liquid noble r d for dark matter and double beta decay
play

Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay Tom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 1 Dark matter and decay with liquid nobles Double beta decay EXO XMASS Dark matter LUX / LZ / XENON1T


  1. Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 1

  2. Dark matter and ßß decay with liquid nobles Double beta decay EXO XMASS Dark matter LUX / LZ / XENON1T DarkSide XAX / MAX / Darwin XMASS DEAP / CLEAN Xe Ar Ne T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 2

  3. Challenges • Dark matter: Two phase Xe TPC — Improve S1/S2 discrimination: Common goal: • Cathode HV near 500 kV detector masses of tons • Highest light yield to tens of tons — Kr removal — Xe purity for charge + light — External detector — Reduce backgrounds in PMTs plus other components • Dark matter: Two phase LAr TPC — Reduce huge 39 Ar background • PSD discrimination • Removal • Xe ßß decay — Backgrounds, backgrounds, backgrounds — Light collection — Ba tagging T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 3

  4. Self shielding of gamma backgrounds PMT • Dark matter: single low-energy Compton scatter must enter and escape scatter = L λ e − L P ( L ) ∼ λ • 136 Xe ßß Decay — Q=2480 keV endpoint, above most lines, except: • 208 Tl: 2614 keV, 100% BR • 214 Bi: 2448 keV, 1.57% BR — Simple self-shielding: − x P ( L ) = P o e λ • Weaker than DM case • Conclusion: ßß experiment requires much lower backgrounds in components. T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 4

  5. S1/S2 Discrimination C.E. Dahl, J. Kwong Electron recoil band width S1 [PE] 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 /S1)-ER mean 0.4 0.2 0.0 b (S2 -0.2 10 log -0.4 99.75% -0.6 -0.8 Recombination -1.0 ZEPLIN III: ~99.99% ~5 kV/cm XENON100 -1.2 10 20 30 40 50 Energy [keVnr] • Sophisticated understanding of underlying processes in Xe. — Now: NEST simulation — Postdiction of Zeplin III result • High field helps oblem.( (figure(from(M.(Szydagis)( • Light collection helps XENON10(level((730(V/cm)( • Calibration is challenge: tritiated methane source XENON100(level((530(V/cm)( XENON10( ( (LUX) ZEPLINQIII(levels((3.4(and( 3.9(kV/cm)( • Situation in LAr is largely unknown. T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 5 5 NEST

  6.   = ¡fraction ¡of ¡“prompt”/total ¡light     Pulse shape DEAP-1 data discrimination in LAr 120-240 pe 60 keVr thres. 9 with 8 pe/keVee • Remarkably good: roughly matched to very large 39 Ar background • Very sensitive to amount of light collection • DEAP-1: believe threshold is ~60 keVr ~7 ~12 ~30 • R&D: map to low energy, high separation T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 6

  7. Light collection • LAr: — Waveshifters • Needed because of XUV photons: PMTs, reflectors • Doesn’t poison LAr for charge drift — Large phase space for optical design, especially single- phase detector. — R&D: geometry, quality of waveshifter film: reflectivity Rate (mBq/p.e.) 20 • LXe 661.7keV 15 — PTFE has remarkably high reflectivity in LXe, 10 apparently consistent with 100%. 5 DarkSide10: 8.9 pe/keV • Not the gas in gas Xe under same conditions. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 S1 (p.e.) — Why? LUX: 8 pe/keV — Can this be reproducibly controlled? T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 7

  8. LAr: 39 Ar reduction • Raw background ~ 1 Bq/kg • Minimal goal for TPC running: reduce by 10-100. — Factor of ~10 8 would allow lowest threshold • Old Ar in underground gas, requires extensive separation system - Princeton Underground Argon Measurements Rate/(Bq/keV) — <6.5 mBq/kg AAr, @KURF UAr, @Surface -2 10 — 143 of 150 kg collected, stable UAr, @Surface, Muon Vetoed UAr, @KURF production at 1/2 kg/day -3 10 — NSF funded expansion up to 50 kg/ day -4 10 -5 10 -6 10 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Energy/keV T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 8

  9. High voltage • High voltage on cathode sets drift field Example: LUX HV feedthrough (Yale) — Key driver of S2/S1 disc. in Xe, at least. LUX • Difficult in both LXe and LAr W — Not a distinguished history to date Ra — Need > 100kV in Xe to improve discrimination in fi LZ beyond ~99.5% No • Feedthrough design pursued by several fl groups /experiments — Core challenge: passage through gas phase • Alternative - generate in liquid (e.g., Crockcroft Walton) • Electroluminesence in detector also a 100 kV achieved in 2 / 2 feedthroughs with no sign of breakdown or aging challenge Design appears scalable to — Demonstrated in small detectors at needed field ~300 kV T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 9

  10. PMTs • Hamamatsu R11410mod, 3” with high QE is PMT 238 U 232 Th 40 K 60 Co new “default” [mBq/ [mBq/ [mBq/ [mBq/ — Backgrounds ~ 20 times lower than PMT] PMT] PMT] PMT] previous 2” tube (R8778) R8778 9.5±0.6 2.7±0.3 66±2 2.6±0.1 — Beginning to become non-dominant compared to current TPC mechanics R11410 • Reliance on Hamamatsu! <0.4 <0.3 <8.3 2.0±0.2 MOD • QUPIDs - no longer being developed(?) R11410mod • PMTs unlikely to be replaced for DM -> highest possible coverage • SiPMTs being pursed by EXO — Light yield -> resolution, but background essential. T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 10

  11. External detector system: LZ, DarkSide • Veto • Near-hermetic background measurement: systematics Active Xe Liquid Xe Skin Scint. • LZ n capture — Neutron and gamma vetoing — Xe “skin” — Gd-loaded LAB scintillator Ti PTFE γ — “Daya-Bay” architecture • DarkSide Dark Side — Neutron veto — B-loaded scintillator -> n-alpha • Doesn’t require high gamma efficiency — SS vessel with high PMT count LZ • Relative importance decreases as mass increases: self shielding T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 11

  12. Materials backgrounds • Ti - are LUX Ti backgrounds reproducible? How low are they? • How low can PMTs go? • Rn control — Rn in liquid, from all components: need few mBq in Xe TPC • Requires SNO/Borexino “lite” emanation program — Rn daughters on PTFE. • alpha-n • Pb recoil in single-phase - acute issue. — Rn daughters in PTFE? • Kr in Xe, 39 Ar in LAr • ßß decay: everything. PMTs far from being allowed, all materials require extreme cleanliness — Screening an enormous challenge. — Need whole-body screener with radically lower backgrounds T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 12

  13. Xe purification • Electron drift over meters is significant challenge in LXe — apparently harder than LAr. • Commercial heated getter removes impurities: challenge is liquid circulation • LUX, others: high efficiency dual-phase heat exchanger • Analytical techniques: simple RGA + novel cryo-trap (UMD) • Liquid purification — Pump — Variation of spark purifiers LZ 0.5 ppt Kr scheme 184 Temperature (K) 0 slpm 7.2 slpm 42.0 slpm 183 182 IR Shield Cryostat Can 181 Xenon Vessel Flange 180 Displacement Blocks 179 178 177 176 Power (W) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 IR Shield 40 Cryostat Can Xenon Vessel Flange 30 Displacement Blocks Heater Power open leak valve 20 10 T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 0 13 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Time (s)

  14. Kr separation from Xe: dark matter • Equivalent pp-solar neutrino rate is 0.3 ppt. — 0~.01 ppt for good pp-solar measurement • Commercial Xe typically ~100 ppb. • LUX - chromatography at ~< 2 ppt @ 8 kg/day • XMASS, XENON100 - distillation - XMASS: < 2 ppt at 4.7 kg/ day • Sub ppt: — Key is sampling system — Emanation / leaks need serious attention for sub ppts. • Pre-bake of all required plastic T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend