Legal Notice This presentation includes certain forward looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Legal Notice This presentation includes certain forward looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Legal Notice This presentation includes certain forward looking information (FLI) to provide Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (EEP) and Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (EEQ) investors and potential investors with information about
Legal Notice
2
This presentation includes certain forward looking information (“FLI”) to provide Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (“EEP”) and Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (“EEQ”) investors and potential investors with information about EEP and EEQ and management’s assessment of the future plans and operations, which may not be appropriate for other purposes. FLI involves statements that frequently use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “position,” “projection,” “should,” “strategy,” “will” and similar words. Although we believe that such forward looking statements are reasonable based
- n currently available information, such statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of performance.
Future actions, conditions or events and future results of operations may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking
- statements. Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond EEP’s ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could
cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include: (1) changes in the demand for or the supply of, forecast data for and price trends related to crude oil, liquid petroleum, natural gas and NGLs, including the rate of development of the Alberta Oil Sands; (2) EEP’s ability to successfully complete and finance expansion projects; (3) the effects of competition, in particular, by other pipeline systems; (4) shut-downs or cutbacks at facilities of EEP or refineries, petrochemical plants, utilities or other businesses for which EEP transports products or to whom EEP sells products; (5) hazards and operating risks that may not be covered fully by insurance, including those related to Line 6B and any additional fines and penalties assessed in connection with the crude oil release on that line; (6) changes in or challenges to EEP’s tariff rates; (7) changes in laws or regulations to which EEP is subject, including compliance with environmental and operational safety regulations that may increase costs of system integrity testing and maintenance; and (8) inability of any party to consummate the proposed transaction. FLI regarding “drop-down” sales opportunities for our ownership in Midcoast Operating, L.P. are further qualified by the fact that Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. is under no obligation to buy any of our interests in Midcoast Operating, L.P., and we are under no obligation to sell any such additional interests. As a result, we do not know when or if any such additional interests will be sold. Our FLI is also subject to risks and uncertainties pertaining to operating performance, regulatory parameters, project approval and support, weather, economic conditions, interest rates and commodity prices, including but not limited to those discussed more extensively in our filings with U.S. securities regulators. The impact of any one risk, uncertainty or factor on any particular FLI is not determinable with certainty as these are interdependent and our future course of action depends on management’s assessment of all information available at the relevant time. Any FLI in this presentation is based only on information currently available to us and speaks only of the date on which it is made. Except to the extent required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any FLI, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All FLI in this presentation is expressly qualified in its entirety by these cautionary statements and by such other factors as discussed in EEP’s and EEQ’s SEC filings, including its most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Corporate Structure
3
Corporate structure as of August 14, 2014
48.4% LP interest 46% LP interest 2% GP interest 52% LP interest 51.5% LP interest
Public Unitholders
88.3% of listed shares
Public Unitholders
2% GP interest 29.9% LP interest (indirect)
Enbridge Inc. (NYSE: ENB) (Baa1 / A-) Enbridge Energy Management, L.L.C. (NYSE: EEQ)
16.7% LP interest (I-units) 11.7% of listed shares 100% voting interest
Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: EEP) (Baa2 / BBB)
51.6% LP interest
Midcoast Operating, L.P. “Midcoast Operating”
100% interest (indirect)
Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: MEP) Public Unitholders
Enbridge Inc. owns ~34% of EEP
4
Strong Business Fundamentals: Strength & Stability
Migrating to a Much Lower Risk Business Model Strong General Partner Stable Distributions & Prudent Growth Attractive Yield
Investment Proposition
4
Investment Highlights
5
*Enterprise Value as of 7/31/14; **Return CAGR since inception (nominal)
One of the longest established pipeline MLPs (1991) Track record of consistently delivering cash distributions (never reduced) Largest pipeline transporter of crude oil production growth from Western Canada Largest pipeline transporter of crude oil production growth from Bakken formation
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000
Total Shareholder Return
1991 2013
Enterprise Value - Large-Cap MLP Commercially secured organic growth underway
Strong Investment Grade
(S&P, Moody’s, DBRS)
Low-risk transformative growth underway
~$1.8 billion of growth capital placed in service ~$3.1 billion of funding secured IPO carve-out of natural gas & NGL business ~ position EEP as pure-play liquids pipeline MLP
Highlights 2013 Highlights
Attractive Investment Proposition
* As of August 15, 2014
Williams Nustar Energy Transfer EEP Buckeye Kinder Morgan Oneok Plains All American Spectra Partners Enterprise
Magellan Midstream Sunoco Logistics
Boardwalk
FTSE NAREIT S&P 500 Utilities
10-Yr Treasury Notes
S&P 500
0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10%
Peer average: 4.9%
EEP: 6.3%
MLPs*
Other Asset Classes*
Attractive Yield
6
Financial Highlights
Market Cap* $15B Yield* 6.3% Distribution $2.22/unit annual
Total Shareholder Return (10yr CAGR)
9% Credit Rating (S&P, Moody’s, DBRS) Investment Grade BBB/Baa2/BBB 2014 Adjusted EBITDA Guidance $1.5 to $1.6 Billion
Key Assets
Liquids Deliveries of ~ 2.2 MMbpd Transportation Pipelines 6,265 miles Gathering Pipelines 240 miles of pipe Storage Capacity 39.4 MM bbls
Natural Gas Deliveries of ~ 2.5 bcf/d
Gathering & Transportation Pipelines 11,400 miles Processing Capacity (26 plants) 2.3 Bcf/d Treating Capacity (11 plants) 1.3 Bcf/d
Distribution Growth Target
7
Organic growth platform supports distribution growth
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2017e
2% - 5% Annual Growth Target
2.7% 4.2%
- 3.8%
3.6% 2.1%
- 2.1%
Momentum to achieve higher end of growth target
65% 62% 19%
- Owner and operator of largest crude
- il pipeline system
- ~$42 billion equity market cap
- Strong investment grade (A-, Baa1)
- Proven track record: industry leading
EPS and DPS growth
- 5 year EPS CAGR of 14%
- 5 year DPS CAGR of 14%
- Strategy aligned with Partnership
- ~$37 billion commercially secured
- rganic growth program underway
Strength of GP – Enbridge Inc.
8
ENB: North American leader in energy delivery
Strategic Position
9
Norman Wells Zama Portland Seattle Casper Montreal Salt Lake City Patoka Cushing Ottawa Superior Chicago Clearbrook Regina Flanagan Hardisty Toledo Toronto Sarnia Buffalo Wood River Edmonton Fort McMurray Houston
- St. James
Philadelphia Cromer
- St. John
WCSB BAKKEN EEP Contract Storage EEP Liquids Pipelines ENB Liquids Pipelines
Competitive Advantages
- Refiners
– Access to multiple crude streams
- Producers
– Access to multiple premium markets
- Flexible system
- Size and scale unmatched
– Will expand to ~2.85 MMb/d in 2017
Positioned for Long-Term Growth
- Direct connection to growing supply basins (Heavy
& Light)
High quality customer base ENB and EEP Strategically Aligned
OTHER
ENB
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 MMb/d
2013 Enbridge Upside Forecast Optimal Pipeline Capacity Supply Forecast
WCSB Supply Forecast vs. Pipeline Takeaway Capacity*
10
*Includes Bakken entering ENB Mainline ex-Superior Sources: Enbridge Internal Forecast
Keystone XL ENB Northern Gateway TransMountain Expansion Energy East
11
Range of External Supply Forecasts
Tesoro Mandan Refinery Enbridge Berthold Rail ND
Baker Take-away (Platte)
Plains Bakken North
Enbridge Sandpiper*
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
MMb/d
Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Enbridge North Dakota system
* Sandpiper construction to be funded 37.5% by Marathon Petroleum Corp; Marathon to assume ~27% equity participation in expanded EEP North Dakota System after
Sandpiper in-service.
Bakken Crude Oil Supply vs. Pipeline Takeaway Capacity
North American Crude Oil Price Fundamentals
12
$106 $102 $91
Alberta Light
Bakken Brent Maya Asia $89 $102 LLS WCS $90 $80 $98
Light Crude Heavy Crude
$101 WTI
Light Differentials
8/14/14 1/30/13 Brent – WTI
$4 $19
LLS – WTI
$4 $18
Asia – WTI
$8 $22
WTI – Bakken
$8 $3
WTI - Alberta Light
$9 $6 Heavy Differentials
8/14/14 1/30/13 Maya – WCS
$11 $39
Asia – WCS
$21 $44
Significant Infrastructure Investment Opportunities
August 14, 2014 prices (in US$/bbl)
North American Supply North American Demand Transportation Bottlenecks Volatile Price Differentials
Providing New Market Access
13
Norman Wells Zama Edmonton Fort McMurray Portland Seattle Casper Montreal Salt Lake City Patoka Cushing Superior Chicago Clearbrook Regina Flanagan Hardisty Toledo Sarnia Buffalo Houston
- St. James
Cromer
- St. John
+600 kbpd Heavy
+80 kbpd Heavy +250 kbpd Light +50 kbpd Heavy
+300 kbpd Light
Western USGC Access Eastern Access Light Oil Market Access
+50 kbpd Light
Opening New Markets for up to 1.7 million barrels per day
+ ~1.0 MMbpd of Heavy and + ~0.7 MMbpd of Light
+50 kbpd Light
Nanticoke
+250 kbpd Heavy
Organic Growth Projects:
Commercially secured Low risk framework Long-term contracts
Montreal Gretna Regina Hardisty Kerrobert Toledo Buffalo Edmonton
Houston
Fort McMurray Cromer Cushing Patoka Chicago/ Flanagan Sarnia Superior Port Arthur
Market Access Programs
14
Westover
+600 kbpd
+300 kbpd +440 kbpd
+80 kbpd
+320 kpbd
2013
Bakken Pipeline Expansion+ Berthold Rail - EEP Line 5 Expansion (+50 kbpd) - EEP Line 62 Expansion (+105 kbpd) - EEP Line 9A Reversal (+50 kbpd) - ENB Toledo Pipeline Partial Twin (+80 kbpd) - ENB Seaway Pipeline Expansion (+400 kbpd) - ENB
2014
Line 6B Replacement (+260 kbpd) – EEP Line 61 (+160 kbpd) - EEP
- Line 67 (+120 kbpd) (1)- EEP
- Line 9B Reversal + Expansion (+320 kbpd) - ENB
- Flanagan South Pipeline (+600 kbpd) - ENB
- Seaway Twin + Lateral (+450 kbpd) - ENB
2015
- Line 67 (+230 kbpd) – ENB/EEP
- Line 61 (+640 kbpd) - EEP
- Chicago Area Connectivity (+570 kbpd) – EEP
- Southern Access Extension (+300 kbpd) - ENB
- Edmonton to Hardisty (+570 kbpd) - ENB
2016
- Sandpiper Pipeline (+225/+375 kbpd) – EEP
- Line 6B Expansion (+70kbpd) - EEP
Market Access Programs Bolster Lakehead System Utilization
(1) Phase 1 of Line 67 in-service delayed, however, throughput impacts expected to be substantially mitigated
by temporary system optimization actions.
2017
- Line 3 Replacement –ENB/ EEP
Lakehead System
15
Project Execution – 2014 In-Service
Eastern Access: Ln 6B Replacement
- 160 miles of Line 6B replacement
entered service in May
- Remaining 50 mile replacement
construction underway (early 4Q 2014 in service)
- ~$2.1 billion capital
Mainline Expansions
- Line 61- expansion from 400kbpd to
560kbpd between Superior and Flanagan entered service August
- ~$0.2 billion capital
* Jointly funded 25% EEP / 75% ENB
Commercially Secured 30 year Cost of Service
Bakken Expansion – Sandpiper Pipeline
Clearbrook Superior Sarnia Chicago Patoka Toledo Montreal Westover Hardisty
Cushing
Regina Gretna
Sandpiper ($2.6 B)
- Scope: 610 mile, 24”/30” pipeline
- Capacity: ~ 225 kbpd/375 kbpd
- Target in-service: Early 2016
- Marathon Funding:
37.5% of construction for ~27% equity interest in EEP ND system
Low risk framework (ship-or-pay/COS) Anchor Shipper secured Petition for Declaratory Order
approved by FERC May 2014
Flanagan
16
- Line 3:
– Part of Enbridge mainline system – Replace all remaining segments from Hardisty to Superior with latest available high strength steel and coating technology
- EEP Capital Investment:
– border to Superior ~ $2.6 billion capital – to be joint funded with ENB
- Expected Completion:
– 2nd Half of 2017
- 30 year Cost-of-Service
– 15 year primary term
- Shipper Support (CAPP/RSG)
Line 3 Replacement
17
Safety and Operational Reliability
18
Risk Management
- Risk Policy, Risk Framework, Risk Culture Survey + Training
Inline inspection (ILI)
- Significant dig program 3,400 pipe joints examined followed
with non-destructive testing
- Research and Development in tool enhancements - Medical
imaging technology
On-line sensors
- Pressures/cycling, pipe movement, external
& internal corrosion, vibration
Surveys
- Pipe depth, river crossing and geotechnical conditions,
corrosion control, 3rd party activity
Incident Response
- Focused Emergency response tactical plans
Health & Safety
- Process safety management implementation
19
Commercial Structure & Risk Profile
Crude oil projects progressively transform EEP to lower risk business model
Cost of Service/Take-or-Pay: Contribution from Liquids and Natural Gas business cost of service and take-or-pay contracts. Fee-based: Contribution from Liquids and Natural Gas business fee-based service. Commodity Sensitive: Contribution from Natural Gas business from its commodities length (before hedging). Contribution is based on revenues from Liquids segment and gross margin from Natural Gas segment, after deducting non-controlling interest. Assumes Natural Gas business dropped down to MEP within five years.
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
59% 23% 18%
Cost-of-Service/Take-or-Pay Commodity Sensitive Fee-Based
24% 76%
(Unconsolidated view)
Executed Drop-Down to MEP
Drop-Downs Bolster Funding Program
20
Past State Current State
EEP: ‘Pure-Play’ Liquids Pipeline MLP MEP: ‘Pure-Play’ Natural Gas & NGL Midstream MLP
Gas & Liquids Operations
- Executed Drop-Down to MEP July 1, 2014
- Sold 12.6% interest in Midcoast Operating for $350 million
- Drop-down remaining interests in gas business to MEP through 2017
Gas-Focused Operations Liquids-Focused Operations Drop-down proceeds largely mitigate equity funding requirements
Natural Gas and NGL Midstream Business
Anadarko System Ajax Processing Plant
in service 3Q 2013
Texas Express NGL System In service 4Q 2013 North Texas System Marble Falls Associated Rich Gas East Texas System Beckville Processing Plant expected in service 1Q 2015
Petal
Logistics and Marketing 250 transport trucks, 300 trailers, 205 rail cars, TexPan Liquids Rail Facility 100,000+ Bpd of long-term fractionation capacity secured Key Assets
Natural Gas Deliveries ~ 2.5 bcf/d Gathering and Transportation Pipelines 11,400 miles Processing Capacity (26 plants) 2.3 Bcf/d Treating Capacity (11 plants) 1.3 Bcf/d Texas Express NGL system 35% JV interest
21
Equity Restructure
Improves EEP’s cost of capital Increases distributable cash available to LP unit holders Establishes momentum for distribution growth Enhances acquisition competitiveness
Prospective Benefits
(1) Revised Structure Incentive pertains to distributions paid by EEP in excess of
$0.5435/unit per quarter.
22
EEP Equity Restructuring
Strengthen and position EEP as future drop-down vehicle
Lower Partnership’s Cost of Capital
23
Enbridge is strategically aligned with and invests in EEP
- Joint funding agreements
- $1.2 billion preferred unit private
placement
- $450 million accounts receivable
purchase
- Midcoast Energy Partners IPO
- Re-establish EEP as strong
sponsored vehicle
- Improve EEP’s valuation to
more competitively pursue acquisition opportunities
Strengthen and position EEP as future drop-down vehicle
Alleviate Equity Overhang Enhance Prospective Cost of Capital
Strengthening Distribution Coverage
24
Secured growth projects improve distribution coverage
0.00x 0.25x 0.50x 0.75x 1.00x 1.25x 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014e 2017e
Long Range Coverage Target
Guidance range
Coverage*
* Coverage includes EEQ paid-in-kind distribution.
- Accretive growth underway
- Backed by long-term, low risk
commercial framework
- cost-of-service
- ship-or-pay
Highly certain distributable cash flow growth
Funding Plan 2014-2017 (unconsolidated)
25
Debt
Total Requirement 2.4 2014 – 2017 Maturities 0.9 Debt Requirement 3.3
Equity
Total Requirement 1.2 EEQ PIK (0.6) Equity Requirement 0.6
Financing Options
- Additional MEP Drop-Downs
- Bank Credit Facility
- Floating Rate Note
- Term Debt
- Hybrid Securities
- Additional MEP Drop-Downs
- Hybrid Securities
- Private Placement
- ATM program
- EEP/EEQ Common Unit Offering
Uses/(Sources)
Secured Growth Capital 9.4 Maintenance Capital 0.4 Joint Funding Call Back on Lakehead Expansions 0.7 10.5 ENB Joint Funding* (3.3) Sandpiper Joint Funding (1.0) MEP Drop-Downs +/- (2.6)
Net Funding Required 3.6 Equity funding requirements manageable
($billion)
* Joint funding with Enbridge Inc. includes estimated 50% funding by Enbridge Inc. for U.S. component of Line 3 Replacement program and 50% estimated funding by EEP. Participation levels being finalized and approved by Independent Special Committee.
Long-Term ENB Liquids Drop-Down Potential: $10 Billion +
26
2017e
Distributable Cash
Pipeline System Upsize Option Capital Cost/ Book Value*
- Eastern Access
$0.4 (2016/2017) ~ $1.5
- Mainline Expansion
$0.4 (2016/2017) ~ $1.4
- Alberta Clipper
- ~ $0.8
- Line 3 Replacement**
$0.4 (2018) ~ $0.9
- Flanagan South
- ~ $2.8
- Seaway/Seaway Twin
- ~ $2.4
Substantial drop-down opportunities from parent supports long-term growth outlook
* Estimated capital cost or net book value of assets held by Enbridge Inc. ** Line 3 Replacement Joint Funding Agreement under consideration by a Special Committee of the independent Board of Directors., including an option to upsize EEP
- wnership by 15% one year after the in-service date.
~ $10B
($ Billions)
Examples:
Key Takeaways
27
- Strategic position supported by strong business fundamentals
- Secured Liquids projects collectively transform the Partnership to
an even lower risk business model
- Coverage strengthens as organic growth projects enter service
- Distribution growth: targeting 2% to 5% annual growth
- Minimal equity funding requirements
- Drop downs to MEP bolster funding program
- General Partner is strategically aligned with and invests in EEP
Safety and operational reliability are cornerstones that underpin
- ur business and growth outlook
Delivering Cash Flow Growth* (unconsolidated)
29
$701 $0 $400 $800 $1,200 $1,600
IH 2014 FY 2014e
Eastern Access Line 6B Replacement Phase 1: In-service May 1st Phase 2: In-service early 4Q14
EBITDA ramps up in 2H14: project in-service + increasing system utilization
* Includes noncontrolling interest attributable to projects jointly funded with Enbridge Inc. and noncontrolling interest attributable to Midcoast Energy Partners. L.P.
Adjusted EBITDA ($ millions)
Line 61 Expansion In-service 3Q14 Lakehead Volume/Rate Growth Natural Gas G&P Volumes
Delivering Prudent Growth
30
(1) Eastern Access and Mainline Expansion Liquids projects to be jointly funded by EEP & ENB. Sandpiper construction to be funded 37.5% by Marathon Petroleum Corp. (2) Eastern Access has modest capital cost risk (3) Assumed capex is proportionally funded based on EEP’s weighted average ownership of Midcoast Operarting. (4) Line 67 in-service delayed, however, throughput impacts expected to be substantially mitigated by temporary system optimization actions. (5) Joint funding with Enbridge Inc. includes estimated 50% funding by Enbridge Inc. for U.S. component of Line 3 Replacement program and 50% estimated funding by EEP. Participation levels under
consideration by Independent Special Committee.
($MM) Growth Capital Net Capital EEP Target In-Service Risk Profile Liquids: Bakken Growth Projects Sandpiper 2,600 1,625 early 2016 Long-term Ship-or Pay/ Cost of Service Eastern Access (1) 30 year Cost of Service Highly Certain Cash Flows No Volume Risk No Capital Risk (2) Line 6B Replacement, Line 5, Line 62 expansion 2,400 600 2Q 2013 – 2014 Line 6B Expansion + tankage 310 78 early 2016 US Mainline Expansion (1) Line 67 (Border to Superior) (4) Line 61 (Superior to Flanagan) 1,780 445 Phase 1 3Q14; Phase 2 2015-2016 Chicago Connectivity (Line 62 twin) 495 124 2H 2015 Line 3 Replacement (5) 2,600 1,300 2H 2017 30 year Cost of Service Natural Gas: Beckville Plant(3) 145 79 2015 Commodity & volume risk $10,330 $4,251
Organic growth secured by long-term low risk commercial structures
Delivering Low-Risk Sustainable Growth
31
(1) Eastern Access and Mainline Expansion liquids expansion projects jointly funded by EEP & ENB. Line 3 Replacement joint funding under consideration by independent Special
- Committee. Sandpiper construction funded 37.5% by Marathon Petroleum Corp.
(2) Natural Gas project capital to be proportionately funded between EEP and Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P (MEP). (3)
Line 67 in-service delayed, however, throughput impacts expected to be substantially mitigated by temporary system optimization actions.
