Lunch & Learn Series: Healthcare Justice March 18, 2020 ABOUT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lunch learn series healthcare justice
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lunch & Learn Series: Healthcare Justice March 18, 2020 ABOUT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lunch & Learn Series: Healthcare Justice March 18, 2020 ABOUT US The Shriver Center on Poverty Law fights for economic and racial justice. Over our 50-year history, we have secured hundreds of victories with and for people living in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lunch & Learn Series: Healthcare Justice

March 18, 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Shriver Center on Poverty Law fights for economic and racial justice. Over our 50-year history, we have secured hundreds of victories with and for people living in poverty in Illinois and across the country. Today, we litigate, shape policy, and train and convene multi-state networks of lawyers, community leaders, and activists nationwide. Together, we are building a future where all people have equal dignity, respect, and power under the law. Join the fight at povertylaw.org. ABOUT US

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Response to COVID-19

povertylaw.org/pritzkerletter

Response, Care, and Advocacy for the Communities We Serve

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Today’s Agenda

  • What Can Illinois Do to Cover the Remaining Uninsured?
  • Stephanie Altman, Shriver Center on Poverty Law
  • Heath Disparities & Insurance Landscape
  • Dr. Susan Rogers, Physicians for a National Health Program
  • Moderated Q&A
  • Audience Q&A
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Stephanie Altman, Director of Healthcare Justice & Senior Director of Policy, Shriver Center on Poverty Law

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What Can Illinois Do to Cover the Remaining Uninsured?

Advocacy on State, Local and Federal Fronts to Combat COVID-19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What can we do now to combat COVID-19

  • Shriver Center has sent recommendations to the Governor

including expanding Medicaid, covering the uninsured, and expediting Medicaid processing.

  • We are working with legislators, Congressional delegation

members and the state administration to implement emergency policies including Medicaid announcement to cover COVID-19 tests and treatment for uninsured.

  • Federal government flexibility on Medicaid to increase

funds, eligibility, and coverage.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Gov Pritzker Ran on Medicaid Buy In (“Illinois Cares”) during Campaign

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • People use the term “Medicaid buy-in” to describe a wide range of

state policies that allow individuals not otherwise eligible for Medicaid to pay to access Medicaid or a Medicaid-like insurance plan.

  • States may also use different names – like “public option”
  • Core feature of a buy-in is to provide more affordable options to

individuals and families by leveraging other state-run programs, such as a state employee health plan or basic health program.

  • While buy-in options differ, they utilize the state’s administrative

and purchasing power to provide more coverage options and create affordable, quality plans for residents.

What is a Medicaid Buy-In?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Potential Goals for an Illinois Medicaid Buy-in

  • Increase health coverage
  • Cover undocumented adults
  • Introduce more competition
  • Lower consumer costs
  • Alignment with Marketplace
  • Minimize Churn and Disruption
  • Road to Single Payer
  • Reduce Threat From the Trump Administration (Health Repeal

lawsuit, executive orders, etc.)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Resources

  • HB4891 has been introduced

http://ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=4891&GAI D=15&GA=101&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=125045&SessionI D=108

  • Shriver Center 2020 Policy Agenda:

https://www.povertylaw.org/article/agenda2020/

  • Shriver Center Recommendation on COVID-19

https://www.povertylaw.org/article/pritzkerletter/

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Dr. Susan Rogers, MD, FACP, President-elect of

Physicians for a National Health Program

slide-13
SLIDE 13

WHY WE NEED MEDICARE FOR ALL

Susan Rogers MD, FACP President Elect, PNHP 3/18/2020

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The economics of medical care in the United States has made poor patients the ones no one wants to treat

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Concentrated poverty is where more than 40% live below the FPL

slide-16
SLIDE 16

US Public Spending per Capita for Health Exceeds Total Spending in Other Nations

Note: “Public” includes benefit costs for gvt employees and tax subsidies for private insurance OECD 2019; NCHS; AJPH 2016;106:449 (updated) – Data are for 2018

$7,273 $7,320 $5,990 $5,290 $5,450 $4,970 $4,970 $4,770 $4,070 $3,847 USA Switz Germ Holland Sweden Canada France Japan UK

USA Total: $11,120

Total Spending USA Public USA Private

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Uninsured All Year, 1940-2018

20 40 60 80 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Millions

Medicare / Medicaid

Source: Social Security Bul, HIAA, CPS, and CBO estimate

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Uninsured by Race/Ethnicity, 2018

US Census Bureau

5.4% 9.7% 17.9% 20.2% 6.8% White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic Native American Asian

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Under-Insurance Growing

Commonwealth Fund Health insurance Surveys 2003-2018 *Under-insurance is defined here as being insured all year, but out-of-pocket expenses were >10% of income (>5% of income if low income) or deductible was >5% of income

Percent of Adults 19-64 under-insured* 9% 9% 16% 16% 17% 22% 23% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2003 2005 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Life Expectancy

OECD, 2019 Note: Data are for 2017 or most recent year available

Years 78.6 81.1 81.3 82.0 82.5 82.6 83.0 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 USA Germ. UK Can. Swe. Fra. Italy

slide-21
SLIDE 21

INEQUITIES

  • BLACK LIVES ARE AT LEAST 3 YRS SHORTER
  • BLACK INFANT MORTALITY IS TWICE THAT OF WHITE BABIES
  • BLACK MATERNAL MORTALITY IS 3X WHITE MATERNAL MORTALITY
  • LACK OF MEDICAID EXPANSION LEFT ALMOST ¼ OF BLACKS UNINSURED
slide-22
SLIDE 22

THERE IS LITTLE CHOICE WITH PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE

  • Private health insurance limits choice to the

network of doctors and hospitals with whom they have negotiated contracts and drug benefits

  • You pay more to go out of network, end up with

surprise bills

  • Difficult to determine what your plan offers or what

services are covered

  • Less than half of those employed have choice of

insurance plans which can then change every year

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Drug Company Profits

Fortune 500 rankings for 1995-2017 Total drug company profits, 2017= $44.4 billion. Depressed by one-time charges for repatriated profits

Return on Revenue (%)

14% 17% 16% 19% 19% 19% 19% 17% 14% 16% 16% 20% 16% 19% 15% 16% 23% 23% 22% 23% 14% 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 1% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 7% 8%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Drug Companies Fortune 500 Median

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Medicare Would Have Saved $71 Billion Over 6 Years if it Paid VA Prices

JAMA IM 2019;179:431

Spending for top 50 drugs ($s Billions) $26.3 $24.7 $22.3 $25.4 $30.0 $32.5 $13.4 $12.4 $12.4 $15.8 $17.9 $18.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Medicare Spending Cost at VA Prices

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Millions Lose Private Insurance Every Year

Source: Bruenig – Jacobin Blog Post. July 2019 Other reasons for involuntary switch: Employer stopped offering coverage; coverage too expensive; policy holder died; hours dropped

Millions affected 40.1 21.9 4.5 4.1 3.7 1.5 Quit Job Fired Turned 26 Other Job Change Turned 65 Divorce One in seven firms switch coverage every year;

Unknown millions affected

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Wasted Money on Bureaucracy

https://newsatjama.jama.com/2017/04/25/jama-forum-where-does-the-health-insurance-premium- dollar-go/

957 1600

Hospital Beds Billing Clerks

Duke University Hospital System

(3 Hospitals)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Single Payer/Medicare for All

Comprehensive coverage

  • Preventive services
  • Hospital care
  • Physician services
  • Dental services
  • Mental health services
  • Medication expenses
  • Reproductive health services
  • Physical/Occupational Therapy
  • Home Care/Nursing home care/Long

term care “All medically necessary services” No co-pays or deductibles

slide-28
SLIDE 28

http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-system-cost Accessed 2/25/2017 https://www.nesri.org/news/2019/05/247-economists-sign-letter-backing-medicare-for-all Accessed 8/13/2019

Single Payer Medicare for All Makes Economic Sense

247 economists:

“The time is now for Medicare for All.” 29 studies:

The savings would fund full coverage.

“Health care is not a service that follows standard market rules. It should therefore be provided as a public good.”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Public Option = High Costs

IT IS STILL BASED ON PRIVATE INSURANCE

  • Less savings than single payer because of insurers’ overhead
  • Multiple payers = no savings on billing and administration
  • Private insurers will tilt the playing field (as under Medicare

Advantage) raising system-wide costs and perpetuating network restrictions, cherry-picking, lemon dropping etc.

  • Higher system-wide costs (compared to single payer) assure

political pressure for benefit cuts

slide-30
SLIDE 30

COVID19

  • Highlights the reason everyone needs access to

healthcare

  • Everyone benefits from testing, treatment
  • National protection, not piecemeal
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

For more information

Health policy websites:

  • The Commonwealth Fund: www.commonwealthfund.org
  • Kaiser Family Foundation: www.kff.org
  • Health Affairs Blog: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/
  • Physicians for a National Health Program: www.PNHP.org
slide-33
SLIDE 33

INEQUITIES

  • BLACK LIVES ARE AT LEAST 3 YRS SHORTER
  • BLACK INFANT MORTALITY IS TWICE THAT OF WHITE BABIES
  • BLACK MATERNAL MORTALITY IS 3X WHITE MATERNAL MORTALITY
  • LACK OF MEDICAID EXPANSION LEFT ALMOST ¼ OF BLACKS UNINSURED
slide-34
SLIDE 34

THERE IS LITTLE CHOICE WITH PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE

  • Private health insurance limits choice to the

network of doctors and hospitals with whom they have negotiated contracts and drug benefits

  • You pay more to go out of network, end up with

surprise bills

  • Difficult to determine what your plan offers or what

services are covered

  • Less than half of those employed have choice of

insurance plans which can then change every year

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Drug Company Profits

Fortune 500 rankings for 1995-2017 Total drug company profits, 2017= $44.4 billion. Depressed by one-time charges for repatriated profits

Return on Revenue (%)

14% 17% 16% 19% 19% 19% 19% 17% 14% 16% 16% 20% 16% 19% 15% 16% 23% 23% 22% 23% 14% 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 1% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 7% 8%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Drug Companies Fortune 500 Median

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Medicare Would Have Saved $71 Billion Over 6 Years if it Paid VA Prices

JAMA IM 2019;179:431

Spending for top 50 drugs ($s Billions) $26.3 $24.7 $22.3 $25.4 $30.0 $32.5 $13.4 $12.4 $12.4 $15.8 $17.9 $18.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Medicare Spending Cost at VA Prices

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Millions Lose Private Insurance Every Year

Source: Bruenig – Jacobin Blog Post. July 2019 Other reasons for involuntary switch: Employer stopped offering coverage; coverage too expensive; policy holder died; hours dropped

Millions affected 40.1 21.9 4.5 4.1 3.7 1.5 Quit Job Fired Turned 26 Other Job Change Turned 65 Divorce One in seven firms switch coverage every year;

Unknown millions affected

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Wasted Money on Bureaucracy

https://newsatjama.jama.com/2017/04/25/jama-forum-where-does-the-health-insurance-premium- dollar-go/

957 1600

Hospital Beds Billing Clerks

Duke University Hospital System

(3 Hospitals)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Single Payer/Medicare for All

Comprehensive coverage

  • Preventive services
  • Hospital care
  • Physician services
  • Dental services
  • Mental health services
  • Medication expenses
  • Reproductive health services
  • Physical/Occupational Therapy
  • Home Care/Nursing home care/Long

term care “All medically necessary services” No co-pays or deductibles

slide-40
SLIDE 40

http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-system-cost Accessed 2/25/2017 https://www.nesri.org/news/2019/05/247-economists-sign-letter-backing-medicare-for-all Accessed 8/13/2019

Single Payer Medicare for All Makes Economic Sense

247 economists:

“The time is now for Medicare for All.” 29 studies:

The savings would fund full coverage.

