littlemountain planning program
Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
littlemountain Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January 2012 Open Houses Presentation to Little Mountain Community Advisory Group littlemountain Overview planning program Open house attendance 409 signed in
littlemountain planning program
Overview
Open house attendance
409 signed in 600+ total
Comment forms submitted
326 paper (39 former residents) 143 on-line (4 former residents) Total: 469 responses July 2011: 236 forms total
littlemountain planning program
Who Responded?
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
35% 17% 44% 4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
43% 22% 32% 2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 2. Public Space Focus
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
46% 26% 24% 3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 3. Connections
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
33% 23% 39% 5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 4. Sun & Shadow
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
41% 24% 29% 6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 5. Building Variety
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
littlemountain planning program
Guiding Principles
36% 22% 36% 6%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 6. View s
littlemountain planning program
Principles Summary
Performs Well Public spaces Connections through site Building variety Split Views Needs Work Relationship to neighbourhood Shadowing
littlemountain planning program
Principles – Open-ended
littlemountain planning program
Principles – Open-ended
Positive Commentary Praise for quality of site plan Visibly-improved design New residential opportunities Good project overall
littlemountain planning program
Principles – Open-ended
Negative Commentary Too dense – inappropriate scale Too much height Transitions to surrounding area Not enough green space Not enough social/affordable housing Holborn not listening to earlier input
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
1 2 3 4
Height
Not Enough Right Amount Too Many
2-6 7-9 10-12 13-14
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
1 2 3 4
Height
Not Enough Right Amount Too Many
2-6 7-9 10-12 13-14
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density
5% 6% 31% 15% 42%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much
8: Level of Density
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density – Open-ended
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density – Open-ended
Positive Commentary Appropriate scale for large site Density right if designed well Affordability – young people, 1st time home buyers Sustainability – accommodate growth Increase vibrancy in area
littlemountain planning program
Height & Density – Open-ended
Negative Commentary Incompatible with single-family homes, Main Street character Not downtown, not on rapid transit line Sensitivity of QE Park Too many new people in neighbourhood Community facilities already
- verwhelmed
Traffic impacts
littlemountain planning program
Community Benefits
40% 22% 37%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Yes Almost No
- 9. Level of Community Benefits
littlemountain planning program
Community Benefits
40% 22% 37%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Yes Almost No
- 9. Level of Community Benefits
littlemountain planning program
Community Benefits – Open ended
Some support for proposed benefits Additional childcare needed (>69 spaces) Existing facilities (e.g., Hillcrest) at capacity Additional affordable housing
20%, 1/3, tenures (co-op, rental)
More local-serving retail & services More green space and play space
littlemountain planning program
Additional Comments
“Get on with it!” vs. “back to the drawing board!” Attractive design
but too tall/dense
Opportunity for young families to live in area More social/affordable housing Too out-of-character
Height, density, design
littlemountain planning program
Paper Forms vs. Online
First time in process online forms used Limited to one form per household 30% of all responses on-line Most responses from immediate area 5%-15% difference between on-line and paper forms
– Generally more critical of the concept
littlemountain planning program
Paper Forms vs. Online
- 11%
- 3%
14% 1%
- 20%
- 10%
0% 10% 20% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood
14% difference in on-line vs. paper responses.
littlemountain planning program
Paper Forms vs. Online
0%
- 5%
1% 5%
- 20%
- 10%
0% 10% 20% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 3. Connections
littlemountain planning program
Paper Forms vs. Online
2%
- 2%
- 11%
2% 10%
- 20%
- 10%
0% 10% 20% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much
8: Level of Density
littlemountain planning program
Anomalies – 2011 Example
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1.45 2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 Density Concept
- 9. Transition to Neighbourhood
Meets Principle Almost Meets Principle Does Not Meet Principle
# of Responses
littlemountain planning program
Former Residents
70% 9% 13% 9%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood
Attended Open House or Submitted On-line (n=23)
littlemountain planning program
Former Residents
0% 0% 100% 0%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know
- 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood
Submitted Independently (n=16)
littlemountain planning program
Former Residents
0% 13% 50% 19% 19%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much
8: Level of Density
Attended Open House or Submitted On-line (n=23)
littlemountain planning program
Former Residents
0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much
8: Level of Density
Submitted Independently (n=16)
littlemountain planning program