Magseis ASA Pareto Oil & Offshore Conference 13 September 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
magseis asa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Magseis ASA Pareto Oil & Offshore Conference 13 September 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 24, 2023 398 likes •617 views

Magseis ASA Pareto Oil & Offshore Conference 13 September 2017 Highlights Strong growth in the OBS market in 2016-2018, driven by focus on 4D / IOR Ocean Bottom Seismic market growing rapidly Technology drives acquisition costs

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Magseis ASA

Pareto Oil & Offshore Conference

13 September 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Highlights

Ocean Bottom Seismic market growing rapidly Magseis holds strong technology position Flexible business model

2
  • Strong growth in the OBS market in 2016-2018, driven by focus on 4D / IOR
  • Technology drives acquisition costs down, capturing market share from streamer
  • Operate with a fleet of short and longer term vessels charters
  • Strategic partnerships with other contractors in certain markets
  • Magseis has the smallest and highest-spec sensors on the market
  • Strong track-record of delivering efficient, automated cable and ROV operations
Source: Magseis
slide-3
SLIDE 3

OBS provides superior image quality

  • Continues to gain market share over high-end streamer seismic

Streamer Seismic Ocean Bottom Seismic (OBS)

80%

Market share

20%

Market share

3 Source: Magseis/Statoil
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Market has returned to growth

  • Driven by 4D/IOR focus, cost reductions will accelerate this
Source: Magseis/Arkwright/Rystad Energy/Statoil 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

MASS technology - Marine Autonomous Seismic System

Miniaturised node sensors Handling system Applications

ROV deployment Ultra deep water deployment Cable deployment

5
  • Highest spec sensor
  • n the market
  • Smart, light, robust and

easy-to-handle node

  • Superior logistics

and efficiency

  • Automated handling system
Cable ROV Node Deployer Source: Magseis
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Larger spread driving substantial cost reductions

100K

$ per.km²

25K

$

per.km²

2014 75km 2015 150km 2016 350km 2018 >600km

Cable length

Large spreads - rolling operations

Multiple patch deployment 6 Source: Magseis
slide-7
SLIDE 7 Source: Magseis

Red Sea project (S-78)

7

Operational highlights

  • Magseis and BGP have delivered a highly-efficient, continuous
  • peration for more than 15 months in the region
  • Operating a rolling spread of more than 350km of MASS cable
  • Covering a complex area of more than 1,500km2 with water depths

varying from 0 – 1,100m

  • Delivering a high-quality data set and excellent HSE performance
slide-8
SLIDE 8 Source: Magseis, NASA

Further Red Sea exploration potential

8

Saudi Aramco was the first to use a deep water rig in the Red Sea region after a 15-month seismic study in 2009 indicated the presence of natural gas. The company discovered three oil and two gas fields in 2013.

(Abdelghani Henni, HartsEnergy)

“We continue our program to explore the shallow waters of the Red Sea, completing our largest single survey of the seabed encompassing Saudi Arabian territorial waters,” Saudi Aramco said in its latest annual report (2016).

(Abdelghani Henni, HartsEnergy)

State-owned Saudi Aramco is hoping that innovative seismic acquisition technology will help the company to successfully explore the geologically complex sub-salt of the ecologically sensitive Red Sea. The operator had said its share of Red Sea oil and gas resources had the potential to boost Saudi Arabia’s reserves base by more than 30%.

(Saleh Al Saleh, Upstream online) Red Sea
slide-9
SLIDE 9

ConocoPhillips Eldfisk project

9
  • First full scale Mobile ROV operation
  • 3000 MASS nodes and 2 ROVs
  • Completed on schedule and budget
  • Using ROV vessel and Source vessels already on

charter with ConocoPhillips

  • Operational efficiency can be improved further by

deploying more MASS nodes and faster ROVs

Source: Magseis
slide-10
SLIDE 10

MASS Modular

10

High capacity, mobile ROV operation

  • Containerised, modular system
  • Can be rigged up/down within 1 week on vessels
  • f opportunity or onshore
  • Unlimited number of nodes can be deployed
  • Efficiency comparable to high-end cable based

deployment platforms

  • Commercially available from Q3 17, strong interest

from clients

Source: Magseis
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ramping up capacity to meet market growth:

Source: Magseis 11
  • MASS node inventory growing from 5,000 to 14,000 by Q1

2018

  • Critical long-lead components for an additional 6,000 has

been secured, enabling Magseis to reach 20,000 MASS nodes by YE 2018

  • Firmly establishing Magseis as a joint industry leader in terms
  • f OBS node capacity
  • Strategic focus on maximizing the utilisation of our MASS

nodes and Return On Capital Employed

2016 30 000 25 000 20 000 15 000 10 000 5000 2017 2018

MASS Node Inventory

2019 Committed orders for complete MASS nodes Secured, critical long-lead items
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Crew #3 preparations ongoing

