Me Medica cal Ma Marijuana Te Testing Advisor Advisory Council - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

me medica cal ma marijuana te testing advisor advisory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Me Medica cal Ma Marijuana Te Testing Advisor Advisory Council - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Me Medica cal Ma Marijuana Te Testing Advisor Advisory Council Council October 24, 2019 Councils Charge A.R.S. 36 2821(B) The MMJ Testing Advisory Council shall make recommendationsregarding: Establishing a required testing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Me Medica cal Ma Marijuana Te Testing Advisor Advisory Council Council

October 24, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Council’s Charge

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A.R.S. §36‐2821(B)

The MMJ Testing Advisory Council shall make recommendations…regarding:

  • Establishing a required testing program
  • Testing and potency standards
  • Procedural requirements for collection, storing,

and testing

  • Reporting results to patients and the department
  • Remediation and disposal requirements
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Review of timeline and steps for lab certification

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lab Certification Process

  • Administrative Review (30 days)

○ NOD or Notification of Admin Complete ■ Lab has 90 days to respond to an NOD

  • Substantive Review (60 days)

○ RFI ■ Lab has 10 days to respond to an RFI ○ Inspection ■ SOD and POC

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Review of current lab testing practices – Tabitha Hauer

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Discussion/recommendations of testing and potency standards

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NOTE: The following slides are intended as a starting point for Council discussion based on information presented at the initial Council meeting on 9/26/19.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Key Discussion Points

  • What parameters should be tested for within

each category?

  • What is the safety level before a product must

be remediated or disposed?

  • What test method options should be used?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Considerations for Discussion

  • Statutory intent is to detect “unsafe levels” and

confirm potency

  • What framework should guide setting action

levels? Variable? Protective for children? For immunocompromised?

  • Consider requiring existing methods OR in-

house developed methods meeting method criteria of previously validated methods

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Microbial Contamination

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • E. coli Considerations

Microbial Contamination

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Aspergillus Considerations

  • Option: Test for Aspergillus flavuus, fumigatus,

niger, terreus

○ If positive, product cannot be sold

OR

○ If positive, product cannot be sold in an inhalable form

  • Option: Do not test; label inhalables with a

warning that they may contain Aspergillus

Microbial Contamination

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Methods

  • Use Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA

2013a) and validated by AOAC Appendix J

Microbial Contamination

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Additional Discussion Microbial Contamination

  • Any other parameters for testing?
  • Any other method options for testing?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Heavy Metals

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Considerations

  • Varying limits based on method of consumption

○ Inhalable ○ Other

  • Any FDA/USP or in-house developed method

that is validated by AOAC Appendix K and can meet the method criteria from the EPA methods

Heavy Metals

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Metal Limit (ppm) Method Inhalable Other Arsenic 0.2 1.5

Any FDA/USP

  • r in-house

developed method that is validated by AOAC Appendix K and can meet the method criteria from the EPA methods

Cadmium 0.5 0.5 Lead 0.5 0.5 Mercury 0.1 3.0 Chromium 0.6 2.0

Heavy Metals

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Additional Discussion

  • Any other parameters for testing?
  • Any other method options for testing?

Heavy Metals

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pesticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Growth Regulators

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Considerations

  • Utilize Oregon’s list of parameters plus at least
  • ne herbicide.
  • Utilize Oregon’s safety limits and the USP

limits for herbicides.

  • Utilize any AOAC or in-house developed

method that is validated by AOAC Appendix K and can meet the method criteria from the EPA methods.

Pesticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Growth Regulators

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Oregon List and Limits

Pesticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Growth Regulators

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Additional Discussion

  • Any other parameters for testing?
  • Any other method options for testing?

Pesticides, Fungicides, Herbicides, Growth Regulators

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Residual Solvents

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Considerations

  • Utilize Oregon’s list of parameters
  • Utilize Oregon’s safety limits
  • Any EPA, AOAC, or in-house developed

method that is validated by AOAC Appendix K and can meet the method criteria from the EPA methods

Residual Solvents

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Oregon List and Limits Residual Solvents

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Additional Discussion

  • Any other parameters for testing?
  • Any other method options for testing?

Residual Solvents

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Potency Potency

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Considerations

  • Create an Arizona cannabinoid list that

includes the acid forms: THCa, CBDa, CBCa

  • Test the cannabinoid list by AHP or in-house

methods that are validated by AOAC Appendix K and can meet the method criteria from the EPA methods

Potency

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Additional Discussion

  • Set limits for THC, CBD, and/or CBC levels?
  • Any other method options for testing?

Potency