Making Black Holes - Early black hole formation scenarios - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

making black holes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Making Black Holes - Early black hole formation scenarios - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Making Black Holes - Early black hole formation scenarios - Connect with Star Formation? With: Matthew Turk, John Wise, Jeff Oishi, Ji-hoon Kim, Peng Simulation: John Wise & Tom Abel 2011 Visualization: Ralf Khler & Abel (KIPAC)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Making Black Holes

Tom Abel
 Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory & Physics Department, Stanford University


Simulation: John Wise & Tom Abel 2011 Visualization: Ralf Kähler & Abel (KIPAC)

  • Early black hole

formation scenarios

  • Connect with Star

Formation? With: Matthew Turk, John Wise, Jeff Oishi, Ji-hoon Kim, Peng Wang, Marcelo Alvarez. Vis: Ralf Kaehler

slide-2
SLIDE 2

?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Martin Rees 1980

Accessible to direct simulations in hydrodynamic and MHD limits Dynamic range > 1e10 + subgrid modeling Accessible to direct simulations in 
 N-body limit > 1e6 particles Numerical Relativity


First Black Holes

An old subject which modern simulations are poised to make substantial progress on.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Insignificant BH accretion - no mini quasars because of internal photo- evaporation, nor pre-cursors of Quasars, large local feedback.

Alvarez, Wise & Abel ApJL, 2008

solid: with radiation feedback
 dotted without feedback

Do the first black holes grow rapidly?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Yes! But how about the small seeds falling into rapidly growing galaxies. Surely they must grow then, isn’t it?

  • Same initial conditions as

“Simulation B” of Wise et al (2008abcd…)

– 1.5 Mpc periodic box – 10243 effective resoltution – 0.3 pc resolution – H2 chemistry, pop III and pop II star formation, full radiative transfer, – First star forms at z~30 – Ionizing radiation from 100 M¤ stars coupled to hydro – Remnant black hole accretion and radiative feedback treated including secondary ionization Alvarez, Wise & Abel (2009)

~6 kpc proper

slide-6
SLIDE 6

0.5 1 1.5 2 z (kpc) 0.5 1 1.5 2 z (kpc) 0.5 1 1.5 2 z (kpc) 0.5 1 1.5 2 x (kpc) 0.5 1 1.5 2 x (kpc) 0.5 1 1.5 2 z (kpc) 5 · 10−7 1 · 10−6 2 · 10−6 5 · 10−6 1 · 10−5 2 · 10−5 5 · 10−5 1 · 10−4 H2IFraction 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 ElectronFraction 10−26 10−25 10−24 10−23 10−22 Density(g/cm3) 5 · 103 1 · 104 2 · 104 Temperature(K)

z=8.2 still no further growth. Halo: 2⨉108 solar mass 3 solar masses total on 25 black holes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

500 pc age of universe

Black holes spend almost all their time in the wrong places

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Most Pop III stellar seed black holes do not grow.

  • Only need to make one

bright high-z quasar per comoving Gpc. So only

  • ne of hundreds of

thousands potential pop III remnant black holes has to experience runaway growth.

  • Why that one?
  • How does kpc scale

gas know to keep being available for accretion

  • nto it?

500 pc

Wise, Alvarez, Abel in prep.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SMBH from direct gaseous collapse?

  • Perhaps some halos with 104K can have central cores that collapse directly? (e.g.

Koushiappas et al. 2004; Volonteri & Rees 2005; Begelman et al 2006; Spaans & Silk 2006; Lodato & Natarajan 2006; Wise & Abel 2007; Regan & Haehnelt 2008)

  • Numerical experiment
  • Assume no molecules can be formed (actually very bad assumption ...)
  • Only H, He cooling leads to the first cooling objects to be ~ 1e8 solar masses

which have a central 1e5 solar mass cloud contract fast.

  • See it as a numerical experiment to study the collapse of a turbulent

isothermal cloud formed form cosmological initial conditions

  • Interesting also as a model to start studying the role of turbulence in galaxy

formation

  • Dynamic range of 1015 which is by far the highest resolution simulation carried
  • ut. Beat our own record by 5 orders of magnitude ...
  • Wise, Turk & Abel (2008), ApJ, 682, 745
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Wise, Turk & Abel 2008, ApJ

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bars within Bars (and disks) are misaligned

  • Turbulent viscosity sufficient.
  • Angular momentum may be transported

quickly.

  • Is this scenario realized when halo forms

next to a bright source? (Shang, Bryan & Haiman 2010)

  • Lyman Werner band H2 dissociation so

strong that during collapse no molecules can form

  • Need to have such a high flux for the

entire time the progenitors grow from 105 to 108 solar mass.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NGC1333 in Perseus

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Numerical experiments: Model Setup

  • Spherical cloud with total mass = 1200 Msun with total of


1641 Msun in the box and density profile: Turbulence Magnetic 
 field Wind Base

No

HD

virial No

MHD

virial 1e-4 G No

Wind

virial 1e-4 G Yes

Wind/Hydro virial

Yes

  • cs = 0.265 km/s (T=20 K);
  • Initial turbulence has k-2 Burger’s


power spectrum with M=9 


  • Uniform magnetic field in z direction.


Mass-to-flux ratio: overall: 1.4; 
 central: 3.3.

  • Sink particles to model star formation 


designed to give more or less the known 
 answer
 


  • Protostellar outflow feedback.
  • Top grid 128^3, 4 levels of refinement by 2, 


maximum resolution 100 AU 
 2048 dynamic range . Box size: 2 pc

Wang, Li, Abel, Nakamura 2010 ApJ

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Formation of a Star Cluster in the Milky Way

Sim: Wang, Abel, Li, Nakamura 2009 Viz: Kähler, Wang & Abel 2009

Log of column density: blue-white yellow: kinetic energy - jets from young stars

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Relevant physics in star formation

  • Hydro/MHD models form stars much

to quickly and very accelerated ...

  • With proto-stellar outflows and MHD
  • ne gets const. star formation rate
  • Winds keep turbulence allow cloud to

form stars for many dynamical times

  • First Model with sustained star

formation over many dynamical times without large scale driving

  • “primordial” turbulence decays fast,

most of the mass 


  • f a star cluster is built during
  • utflow-driven turbulence phase.
  • Our models still are missing
  • ambipolar diffusion
  • IR radiation

Wang, Li, Abel, Nakamura 2010 ApJ turbulence + winds (no MHD)

Hydro +Turbulence +MHD +winds

Time in Myr Total Stellar Mass

slide-18
SLIDE 18

|⇤ ⇥ B|

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

  • B-fields are amplified from the start.

Relevant on small scales quickly. Viscous scale, Reynolds number and small scale dissipation are affected first.

  • Radiation and supernovae feedback severe

for early small galaxies.

  • Early black holes barely grow.
  • Key in evaluating whether the direct

collapse scenario is viable will be to simultaneously and believably model star formation.

  • The absence of Star Formation that allows/

enables super massive black hole formation remains poorly understood.

  • At the same we have amazing codes now.

How can we use them to make progress?