Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

little mountain housing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

littlemountain Little Mountain Housing planning program Feedback from January 2012 Open Houses Presentation to Little Mountain Community Advisory Group littlemountain Overview planning program Open house attendance 409 signed in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

littlemountain planning program

Little Mountain Housing

Feedback from January 2012 Open Houses

Presentation to Little Mountain Community Advisory Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

littlemountain planning program

Overview

Open house attendance

409 signed in 600+ total

Comment forms submitted

326 paper (39 former residents) 143 on-line (4 former residents) Total: 469 responses July 2011: 236 forms total

slide-3
SLIDE 3

littlemountain planning program

Who Responded?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

slide-5
SLIDE 5

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

35% 17% 44% 4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood
slide-6
SLIDE 6

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

slide-7
SLIDE 7

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

43% 22% 32% 2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 2. Public Space Focus
slide-8
SLIDE 8

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

slide-9
SLIDE 9

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

46% 26% 24% 3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 3. Connections
slide-10
SLIDE 10

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

slide-11
SLIDE 11

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

33% 23% 39% 5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 4. Sun & Shadow
slide-12
SLIDE 12

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

slide-13
SLIDE 13

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

41% 24% 29% 6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 5. Building Variety
slide-14
SLIDE 14

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

slide-15
SLIDE 15

littlemountain planning program

Guiding Principles

36% 22% 36% 6%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 6. View s
slide-16
SLIDE 16

littlemountain planning program

Principles Summary

Performs Well Public spaces Connections through site Building variety Split Views Needs Work Relationship to neighbourhood Shadowing

slide-17
SLIDE 17

littlemountain planning program

Principles – Open-ended

slide-18
SLIDE 18

littlemountain planning program

Principles – Open-ended

Positive Commentary Praise for quality of site plan Visibly-improved design New residential opportunities Good project overall

slide-19
SLIDE 19

littlemountain planning program

Principles – Open-ended

Negative Commentary Too dense – inappropriate scale Too much height Transitions to surrounding area Not enough green space Not enough social/affordable housing Holborn not listening to earlier input

slide-20
SLIDE 20

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

1 2 3 4

Height

Not Enough Right Amount Too Many

2-6 7-9 10-12 13-14

slide-21
SLIDE 21

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

1 2 3 4

Height

Not Enough Right Amount Too Many

2-6 7-9 10-12 13-14

slide-22
SLIDE 22

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density

slide-23
SLIDE 23

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density

5% 6% 31% 15% 42%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much

8: Level of Density

slide-24
SLIDE 24

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density – Open-ended

slide-25
SLIDE 25

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density – Open-ended

Positive Commentary Appropriate scale for large site Density right if designed well Affordability – young people, 1st time home buyers Sustainability – accommodate growth Increase vibrancy in area

slide-26
SLIDE 26

littlemountain planning program

Height & Density – Open-ended

Negative Commentary Incompatible with single-family homes, Main Street character Not downtown, not on rapid transit line Sensitivity of QE Park Too many new people in neighbourhood Community facilities already

  • verwhelmed

Traffic impacts

slide-27
SLIDE 27

littlemountain planning program

Community Benefits

40% 22% 37%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Yes Almost No

  • 9. Level of Community Benefits
slide-28
SLIDE 28

littlemountain planning program

Community Benefits

40% 22% 37%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Yes Almost No

  • 9. Level of Community Benefits
slide-29
SLIDE 29

littlemountain planning program

Community Benefits – Open ended

Some support for proposed benefits Additional childcare needed (>69 spaces) Existing facilities (e.g., Hillcrest) at capacity Additional affordable housing

20%, 1/3, tenures (co-op, rental)

More local-serving retail & services More green space and play space

slide-30
SLIDE 30

littlemountain planning program

Additional Comments

“Get on with it!” vs. “back to the drawing board!” Attractive design

but too tall/dense

Opportunity for young families to live in area More social/affordable housing Too out-of-character

Height, density, design

slide-31
SLIDE 31

littlemountain planning program

Paper Forms vs. Online

First time in process online forms used Limited to one form per household 30% of all responses on-line Most responses from immediate area 5%-15% difference between on-line and paper forms

– Generally more critical of the concept

slide-32
SLIDE 32

littlemountain planning program

Paper Forms vs. Online

  • 11%
  • 3%

14% 1%

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood

14% difference in on-line vs. paper responses.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

littlemountain planning program

Paper Forms vs. Online

0%

  • 5%

1% 5%

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 3. Connections
slide-34
SLIDE 34

littlemountain planning program

Paper Forms vs. Online

2%

  • 2%
  • 11%

2% 10%

  • 20%
  • 10%

0% 10% 20% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much

8: Level of Density

slide-35
SLIDE 35

littlemountain planning program

Anomalies – 2011 Example

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1.45 2.0 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.0 3.25 Density Concept

  • 9. Transition to Neighbourhood

Meets Principle Almost Meets Principle Does Not Meet Principle

# of Responses

slide-36
SLIDE 36

littlemountain planning program

Former Residents

70% 9% 13% 9%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood

Attended Open House or Submitted On-line (n=23)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

littlemountain planning program

Former Residents

0% 0% 100% 0%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Meets principle Almost meets principle Does not meet principle Don’t know

  • 1. Relationship to Neighbourhood

Submitted Independently (n=16)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

littlemountain planning program

Former Residents

0% 13% 50% 19% 19%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much

8: Level of Density

Attended Open House or Submitted On-line (n=23)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

littlemountain planning program

Former Residents

0% 0% 0% 0% 100%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Not Enough Not Quite Enough Just Right A Bit Too Much Too Much

8: Level of Density

Submitted Independently (n=16)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

littlemountain planning program

Discussion

Questions & Comments Discussion Next Steps