Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay Tom - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

liquid noble r d for dark matter and double beta decay
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay Tom - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013 1 Dark matter and decay with liquid nobles Double beta decay EXO XMASS Dark matter LUX / LZ / XENON1T


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Liquid Noble R&D for dark matter and double beta decay

Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Dark matter and ßß decay with liquid nobles

Double beta decay

EXO XMASS

Dark matter

LUX / LZ / XENON1T DarkSide XAX / MAX / Darwin XMASS DEAP / CLEAN

2

Xe Ar Ne

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Challenges

  • Dark matter: Two phase Xe TPC

— Improve S1/S2 discrimination:

  • Cathode HV near 500 kV
  • Highest light yield

— Kr removal — Xe purity for charge + light — External detector — Reduce backgrounds in PMTs plus other components

  • Dark matter: Two phase LAr TPC

— Reduce huge 39Ar background

  • PSD discrimination
  • Removal
  • Xe ßß decay

— Backgrounds, backgrounds, backgrounds — Light collection — Ba tagging

3

Common goal: detector masses of tons to tens of tons

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Self shielding of gamma backgrounds

  • Dark matter: single low-energy Compton scatter

must enter and escape

  • 136Xe ßß Decay

— Q=2480 keV endpoint, above most lines, except:

  • 208Tl: 2614 keV, 100% BR
  • 214Bi: 2448 keV, 1.57% BR

— Simple self-shielding:

  • Weaker than DM case
  • Conclusion: ßß experiment requires much lower

backgrounds in components.

4

scatter PMT

P(L) ∼ = L λ e− L

λ

P(L) = P

  • e

− x λ

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

S1/S2 Discrimination

  • Sophisticated understanding of underlying processes

in Xe.

— Now: NEST simulation — Postdiction of Zeplin III result

  • High field helps
  • Light collection helps
  • Calibration is challenge: tritiated methane source

(LUX)

  • Situation in LAr is largely unknown.

5 5 Electron recoil band width

Recombination

C.E. Dahl, J. Kwong

ZEPLIN III: ~99.99% ~5 kV/cm

(

XENON100(level((530(V/cm)( ZEPLINQIII(levels((3.4(and( 3.9(kV/cm)( XENON10( XENON10(level((730(V/cm)(

  • blem.(

(figure(from(M.(Szydagis)(

NEST

Energy [keVnr] 10 20 30 40 50 /S1)-ER mean

b

(S2

10

log

  • 1.2
  • 1.0
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.0 0.2 0.4 S1 [PE] 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

XENON100 99.75%

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Pulse shape discrimination in LAr

  • Remarkably good: roughly matched to

very large 39Ar background

  • Very sensitive to amount of light

collection

  • DEAP-1: believe threshold is ~60 keVr
  • R&D: map to low energy, high

separation

6

9

   



 = ¡fraction ¡of ¡“prompt”/total ¡light DEAP-1 data 120-240 pe 60 keVr thres. with 8 pe/keVee

~30 ~12 ~7

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Light collection

  • LAr:

— Waveshifters

  • Needed because of XUV photons: PMTs, reflectors
  • Doesn’t poison LAr for charge drift

— Large phase space for optical design, especially single-

phase detector.

— R&D: geometry, quality of waveshifter film: reflectivity

  • LXe

— PTFE has remarkably high reflectivity in LXe,

apparently consistent with 100%.

  • Not the gas in gas Xe under same conditions.

— Why? — Can this be reproducibly controlled?

7

S1 (p.e.)

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Rate (mBq/p.e.)

5 10 15 20

661.7keV

DarkSide10: 8.9 pe/keV LUX: 8 pe/keV

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

LAr: 39Ar reduction

  • Raw background ~ 1 Bq/kg
  • Minimal goal for TPC running: reduce by 10-100.

— Factor of ~108 would allow lowest threshold

  • Old Ar in underground gas, requires extensive separation system -

Princeton

— <6.5 mBq/kg — 143 of 150 kg collected, stable

production at 1/2 kg/day

— NSF funded expansion up to 50 kg/

day

8

Energy/keV 200 400 600 800 1000 Rate/(Bq/keV)

  • 6

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

Underground Argon Measurements

AAr, @KURF UAr, @Surface UAr, @Surface, Muon Vetoed UAr, @KURF

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

High voltage

  • High voltage on cathode sets drift field

— Key driver of S2/S1 disc. in Xe, at least.

