mathematical statistical physics yitp kyoto july 30th
play

Mathematical Statistical Physics, YITP Kyoto, July 30th, 2013 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mathematical Statistical Physics, YITP Kyoto, July 30th, 2013 RIGOROUS RESULTS ON SHORT-RANGE FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPIN GLASSES Pierluigi Contucci Department of Mathematics University of Bologna 1 Consider configurations of N Ising spins = {


  1. Mathematical Statistical Physics, YITP Kyoto, July 30th, 2013 RIGOROUS RESULTS ON SHORT-RANGE FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPIN GLASSES Pierluigi Contucci Department of Mathematics University of Bologna 1

  2. Consider configurations of N Ising spins σ = { σ i } , τ = { τ i } , ... , introduce a centered Gaussian Hamiltonian H N ( σ ) de- fined by the covariance Av( H N ( σ ) H N ( τ )) = Nc N ( σ , τ ) . Examples of covariances: Sherrington-Kirkpatrick and Edwards-Anderson model 2 0 1 @ 1 1 X X σ i τ i , σ i σ j τ i τ j A N N i | i − j | =1 2

  3. We are interested in the large volume properties of the random probability measure e − β H N ( σ ) p N ( σ ) = σ e − β H N ( σ ) P for all β > 0. Quantities of interest include: the pressure e − β H N ( σ ) X P N ( β ) = Av log σ the covariance moments 0 1 σ , τ c N ( σ , τ ) e − β [ H N ( σ )+ H N ( τ )] P A = Av @ σ , τ e − β [ H N ( σ )+ H N ( τ )] P 3

  4. Z = < c > N = cp N ( c ) dc , Z c 12 c 23 p (12) , (23) < c 12 c 23 > N = ( c 12 , c 23 ) , N and especially the joint distribution (permutation invari- ant) p (12) , (23) ,..., ( kl ) ,... ( c 12 , c 23 , ..., c kl , ... ) N The joint distribution allows to compute internal en- ergy, specify heat, etc. What happens when N → ∞ ? 4

  5. The mean-field theory (Replica Symmetry Breaking) is characterised by two properties: • p ( c ) has a non-trivial support • the joint distribution p (12) , (23) ,..., ( kl ) ,... ( c 12 , c 23 , ..., c kl , ... ) fulfils a factorisation property and can be recon- structed starting from p ( c ) through the ultrametric and replica equivalence rule. 5

  6. Ultrametricity: p (12) , (23) , (31) ( c 12 , c 23 , c 31 ) = Z c 12 δ ( c 12 − c 23 ) δ ( c 23 − c 31 ) p ( c 12 ) p ( c ) dc 0 + θ ( c 12 − c 23 ) δ ( c 23 − c 31 ) p ( c 12 ) p ( c 23 ) + θ ( c 23 − c 31 ) δ ( c 31 − c 12 ) p ( c 23 ) p ( c 31 ) + θ ( c 31 − c 12 ) δ ( c 12 − c 23 ) p ( c 31 ) p ( c 12 ) no scalene triangles! 6

  7. Replica Equivalence (Ghirlanda-Guerra) p (12) , (23) ( c 12 , c 23 ) = 1 2 p ( c 12 ) δ ( c 12 − c 23 ) + 1 2 p ( c 12 ) p ( c 23 ) p (12) , (34) ( c 12 , c 34 ) = 1 3 p ( c 12 ) δ ( c 12 − c 34 ) + 2 3 p ( c 12 ) p ( c 34 ) 7

  8. Rigorous results on factorisation, mean-field models: • 1997, M. Aizenman, P.C. (stochastic stability), 1998 F.Guerra, S.Ghirlanda (based on Pastur-Scherbina) • 2005-2007, P.C. and C.Giardina (results for the first power moments, but hold also in finite-dimension short-range!), M. Talagrand (results in distribution, but only for the SK model) * 2011 D.Panchenko proved that Ghirlanda-Guerra identities in distribution imply ultrametricity (proof by contradiction, geometrical methods) 8

  9. Result : Edwards-Anderson, and a wide class of finite-dimensional models, is ultrametric! P.C., E.Mingione, S.Starr [JSP, 2013] No claim on p ( c ) is made 9

  10. More precisely : consider, in a box Λ ⊂ Z d , the model defined by the Hamiltonian X H Λ ( σ ) = J Λ ,X σ X X ⊆ Λ if (thermodynamic stability) Av ( H Λ ( σ ) H Λ ( σ )) ≤ cN then for all power p , any number of system copies n , any bounded measurable function f of the { c l,m } n l,m =1 in the thermodynamic limit it holds: n 1 1 < fc p < fc p n + 1 < f >< c p X n +1 ,n +1 > = k,n +1 > + 1 , 2 > , n + 1 k =1 and (by Panchenko result) is ultrametric. 10

  11. Main idea : • Stochastic Stability and its extension (P.C., C.Giardina, C.Giberti, EPL 2011) Consider the quenched equilibrium state σ F ( σ ) e − β H N P ! < F > N = Av σ e − β H N P and the smooth deformation g of the Hamiltonian den- sity h : = < Fe − λ g ( h ) > < F > ( λ ) N < e − λ g ( h ) > 11

  12. The spin glass quenched equilibrium state is stochasti- cally stable: < F > ( λ ) → < F > N (check that the perturbation doesn’t spoil thermody- namic stability). This implies bounds on thermal and disorder fluctuation Av( ω ( H 2 )) − Av( ω ( H ) 2 ) ≤ c 1 N Av( ω ( H ) 2 ) − Av( ω ( H )) 2 ≤ c 2 N 12

  13. What’s next? • Overlap Equivalence: V N ( Q | q ) → 0 numerically seen in PRL 2006 by P.C., Cristian Gi- ardina, Claudio Giberti, Cecilia Vernia • . • ... • Triviality? Study P ( Q ) 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend