marc hanewinkel marc hanewinkel
play

Marc Hanewinkel Marc Hanewinkel Freiburg, Germany Freiburg, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Marc Hanewinkel Marc Hanewinkel Freiburg, Germany Freiburg, Germany Baden-Wrttemberg Forest Research Institute Baden-Wrttemberg Forest Research Institute Natural risks and long term forest management Marc Hanewinkel Forest Research


  1. Marc Hanewinkel Marc Hanewinkel Freiburg, Germany Freiburg, Germany Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  2. Natural risks and long term forest management Marc Hanewinkel Forest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  3. Natural risks and long term forest management 1. Introduction 2. Lessons learnt from „Lothar“ 3. „Lothar“ and the aftermath • insect calamities • carbon sequestration • timber industry 4. What comes next ? Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  4. 26.12.1999 ‘Lothar‘ Forest Research Institute Baden-Württemberg Introduction

  5. Introduction Recent large storm disturbances in Europe 1990 – „Vivien/Wiebke“ >100 million m 3 1999 – „Lothar/Martin“ >180 million m 3 2005 – „ Gudrun/Sweden“ > 75 million m 3 Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  6. Lessons learnt Lessons learnt – a risk model (M.Schmidt, J.Bayer, G.Kändler) • Vulnerability of different tree species • Influence of tree height and height / diameter ratio (h/d) • Influence of exposure (TOPEX) • Influence of geographic position • Goal: Regionalization – mapping of potential risk • Database: National Forest Inventory in Germany (2002) B C 150 m A D 4 Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  7. Lessons learnt Comparing tree height and species Spruce Fir Beech P (Storm damage) Fir Beech Spruce Fir Spruce Beech Tree height (m) Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  8. Topex: topographic The Windthrow Research Group, University of British Columbia exposure ################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################################ 0 -1*Topex-Index -200 -400 3450000 3455000 3460000 3465000 3470000 R echtswert Easting Seehöhe ü. NN [m] 800 Height a.s.l 600 400 200 3450000 3455000 3460000 3465000 3470000 R echtswert Easting Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  9. Lessons learnt • Influence of tree height and geographic position (large-scale airflow - conditions) # MA 1.0 N 0 340 350 10 20 # 330 30 HD 320 40 310 50 300 60 0.8 290 70 280 80 KA W P (Storm damage) 270 90 0 O # P (Sturmschaden) 260 100 250 110 0.6 240 120 230 130 # 220 140 # S 210 150 200 160 190 170 180 S # 0.4 U # # 0.2 # FR # # 0.0 # RV # 0 10 20 30 40 50 # Tree height Baumhöhe [m] Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  10. Lessons learnt Spatial autocorrelation Sturmschadenswahrscheinlichkeit Probability of storm damage Thin Plate Regression Spline 2-dimensional function to 5500000 assess spatial influence Bad Mergentheim g ( π i ) = X i β + f (north; east i ) + Z i b + ε i Karlsruhe Hochwert 5400000 Northing Stuttgart Oberkirch Ulm Freiburg 5300000 Ravensburg 3400000 3450000 3500000 3550000 3600000 Rechtswert Easting Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  11. Lessons learnt Spatial autocorrelation Sturmschadenswahrscheinlichkeit Probability of storm damage Thin Plate Regression Spline 2-dimensional function to assess spatial influence Probability of storm damage g ( π i ) = X i β + f (north; east i ) + Z i b + ε i P (Sturmschaden) E a RW s g t n i HW n i h g t r o N Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  12. Lessons learnt Regionalization – map of potential risk Northern Black Forest P (storm damage): 0 0 - . 1 0 . 1 - 0 2 . 0 . 2 - 0 3 . 0 . 3 - 0 4 . 0 . 4 - 0. 5 0 . 5 - 0 . 6 0. - 6 0 . 7 Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  13. • Regionalization of risk based on digital terrain model (DTM) and inventory data and original meteorological conditions Risk-classes " 0,000106 - 0,050000 " 0,050001 - 0,100000 " 0,100001 - 0,150000 " 0,150001 - 0,200000 " 0,200001 - 0,250000 " 0,250001 - 0,300000 " 0,300001 - 0,350000 " 0,350001 - 0,400000 " 0,400001 - 0,450000 " 0,450001 - 0,500000 " 0,500001 - 0,550000 " 0,550001 - 0,600000 Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  14. • Regionalization of risk based on digital terrain model (DTM) and inventory data and meteorological conditions type: centre of „Lothar“ - damage Risk classes " 0,000106 - 0,050000 " 0,050001 - 0,100000 " 0,100001 - 0,150000 " 0,150001 - 0,200000 " 0,200001 - 0,250000 " 0,250001 - 0,300000 " 0,300001 - 0,350000 " 0,350001 - 0,400000 " 0,400001 - 0,450000 " 0,450001 - 0,500000 " 0,500001 - 0,550000 " 0,550001 - 0,600000 Schmidt et al. (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  15. Lessons learnt Forest management implications • Use large disturbances to build risk models (learn lessons !) • Use topex (northing/easting) to map and regionalize the risk (exposure, wind direction) • Reduce height ! Decrease h/d (e.g. reach diameters earlier !) • Choose adequate species Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  16. Natural risks and long term forest management 1. Introduction 2. Lessons learnt from „Lothar“ 3. „Lothar“ and the aftermath • insect calamities • carbon sequestration • timber industry 4. What comes next ? Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

  17. The aftermath Insect calamities • Bark beetle attacks in the follow-up of „Lothar“ Storm damage due to Bark beetles after „Lothar“ n F o K ä f e r b e f a l l a c h r s t b e z i r k e n „Lothar“ 2002 d G e s a m t w a l B a d e n - W ü r t t e m b e r g S t a n d 3 1 . 0 1 . 2 0 0 2 Wertheim T auberbischofsheim Walldürn Lauda- Buchen Königshofen Weinheim Bad Mergentheim K äferh o l z f m Eberbach 0 - 5 0 0 H eidelberg Adelsheim S Mosbach c h w 5 0 1 - 2 5 0 0 a rz Neckargmünd a c Schrozberg h 2 5 0 1 - 5 0 0 0 Schwetzingen Künzelsau 5 0 0 1 - 7 5 0 0 N euenstadt Schöntal Sinsheim 7 5 0 1 - 1 0 0 0 0 Philippsburg G undelsheim 1 0 0 0 1 - 1 5 0 0 1 C railsheim 1 5 0 0 1 - 2 0 0 0 0 Vellberg 2 0 0 0 1 - 3 0 0 0 0 Bruchsal H ardt H eilbronn Bretten Löwenstein ü b e r 3 0 0 0 0 Eppingen Schwäbisch Hall Rosenberg H ospitalw ald Dinkelsbühl Maulbronn Murrhardt G aildorf Ellwangen Karlsruhe g ü r Backnang Abtsgmünd b n e Mühlacker u G schw end R astatt e Vaihingen N Welzheim Karlsbad Pforzheim Aalen Bopfingen R otenfels Bad Schorndorf Lorch Schwäbisch Gmünd H errenalb Stuttgart Bad Liebenzell Bad B ü h l Leonberg Wildbad O berkochen G ernsbach Esslingen B aden-BadenStadt H eidenheim G öppingen C alw Enzklösterle Steinheim Weil im Murgschifferschaft in Forbach Schönbuch F orbach H errenberg G eislingen Altensteig Nürtingen O b e r k i r c h Kirchheim G iengen K e h l i n R h e i n a u Klosterreichenbach N agold T übingen Pf alz- Bebenhausen Langenau grafenweiler Blaustein Baiersbronn R eutlingen B a Bad Urach O f e f n b u r g - G d Peterstal Rottenburg F reudenst adt riesbach G e n g e n b a c h H orb Bad Rippoldsau -Schapbach Blaubeuren Mössingen Münsingen Z e l l Alpirsbach Sulz Hechingen U lm Lichtenstein L a h r Wolf ach Burladingen H a u s a c h R osenfeld Ette n h e i m Z wiefalten Ehingen Schramberg O berndorf B G ammertingen Albstadt a li n E l z a c h g Kenzingen e n Biberach-Staat Riedlingen Emm e n d i n g e n R ottw eil Triberg W a l d k i r c h Biberach-Stadt W e Spaichingen h Breisach Villingen-Schwenningen i n Mengen O chsenhausen Stadt g Meßkirch F urtwangen Villingen- e BadSchussenried n reiburg-S t a d t Schwenningen Biberach F S t . M ä r g e n St aat Staat T uttlingen K i r c h z a r t e n T i tisee-N eustadt Donaueschingen Pfullendorf Immendingen BadWaldsee St aufen Leutkirch T o d t n a u Stockach S c h l u chsee Müllheim/Baden Engen S c h ö n a u Bonndorf S t . B l a s e i n R avensburg S c h w a r z w a l d Überlingen Kandern Stühlingen R adolfzell Wangen Scho p f h e i m T o d t m o o s W a l d shut-Tiengen T ettnang Lörrach B a d S ä c k i n g e n Jestetten ZSLF V S z Weigerstorfer (2006) Baden-Württemberg Forest Research Institute

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend