LUCC and Its Influences on LUCC and Its Influences on Regional NPP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lucc and its influences on lucc and its influences on
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

LUCC and Its Influences on LUCC and Its Influences on Regional NPP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LUCC and Its Influences on LUCC and Its Influences on Regional NPP Regional NPP Maosong Liu, Liu, Shuqin Shuqin An, An, Maosong Xinfang Chen, Chen, Jinmin Jinmin Chen, Chi Chen, Chi Xu Xu, Chen Zhang , Chen Zhang Xinfang Nanjing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

LUCC and Its Influences on LUCC and Its Influences on Regional NPP Regional NPP

Maosong Maosong Liu, Liu, Shuqin Shuqin An, An, Xinfang Xinfang Chen, Chen, Jinmin Jinmin Chen, Chi Chen, Chi Xu Xu, Chen Zhang , Chen Zhang Nanjing University Nanjing University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Topic Topic

1.

  • 1. Urbanization and Vegetation

Urbanization and Vegetation

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area
  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area
  • 3. Topography and NPP
  • 3. Topography and NPP
slide-3
SLIDE 3

1.

  • 1. Urbanization and Vegetation

Urbanization and Vegetation

  • Urbanization is one of the most important force

Urbanization is one of the most important force driven LUCC, and affect many features of driven LUCC, and affect many features of vegetation, such as NPP, biodiversity, landscape vegetation, such as NPP, biodiversity, landscape quality. quality.

  • Urbanization is represented as urban

Urbanization is represented as urban-

  • suburb

suburb gradient belts, and can be studied by the gradient belts, and can be studied by the gradient analysis. gradient analysis.

  • The vegetation types and the FC affected by

The vegetation types and the FC affected by many many fractors fractors, especially economic. , especially economic.

  • NPP correlated with urbanization, and has very

NPP correlated with urbanization, and has very important influences on air quality, many important influences on air quality, many because the gas exchange. because the gas exchange.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1.

  • 1. Urbanization and Vegetation

Urbanization and Vegetation

Urban sprawl in Nanjing and Jiangyin

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1.

  • 1. Urbanization and Vegetation

Urbanization and Vegetation

  • 0. 1
  • 0. 2
  • 0. 3
  • 0. 4
  • 0. 5
  • 0. 6
  • 0. 7

Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ 覆盖率(% )

PF/ PA TF/ TA M F/ M A

Forest succession of deciduous from bare land in the coming 200 year s 五角枫 臭椿 合欢 桤木 构树 山核桃 锥栗 板栗 朴树 皂荚 胡桃 枫香 石栎 马尾松 野柿 黄连木 化香 响叶杨 青檀 麻栎 白栎 桴树 栓皮栎 南京椴 榔榆 榆

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111 121 131 141 151 161 171 181 191 201 YEAR NUM BER% Ul m us pum i l a l i nn Ul m us par vi f l or a j acq Ti l i a m i quel i ana m axi m Q uer cus var i abi l i s bl Q uer cus gl andul i f er a bl . Q uer cus al ba Q uer cus acut i ssi m a car r ut h Pt er ocel t i s t at ar i nowi i m axi Popul us adenopoda m axi m Pl at ycar ya st r obi l acea si ebe Pi st aci a chi nensi s bunge Pi ospyr os kaki . l Pi nus m assoni ana l am b Pal ber gi a hupeana hance Li t hocar pus gl aber nakai Li qui dam bar f or m
  • sana hance
Jugl ans r egi a l i nn G l edi t si a si nensi s l am Cel t i s si nensi s per s Cel t i s kor ai ensi s nakai Cast anea m
  • l l i ssi m
a bl um e Cast anea henr yi r ehdet wi l s Car ya i l l i noensi s k. koch Br oussonet i a papyr i f er a Al nus cr em ast ogyne Bur k Al bi zzi a j ul i br i ssi n Ai l ant hus al t i ssi m a swi ngl eh A r m n M i m

Forest Coverage changed along urban-suburb gradient Succession of forests

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2.

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area

NPP in urbanizing area

  • BEPS is a process based

BEPS is a process based biogeochemistry model biogeochemistry model developed on the base of developed on the base of Forest Forest-

  • BGC model and it is

BGC model and it is refined by incorporating a more refined by incorporating a more advanced photosynthesis model advanced photosynthesis model ( (Farquar Farquar, 1988 )with a new , 1988 )with a new temporal and spatial scaling temporal and spatial scaling scheme and an advanced scheme and an advanced canopy radiation transfer model canopy radiation transfer model concerning of canopy concerning of canopy architecture of different architecture of different vegetation type. BEPS model vegetation type. BEPS model can calculate gross primary can calculate gross primary productivity (GPP), NPP and productivity (GPP), NPP and evapotranspiration evapotranspiration (ET) with the (ET) with the input data including land cove, input data including land cove, leaf area index (LAI), soil leaf area index (LAI), soil available water capacity (AWC) available water capacity (AWC) and daily meteorology data. and daily meteorology data.

Annual net primary production Photosynthesis & respiration Stomatal & mesophyll conductance Soil water balance NPP distribution

Land cover type

NDVI LAI

Biophysical parameters

Soil data (AWC)

Daily net primary production

Radiation (Daily) Temperature (Daily)

Precipitation (Daily)

Humidity (Daily)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2.

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area

NPP in urbanizing area

  • Case study: NPP in

Case study: NPP in Jiangyin Jiangyin

1991年LAI分布 2002年LAI分布

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2.

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area

NPP in urbanizing area

45.45 28.56 0.72 25.27 Forest A4 0.07 74.87 2.08 22.98 Cropland A3 0.05 29.69 61.44 8.82 Water A2 0.14 30.86 0.47 68.52 Residential A1 Transitional probability (Pij) (19912002) 859.25 539.91 13.59 477.63 Forest A4 49.75 50728.23 1411.2 15568.18 Cropland A3 5.81 3340.61 6912.71 992.67 Water A2 24.67 5526.36 83.63 12263.79 Residential A1 Transitional area(Aij) (19912002)

  • 50.30
  • 11.25
  • 25.16

63.71 Amplitude (19912002)(%)

  • 950.9
  • 7622.25
  • 2830.67

11403.82 Changed area 939.48 60135.11 8421.13 29302.27 Area in 2002 1890.38 67757.36 11251.8 17898.45 Area in 1991 Forest (A4) Cropland (A3) Water (A2) Residential (A1)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2.

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area

NPP in urbanizing area

Biological parameters and initial

carbon content for various land covers in BEPS model

Foley (1994) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.1 2.3 1.7 kgC/m2 Root carbon content

Foley (1994) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.1 9.2 8 kgC/m2 Stem carbon content

Foley (1994) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.1 0.5 0.3 kgC/m2 Leaf carbon content

Foley (1994) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 kgC/day/kg Root respiration coefficient

Foley (1994) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 kgC/day/kg Stem respiration coefficient

Foley (1994) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.002 0.00267 0.00398 kgC/day/kg Leaf respiration coefficient

Hunt et al. (1996) and Matsushita, et al. (2002)

0.002 0.00225 0.0045 m/s Maximum stamotal conductance(H2O)

Chen (1996)and Chen and Cihlar (1995)

0.9 0.5 0.7 - Clump index references crop Conifer forest Broadleaved forest unit

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2.

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area

NPP in urbanizing area

Mean and total NPP in

in 1991a and 2002a

14.45 58.80 51.39 13.60 fraction(%) 116.71 4.61 4.43 107.67 Loss 691.16 3.23 4.19 683.74 2002 807.87 7.84 8.62 791.41 1991 Total NPP(Gg C y-1)

  • 8.74

8.18 2.65 fraction(%)

  • 87

64 31 Loss

  • 908

718 1137 2002

  • 995

782 1168 1991 Mean NPP(g Cm-2 y-1) total Broadleaved forest Conifer forest Cropland

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2.

