Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update Levy 2010 Update & Key - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update Levy 2010 Update & Key - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Consolidated School District 158 Levy Year 2010 Property Tax Update Levy 2010 Update & Key Points In accordance with PTELL, the District increased its levied taxes from prior years extension by CPI, or 2.7% - From $59.2M to
Levy 2010 Update & Key Points
- In accordance with PTELL, the District increased its levied
taxes from prior year’s extension by CPI, or 2.7% - From $59.2M to $60.7M.
- Estimated aggregated EAV, at the time of the 2010 Levy,
approximated a 5% decrease in EAV. Actual EAV for the District, after Board of Review and the State equalizer, resulted in an approximate $171M, or 12% decrease in
- EAV. Kane’s EAV decreased 2.77% versus McHenry’s EAV
decreasing 14.1% (after the State Equalizer).
- New Construction was estimated at $11.61M and came in at
$11.70M
Levy 2010 Update & Key Points
- For the first time in 28 years, the Illinois Department of
Revenue issued a State multiplier (equalizer) to McHenry County of 3.48% .
- The District’s Tax Rate, as a result of the above, increased
from $4.12 in prior year to approximately $4.88 in the current year. The McHenry County rate approximates $4.81 and the Kane County rate approximates $4.95.
- The result of the above, is a major shifting of the tax
burden within the District.
CPI, EAV & Tax Rate
CPI CPI CPI EAV EAV EAV Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate
Shifting of Tax Burden Overview
Taxing District’s Needs (The Levy) $61M Subject to PTELL *
The Allocation
(Managed by the Township and County Assessors, based on assessed values) Reflects a 2.7% Increase **
Reflects a shifting of property tax due to the significant number of properties reassessed.
* PTELL protects property tax payers by limiting the increase in property tax extensions (from taxing bodies) to 5% or CPI, whichever is less. ** Prior year’s levy increase, excluding new construction, was at CPI of .01%
Impact of Declining Assessed Values
Assumptions
Assessed Value 300,000 Equalized Assessed Value 100,000 Per $100 of EAV 1,000 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 District Tax Rate
EAV -30% EAV -15% EAV -5% EAV Flat District
2011 Property Tax - McHenry 4.81 #
3,367 4,089 4,570 4,810 61,171,097
- 18%
- 1%
11% 17% 2.7% ^ 2011 Property Tax - Kane 4.95 #
3,465 4,208 4,703 4,950
- 16%
2% 14% 20% 2010 Property Tax ('09 Levy) 4.12 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 59,177,271
# Kane County's rate approximates $4.95, McHenry County's rate approximates $4.81 - The difference in rates is due to the State Equalizer ^ Before New Construction
All amounts are estimated
Matrix of Potential Impact by County
Assumptions
Assessed Value 300,000 Equalized Assessed Value 100,000 Per $100 of EAV 1,000 District Tax Rate
- 35%
- 30%
- 25%
- 20%
- 15%
- 10%
- 5%
0% 2011 Property Tax - McHenry 4.81 #
3,127 3,367 3,608 3,848 4,089 4,329 4,570 4,810
- 24%
- 18%
- 12%
- 7%
- 1%
5% 11% 17% 2011 Property Tax - Kane 4.95 #
3,218 3,465 3,713 3,960 4,208 4,455 4,703 4,950
- 22%
- 16%
- 10%
- 4%
2% 8% 14% 20% 2010 Property Tax ('09 Levy) 4.12 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120 4,120
# Kane County's estimated rate approximates $4.95, McHenry County's estimated rate approximates $4.81 - The difference in rates is due to the State Equalizer
Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) Reduction
All amounts are estimated