“Health care is not a service that follows standard market rules. It should therefore be provided as a public good.”

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Public Option = High Costs

IT IS STILL BASED ON PRIVATE INSURANCE

  • Less savings than single payer because of insurers’ overhead
  • Multiple payers = no savings on billing and administration
  • Private insurers will tilt the playing field (as under Medicare

Advantage) raising system-wide costs and perpetuating network restrictions, cherry-picking, lemon dropping etc.

  • Higher system-wide costs (compared to single payer) assure

political pressure for benefit cuts

slide-42
SLIDE 42

COVID19

  • Highlights the reason everyone needs access to

healthcare

  • Everyone benefits from testing, treatment
  • National protection, not piecemeal
slide-43
SLIDE 43
slide-44
SLIDE 44

For more information

Health policy websites:

  • The Commonwealth Fund: www.commonwealthfund.org
  • Kaiser Family Foundation: www.kff.org
  • Health Affairs Blog: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/
  • Physicians for a National Health Program: www.PNHP.org
slide-45
SLIDE 45

WHY WE NEED MEDICARE FOR ALL

Susan Rogers MD, FACP President Elect, PNHP 3/18/2020

slide-46
SLIDE 46

The economics of medical care in the United States has made poor patients the ones no one wants to treat

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Concentrated poverty is where more than 40% live below the FPL

slide-48
SLIDE 48

US Public Spending per Capita for Health Exceeds Total Spending in Other Nations

Note: “Public” includes benefit costs for gvt employees and tax subsidies for private insurance OECD 2019; NCHS; AJPH 2016;106:449 (updated) – Data are for 2018

$7,273 $7,320 $5,990 $5,290 $5,450 $4,970 $4,970 $4,770 $4,070 $3,847 USA Switz Germ Holland Sweden Canada France Japan UK

USA Total: $11,120

Total Spending USA Public USA Private

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Uninsured All Year, 1940-2018

20 40 60 80 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Millions

Medicare / Medicaid

Source: Social Security Bul, HIAA, CPS, and CBO estimate

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Uninsured by Race/Ethnicity, 2018

US Census Bureau

5.4% 9.7% 17.9% 20.2% 6.8% White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic Native American Asian

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Under-Insurance Growing

Commonwealth Fund Health insurance Surveys 2003-2018 *Under-insurance is defined here as being insured all year, but out-of-pocket expenses were >10% of income (>5% of income if low income) or deductible was >5% of income

Percent of Adults 19-64 under-insured* 9% 9% 16% 16% 17% 22% 23% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2003 2005 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Life Expectancy

OECD, 2019 Note: Data are for 2017 or most recent year available

Years 78.6 81.1 81.3 82.0 82.5 82.6 83.0 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 USA Germ. UK Can. Swe. Fra. Italy

slide-53
SLIDE 53

INEQUITIES

  • BLACK LIVES ARE AT LEAST 3 YRS SHORTER
  • BLACK INFANT MORTALITY IS TWICE THAT OF WHITE BABIES
  • BLACK MATERNAL MORTALITY IS 3X WHITE MATERNAL MORTALITY
  • LACK OF MEDICAID EXPANSION LEFT ALMOST ¼ OF BLACKS UNINSURED
slide-54
SLIDE 54

THERE IS LITTLE CHOICE WITH PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE

  • Private health insurance limits choice to the

network of doctors and hospitals with whom they have negotiated contracts and drug benefits

