md3312 hl lhc da studies status
play

MD3312: HL-LHC DA Studies Status Joschua Dilly O MC 30.10.2019 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MD3312: HL-LHC DA Studies Status Joschua Dilly O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 1 General MD Outline Amplitude Detuning Analysis Vertical Kicks Outlook O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 2 General MD Outline O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 3 General MD Parameters


  1. MD3312: HL-LHC DA Studies Status Joschua Dilly O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 1

  2. General MD Outline Amplitude Detuning Analysis Vertical Kicks Outlook O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 2

  3. General MD Outline O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 3

  4. General MD Parameters Table: Key MD parameters. Objective: Replication of HL-LHC Dynamic Aperture and Amplitude Detuning. MD #: 3312 Operators: Markus Albert, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci Fill #: 7391 Beam Process: MD → SQUEEZE-6.5TeV-ATS-65cm-60 15cm-2017 V1 ATSFlat@526 [END] Date: 30 . 10 . 2018 Start Time: 12 : 00 End Time: 17 : 30 Optics: R2017aT65 A60 15C15 60A10mL300 Crossing: No crossing Separation: [ 0.3 / 1.4 / 0.3 / -1 ] mm in [ IP1 / IP2 / IP5 / IP8 ] , Plane: [ V / V / H / H ] Offset: No offset O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 4

  5. Outline • Setup: End-of-Squeeze, flat-optics, 6.5TeV • Coupling Correction • Waist-Shift tests with K-Modulation • Trimming RCTX to replicate HL-LHC b 6 errors • Beam 1: Amplitude Detuning , Beam 2: Dynamic Aperture • Trimming RCOX, RCSSX, RCSX and RCSOX to replicate HL-LHC b 4 , a 3 , b 3 , a 4 errors • Beam 1: Amplitude Detuning, Beam 2: Dynamic Aperture ⇒ Dump because of Beam 2 O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 5

  6. Preliminary Results (in MD Note) • Influence of Tune Feedback on ATS-optics • Summary of Waist-Correction • Lifetime Analysis during Trims of errors • Some Lifetime Analysis during AD-Kicks • Some Lifetime Analysis during DA-Kicks O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 6

  7. Amplitude Detuning Analysis O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 7

  8. Working Points 2. order 5. order Resonance Lines: 3. order 6. order 4. order 7. order 0.34 0.33 AC Dipole (1) (-4, 1) (0.271, 0.325) 0.32 Natural 0.31 (0.283, 0.31) AC Dipole (2) 0.30 Q y (0.275, 0.3) 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 Q x • One WP close to 6 th order resonance line (-4 , 1) • One WP far away from resonance lines O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 8

  9. Subsection 1 Vertical Kicks O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 9

  10. Vertial Kicks - Spectrum BPM.31R4.B1 N(1, 0) N(0, 1) N(0, 2) N(1, 1) N(2, 0) (-4, 1) (1, 0) (0, 1) (0, 2) (1, 1) (2, 0) 10 1 Amplitude in X [a.u] 10 3 10 5 10 7 10 9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Frequency [tune units] BPM.31R4.B1 N(1, 0) N(0, 1) N(0, 2) N(1, 1) N(2, 0) (-4, 1) (1, 0) (0, 1) (0, 2) (1, 1) (2, 0) 10 1 Amplitude in Y [a.u] 10 3 10 5 10 7 10 9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Frequency [tune units] • Problem: Only in 5 out of 14 kicks tune visible • Tried with SVD Cuts down to 4, Old/New Harpy, SUSSIX • Also: Resonance Line not Visible O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 10

  11. Vertial Kicks - Spectrum BPM.31R4.B1 N(1, 0) N(0, 1) N(0, 2) N(1, 1) N(2, 0) (-4, 1) (1, 0) (0, 1) (0, 2) (1, 1) (2, 0) 10 1 Amplitude in X [a.u] 10 3 10 5 10 7 10 9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Frequency [tune units] BPM.31R4.B1 N(1, 0) N(0, 1) N(0, 2) N(1, 1) N(2, 0) (-4, 1) (1, 0) (0, 1) (0, 2) (1, 1) (2, 0) 10 1 Amplitude in Y [a.u] 10 3 10 5 10 7 10 9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Frequency [tune units] • Problem: Only in 5 out of 14 kicks tune visible • Tried with SVD Cuts down to 4, Old/New Harpy, SUSSIX • Also: Resonance Line not Visible O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 10

  12. Vertical Kicks - Amplitude Detuning (700 ± 500) 10 3 m 1 B1 Vkicks 4 3 ] [10 2 Q y 0 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 2 J y [ m ] ⇒ Very high but maybe wrong Amplitude Detuning analysis • To be checked: Maybe error in code with units as new Harpy O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 11

  13. Vertical Kicks - Intensity Losses Intensity Kicks Losses Date: 2018-10-30 -0.1±0.1 % -0.1±0.0 % -0.2±0.1 % -0.3±0.1 % -0.3±0.1 % 100 -0.4±0.1 % 98 -0.6±0.0 % -0.8±0.0 % -1.3±0.1 % Beam Intensity [%] 96 -2.0±0.1 % 94 -2.5±0.1 % 92 -1.2±0.0 % 90 -0.6±0.1 % -0.4±0.0 % 88 14:10:00 14:15:00 14:20:00 Time • Losses at kicks clearly visible O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 12

  14. Vertical Kicks - Forced DA Fit: DA= 3.357 ± 0.011 N Kicks 2.5 2.0 Beam Losses [%] 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N = 2 J Y / nominal ⇒ Forced DA evaluation possible from � ∆ I � DA J = J forced − ǫ ln (1) I 0 ⇒ Very small? O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 13

  15. Outlook O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 14

  16. To do • Check old AD analysis with new code (to exclude errors) • Check MD3312 data again with SUSSIX • Analyse Horizontal Kicks with b 6 • Analyse RDTs during DA kicks • What else to do with Beam 2 Dynamic Aperture Kicks? • Forced DA for 2D kicks ?? • Analyse Vertical Kicks after full HL-errors O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 15

  17. O MC 30.10.2019 MD3312 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend