ma chia data collection
play

MA CHIA DATA COLLECTION & SHARING PRACTICES Kathy Hines Senior - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DE-IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT OF MA CHIA DATA COLLECTION & SHARING PRACTICES Kathy Hines Senior Director of Partner Operations and Data Compliance, Massachusetts Center for Health Information and Analysis (MA CHIA) Samuel Chick Data &


  1. DE-IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT OF MA CHIA DATA COLLECTION & SHARING PRACTICES Kathy Hines Senior Director of Partner Operations and Data Compliance, Massachusetts Center for Health Information and Analysis (MA CHIA) Samuel Chick Data & Analytics Process Manager, Onpoint Health Data November 6, 2019

  2. De-Identification Cycle 3 2 MA CHIA MA CHIA Data FileSecure Validations 4 1 MA CHIA Payer Master Data Data Management Submissions (MDM) 5 6 Final Data De-Identification Release Steps MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 2

  3. First Steps: 2016 Submission Guide Changes – Data Removal ▪ Claims • First/Last names • Social Security numbers (SSNs) • Street/City address information • ZIP code limited to first 5 digits ▪ Eligibility • Street/City address information • ZIP code limited to 5 digits MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 3

  4. De-Identification Cycle 3 2 MA CHIA MA CHIA Data FileSecure Validations 4 1 MA CHIA Payer Master Data Data Management Submissions (MDM) 5 6 Final Data De-Identification Release Steps MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 4

  5. First Steps: 2016 FileSecure ▪ Created by CHIA to be installed at data submitters’ sites ▪ Successfully masks identifiable information prior to submission ▪ Performs validation/standardization before masking ▪ Utilizes a NIST-certified SHA-3 hashing algorithm Updated Data Transfer ▪ Standard SFTP client with AES-256 encryption MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 5

  6. First Steps: 2016 FileSecure Process on Member Eligibility ▪ Performs validation/standardization before masking • First Name – Standardized • Last Name – NYSIIS phonetic standardization • SSNs – Incorrectly formatted SSNs removed • Date of Birth – Incorrectly formatted dates removed; creates YYYYMM field ▪ Successfully masks identifiable information, including names, SSNs, and full dates of birth MA CHIA De-identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 6

  7. De-Identification Cycle 3 2 MA CHIA MA CHIA Data FileSecure Validations 4 1 MA CHIA Payer Master Data Data Management Submissions (MDM) 5 6 Final Data De-Identification Release Steps MA CHIA De-identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 7

  8. HIPAA Safe Harbor vs. De-identification Safe Harbor De-identification Pros Pros ▪ Easy to implement and ▪ Methodology tailored to data maintain set in question ▪ Cons Lower overall risk of re-identification ▪ 18 data elements redacted or removed entirely Cons ▪ More restrictive than de- ▪ No single method for identification with respect implementation to birth dates, service ▪ Requires routine reassessment dates, and geographic ▪ More restrictive than Safe data Harbor with respect to some individual claim lines MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Samuel Chick | November 2019 8

  9. Stage 1. Worked with MA CHIA to Define Approach ▪ Established the variables to be considered for a formal re-identification risk analysis • Catalogued all direct identifiers and quasi-identifiers ▪ Determined acceptable risk levels • Minimum cell size, maximum risk, average risk • Assumed an adversarial environment where the recipients of the data have knowledge of quasi-identifying values for the individual MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Samuel Chick | November 2019 9

  10. Stage 2. Developed Initial Data Profile ▪ Profiled quasi-identifying variables independently and jointly • Generated a distribution of risk for the data ▪ Developed acceptable transformation strategy and performed risk mitigation where risk was deemed to be above acceptable ranges Note: The following risk calculations are examples only; they do not reflect actual CHIA reporting results. Number of Fields Fields in Policy Risk 1 ZIP* 0.000578 2 ZIP*, GENDER 0.000484 2 ZIP*, BIRTHYEARMONTH 0.006937 2 ZIP*, STATE 0.000624 3 ZIP*, STATE, GENDER 0.000649 3 ZIP*, STATE, BIRTHYEARMONTH 0.006917 4 ZIP*, STATE, GENDER, BIRTHYEARMONTH 0.013033 4 ZIP*, STATE, GENDER, ETHNICITY 0.001232 5 ZIP*, STATE, GENDER, BIRTHYEARMONTH, ETHNICITY 0.026261 MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Samuel Chick | November 2019 10

  11. Stage 3. Applied the Data Strategy ▪ The risk mitigation model was applied to multiple years of data (MA APCD data set years 2012 – 2017) to assess the risk stability over time and project a solution for the following year MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Samuel Chick | November 2019 11

  12. Stage 4. Assessed Data Strategy Results ▪ The data shared with CHIA was determined to meet the de- identification requirements set forth in the HIPAA Privacy Rule and related relevant law and regulation ▪ Determination based upon the transformation of the fields and applies to CHIA as well as anticipated downstream recipients, provided they: 1. Enter into a data-use agreement with CHIA that prohibits data linkage that would lead to the re-identification of patients 2. Correspond to CHIA-approved data recipients that do not have access to identified or identifiable patient data MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Samuel Chick | November 2019 12

  13. De-Identification Cycle 3 2 MA CHIA MA CHIA Data FileSecure Validations 4 1 MA CHIA Payer Master Data Data Management Submissions (MDM) 5 6 Final Data De-Identification Release Steps MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 13

  14. Where are We Now? Submission Guide Changes – Data Removal ▪ Claims • Member state • Member ZIP code ▪ Eligibility • Race/Ethnicity indicators • Disability/Marital/Student/Family size indicators • Language (list abbreviated) MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 14

  15. Where are We Now? FileSecure Process Updates on Member Eligibility ▪ ZIP code processing • Flag if invalid ZIP code • Retain MA ZIP codes only • Map MA ZIP codes to mask small areas in MA APCD ▪ State code processing • Flag if invalid state • Retain only New England and New York state codes MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 15

  16. Where are We Now? In Progress ▪ One ZIP code per person per year ▪ Exclusion of select diagnosis codes MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | Kathy Hines | November 2019 16

  17. Contact Us ▪ Kathy Hines, MA CHIA kathy.hines@state.ma.us ▪ Samuel Chick, Onpoint Health Data schick@onpointhealthdata.org ▪ Brad Malin, Privasense, LLC brad.malin@protonmail.com MA CHIA De-Identification Assessment | November 2019 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend