst. o BaBar, 383 M BB pairs. (cc)K 0 o hep-ex/0703021, submitted to PRL. S (CP odd) (cc)K 0 L (CP even) o Now with systematics for each golden mode separately, J/ ψ K 0 S and J/ ψ K 0 modes. o Also | λ | measurements - see backup slides. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 10

  11. Sin2ß from b → ccs o Belle, 535 M BB pairs. PRL 98 (2007) 031802) J/ ψ K 0 J/ ψ K 0 S L (CP odd) (CP even) o J/ ψ K 0 S only o J/ ψ K 0 L only Sin2ø 1 = + 0.643 ± 0.038 total Sin2ø 1 = + 0.641 ± 0.057 total A = – 0.001 ± 0.028 total A = – 0.045 ± 0.033 total Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 11

  12. Sin2ß from b → ccs Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 12

  13. Sin2ß from b → ccs o 4 solutions for ß from the b → ccs sin2 ß measurement Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 13

  14. The 4-fold ambiguity in ß - resolved ? o Reduce 4-fold ambiguity to 2-fold ambiguity (ß → π /2 -ß) by measuring (the sign of) cos2ß. Negative cos2ß ruled out by: -ve solution, ß = φ 1 = (68.7 ± 1.0) 0 o Time-dependent Dalitz analysis of o B 0 → D *+ D *- K 0 S o BaBar: PRD 74, 091101 (2006), 94% CL. o B 0 → D 0 (K 0 S π + π - )h 0 o BaBar: hep-ex/060105, 87% CL. o Belle: PRL 97, 081801 (2006), 98.3% CL. o B 0 → K + K - K 0 o BaBar: 21 o favoured over 69 o at 4.6 σ level. o Time-dependent angular analysis of B 0 → J/ ψ K *0 o BaBar : PRD 71, 032005 (2005), 87% CL. o Belle : PRL 95, 091601 (2005). +ve solution, ß = φ 1 = (21.3 ± 1.0) 0 “Strongly favoured” Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 14

  15. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - so what next ? o Achille’s talk (yesterday), and the following talks on α and γ will talk about whether 1 o measurements of these angles are possible. o We (ß) are already there (expect <1 0 by the end of B- factory running) o Question: Why push further ? Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 15

  16. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and b → cud. o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 16

  17. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and b → cud. o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 17

  18. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and Taken from Guy b → cud. Wilkinson’s talk at the January 2007 o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes LHCb Upgrade Workshop. increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 18

  19. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and Taken from Guy b → cud. Wilkinson’s talk at the January 2007 o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes LHCb Upgrade increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. Workshop. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative SuperB CDR importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 19

  20. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and b → cud. o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend