Defect Detection in GFRP Plates Using Electromagnetic Induction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

defect detection in gfrp plates using
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Defect Detection in GFRP Plates Using Electromagnetic Induction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Defect Detection in GFRP Plates Using Electromagnetic Induction Testing Using Autoencoder Wataru Matsunaga (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Yoshihiro Mizutani (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Akira Todoroki (Tokyo Institute of Technology)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2020/11/7 1

1 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Defect Detection in GFRP Plates Using Electromagnetic Induction Testing Using Autoencoder

Wataru Matsunaga (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Yoshihiro Mizutani (Tokyo Institute of Technology) Akira Todoroki (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2020/11/7 2

2 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Background (1/2)

◼Moisture absorption ◼Ultraviolet (UV)

Decrease of the tensile strength in GFRP by moisture absorption Decrease of the tensile strength in GFRP by UV

  • Ref. MAHMOOD M. SHOKRIEH,
ALIREZA BAYAT, “Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on Mechanical Properties of Glass/Polyester Composites”, Journal of Composite Materials 2007, vol. 41,
  • pp. 2443-2455.

35%

  • Ref. Satoshi Somiya, Ryuya Maruyama , “Effect of Fiber
Fraction and Water Absorption of Fracture Toughness for Glass Fiber Reinforced Polyethersulfone”, JSME annual meeting paper 2005, vol. 1, pp. 521-522.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

2020/11/7 3

3 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Background (2/2)

◼Proposal method ◼Conventional non-destructive testing method

Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Microwave or Terahertz wave testing Electromagnetic induction testing (EIT)

  • Necessity for couplant
  • Necessity for speed of sound
  • Poor spatial resolution
  • High cost devices

✓ High speed and no-contact detection ✓ Various spatial resolution by changing the composition for probe ✓ Relatively low cost devices

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2020/11/7 4

4 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Objectives

◼ Conventional EIT ◼ Proposal EIT ◼ Objectives

  • Construction of autoencoder which can judge the severe crack
  • rientation
  • Verify the validity of autoencoder for EIT

Applicable to detecting the crack opening direction Applicable to detecting the crack existence

But… Interpretation of the experimental results is difficult

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2020/11/7 5

5 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Electromagnetic induction testing (EIT)

Configuration for EIT

✓ Applicable to non-conductive materials ✓ Non-contact and high speed detection ✓ Applicable to detecting the permittivity

  • Driver coil
  • Pickup coil

➢ Induce displacement current by applying ac voltage at high frequency (3-30 MHz) ➢ Detect the change of the electromagnetic field for displacement current

◼ Advantages for proposal method ◼ Principle

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2020/11/7 6

6 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Proposal method

◼ Driver Field Lens (DFL)

Deform the electromagnetic field Detect the angle of crack Increase the amount of flux passing through the crack AC voltage is applied Magnetic flux occur and electric- magnetic field is induced into DFL

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2020/11/7 7

7 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Autoencoder

◼ Encoder ◼ Decoder

Encode Decode

Autoencoder is composed of encoder and decoder

Output Input

Schematic of autoencoder Input data is compressed and dimension of data is reduced Feature is extracted Output data is restored using the extracted feature

Features

When the detection target data are input, error is output because the input data cannot decode sufficiently.

◼ Autoencoder

  • Training data: data except detection target data
  • Input data: some training data and detection target data
slide-8
SLIDE 8

2020/11/7 8

8 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Training data and Evaluation data (1/2)

◼ Experiment

  • Angle [ ]: 0-180 (each 15 )

°

  • Crack width [mm]: 0, 1, 3, 5
  • Crack length [mm]: 5, 10, 15, 25
  • Detection area [mm]: -53 ≤ x ≤ 47

(each 2 mm) °

Schematic for experiment setup

◼ Training data: 90 results °

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2020/11/7 9

9 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Training data and Evaluation data (2/2)

◼ Evaluation data: except for 90 results

When the 90 results are inputted When the other degree results are inputted Normal (low error value) Anomaly (high error value) ° °

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2020/11/7 10

10 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Architecture of autoencoder

◼ Constructed autoencoder

Normalization

  • Input data (-1 ≤ Value ≤1)

Vn-in = Vin / 70 Vn-out = Vout / 2500

Architecture of autoencoder

  • Sub2:
  • PowScalar:
  • MulScaler

In this autoencoder, * = 0 due to eliminating the effect of the squared error y3 = y1 – y2 y4 = y3

2

y8 = y7 × *

  • Tanh: activation function

Hyperbolic tangent function

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2020/11/7 11

11 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Results (1/2)

This results cannot be divided into two groups simply because the normal and anomaly data is mixed in specific error range Normal + anomaly Anomaly Threshold Error for the anomaly data is distributed wider range

Normal and anomaly data is mixed

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2020/11/7 12

12 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Results (2/2)

  • Error for the normal data is small while anomaly data is large
  • Error for the normal data is distributed in smaller range

Normal + anomaly Anomaly Threshold

Normal and anomaly data is mixed

Separate the data not including the normal data from the data including normal data by setting the appropriate threshold

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2020/11/7 13

13 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Discussion

◼ Normal data: No crack and 90 data ◼ Anomaly data: No crack data and data except for 90

(DFL angle = Crack angle) (DFL angle ≠ Crack angle) Non-severe crack data + without crack data Severe crack data + without crack data

◼ Total data: normal data + anomaly data

Severe crack data + non-severe crack data + without crack data

This method is applicable to first screening to separate the severe crack data ° °

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2020/11/7 14

14 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Conclusion

◼ The constructed autoencoder cannot divide into normal and anomaly data because these data are mixed in the specific error range. ◼ The constructed autoencoder can separate the data not including the normal data from the data including normal data by setting the appropriate threshold. ◼ The validity of autoencoder for electromagnetic induction testing is demonstrated. The constructed autoencoder is valid for first screening to separate the severe crack data.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2020/11/7 15

15 Tokyo Institute of Technology 1st International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences 2020/11/10-30

Thank you for your attention