Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update Levy 2010 Update & Key - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

levy year 2010 property tax update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update Levy 2010 Update & Key - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Consolidated School District 158 Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update Levy 2010 Update & Key Points In accordance with PTELL, the District increased its levied taxes from prior years extension by CPI, or 2.7% - From $59.2M to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update

Consolidated School District 158

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Levy 2010 Update & Key Points

  • In accordance with PTELL, the District increased its levied

taxes from prior year’s extension by CPI, or 2.7% - From $59.2M to $60.7M.

  • Estimated aggregated EAV, at the time of the 2010 Levy,

approximated a 5% decrease in EAV. Actual EAV for the District, after Board of Review and the State equalizer, resulted in an approximate $171M, or 12% decrease in

  • EAV. Kane’s EAV decreased 2.77% versus McHenry’s EAV

decreasing 14.1% (after the State Equalizer).

  • New Construction was estimated at $11.61M and came in at

$11.70M

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Levy 2010 Update & Key Points

  • For the first time in 28 years, the Illinois Department of

Revenue issued a State multiplier (equalizer) to McHenry County of 3.48% .

  • The District’s Tax Rate, as a result of the above, increased

from $4.12 in prior year to approximately $4.88 in the current year. The McHenry County rate approximates $4.81 and the Kane County rate approximates $4.95.

  • The result of the above, is a major shifting of the tax

burden within the District.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CPI, EAV & Tax Rate

CPI CPI CPI EAV EAV EAV Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Shifting of Tax Burden Overview

Taxing District’s Needs (The Levy) $61M Subject to PTELL *

The Allocation

(Managed by the Township and County Assessors, based on assessed values) Reflects a 2.7% Increase **

Reflects a shifting of property tax due to the significant number of properties reassessed.

* PTELL protects property tax payers by limiting the increase in property tax extensions (from taxing bodies) to 5% or CPI, whichever is less. ** Prior year’s levy increase, excluding new construction, was at CPI of .01%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Impact of Declining Assessed Values

Assumptions

Assessed Value 300,000 Equalized Assessed Value 100,000 Per $100 of EAV 1,000 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 District Tax Rate

EAV -30% EAV -15% EAV -5% EAV Flat District

2011 Property Tax - McHenry 4.81 #

3,367 4,089 4,570 4,810 61,171,097

  • 18%
  • 1%

11% 17% 2.7% ^ 2011 Property Tax - Kane 4.95 #

3,465 4,208 4,703 4,950

  • 16%

2% 14% 20% 2010 Property Tax ('09 Levy) 4.12 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 59,177,271

# Kane County's rate approximates $4.95, McHenry County's rate approximates $4.81 - The difference in rates is due to the State Equalizer ^ Before New Construction

All amounts are estimated

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Matrix of Potential Impact by County

Assumptions

Assessed Value 300,000 Equalized Assessed Value 100,000 Per $100 of EAV 1,000 District Tax Rate

  • 35%
  • 30%
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 15%
  • 10%
  • 5%

0% 2011 Property Tax - McHenry 4.81 #

3,127 3,367 3,608 3,848 4,089 4,329 4,570 4,810

  • 24%
  • 18%
  • 12%
  • 7%
  • 1%

5% 11% 17% 2011 Property Tax - Kane 4.95 #

3,218 3,465 3,713 3,960 4,208 4,455 4,703 4,950

  • 22%
  • 16%
  • 10%
  • 4%

2% 8% 14% 20% 2010 Property Tax ('09 Levy) 4.12 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120

# Kane County's estimated rate approximates $4.95, McHenry County's estimated rate approximates $4.81 - The difference in rates is due to the State Equalizer

Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) Reduction

All amounts are estimated