  • 2. NPP in urbanizing area

NPP in urbanizing area

1 2 3 4 5 6

针叶林 coni f er 阔叶林 br oadl eave 农田 agr i cul t ur e

叶面积指数 LAI

1991年 2002年

Variation of mean LAI of all vegetation type

slide-12
SLIDE 12

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • Topography affect the spatial pattern of PP,

Topography affect the spatial pattern of PP, mainly through light, water, nutrients, mainly through light, water, nutrients, temperature, winds. Especially soil water flow temperature, winds. Especially soil water flow direction. direction.

  • Topography affect the RS imageries, such as

Topography affect the RS imageries, such as distortion, caused the shift of pixels, and so on. distortion, caused the shift of pixels, and so on. So, in NPP calculation based on RS data, we So, in NPP calculation based on RS data, we must consider the topography must consider the topography charactors charactors. .

slide-13
SLIDE 13

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • BEPS

BEPS-

  • Ter r ai nLab

Ter r ai nLab m

  • del

m

  • del

BEPS and BEPS and Ter r ai nLab Ter r ai nLab ar e devel oped ar e devel oped by by J. C hen

  • J. C
  • hen. BEPS not deal i ng w

i t h . BEPS not deal i ng w i t h soi l w at er hor i zont al f l ow but soi l w at er hor i zont al f l ow but Ter r ai nLab Ter r ai nLab di d. So w e use t hese di d. So w e use t hese t w

  • m
  • del s t oget her , and t est t he

t w

  • m
  • del s t oget her , and t est t he

ef f ect s of t opogr aphy on N PP. ef f ect s of t opogr aphy on N PP.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • BEPS

BEPS-

  • TerrainLab

TerrainLab model model

slide-15
SLIDE 15

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • Case study

Case study

1. 1.

Study area: Study area: Boahe Boahe watershed near watershed near Xi Xi’ ’an an, , area 3908 km area 3908 km2

2, annual precipitation 782mm,

, annual precipitation 782mm,

  • av. Temp. is
  • av. Temp. is 7. 6
  • 7. 6 ℃

℃.

. 2. 2.

Data measured Data measured: :LAI LAI, ,NPP NPP

3. 3.

Landsat Landsat TM TM, ,LAI LAI, ,Landcover Landcover, DEM , DEM

4. 4.

soil map, AWC soil map, AWC

5. 5.

Prec Prec., Temp. Humidity ., Temp. Humidity

slide-16
SLIDE 16

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • 4

4 types of model considerations types of model considerations

no no no no 4 4 yes yes no no 3 3 no no yes yes 2 2 yes yes yes yes 1 1 Topography on soil Topography on soil water lateral flow water lateral flow Topography on Topography on meteorology meteorology Scenario Scenario

slide-17
SLIDE 17

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • Calculated and observed annul NPP

Calculated and observed annul NPP R R2

2 =0.6418

=0.6418 Y=0.4626x+495.35 Y=0.4626x+495.35 4 4 R R2

2 =0.6513

=0.6513 Y=0.4675x+490.96 Y=0.4675x+490.96 3 3 R R2

2 =0.7611

=0.7611 Y=0.6639x+277.66 Y=0.6639x+277.66 2 2 R R2

2 =0.8151

=0.8151 Y=0.6403x+307.43 Y=0.6403x+307.43 1 1 R R2

2

Regression equation Regression equation scenario scenario

slide-18
SLIDE 18

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • D

i st r i but i on of AN PP ( M

  • del out put )

D i st r i but i on of AN PP ( M

  • del out put )

ANPP varied between 400-920 gCm-2 yr-1,

  • Aver. ANPP

is 741 gCm-2 yr-1 ,and in forest, ANPP varied in 700-880 gCm-2 yr-1 。

slide-19
SLIDE 19

3.

  • 3. Topography and NPP

Topography and NPP

  • AN

PP changed w i t h el evat i on and sl ope AN PP changed w i t h el evat i on and sl ope di r ect i on di r ect i on

ANPP increased with elevation while < 1350m but decreased when > 1350m and has a maximum at 1350m, while below 1900m, ANPP changed not more than 6% with slope direction, and nearly not changed regular while higher than 1900m.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

THANKS!!! THANKS!!!