Source: Magseis 12
  • Recent experience from ROV operations have reduced the gap in efficiency between ROV and cable operations
  • Efficient ROV operations with small MASS nodes can address a significant part of the OBS market
  • Refinement of cable vessel design ongoing to increase efficiency and reduce capex
  • Cable operation is a requirement for many projects and we plan to operate 2-3 cable vessels
  • Target start of next cable operations during 2018 based on potential projects
  • The 6000 nodes built for Crew 3 will be delivered Q1 2018 and a new mobile handling unit will be built
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Exclusive source technology agreement

  • Significant potential to reduce costs further
  • Improved efficiency and data quality by new Source Isolation technology
  • Improved source efficiency though simultaneous shooting by one source vessel
  • Improved shot sampling over conventional technologies
  • Exclusive agreement for OBS
  • Field test conducted August 2017
  • Commercially available in 2018
13

Source Isolation Conventional shooting 25m 50m

Source: Magseis
slide-14
SLIDE 14 KEY F Y FIGURES 1H

H 2017

17 Source: Magseis

40.5

REVENUE

16.7

EBITDA

6.8

NET INCOME

33.7

CASH BALANCE

$ MILLION $ MILLION $ MILLION $ MILLION $ MILLION

25.8 40.5 0.0

REVENUE

H1 2016

REVENUE

1H 2017

EBITDA

1H 2017

EBITDA

H1 2016

16.7

14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary: Magseis well positioned for 2018

15

Strong Operational Performance Strong Pipeline Strategy MASS Technology

  • Continue to develop the MASS technology for flexible operations
  • Source Isolation technology targeting 30-50% acquisition cost reduction
  • Succesfull introduction of MASS Modular with ROV deployment
  • Impressive operations in challenging conditions in the Red Sea
  • Strong focus on reducing cost through large spreads and efficient operations
  • Balance risk through a combination of short and long term vessel charters
  • Several active tenders in key markets (capacity already tied-up on awarded projects)
  • High likelihood of repeat business with current clients
slide-16
SLIDE 16 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Second quarter and first half 2017

  • Key figures
17 Source: Magseis Revenue 19 399 7 671 40 475 25 786 Cost of sales 8 659 5 903 18 656 19 532 EBITDA 8 398
  • 1 578
16 727
  • 19
EBIT 4 711
  • 3 546
9 472
  • 6 032
Net profit/loss 3 313
  • 3 970
6 823
  • 7 912
Basic earnings per share 0.05
  • 0.25
0.11
  • 0.12
Financial position Cash 33 657 16 855 Working Capital1) 17 359
  • 4 238
Total equity 95 069 57 563 Equity ratio 78.6% 66.4% Gross interest bearing debt 9 752 6 329 Cash flow Profit and loss Q2 2017 Q2 2016 YTD 2017 YTD 2016 1): Working Capital defined as Trade Receivables less Trade Payables Net cash from operating activities
  • 9 481
  • 5 461
592
  • 3 928
Net cash from investing activities
  • 8 827
  • 8 399
  • 18 276
  • 10 714
Net cash from financing activities
  • 2 228
15 497 32 367 20 062
  • USD 19.4 million in Revenues
  • Higher than expected due to strong operational performance
  • n both Red Sea and ConocoPhillips projects
  • USD 1.5m of paid standby incurred during the quarter
  • Very strong EBITDA performance at USD 8.4 million
  • Capitalised 10 day yard stay during April (USD 2.0m reduction)
  • Total Amortisation of USD 2.8m during the quarter
  • Closing cash position of USD 33.7 million
  • Equity ratio of 78.6%
  • Working Capital increase
  • Reversion to more normalised payment terms from BGP
  • Increased revenue base
  • Low level of payables
  • Full-year guidance re-iterated
  • Expected EBITDA for 2017 of > USD 20m
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Second quarter and first half 2017

