Market: Feasibility Assessment Update from EIM Entities What is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Extended Day-Ahead Market:

Feasibility Assessment Update from EIM Entities

What is EDAM?

• Extended Day-Ahead Market
• A market services concept
• Similar to EIM:
• Voluntary
• Additional, incremental benefits
• Use of existing infrastructure
• EDAM would be an additional

market service layered on top of EIM

• EIM would continue to respond to

imbalances between day-ahead and real-time

2

What is EDAM Not?

• EDAM is not equivalent to becoming a full

member of CAISO (or any other RTO)

• Transmission control, planning and

cost allocation remains with member utility.

• It is unlikely that EDAM will result in a

single, unified transmission rate across the EDAM footprint.

• Resource Adequacy and Resource

Planning will continue to remain with member utilities and their respective regulating authorities.

• EDAM is not intended to result in any

changes to state regulatory authority

3

The Western EIM is growing and delivering benefits

71% of electricity demand in the western interconnect is served by entities that are either participating in the EIM or committed to by 2022. As of June 2019, the EIM has reported $736 million in gross benefits since it started.

4

EDAM could provide incremental benefits and build upon infrastructure already in place for the EIM.

Potential benefits of EDAM

• Potential production cost savings through
• More efficient Day-Ahead hourly trading and use of available

transmission through an organized market

• More efficient day-ahead unit commitment
• Co-optimized footprint wide resources for a more efficient and

cost effective day-ahead solution

• Potential environmental benefits such as

reduced renewable curtailment

• Diversity of imbalance reserves

5

The EDAM Feasibility Assessment evaluated the conceptual potential of the EDAM proposal

• The EDAM Feasibility Assessment is a high-level modeling study intended to

inform EIM Entities and their interest in proceeding to a market design process.

• The EIM Entities contracted with The Brattle Group (“Brattle”) and

Energy+Environmental Economics (“E3”) to conduct the assessment based on production cost modeling and other data analysis.

• The EIM Entities understand that CAISO will conduct the EDAM market design in

a public stakeholder process that will allow the EIM Entities to evaluate their

• wn individual expected benefits and costs associated with participation in a

potential EDAM.

6

EDAM Feasibility Assessment Framework

7

• Designed to study annual WECC-wide commitment and dispatch cost impact of

expanding the EIM to the day-ahead market.

• Estimates system-wide impacts based on the difference between simulations of 2028

EDAM and business-as-usual (BAU) cases.

• Every EIM participant with a signed implementation agreement as of the start of the

study was assumed to participate in the EDAM against a baseline of continuation of the current market structure

• Primary focus on production cost savings, but other potential savings were

considered.

Modeling the WECC System & Markets

8

The WECC is a large and complex system with multiple functional layers

– Complex power system with

~20k buses, ~25k lines, ~5k generators, 38 balancing areas (BAs), multiple reserve sharing groups, diverse state policies

– The feasibility assessment

modeled WECC with detailed representations of six layers of how utilities across WECC relate to and transact with each other

9

EDAM production cost model development process relied on input from EIM entities

A note about confidentiality: Inputs and results that are specific to an individual entity are confidential. Aggregate inputs and results are presented in this presentation.

Modeling of Market Trading

10

• The model estimates the impact of an EDAM on trading

efficiency

• EDAM enables hourly day-ahead trades through a

centralized market operator.

• OATT still applies: transmission reservations on contract paths

still required to move power.

• Other trade types modeled:
• Traditional Day-Ahead On-Peak and Off-Peak blocks
• Hourly real time trading
• Hourly intertie bidding with CAISO
• EIM

Types of Trades Modeled

The Feasibility Assessment includes a resource sufficiency step in the EDAM case

• Resource Sufficiency is used to ensure sufficient resources made available to meet

load and reserve obligations in each BAA

• Enables reliability and fairness
• Assumed each BAA has sufficient capacity to cover:
• Contingency Reserves and regulation
• Uncertainty of DA Load and VER forecasts
• A limited quantity of replacement reserve to cover real-time forced outages beyond 60-

minute contingency period

• Assume EDAM could provide diversity benefits by
• Reducing total quantity of reserves needed to cover forecast error and replacement

reserve across EDAM footprint

• More efficiently allocate reserves for forecast error and replacement reserves across EDAM

footprint

• EDAM did not assume co-optimization of contingency reserves
• Most entities already participate in reserve sharing

11

The Feasibility Assessment includes a resource sufficiency step

• Resource needs for the day ahead forecast error and replacement reserves are

calculated across the EDAM Footprint to capture a diversity benefit.

• All other reserves are modeled the same way in the BAU case.

12

Reserve Type Reduced in EDAM? Where calculated in the BAU case Where calculated in the EDAM case Forecast Error Yes Local EDAM Footprint Replacement Reserves Yes Local EDAM Footprint Contingency, Non-spin No Local Local Contingency, Spin No Local Local Regulation No Local Local

‘Local’ carrying of reserves means it can be carried on generation in the BAA, or on remotely

• wned/contracted generation.