  • Difficult in both LXe and LAr

— Not a distinguished history to date — Need > 100kV in Xe to improve discrimination in

LZ beyond ~99.5%

  • Feedthrough design pursued by several

groups /experiments

— Core challenge: passage through gas phase

  • Alternative - generate in liquid (e.g.,

Crockcroft Walton)

  • Electroluminesence in detector also a

challenge

— Demonstrated in small detectors at needed field

9

LUX W Ra fi No fl

100 kV achieved in 2 / 2 feedthroughs with no sign of breakdown or aging

Example: LUX HV feedthrough (Yale) Design appears scalable to ~300 kV

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

PMTs

  • Hamamatsu R11410mod, 3” with high QE is

new “default”

— Backgrounds ~ 20 times lower than

previous 2” tube (R8778)

— Beginning to become non-dominant

compared to current TPC mechanics

  • Reliance on Hamamatsu!
  • QUPIDs - no longer being

developed(?)

  • PMTs unlikely to be replaced for DM
  • > highest possible coverage
  • SiPMTs being pursed by EXO

— Light yield -> resolution, but background

essential.

PMT

238U

[mBq/ PMT]

232Th

[mBq/ PMT]

40K

[mBq/ PMT]

60Co

[mBq/ PMT] R8778 9.5±0.6 2.7±0.3 66±2 2.6±0.1 R11410 MOD <0.4 <0.3 <8.3 2.0±0.2

R11410mod

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

External detector system: LZ, DarkSide

  • Veto
  • Near-hermetic background measurement: systematics
  • LZ

— Neutron and gamma vetoing — Xe “skin” — Gd-loaded LAB scintillator — “Daya-Bay” architecture

  • DarkSide

— Neutron veto — B-loaded scintillator -> n-alpha

  • Doesn’t require high gamma efficiency

— SS vessel with high PMT count

  • Relative importance decreases as mass increases: self shielding

11

Active Xe Xe Skin Liquid Scint. γ n capture PTFE Ti LZ Dark Side

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Materials backgrounds

  • Ti - are LUX Ti backgrounds reproducible? How low are they?
  • How low can PMTs go?
  • Rn control

— Rn in liquid, from all components: need few mBq in Xe TPC

  • Requires SNO/Borexino “lite” emanation program

— Rn daughters on PTFE.

  • alpha-n
  • Pb recoil in single-phase - acute issue.

— Rn daughters in PTFE?

  • Kr in Xe, 39Ar in LAr
  • ßß decay: everything. PMTs far from being allowed, all materials

require extreme cleanliness

— Screening an enormous challenge. — Need whole-body screener with radically lower backgrounds

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Xe purification

  • Electron drift over meters is significant challenge in LXe

— apparently harder than LAr.

  • Commercial heated getter removes impurities: challenge is

liquid circulation

  • LUX, others: high efficiency dual-phase heat exchanger
  • Analytical techniques: simple RGA + novel cryo-trap (UMD)
  • Liquid purification

— Pump — Variation of spark purifiers

13

Time (s) 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Power (W) 10 20 30 40 IR Shield Cryostat Can Xenon Vessel Flange Displacement Blocks Heater Power 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Temperature (K) 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 IR Shield Cryostat Can Xenon Vessel Flange Displacement Blocks 0 slpm 7.2 slpm 42.0 slpm

0.5 ppt Kr

  • pen leak valve

LZ scheme

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • T. Shutt - Argonne, 1/11/2013

Kr separation from Xe: dark matter

  • Equivalent pp-solar neutrino rate is 0.3 ppt.

— 0~.01 ppt for good pp-solar measurement

  • Commercial Xe typically ~100 ppb.
  • LUX - chromatography at ~< 2 ppt @ 8 kg/day
  • XMASS, XENON100 - distillation - XMASS: < 2 ppt at 4.7 kg/

day

  • Sub ppt:

— Key is sampling system — Emanation / leaks need serious attention for sub ppts.

  • Pre-bake of all required plastic

14