SPECIAL K: A LITTLE GOES A LONG WAY
ALI PRYNE PHARMD, BCPS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO
LONG WAY ALI PRYNE PHARMD, BCPS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL, GLENWOOD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SPECIAL K: A LITTLE GOES A LONG WAY ALI PRYNE PHARMD, BCPS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO DISCLOSURES Nothing to disclose OBJECTIVES 1. Compare differing doses of ketamine for indications such as sedation, analgesia, and
ALI PRYNE PHARMD, BCPS VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO
DISCLOSURES
OBJECTIVES
BACKGROUND
MECHANISM OF ACTION
direct action on the cortex and limbic system.
MECHANISM OF ACTION
central sensitization, hyperalgesia and opioid tolerance. Reduces polysynaptic spinal reflexes.
ASSESSMENT QUESTION
Select all approved routes of administration Intranasal Intravenous/Intraosseous Intramuscular Oral Rectal Endotracheal
ADMINISTRATION
Ketamine Slow infusion vs IV push (Clattenburg et. al.)
Purpose Low dose ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) IV push (IVP) vs slow infusion (SI) (over 15 min) Methods Prospective, randomized, double blind, double dummy, placebo controlled Moderate to severe pain in ED Primary outcome = side effects only – not efficacy Psychoperceptual SE w/in 60 min of administration Used SERDSA (side effects rating scale for dissociative anesthetics) Data 59 participants, 86.2% IVP vs 70% SI; not significant 75.9% IVP vs 43.4% SI; statistically significant No difference in analgesia effect Discussion Small study, not validated scale Conclusions Similar rate of SE, less severe w/ SI IVP = higher risk of “bothersome” SE Considerations Limited external validity Blinded – attempted to limit bias
Pharmacokinetics
Onset of action: IV: 30 seconds IM: ~4 minutes IN: ~10 minutes Oral: ~30 minutes Duration: IV:~10 minutes IM: 15-25 minutes IN: Up to 60 minutes Protein binding: 27 % Metabolism: Four varying metabolites Hepatic via N-dealkylation (norketamine) - ~30 % as potent as ketamine Bioavailability: IM: 93% IN: 35-50% Oral: 20-30% Half-life: Alpha ~10-15 minutes, Beta 2.5 hours Time to peak, plasma: IM: 5-30 minutes IN: 10-15 minutes Oral: ~30 minutes Excretion: Urine 91%, feces 3%
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
ASSESSMENT QUESTION
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
COMPOUNDING
Infusion
VIAL SIZES
x x
PATIENT CASE
A 34 y/o M is transported to the ER after a MVC. No PMH and NKDA. He had a positive LOC, airbags did not deploy, GCS of 9, and is beginning to not protect his airway. MD would like to proceed with RSI and looks to you for recommendations…
ADVERSE REACTIONS
X
Ketamine Safety: PTSD (Highland et. al.)
Purpose Determine if ketamine SE increase risk for PTSD in combat casualty care. Methods Evaluated those medically evacuated from combat (paired) PCL (PTSD checklist scores) w/in 365 days of injury, if positive and severity Ketamine >7 days before evaluation Matched cohort n(1:1, and 1:4) Data N=1158, 107 got ketamine Primary outcome: OR=1.28 95% CI (0.48-3.47) p = .62 Secondary outcome: mean difference 1.98 95% CI (-.99 – 4.96) p = .19 Discussion Varying times between assessment, ketamine administration, and injury Low power Unknown if received in field (just at medical center post injury) Conclusions Medical and surgical care provided in service members does not appear to increase risk for PTSD Considerations Small sample size Accounted for confounders fairly well
SEDATION
KETAMINE DOSING: SEDATION
Ketamine Procedural Sedation (Yin et. Al.)
Purpose Optimal agent combined w/ propofol for sedation in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy Methods ketamine w/ propofol dexmedetomidine w/ propofol sufentail w/ profofol saline w/ propofol Data See next page Discussion Well done study (prospective, blind, large single center) No major biases Conclusions Lower rates of bradycardia, hypoxia, and hypotension Considerations Only studied elderly patients (60-80 years old) short procedures (<40 min) weren’t in poor physical status (per ASA classifications)
Ketamine Intubation sedation (Shahtahmasebi et. al.)