  • You pay more to go out of network, end up with

surprise bills

  • Difficult to determine what your plan offers or what

services are covered

  • Less than half of those employed have choice of

insurance plans which can then change every year

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Drug Company Profits

Fortune 500 rankings for 1995-2017 Total drug company profits, 2017= $44.4 billion. Depressed by one-time charges for repatriated profits

Return on Revenue (%)

14% 17% 16% 19% 19% 19% 19% 17% 14% 16% 16% 20% 16% 19% 15% 16% 23% 23% 22% 23% 14% 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 1% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 7% 8%

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Drug Companies Fortune 500 Median

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Medicare Would Have Saved $71 Billion Over 6 Years if it Paid VA Prices

JAMA IM 2019;179:431

Spending for top 50 drugs ($s Billions) $26.3 $24.7 $22.3 $25.4 $30.0 $32.5 $13.4 $12.4 $12.4 $15.8 $17.9 $18.0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Medicare Spending Cost at VA Prices

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Millions Lose Private Insurance Every Year

Source: Bruenig – Jacobin Blog Post. July 2019 Other reasons for involuntary switch: Employer stopped offering coverage; coverage too expensive; policy holder died; hours dropped

Millions affected 40.1 21.9 4.5 4.1 3.7 1.5 Quit Job Fired Turned 26 Other Job Change Turned 65 Divorce One in seven firms switch coverage every year;

Unknown millions affected

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Wasted Money on Bureaucracy

https://newsatjama.jama.com/2017/04/25/jama-forum-where-does-the-health-insurance-premium- dollar-go/

957 1600

Hospital Beds Billing Clerks

Duke University Hospital System

(3 Hospitals)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Single Payer/Medicare for All

Comprehensive coverage

  • Preventive services
  • Hospital care
  • Physician services
  • Dental services
  • Mental health services
  • Medication expenses
  • Reproductive health services
  • Physical/Occupational Therapy
  • Home Care/Nursing home care/Long

term care “All medically necessary services” No co-pays or deductibles

slide-60
SLIDE 60

http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-system-cost Accessed 2/25/2017 https://www.nesri.org/news/2019/05/247-economists-sign-letter-backing-medicare-for-all Accessed 8/13/2019

Single Payer Medicare for All Makes Economic Sense

247 economists:

“The time is now for Medicare for All.” 29 studies:

The savings would fund full coverage.

“Health care is not a service that follows standard market rules. It should therefore be provided as a public good.”

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Public Option = High Costs

IT IS STILL BASED ON PRIVATE INSURANCE

  • Less savings than single payer because of insurers’ overhead
  • Multiple payers = no savings on billing and administration
  • Private insurers will tilt the playing field (as under Medicare

Advantage) raising system-wide costs and perpetuating network restrictions, cherry-picking, lemon dropping etc.

  • Higher system-wide costs (compared to single payer) assure

political pressure for benefit cuts

slide-62
SLIDE 62

COVID19

  • Highlights the reason everyone needs access to

healthcare

  • Everyone benefits from testing, treatment
  • National protection, not piecemeal
slide-63
SLIDE 63
slide-64
SLIDE 64

For more information

Health policy websites:

  • The Commonwealth Fund: www.commonwealthfund.org
  • Kaiser Family Foundation: www.kff.org
  • Health Affairs Blog: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/
  • Physicians for a National Health Program: www.PNHP.org
slide-65
SLIDE 65
  • Dr. Susan Rogers, MD, FACP,

President-elect of Physicians for a National Health Program

Inequalities in the health care system

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Moderated Q&A

Moderator: Keenya Lambert Panelists: Stephanie Altman & Susan Rogers

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Audience Q&A

Send questions via Chat

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Take Action Today

  • Share our COVID-19 Policy Priorities for Low-Income

Communities

  • Follow the Shriver Center on Social Media & Share Our

Posts

  • Ask the Shriver Center or PNHP to Present

stephaniealtman@povertylaw.org

ADD SUSAN EMAIL

slide-69
SLIDE 69