Long-term Variaon of the Coupling between Solar Proxies: Coupled - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

long term varia on of the coupling between solar proxies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Long-term Variaon of the Coupling between Solar Proxies: Coupled - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Long-term Variaon of the Coupling between Solar Proxies: Coupled Oscillators Approach Anton Savosanov, Alexander Shapoval, Mikhail Shnirman NRU Higher School of Economics, Laboratory of Complex Systems Modelling and Control Instute of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Long-term Variaon of the Coupling between Solar Proxies: Coupled Oscillators Approach

Anton Savosanov, Alexander Shapoval, Mikhail Shnirman

NRU Higher School of Economics, Laboratory of Complex Systems Modelling and Control Instute of Earthquake Predicon Theory and Mathemacal Geophysics Moscow, Russia July 9, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Introduction: cyclic scenarios and the meridional fmow Reconstructions in Kuramoto model Advances: time-dependent coupling and Kuramoto’s applicability Advances: model misinterpretation — van der Poll-Duffjng case

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Intro: Oscillang Trend in Solar Acvity

Hazra et al, 2014

Idea

Independently of physical background one should try to reproduce phenomena of the solar dynamo with models of interacting oscillators.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Intro: Meridional Flow and Cells Structure

Boning et al, 2017: GONG reconstructions 2004-2012

  • Three cells of the

meridional fmow per hemisphere are assumed;

  • Their placement is up to

debate;

π d=3π π

  • Each cell is associated with

an oscillator; one should consider their interactions (couplings).

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Oscillators’ Modelling: Kuramoto

Kuramoto Model of the Coupled Oscillators

Oscillators: Xi(t) = Ai(t) sin

  • Ωit + ϕi
  • ; θi = Ωit + ϕi are phases

˙ θi = ωi

  • natural frequencies

+

  • j

κij

  • coupling

sin(θj − θi), Ωi are frequencies

Assumptions

There-layer structure of the meridional fmow Relationship between the inner and outer layers is organized through the middle layer The coupling is symmetrical, Oscillators are synchronized:

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Oscillators’ Modelling: Kuramoto

Kuramoto Model of the Coupled Oscillators

Oscillators: Xi(t) = Ai(t) sin

  • Ωit + ϕi
  • ; θi = Ωit + ϕi are phases

˙ θi = ωi

  • natural frequencies

+

  • j

κij

  • coupling

sin(θj − θi), Ωi are frequencies

Assumptions

  • There-layer structure of the meridional fmow

Relationship between the inner and outer layers is organized through the middle layer The coupling is symmetrical, Oscillators are synchronized:

5

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Oscillators’ Modelling: Kuramoto

Kuramoto Model of the Coupled Oscillators

Oscillators: Xi(t) = Ai(t) sin

  • Ωit + ϕi
  • ; θi = Ωit + ϕi are phases

˙ θi = ωi

  • natural frequencies

+

  • j

κij

  • coupling

sin(θj − θi), Ωi are frequencies

Assumptions

  • There-layer structure of the meridional fmow
  • Relationship between the inner and outer layers is organized

through the middle layer The coupling is symmetrical, Oscillators are synchronized:

5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Oscillators’ Modelling: Kuramoto

Kuramoto Model of the Coupled Oscillators

Oscillators: Xi(t) = Ai(t) sin

  • Ωit + ϕi
  • ; θi = Ωit + ϕi are phases

˙ θi = ωi

  • natural frequencies

+

  • j

κij

  • coupling

sin(θj − θi), Ωi are frequencies

Assumptions

  • There-layer structure of the meridional fmow
  • Relationship between the inner and outer layers is organized

through the middle layer

  • The coupling is symmetrical, κij = κji

Oscillators are synchronized:

5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Oscillators’ Modelling: Kuramoto

Kuramoto Model of the Coupled Oscillators

Oscillators: Xi(t) = Ai(t) sin

  • Ωit + ϕi
  • ; θi = Ωit + ϕi are phases

˙ θi = ωi

  • natural frequencies

+

  • j

κij

  • coupling

sin(θj − θi), Ωi are frequencies

Assumptions

  • There-layer structure of the meridional fmow
  • Relationship between the inner and outer layers is organized

through the middle layer

  • The coupling is symmetrical, κij = κji
  • Oscillators are synchronized: ˙

θi − ˙ θj = 0

5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Oscillators’ Modelling: Reconstrucon in Kuramoto

  • Two oscillators X1(t) and X2(t) given by the toroidal and poloidal magnetic fjelds

and represented, f. i., by solar proxies ISSN and aa

  • Single equation:

˙ θ(t) = 2∆ω − κ(t) sin θ(t) , where θ = θ1 − θ2.

