M T. HOOD ARE A VISITOR SURVEY 1.7.2019 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS AGENDA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

m t hood are a visitor survey 1 7 2019 overview of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

M T. HOOD ARE A VISITOR SURVEY 1.7.2019 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS AGENDA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M T. HOOD ARE A VISITOR SURVEY 1.7.2019 OVERVIEW OF RESULTS AGENDA 01 INTRODUCTION 02 VISITOR OVERVIEW 03 KEY FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & SUPPORTING EVIDENCE 04 Q & A 01 INTRODUCTION STUDY AREA Research Goals This study was


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1.7.2019 M T. HOOD ARE A VISITOR SURVEY OVERVIEW OF RESULTS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA

01 INTRODUCTION 02 VISITOR OVERVIEW 03 KEY FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & SUPPORTING EVIDENCE 04 Q & A

slide-3
SLIDE 3

01 INTRODUCTION

slide-4
SLIDE 4

STUDY AREA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Research Goals

This study was conducted to assist Travel Oregon, Mt. Hood Territory, and other relevant stakeholders in understanding the profile of visitors to the Mt. Hood area. Results will be used to inform future programming, tourism development, marketing, and transportation strategy in the region.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 995 surveys conducted between March 2 and June 26, 2018 throughout the Mt. Hood region.

Margin of error approximately +/-3.1 percentage points calculated for questions at 50% response.

  • Roughly 17 survey locations grouped into 4 major locations for analysis: Estacada, Sandy, Ski

Resorts, and Other Highway 26 Locations

  • Results grouped into 2 seasons (Late Winter and Spring) for analysis; determined by analyzing

weather data (Late Winter: April 23 & earlier / Spring: April 24 & later)

  • Some data treatment occurred, including recoding visitor type based on self-reported

accommodations location, suppressing interview location for the locations visited question, and removing outliers from expenditure data.

  • Respondents given stickers/pins as incentives. Prize drawing at the end of the project (5 $50

Visa cash cards).

METHODOLOGY

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Survey Location Grouped As: Downtown Estacada Estacada Milo McIver State Park Upper Clackamas Whitewater Festival Metzler Park Sandy Downtown Sandy Sandy Ridge Trailhead

  • Mt. Hood Meadows Ski Resort
  • Mt. Hood Meadows Park & Ride
  • Mt. Hood Skibowl

Timberline Ski Area Timberline Resort Shuttle Camp Creek Campground Other Highway 26 Location Government Camp Mirror Lake Trailhead

  • Mt. Hood Express

Trillium Lake Trailhead Zigzag Mountain Trailhead

slide-8
SLIDE 8

02 VISITOR OVERVIEW

slide-9
SLIDE 9

VISITOR TYPE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

VISITOR TYPE BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-11
SLIDE 11

VISITOR TYPE BY SEASON

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION

slide-13
SLIDE 13

GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN (TOP STATES / COUNTRIES)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-15
SLIDE 15

GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN BY SEASON

slide-16
SLIDE 16

LODGING LOCATION

H o o d R i v e r, R h o d o d e n d r o n , W e l c h e s , a n d c a m p g r o u n d s t h r o u g h o u t M t . H o o d N a t i o n a l F o r e s t .

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LODGING TYPE BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LODGING TYPE BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LODGING TYPE BY SEASON

slide-20
SLIDE 20

03 KEY FINDINGS, RECOMMENDATIONS, & SUPPORTING EVIDENCE

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PERSONAL VEHICLES ARE, BY FAR, THE MOST USED TRANSPORTATION METHOD IN THE REGION.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

METHOD OF TRAVEL TO THE AREA

slide-23
SLIDE 23

METHOD OF TRAVEL TO THE AREA BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-24
SLIDE 24

METHOD OF TRAVEL TO THE AREA BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-25
SLIDE 25

METHOD OF TRAVEL TO THE AREA BY SEASON

slide-26
SLIDE 26

TO INCREASE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION USAGE, MAKE THE EXPERIENCE AS SEAMLESS AS DRIVING A CAR.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT

6 0 % o f r e s p o n d e n t s c i t e d a t l e a s t 1 f a c t o r

slide-28
SLIDE 28

IMPROVE COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OFFERINGS.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT

slide-30
SLIDE 30

FAMILIARITY WITH TRANSIT OPTIONS

slide-31
SLIDE 31

FAMILIARITY WITH TRANSIT OPTIONS BY SEASON

slide-32
SLIDE 32

FOCUS ON PROMOTING TRANSPORTATION OPPORTUNITIES TO VISITOR SEGMENTS THAT ARE MORE OPEN TO TAKING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN THE FUTURE.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE

slide-34
SLIDE 34

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY VISITOR TYPE

Note: Seasonal residents aren’t included in the graph above due to a small sample size.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY SEASON

slide-36
SLIDE 36

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY IN- VS. OUT-OF-STATE RESIDENCY

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TO INCREASE BUS USAGE AMONG SOLO TRAVELERS, FOCUS ON OPTIMIZING BUS SERVICE ALONG HWY 26.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TRAVEL PARTY COMPOSITION

1 i n 5 t o o k t h e b u s w h e n t r a v e l i n g t o a s k i r e s o r t

  • r o t h e r H w y

2 6 l o c a t i o n

slide-39
SLIDE 39

MARKET TO CURRENT USERS OF PUBLIC TRANSIT AND RIDESHARE.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF TRANSPORTATION MODES IN A TYPICAL WEEK

  • C u r r e n t u s e r s m o r e o p e n t o t a k i n g p u b l i c t r a n s i t i n t h e M t . H o o d a r e a
  • M o r e l i k e l y t o d e s i r e i n c r e a s e d f r e q u e n c y o f s e r v i c e o n e x i s t i n g r o u t e s
slide-41
SLIDE 41

FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF TRANSPORTATION MODES IN A TYPICAL WEEK BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE

slide-42
SLIDE 42

FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF TRANSPORTATION MODES IN A TYPICAL WEEK BY HOUSEHOLD INCOME

slide-43
SLIDE 43

FREQUENCY OF USAGE OF TRANSPORTATION MODES IN A TYPICAL WEEK BY IN- VS. OUT-OF-STATE RESIDENCY

slide-44
SLIDE 44

IMPROVE GEAR STORAGE OPTIONS ON PUBLIC TRANSIT.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

BARRIERS TO TAKING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

slide-46
SLIDE 46

TRIP PURPOSE

slide-47
SLIDE 47

ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION

slide-48
SLIDE 48
slide-49
SLIDE 49

ACCOMMODATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FOR PETS.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

TRAVEL PARTY COMPOSITION

slide-51
SLIDE 51

TRAVEL PARTY COMPOSITION BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-52
SLIDE 52

TRY TO CAPTURE OUT-OF-STATE VISITORS WHO FLEW AND RENTED A CAR BY PROVIDING BUS SERVICE BETWEEN PORTLAND AND GOVERNMENT CAMP, AND OFFERING STOPS NEAR SKI RESORTS, TRAILHEADS, AND RESTAURANTS.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

METHOD OF TRAVEL TO THE AREA BY IN- VS. OUT-OF-STATE RESIDENCY

5 8 % o f t h o s e w h o f l e w r e n t e d a c a r

  • M o s t l i k e l y t o b e v i s i t i n g P o r t l a n d a n d G o v e r n m e n t C a m p
  • P a r t i c i p a t i n g i n h i k i n g / t r a i l r u n n i n g , s c e n i c d r i v e s , s n o w s p o r t s , a n d d i n i n g o u t
slide-54
SLIDE 54

OFFER “HOP ON, HOP OFF” RIDE OPTION WITH ONE EASY, AFFORDABLE TICKET.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

LOCATIONS VISITED

2 . 7 l o c a t i o n s ,

  • n a v e r a g e
slide-56
SLIDE 56

INCENTIVIZE CARPOOLING WITH PREMIUM PARKING AT TRAILHEADS AND SKI RESORTS.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

METHOD OF TRAVEL TO THE AREA

slide-58
SLIDE 58

BARRIERS TO TAKING PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

slide-59
SLIDE 59

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT

slide-60
SLIDE 60

TRAVEL PARTY SIZE

slide-61
SLIDE 61

IMPROVE SIGNAGE FOR REGIONAL ATTRACTIONS.

slide-62
SLIDE 62
  • “Just driving by it’s not clear that Sandy Ridge

trailhead is a mbk park.”

  • “Real time travel alerts needed”
  • “Better signage; can't see signs in dark”
  • “More trail hiking signage, more camping and

recreational options”

  • “Roadside signage is inadequate and misleading;
  • ther than that wonderful area”
  • “Signage is better almost everywhere else; signs

are small and hard to see”

slide-63
SLIDE 63

TO INCREASE ECONOMIC IMPACT TO THE REGION, ATTRACT THE VISITORS THAT TEND TO SPEND MORE WHILE IN THE AREA: SKI RESORT VISITORS, WINTERTIME VISITORS, OVERNIGHT VISITORS, OUT-OF-STATE RESIDENTS, AND FAMILIES.

slide-64
SLIDE 64

EXPENDITURES

slide-65
SLIDE 65

EXPENDITURES BY INTERVIEW LOCATION

slide-66
SLIDE 66

EXPENDITURES BY SEASON

slide-67
SLIDE 67

EXPENDITURES BY VISITOR TYPE

Note: Seasonal residents aren’t included in the graph above due to a small sample size.

slide-68
SLIDE 68

EXPENDITURES BY IN- VS. OUT-OF-STATE RESIDENCY

slide-69
SLIDE 69

EXPENDITURES BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE

slide-70
SLIDE 70

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE

slide-71
SLIDE 71

FACTORS THAT WOULD INCREASE UTILIZATION OF PUBLIC TRANSIT BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Thank you Questions?