EDAM BA-to-BA Transmission Assumptions

Three sources of transmission capacity made available in the EDAM.

• Bucket 1: Resource sufficiency transmission
• Transmission needed for transactions made prior to EDAM to meet RS requirements
• Could include long-term contracts for remote resources, block purchases from other

BAAs, or purchases of dispatchable RS capacity that can be bid into EDAM (“Bid Range”)

• Bucket 2: “Donated” transmission contracts
• Long-term and highly reliable transmission contracts that are voluntarily made

available to enable EDAM transfers between BAAs

• Entities need to consider various factors when determining the quantity of transmission

rights (ETCs/ETSRs) to make available to EDAM and/or EIM

• Bucket 3: EDAM BA-to-BA transmission available from transmission provider
• Highly reliable transmission that can be sold by the Transmission Provider for EDAM on

a day-ahead basis at a pre-determined EDAM hurdle rate ($3/MWh)

• Includes export transmission from CAISO

13

Trading timeframes and cycles in the model

14

RS- Resource Sufficiency, UC- Unit Commitment, D- Dispatch, EIM- Energy Imbalance

Gas price assumptions

15 Original WECC ADS Inputs Updated CEC Forecast

Two gas price assumption scenarios were modeled: 1) Gas prices in the 2028 WECC ADS database from the CEC gas price model. 2) Gas prices updated from the CEC’s 2019 Forecast update, April 2019. Annual Average 2028 Natural Gas Price by Area (2018 $)

GHG Assumptions

16

• GHG prices only modeled in certain

regions

• California, Oregon, Washington,

Alberta, and British Columbia

• Assumes that in 2028 these regions

participate in a market with the same GHG price

• Assumed $60/metric ton (2018$)

based on 2017 California Energy Commission’s (CEC) high forecast.

Greenhouse Gas Region

CAISO net exports were limited to more closely resemble actual exports

17

• Imposing the CAISO export

constraint in the BAU case has the intended effect, limiting net exports at 5,000 MW in the UC cycle and 7,000 MW in the dispatch and EIM cycles

• In the EDAM case, CAISO imports

3,400 GWh more and exports 2,400 GWh more relative to the BAU case (representing a 9% and 22% increase, respectively) CAISO Net Export Duration Curves w/ Step 2 Refinements

BAU Case (dashed) vs. EDAM Case (solid)

18

Feasibility Assessment Results

• Like similar model studies, potential aggregate results are subject to necessary

simplifications and assumptions. The EIM Entities understand the Feasibility Assessment results are directionally relevant but not at a decision support level of detail.

• Estimated total production cost savings are in the range of $119 – $227 million per

year for a range of scenarios that test certain assumptions.

• Significant drivers include assumptions made for natural gas prices, restrictions on

CAISO export limits, and costs associated with transmission.

• The feasibility assessment also concludes that EDAM has the potential to reduce

greenhouse gas emissions and curtailments of non-emitting variable energy resources.

19

Feasibility Assessment Scenario Analysis

Input/Scenario 1 2 3 4 Natural Gas Price Original WECC ADS Original WECC ADS Original WECC ADS Updated CEC CAISO Net Export Limit UC Only UC + Dispatch/EIM UC + Dispatch/EIM UC + Dispatch/EIM EDAM Bucket 3 Hurdle Rate $3/MWh $3MWh $0MWh $3/MWh Potential Production Cost Reduction $119M/yr $125M/yr $126M/yr $227M/yr

Feasibility Assessment scenarios were constructed to evaluate a range of input assumptions. Estimated potential production cost reductions were calculated for the entire WECC region and assumed all EIM Entities who participated in the assessment join the EDAM.

EDAM could reduce investment costs for some entities

• Reduction in wind and solar curtailments with EDAM could reduce the investment

costs associated with meeting jurisdictional policy for some participating entities.

• The Feasibility Assessment modeling found that EDAM could reduce the curtailment
• f Variable Energy Resources by about 1-2 TWh/yr across the EDAM footprint.
• Translating the estimated reduced VER curtailment into potential investment cost

savings depends on many factors that are hard to quantify, including variable jurisdictional policies, REC markets, and forward-looking assumptions about market design.

• Although EDAM results may inform procurement and infrastructure development, no

attempt was made to quantify any longer term investment benefits.

20

Conclusion

21

• The EDAM Feasibility Assessment supports the potential to realize

incremental WECC-wide benefits from EDAM as compared to business- as-usual.

• Feasibility assessment results are only indicative and based on

assumptions that may not reflect the ultimate market design – this is

• nly the beginning of a substantial and complex process.
• The EIM Entities look forward to participation with all stakeholders in the

process to define the market design.

How to get your questions answered

• Email your questions to initiativecomments@caiso.com. Please

include ‘EDAM Feasibility Assessment’ in the subject line by Thursday, October 10th, 2019.

• EIM Entities will compile the questions and produce a question and

answer matrix that will be posted by CAISO.

22