  • Correlation C1(t) =
  • Corr(X1(t), Y1(t))
  • is computed over the period, say,

T = 10.75 years with the sliding windows

  • Estimate ϕ of the phase θ: ϕ(t) = arccos C1(t) , Blanter et al (2014)
  • Synchronization

˙ θ = 0 ⇒ 2∆ω − κ(t) sin ϕ(t) ≈ 0

  • The estimate of the coupling

κ(t) = 2∆ω sin ϕ(t)

6

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A Reconstrucon of Natural Frequencies

Kuramoto Model with Three Oscillators

Blanter et al. 2018 frequencies ω of top (in red) and bottom (in blue)

  • scillators

in the northern and southern hemispheres Faster velocity of the surface cell and lower velocity of the deep cell The opposite regime: the 1920s, the late 1960s, and the 2000s–

7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A Reconstrucon of Natural Frequencies

Kuramoto Model with Three Oscillators

Blanter et al. 2018 frequencies ω of top (in red) and bottom (in blue)

  • scillators

in the northern and southern hemispheres

  • Faster velocity of the surface cell and lower velocity of the deep cell

The opposite regime: the 1920s, the late 1960s, and the 2000s–

7

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A Reconstrucon of Natural Frequencies

Kuramoto Model with Three Oscillators

Blanter et al. 2018 frequencies ω of top (in red) and bottom (in blue)

  • scillators

in the northern and southern hemispheres

  • Faster velocity of the surface cell and lower velocity of the deep cell
  • The opposite regime: the 1920s, the late 1960s, and the 2000s–

7

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Kuramoto Reconstrucon: me-dependent coupling

Time-dependency

  • We move from constant couplings κ to time-dependent κ(t);
  • Earlier there were no synchronisation if ∆ω > κ; now temporarily breaks are

allowed.

Derived regularities

  • rapid changes in initial coupling results in long

relaxation time of reconstructed coupling

  • long breaks of the synchronisation inequality results

into complete reconstruction failure (fjg.)

  • Adding AR(1) noise could lead to this failure (the

probability depends on autocorrelation and deterministic coupling)

8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Kuramoto Reconstrucon: me-dependent coupling

Courtesy of Andrés Muñoz–Jaramillo Savostianov et al., submitted, revised and went to the farm where all old papers go

Example for solar data

  • Reconstruction

procedure applied to polar faculae data;

  • Initial coupling

extracted by quasi-stationary assumption; the coupling is reconstructed one;

9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Kuramoto Reconstrucon: me-dependent coupling

Courtesy of Andrés Muñoz–Jaramillo Savostianov et al., submited, revised and went to the farm where all old papers go

Example for solar data

  • Reconstruction

(except the 20th cycle) is successful;

  • With addition of

AR(1) noise, the 20th cycle has a high probability of reconstruction failure.

10

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Oscillators’ modelling: van der Poll-Duffjng Oscillator

  • Lack of solar physical background in case of Kuramoto oscillators;
  • More comprehensive (no sine-like) form of solar cycles;
  • Can be derived from MHD equations (+ assumption of axysymmetry)

d2Bφ dt2 + ω2Bφ + µ(3ξB2

φ − 1)dBφ

dt − λB3

φ = 0

Lopes et al. 2015 Balthasar van der Pol

11

slide-18
SLIDE 18

From Single VPD to Coupled VPD

Coupled van der Poll-Duffjng

  • ¨

x − (λ1 − x2) ˙ x + (1 − ∆ω)x + βx3 − µ( ˙ x − ˙ y) = 0 ¨ y − (λ2 − y2) ˙ y + (1 + ∆ω)y + βy3 − µ( ˙ y − ˙ x) = 0

0.2 0.4 and

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Correlation, 0.0 0.2 0.4 ( )/ = 0.2 = 0.1 = 0.05

Idea

  • Numerically establish

correlation/coupling relation for VPD model

  • Extract VPD coupling from

correlation/coupling relation per solar cycle

  • Reconstruct with Kuramoto

12

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Models’ Misinterpretaon Bias in Reconstrucon

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Cycle number

10 9 × 10

1

Coupling ratio, /

= 0.2 = 0.1

Results

  • Reconstruction is not entirely catastrophic (error does not exceed ∼ 10%)
  • The 20th cycle remains to be anomaly
  • Proper way to choose the natural frequency level (∆ω) is crucial

13

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank you for attention Contact: a.s.savostyanov@gmail.com

Contact someone older: abshapoval@gmail.com