Purpose Does ketamine administration impact intubation rates in the transport of patients w/ behavioral disturbances Methods Pre and post ketamine protocol introduction Selected patients transferred from remote areas of Australia Intubation rates and adverse event Ketamine failure = adverse event Data N=340 patients, 129 had an intervention See next page for results AE = 18 ketamine and 50 I+V (difference of -0.43, p = <0.00001 CI -0.58 to -0.28) Discussion 92.5% were mental health/substance abuse Selection bias Conclusions Ketamine reduced intubation rates in patients w/ behavioral disturbances on transport Reduces adverse reactions, but does have risks Considerations Included all post protocol = real life May require intubation for other illness/low GCS Lower cost?
Ketamine Adjunct sedation in vented patients (Groetzinger et. al.)
Purpose Ketamine use as adjunct sedation in mechanically vented patients Methods Retrospective review between 2012-2016, on continuous infusion Dosing, effect on other sedatives, total sedative use, Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS), ADRs and hemodynamics Excluded if paralyzed or ketamine for <6 hours Data N=91, median dose= 0.41 mg/kg/hr, duration = 2.8 days 63% reduction or discontinuation of alternative sedative 7.7% had ADR = discontinuation Increase in SAS at goal 61% vs 55% p =0.001 Discussion Descriptive report No standard protocol for dosing Selection bias (only started in 65% of patients Conclusions Acceptable adjunct sedation in critically ill patients Considerations Attempt for light sedation 30% of adults may experience emergence reactions, only 2% in this study
Ketamine Adjunct sedation (Pruskowski et. al.)
Purpose Ketamine as adjunct sedation/analgesia in trauma patients Methods Retrospective chart review – must have sedation, not just acute pain Determine time at RASS goal and alternative sedation doses Changes 72 hours before or 72 hours after initiation Data N=36, mostly white men w/ blunt trauma Decreased opioid and propofol use Increased dexmedetomidine and ziprasidone use Did not change time at goal RASS Discussion Trade off? Less opioid use for psychosis AE Conclusions Ketamine infusions may not be the best choice for trauma patients Considerations Single center, small study Did not confound for TBI, substance withdrawal or psychiatric disorders
ANALGESIA
KETAMINE DOSING: ANALGESIA
Ketamine Consensus Guidelines: Infusions for Pain (Cohen et. al.)
Indications Chronic neuropathic pain, spinal cord injury, phantom limb pain, post-herpetic neuralgia, headache/migraine, cancer pain, and chronic back pain Contraindications Angina, HTN, high risk CVD, elevated ICP, elevated intraocular pressure, liver disease, hypothyroidism, delirium, psychosis, intoxication, aspiration risk, or active substance abuse. Dose range Minimum dose of 80 mg infused over 2 hours Chronic pain requires higher doses, longer infusions and more frequent administration Administration requirements At a doctors office w/ training for resuscitation and monitoring hemodynamics Rescue medications Possibly midazolam or dexmedetomidine (psychosis) No strong recommendations Positive treatment response High refractory risk, 30% pain reduction = positive outcome Standard duration = >3 weeks outpatient and >6 weeks inpatient
Ketamine Acute pain (Karlow et. al.)
Purpose Low dose ketamine use as alternative to opioids in ED Methods Meta-analysis, doses <0.5 mg/kg Pain scale assessed w/in 60 minutes of administration 3 studies included N=261 patients Data NRS or VAS scale Difference 0.42 95% CI = -0.70 to 1.54 Discussion Strict criteria for inclusion Conclusions Low dose ketamine was non-inferior to opioids (morphine equivalents) Considerations Only 3 studies reviewed
DEPRESSION
KETAMINE DOSING: DEPRESSION
Ketamine Depression(Sanacora et. al.)
