long term grmhd simulations of ns merger accretion disks
play

Long-term GRMHD Simulations of NS Merger Accretion Disks Rodrigo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Long-term GRMHD Simulations of NS Merger Accretion Disks Rodrigo Fernndez (University of Alberta) Alexander Tchekhovskoy (Northwestern), Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley), Francois Foucart (New Hampshire), Dan Kasen (UC Berkeley / LBL) Neutron


  1. Long-term GRMHD Simulations of NS Merger Accretion Disks Rodrigo Fernández (University of Alberta) Alexander Tchekhovskoy (Northwestern), Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley), Francois Foucart (New Hampshire), Dan Kasen (UC Berkeley / LBL)

  2. Neutron Star Mergers RF & Metzger (2016)

  3. Outflow from remnant accretion disk • Neutrino cooling shuts down as disk spreads on viscous timescale (~100-300ms) >> orbital time • Viscous heating & nuclear recombination are unbalanced • If BH at center, eject ~10-20% of initial disk mass, more if HMNS at the center • Material is neutron-rich (Ye ~ 0.2-0.4), mostly light r-process and some heavy, depending on parameters • Mass-averaged wind speed (~0.05c) is slower than dynamical ejecta (~0.1-0.3c) RF & Metzger (2013), MNRAS Lee, Ramirez-Ruiz, & Lopez-Camara (2009) Setiawan et al. (2005) Just et al. (2015), MNRAS RF et al. (2015), MNRAS Metzger (2009)

  4. GRMHD 6 2 . 50 4 mag ) 2 . 25 log 10 β pl = log 10 ( P / P 2 Use HARM, extended to 3D and parallelized with MPI z [10 6 cm] 2 . 00 0 Parameterized neutrino cooling and nuclear -2 1 . 75 recombination, gamma-law EOS, Kerr metric -4 1 . 50 -6 Black hole mass: 3M sun , spin = 0.8 6 Start from equilibrium torus, constant Ye, entropy, 25 and angular momentum, M disk = 0.03M sun 4 20 2 λ MRI / ( r ∆ θ ) z [10 6 cm] 15 Impose strong initial poloidal field, fully resolve MRI in 0 equatorial plane 10 -2 5 Compare with hydro models with identical microphysics -4 0 -6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 see also Siegel & Metzger (2017, 2018) x [10 6 cm] Shibata+ (2007,2012), Janiuk+(2013), Nouri+ (2017) RF , Tchekhovskoy, Quahaert, Foucart, & Kasen (2019)

  5. 1 0 . 5 0.5 0 . 4 Early evolution z [10 7 cm] 0 . 3 0 Y e 0 . 2 0 . 1 -0.5 0 10 Development of MRI starts accretion 0.5 5 z [10 7 cm] Γ [s � 1 ] 0 0 � 5 -0.5 Magnetic field winding and amplification � 10 launch outflow over the first few orbits t � 5 . 0 ms t � 10 ms t = 66 ms t � 230 ms 10 11 0.5 z [10 7 cm] T [K] 0 MRI heating increases entropy and 10 10 equilibrium Ye -0.5 10 30 p / 8 π [erg cm � 3 ] 0.5 10 29 z [10 7 cm] 10 28 0 10 27 10 26 -0.5 B 2 10 25 10 30 φ / 8 π [erg cm � 3 ] 0.5 10 29 z [10 7 cm] 10 28 0 10 27 RF et al. (2019) 10 26 -0.5 B 2 10 25 -1 0 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 0.5 1 1.5 2 x [10 7 cm] x [10 7 cm] x [10 7 cm] x [10 7 cm]

  6. Outflow at r=10 9 cm Long-term mass ejection MHD outflow ejects twice more mass than equivalent hydrodynamic model 50% of the mass is ejected before 1s Late time behavior of MHD and hydro models is very similar: shared mass ejection mechanism RF et al. (2019)

  7. (a) (b) (c) GRMHD 9.3s 10 � 3 Mass in bin [ M � ] 3.0s 1.0s 10 � 4 0.3s 0.1s Mass histograms 10 � 5 at r=10 9 cm 10 � 6 (d) (e) (f) 16.5s α = 0 . 03 10 � 3 3.0s Mass in bin [ M � ] Early ejecta is more 1.0s 10 � 4 neutron rich: imprint of initial disk composition 10 � 5 10 � 6 GRMHD model has (g) (h) (i) 8.8s α = 0 . 10 10 � 3 broader Ye distribution 3.0s Mass in bin [ M � ] 1.0s and faster average 10 � 4 0.4s velocity 10 � 5 10 � 6 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 � 3 10 � 2 10 � 1 10 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 Y e entropy [ k B /baryon] v r / c RF et al. (2019)

  8. 10 51 10 51 (a) total 10 50 kinetic energy in bin [erg] rest kin 10 49 em 10 50 10 48 thermal 10 47 More kinetic energy than 0 10 20 30 10 49 θ (deg) required to explain non- thermal emission from 9 . 3 s 10 48 GW170817 0 . 1 s 0 . 3 s 10 � 3 (b) 9 . 3 s mass in bin [ M � ] Dependent on initial 3 s 10 � 4 magnetic field geometry 1 s 0 . 3 s 10 � 5 0 . 1 s Powerful jet is obtained (c) 10 0 � γβ � at t = 9 . 3 s KE-weighted 10 � 1 mass-weighted RF et al. (2019) � 1 . 0 � 0 . 5 0 . 0 0 . 5 1 . 0 cos ( θ )

  9. Summary 1. GRMHD disks can eject twice more mass than disks evolved in viscous hydrodynamics, have faster average speed and lower average Ye (depending on initial disk composition) 2. Two-component outflow: thermally-driven (MRI turbulence or viscosity) and magnetically-driven (Lorentz force) 3. More than sufficient kinetic energy to account for non-thermal emission from GW170817, but sensitive to initial field geometry Fernández, et al. (2019), MNRAS, 428, 3373 Thanks to:

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend