"Life is like playing a violin in a concert while learning to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
"Life is like playing a violin in a concert while learning to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
"Life is like playing a violin in a concert while learning to play and creating the score as you are playing." Rabinovic et al, (2012, p. 2) IMPORTANT FACTS 1- Approx. 80% of Neurons are Excitatory & 20% are Inhibitory 2- Pyramidal
IMPORTANT FACTS 1- Approx. 80% of Neurons are Excitatory & 20% are Inhibitory 4- Neurons are Connected in Loops and are Self-Organizing & Stable because
- f Refractoriness of Excitatory Neurons
3- The EEG is the Summation of Synaptic Potentials and Changes in the Frequency Spectrum Occur by Changes in Synaptic Potentials 6- EEG Biofeedback is Operant Learning in which a EEG event is followed by a signal that predicts a future reward. This results in the release of Dopamine that alters synapses related to a ‘trace’ of the EEG event that
- ccurred in the past.
Eric Kandel “In Search of Memory” Norton & Co., 2006 – Nobel Prize 2000 Gyorgy Buzsaki “Rhythms of the Brain”, Oxford Univ. Press, 2006
2- Pyramidal neurons have resonant oscillations controlled by the membrane potential, ionic conductances and feedback loops 5- Neurons operate in large Modules that are Cross-Frequency Sycnhronized with Phase Shift and Phase Lock as Basic Mechanisms
Reinforced with In-Phase
Suppressed if Out-of-phase
In-Phase is Reinforced Out-of-Phase is Suppressed Thalamic Gating to the Neurocortex In-Phase is Reinforced Out-of-Phase is Suppressed
Frontal Lobe
Thinking, Planning, Motor execution, Executive Functions, Mood Control
Occipital Lobe
Visual perception & Spatial processing
Parietal Lobe
somatosensory perception integration
- f visual & somatospatial information
Temporal Lobe
language function and auditory perception involved in long term memory and emotion
Brodmann Areas
Parahippocampal Gyrus
Short-term memory, attention
Anterior Cingulate Gyrus
Volitional movement, attention, long term memory
Posterior Cingulate
attention, long-term memory
ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ
Phase difference at t1, t2, t3, t4 = 450 Phase difference at t5, t6, t7, t8 = 100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+
- Time
1st Derivative of Phase-Difference
EEG Phase Reset as a Phase Transition in the Time Domain
00 900
ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ
Phase difference at
t1, t2, t3, t4 = 450
Phase difference at
t5, t6, t7, t8 = 1350
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+
- Time
r2 r1
r1 r2
1st Derivative of Phase-Difference Negative 1st Derivative Positive 1st Derivative
1st Derivative deg/100 msec Phase Difference - deg
Phase Synchrony Interval Phase Shift
Phase Shift Duration Fp1-Fp1 Fp1-F3 Fp1-C3 Fp1-P3 Fp1-O1 Fp1-Fp1 Fp1-F3 Fp1-C3 Fp1-P3 Fp1-O1
Phase Difference in Degrees 1st Derivative deg/100 msec
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
LEFT Anterior - Posterior
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
RIGHT Anterior - Posterior
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
LEFT Posterior - Anterior
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
RIGHT Posterior - Anterior
40 45 50 55 60 65 70
6 cm 12 cm 18 cm 24 cm
Development of Phase Shift Duration
24 cm 6 cm 24 cm 6 cm 24 cm 6 cm 24 cm 6 cm
6 cm 12 cm 18 cm 24 cm
Development of Phase Synchrony Interval
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
LEFT Anterior - Posterior
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
RIGHT Anterior - Posterior
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
LEFT Posterior - Anterior
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
AGEs (0.44 – 16.22 Years) milliseconds
. 4 4 1 . 6 1 2 . 5 9 3 . 4 9 4 . 4 5 5 . 5 6 . 4 9 7 . 5 2 8 . 4 9 . 5 6 1 . 4 4 1 1 . 4 6 1 2 . 5 2 1 3 . 5 1 1 4 . 4 5 1 5 . 4 5 1 6 . 2 2
RIGHT Posterior - Anterior
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
6 cm 24 cm 24 cm 6 cm 6 cm 24 cm 6 cm 24 cm
Published in NeuroImage – NeuroImage, 42(4): 1639-1653, 2008.
INTELLIGENCE AND EEG PHASE RESET: A TWO COMPARTMENTAL MODEL OF PHASE SHIFT AND LOCK
Thatcher, R. W. 1,2, North, D. M.1, and Biver, C. J.1 EEG and NeuroImaging Laboratory, Applied Neuroscience Research Institute.