  • Comprehensive income
  • Revenue
  • USD 19.4m, strong performance on the Aramco S-78 and
ConocoPhillips projects
  • Cost of sales
  • Full quarter of production
  • Amortisation of capitalised mobilisation and yard costs
(net effect of USD 0.8m during Q2)
  • Lower Cost of Sales due to fuel provided on survey
(Q2 2016 also included source vessel costs)
  • Depreciation
  • Amortisation of capitalised mobilisation and yard cost USD 0.4m
  • Amortisation and Impairment
  • No impairment in the second quarter
  • Finance
  • Primarily interest related to BGP pre-funding, GIEK and
Innovation Norway
  • BGP pre-funding repaid
  • Tax
  • USD 0.8m for withholding tax in Saudi Arabia
In USD thousands Q2 2017 (unaudited) YTD 2017 (unaudited) Q2 2016 (unaudited) YTD 2016 (audited) 18 Revenue 19 399 40 475 7 671 25 786 Cost of sales 8 659 18 656 5 903 19 532 Research and development 514 1 013 769 1 261 SG&A and other expenses 1 828 4 079 2 578 5 012 EBITDA 8 398 16 727
  • 1 578
  • 19
Depreciation 3 572 6 791 1 580 4 571 Amortisation 116 231 133 1 143 Impairment
  • 00
233 254 300 EBIT 4 711 9 472
  • 3 546
  • 6 032
Net interest and fx (gain)/loss 560 1 022 117 594 Other finance cost
  • 00
  • 00
  • 7
  • 00
Net finance costs 560 1 022 109 594 EBT 4 151 8 450
  • 3 655
  • 6 627
Tax 838 1 627 315 1 285 Net income 3 313 6 823
  • 3 970
  • 7 912
Currency translation differences Total comprehensive income 3 313 6 823
  • 3 970
  • 7 912
Source: Magseis
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Second quarter and first half 2017

  • Balance sheet
  • Trade receivables comprising BGP/Aramco and
ConocoPhillips
  • May and June production (paid in Q3)
  • Other current assets:
  • Primarily capitalised mobilisation costs and stock
  • Equity ratio of 78.6%
  • Debt covenants at 30%
  • Non-current liabilities
  • Senior debt drawn down from Export Credit Norway and
Innovation Norway: USD 6.6m
  • Shell Deep Water R&D funding: USD 6.8m (contingent liability)
  • Current tax liabilities
– Withholding tax and corporate tax Saudi Arabia – Corporate tax in Singapore and Malaysia
  • Other current liabilities
– Current portion of long-term debt USD 3.2m – Accruals for vessel operational costs USD 3.1m In USD thousands YTD 2017 (unaudited) YTD 2016 (unaudited) 19 Equipment and other intangibles 59 930 55 199 Multi-client library Cash and cash equivalents 33 657 16 855 Trade receivables 21 404 5 769 Stock (fuel and batteries) 1 318 2 103 Other current assets 4 714 6 821 TOTAL ASSETS 121 023 86 748 Share capital 438 303 Share premium 141 506 102 486 Retained earnings and other reserves
  • 46 875
  • 45 226
TOTAL EQUITY 95 069 57 563 Obligation under finance lease 447 1 437 Other non-current financial liabilities 13 675 12 923 TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 14 122 14 360 Trade payables 4 045 10 007 Current tax liability 1 489 190 Other current liabilities 6 298 4 628 TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 11 832 14 825 TOTAL LIABILITIES 25 955 29 186 TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 121 023 86 748 Source: Magseis
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Second quarter and first half 2017

  • Cash flow
20
  • Cash flow from operations
  • Increase in working capital resulting from:
  • Reversion to more normalised DSO from BGP on Red Sea survey
  • First month of production on ConocoPhillips survey
  • Catching up on WHT payments
  • Low level of Payables
  • Cash from investments
  • Relates mainly to investments for the ROV crew and crew 3
  • Cash flow from financing
  • Cash from subsequent equity raise of net USD 0.5m
  • Instalments of USD 2.5m (BGP pre-funding repaid)
  • Financing from Shell under Deepwater R&D agreement of USD 0.2m
Earnings before tax 4 151 8 450
  • 3 655
  • 6 627
Depr, Amor,Impair,Finance, etc. 2 044 6 222 2 071 6 329 Net working capital adjustments
  • 15 677
  • 14 080
  • 3 877
  • 3 630
Net cash flow from operating activities
  • 9 481
592
  • 5 461
  • 3 928
Net cash flow from investing activities
  • 8 827
  • 18 276
  • 8 399
  • 10 714
Net cash flow from financing activities
  • 2 228
32 367 15 497 20 062 Net change in cash and cash equivalents
  • 20 537
14 683 1 637 5 420 Cash balance at the beginning of the period 54 194 18 974 15 218 11 435 Cash balance at period end 33 657 33 657 16 856 16 855 In USD thousands Q2 2017 (unaudited) YTD 2017 (unaudited) Q2 2016 (unaudited) YTD 2016 (unaudited) Source: Magseis