Patient selection Major depressive disorder w/o psychotic features Avoid w/ other traditional contraindications (i.e. increased ICP) Treatment setting/training Basic general training requirements Knowledge of emergence reactions and psychosis Delivery IV w/ monitoring of O2, blood pressure, RR, and HR Frequent monitoring of alertness/sedation scale 1 dose per week by the second month Follow up-duration Typical response occurs after 3 treatments No standard number or duration established Long term effects Unknown Considerations High abuse potential
ASSESSMENT QUESTION
a. Prodrug of ketamine b. Metabolite of ketamine c. S-enantiomer of ketamine d. Inactive metabolite of ketamine
MECHANISM OF ACTION
PHARMACOKINETICS
Protein binding: 43 – 45 % Metabolism: metabolized to active metabolite noresketamine via CYP450, CYP2B6, CYP3A4 and some CYP2C9/CYP2C19 Bioavailability: ~50% Half-life: 7-12 hours, noresketamine ~8 hours Time to peak, plasma: 20-40 minutes Excretion: Urine <1% unchanged
ADMINISTRATION
DEPRESSION
ESKETAMINE DOSING: DEPRESSION
every 4 weeks and decrease interval as tolerated.
Esketamine Intranasal w/ oral antidepressant treatment (Daly et. al.)
Purpose Safety, efficacy and dose response of intranasal esketamine Methods Phase 2, double blind, double dummy, randomized, placebo controlled 4 phase (screening, double blind tx 1-14 days, open label tx 15-74, post tx follow-up at 8 weeks) Treated twice weekly w/ placebo (33), 28 mg (11), 56 mg (11) or 84 mg (12) Changed in MADRS scale Data Esketamine was superior to placebo (all three doses) 28 mg = -4.2 [2.09] p = .02, 56 mg = -6.3 [2.07] p = .001, 84 mg = -9 [2.13] p < .001 Discussion Difficult to blind d/t bitter taste of esketamine Excluded those with SI, psychosis, PTSD, OCD, or substance abuse Conclusions Promising tx for MDD in specific patient population Considerations Funded by Janssen, makers of esketamine
Esketamine IV w/ oral antidepressant treatment (Singh et. al.)
Purpose Efficacy and safety of esketamine IV as adjunct to oral antidepressant medications Methods Multicenter, randomized Infusion on day 1 and day 4 of either 0.2 mg/kg or 0.4 mg/kg Matched 1:1:1, non responders who had placebo were reassigned on day 4 N=30 MADRS score reduction Data Significant improvement in MADRS score 0.2 mg/kg = -16.8 (3) p <.001, 0.4 mg/kg = -16.9 (2.61) p <.001, placebo =-3.8 (2.97) Discussion Lower SE profile w/ 0.2 mg/kg dose (nausea, head ache and dissociation) Rapid response to administration Conclusions Possible adjunct treatment Considerations Small population Limited information on long term Not available in US
ASSESSMENT QUESTION
Select all approved routes of administration Intranasal Intravenous/Intraosseous Intramuscular Oral Rectal Endotracheal
ASSESSMENT QUESTION
PATIENT CASE
A 34 y/o M is transported to the ER after a MVC. No PMH and NKDA. He had a positive LOC, airbags did not deploy, GCS of 9, and is beginning to not protect his airway. MD would like to proceed with RSI and looks to you for recommendations…
ASSESSMENT QUESTION
a. Prodrug of ketamine b. Metabolite of ketamine c. S-enantiomer of ketamine d. Inactive metabolite of ketamine
QUESTIONS?
REFERENCES
https://www.commerce.alaska.gov/web/portals/5/pub/nur_advisory_ketamine_administration.pdf
acute-list
Drug Information, Inc.
intravenous push: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 2018;25:1048-1052.
disorder outcomes in military combat casualties: a matched cohort study. Int Anesthesiol Res Soc 2019. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004327.
gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Ther 2019; awaiting publication.
in the transport of patients with acute behavioural disturbance. Emerg Med Australas 2019;29:291-296.
2018;38(2):181-188.
REFERENCES
ill trauma patients. Pharmacotherapy 2017;37(12):1537-1544.
American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine, the American academy of pain medicine, and the American society of
in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2018;25:1086-97.
Psychiatry 2017;74:399-405.
Drug Forecast P&T 2019;44(6):340-347.
antidepressant for relapse prevention in treatment-resistant depression. JAMA Psychiatry 2018;75(2);139-148.
randomization, placebo-controlled study. Biol Psychiatry 2016; 80:424-431.
Clinical Drug Information, Inc.