- St. Petersburg, Fl1 and Department of Neurology, University of South Florida
College of Medicine, Tampa, Fl.2
Regressions & Correlations of Phase Shift Duration Short Distances (6 cm) Regressions & Correlations of Phase Locking Interval Short Distances (6 cm)
r = .876 @ p< .01 r = .954 @ p< .0001 r = .868 @ p< .01 r = .874 @ p< .01 r = -.875 @ p< .01 r = -.930 @ p< .001 r = -.895 @ p< .01 r = -.985 @ p< .0001 IQ = 78 + 13.78 x (msec) IQ = 70 +11.85 x (msec) IQ = 75 + 24.45 x (msec) IQ = 68 + 34.40 x (msec) IQ = 143 - 3.11 x (msec) IQ = 142 - 3.36 x (msec) IQ = 132 - 4.57 x (msec) IQ = 140 - 20.08 x (msec)
Phase Shift Duration (SD) Phase Lock Duration (LD)
150 350 Full Scale I.Q. Time (msec) 40 60 Full Scale I.Q. Time (msec) 50 250 EPSP Duration Average SD LD Average
Pyramidal Cell Model of EEG Phase Reset and Full Scale I.Q.
High Low High Low Distant EPSP Loop Connections LD Local IPSP Connections SD
ef LFP Pr
Θ − Θ = ∆Φ
LFP
AUTISM AND EEG PHASE RESET: A UNIFIED THEORY OF DEFICIENT GABA MEDIATED INHIBITION IN THALAMO-CORTICAL CONNECTIONS
Thatcher, R. W. 1,2, Phillip DeFina2, James Neurbrander2, North, D. M.1, and Biver, C. J.1 EEG and NeuroImaging Laboratory, Applied Neuroscience Research Institute., St. Petersburg, Fl1 and the International Brain Research Foundation, Menlo Park, NJ2
Shift Duration Short Distances Lock Duration Short Distances Lock Duration Long Distances Shift Duration Long Distances
Msec
46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 DELTA THETA ALPHA1 ALPHA2 BETA1 BETA2 HI-BETA
Autism Normals
NS =.0308 <.0001 =.0299 NS =.0060 NS T-Tests (p):
Msec
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 DELTA THETA ALPHA1 ALPHA2 BETA1 BETA2 HI-BETA
Autism Normals
<.0001 <.0048 NS <.0001 <.0001 NS =.0002 T-Tests (p):
Msec
52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 DELTA THETA ALPHA1 ALPHA2 BETA1 BETA2 HI-BETA
Autism Normals
=.0487 =.0120 <.0001 =.0053 <.0001 <.0001 =.0360 T-Tests (p):
Msec
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 DELTA THETA ALPHA1 ALPHA2 BETA1 BETA2 HI-BETA
Autism Normals
<.0001 NS NS <.0001 <.0001 NS <.0001 T-Tests (p):
- C. Alpha2 Lock Duration Short Distances
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Autism Normals
msec msec
- A. Alpha1 Shift Duration Short Distances
Autism Normals
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
msec
- D. Alpha2 Lock Duration Long Distances
Autism Normals
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
msec
- B. Alpha1 Shift Duration Long Distances
Autism Normals
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
MSEC TOTAL COUNT
Central Frontal Occipital
AUTISM - ALPHA2 – PHASE LOCK DURATION 6cm INTER-ELECTRODE DISTANCES
TEMPORAL QUANTA AND EEG LORETA PHASE RESET
Thatcher, R.W. North, D.M. and Biver, C. J. EEG and NeuroImaging Laboratory, Applied Neuroscience, Inc., St. Petersburg, Fl
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
msec
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
msec
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
msec
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
msec
X-Shift Z-Shift Y-Shift R-Shift
Phase Reset Shift Duration LORETA Default Brain Brodmann Area Pairs
Brodmann Areas (8 & 9) Left Brodmann Areas (30 & 31) Left Brodmann Areas (36 & 39) Left
Eyes Closed Eyes Opened
Brodmann Areas (8 & 9) Left Brodmann Areas (23 & 30) Left Brodmann Areas (9 & 39) Left Brodmann Areas (28 & 36) Left Brodmann Areas (30 & 31) Left Brodmann Areas (24 & 29) Left Brodmann Areas (8 & 9) Right Brodmann Areas (23 & 39) Right Brodmann Areas (31 & 32) Right
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Y-Lock
Eyes Closed Eyes Opened
Brodmann Areas (8 & 10) Right Brodmann Areas (21 & 36) Right
X-Lock
Brodmann Areas (8 & 40) Right Brodmann Areas (21 & 36) Right
msec msec
Z-Lock
Brodmann Areas (28 & 32) Right Brodmann Areas (28 & 30) Right
msec
R-Lock
Brodmann Areas (9 & 30) Right Brodmann Areas (24 & 32) Right
msec
Phase Reset Lock Duration LORETA Default Brain Brodmann Area Pairs
Relations Between Phase Reset Shift & Lock Means and the Euclidean Distance Between Voxels
Distance (mm)
Shift Group Means (msec) Distance (mm)
R = .633; p <= .0001
Left Phase Shift
Distance (mm)
Lock Group Means (msec) Distance (mm)
R = -.505; p <= .0001
Left Phase Lock
Shift Group Means (msec) Distance (mm)
R = .491; p = .0027
Right Phase Shift
Lock Group Means (msec) Distance (mm)
R = -.379; p = .0249
Right Phase Lock
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
msec
Quanta Phase Shift Durations: N = 140 Under Each Quanta Duration
Brodmann Areas (8 & 9) Left Brodmann Areas (30 & 31) Left Brodmann Areas (36 & 39) Left
Eyes Closed Eyes Opened
A 1 2 3 Temporal Quanta
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 200 400 600 800 1000 25 35 45 55 65
Euclidean Distance Between Brodmann Areas (mm) msec
Phase Lock Duration Phase Shift Duration
Gap = 135 msec
B Non-Linear Exponential Brodmann Area Distances: Shift vs Lock
Published as a chapter in “Introduction to QEEG and Neurofeedback: Advanced Theory and Applications” Thomas Budzinsky, H. Budzinski, J. Evans and A. Abarbanel editors, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, 2008.
Normative EEG Amplifiers Patient EEG Amplifiers
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24 24.5 25 25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5 29 29.5 30 30.5 20 40 60 80 100 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 1 10.5 11 1 1.5 1 2 12.5 13 1 3.5 1 4 1 4.5 1 5 15.5 16 1 6.5 1 7 1 7.5 18 18.5 1 9 1 9.5 20 20.5 21 21.5 22 22.5 23 23.5 24 24.5 25 25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5 29 29.5 30 30.5Frequency 0 – 40 Hz uV Frequency 0 – 40 Hz Equilibration Ratio
Normative Database Amplifier Matching – Microvolt Sine Waves 0 to 40 Hz Equilibration Ratios to Match Frequency Responses
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 Delta Theta Alpha Beta Correlation Coefficient
Absolute Power
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 Delta Theta Alpha Beta Correlation Coefficient
Relative Power
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 Delta Theta Alpha Beta Correlation Coefficient
Coherence
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 Delta Theta Alpha Beta Correlation Coefficient
Amplitude Asymmetry
Cross-Validation of NeuroGuide vs NxLink
Anterior Posterior
Correlations between DSCOREs with FULL IQ, VERB IQ, & PERF IQ
r = .829 p < .0001
PERF IQ Discriminant Scores with PERF IQ
PERF IQ DSCOREs r = -.815 p < .0001
VERB IQ Discriminant Scores with VERB IQ
VERB IQ DSCOREs
FULL IQ Discriminant Scores with FULL IQ
r = -.800 p < .0001 FULL IQ DSCOREs
Histograms of Discriminant Functions using IQ Score Measures
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
- 5
- 3
- 1
1 3 5
VERB IQ <= 90 VERB IQ >= 120 90 < VERB IQ < 120 EEG Discriminant Scores
N = 95 N = 270 N = 77
VERBAL IQ
PROPORTION PER POPULATION
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
- 5
- 3
- 1
1 3 5
PERF IQ <= 90 PERF IQ >= 120 90 < PERF IQ < 120 EEG Discriminant Scores
N = 67 N = 302 N = 73
PERFORMANCE IQ
PROPORTION PER POPULATION
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
- 5
- 3
- 1
1 3 5
PROPORTION PER POPULATION EEG Discriminant Scores FULL IQ <= 90 FULL IQ >= 120 90 < FULL IQ < 120
N = 97 N = 267 N = 70
FULL IQ
M ultiple R egressions of Q E E G w ith FU LL IQ
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 0.900 1.000 P hase D ifference C
- herence P
hase R eset per S econd P hase R eset Locking Interval M eans A m plitude A sym m etry P hase R eset D uration M eans B urst A m plitude M eans abs(O U T- P H A S E ) C ross S pectral P
- w
er abs(IN
- P
H A S E ) A bsolute P
- w
er P hase R eset A m plitude M eans P eak Frequency Q E E G ME A S U R E MULTIPLE
Essentials of Operant Conditioning 1- Specificity – Reinforce EEG events in hubs/modules in networks related to the patient’s symptoms. Minimize compensatory hubs/modules. 4- The interval of time between the spontaneous ‘emitted EEG event’ & the ‘feedback signal’ can not be too short, approx. < 250 msec? or too long
- approx. 20 sec?
2- The ‘Feedback Signal’ must predict a large & significant future reward 3- Discrete and novel feedback signals increase the probability of linking the signal and a future reward, i.e., “contingency”
Principles
1- Specificity of EEG Event (E) = Neural State Interval (I) 2- Contiguity Window ( C) = Time period preceding and following a E 3- Contingency of Reward Signal (S) = Feedback signal time locked to E 4- Reward Strength ( R) = Value of the reward if N successes occur in an interval of time, e.g., toys, candy, cookies, money, etc.
Ordinal or Nominal measure Reward Strength (R) Feedback signal time locked to E (msec) Contingency of Reward Signal (S) Time preceding/following E (msec – sec) Contiguity Window (C) Z Scores and Brodmann areas linked to symptoms Specificity of EEG Event (E)
A General Theory of EEG Operant Conditioning and Z Score Biofeedback
Category Measurement
Example of Bursts of Theta Rhythms (4 – 8 Hz) in the Human EEG Burst Duration approx. 200 msec to 600 msec
Moving Window of Operant Learning Quanta
Preconscious Phase Shift Neural Recruitment 250
- 250
- 500
- 750
- 1,000