Commercial Structure
- Commodity/Volume Sensitive
- Take-or-Pay
- Cost of Service
Distribution coverage strengthens as growth projects enter service
Expected Project In-Service Period 1H13 2H13 1H14 2H14 1H15 2H15 1H16 2H16 1H17 2H17 Liquids Projects (1) Bakken Pipeline Expansion Bakken Rail Bakken Access Eastern Access: Line 6B repl., Line 5, Line 62 exp. Mainline Expansion: Line 61 and 67 Exp. Phase 1 (3) Mainline Expansion: Line 61 and 67 Exp. Phase 2 Mainline Expansion: Line 62 Twin (Chicago Connectivity) Sandpiper Eastern Access: Line 6B exp. and Tankage Line 3 Replacement Natural Gas Projects (2) Ajax Plant Texas Express NGL Pipeline JV Beckville Plant
Growing Financial Strength
32
Strengthening credit metrics as expansion projects begin to generate cash
Will maintain strong investment grade credit profile (BBB/Baa2)
Actuals
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Target <4.0 times
Actuals
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Target >4.0 times Actuals
Debt /EBITDA FFO / Interest
Credit metrics post-2009 normalized for Lines 6A and 6B remediation costs and insurance recoveries.
Equity Restructure Highlights
33
Distribution Targets Portion of Quarterly Distribution per Unit Percentage Distributed to General Partner Percentage Distributed to Limited partners Minimum Quarterly Distribution Up to $0.295 2% 98% First Target Distribution >$0.295 to $0.35 15% 85% Second Target Distribution >$0.35 to $0.495 25% 75% Over Second Target Distribution In excess of $0.495 50% 50% Portion of Quarterly Distribution per Unit Percentage Distributed to: Limited Partners (2) General Partner Holders
- f New
IDUs
Distribution Target (1) In excess of $0.5435 75% 2% 23%
Before Equity Restructure After Equity Restructure
Existing Incentive Distribution Rights New Incentive Distribution Units
(1) In the event of any decrease in the Class A unit distribution rate during the next five years, the distribution on the Class D units will be reduced to the amount which would have been received by Enbridge Inc. under the existing IDRs. (2) Includes the new issuance of 66.1 million Class D Units, as well as other Limited Partner Interests.
Equity Restructure Summary
- General Partner (GP) waives current right to receive incentive distribution rights (IDRs)
- GP interest will continue to represent 2% interest in EEP
- As consideration, EEP will issue to the GP:
- 66.1 million Class D LP units; and
- Newly created Incentive Distribution Units (IDUs)
- Class D units will be entitled to cash distributions equal to Class A units
- Prospective distribution increases above current level will have single IDU tier
- Distributions in excess of $0.5435/unit per quarter will be distributed 75% to the Limited Partners, 23% to the holder of the IDUs, and
2% to the General Partner
Joint Funding Agreements
34
Eastern Access and US Mainline Expansions
- Enbridge Inc. to fund 75% of projects ~ in form of 100% equity
investment
- EEP has separate options to upsize interest by up to 15% one
year from last in-service date
Line 3 Replacement
- Project to be jointly funded with Enbridge Inc.*
Sandpiper
- Marathon Petroleum Corp. will fund 37.5% of Project
Sandpiper construction costs. **
Joint funding enhances Partnership’s financing flexibility
Enbridge Inc. Joint Funding Marathon Petroleum Corp. Joint Funding
$1,250 $3,750 $1,300 $1,300 $1,625 $975
EEP Funded ENB Funded MPC Funded
Sandpiper
Line 3 Replacement Eastern Access $ millions
Net Capital To EEP $4,175
Mainline Expansions
*Assumed 50% joint funding participation levels under consideration by a Special Committee of the independent Board of Directors. **Marathon Petroleum Corp. will fund 37.5% of Project Sandpiper cost and assume a ~27% equity interest in the EEP North Dakota system, once the project enters service.
Bakken Infrastructure
Clearbrook
Gretna
Manitoba
Minot Lignite Weyburn
Cromer Berthold
Steelman Tioga Stanley
to Superior
Enbridge Mainline North Dakota System (EEP)
- 210 Mb/d
Bakken Pipeline (EEP, ENF)
- 145 Mb/d
Saskatchewan System (ENF) Bakken Access Program (EEP) 100 Mb/d Berthold Rail (EEP)
- 80 Mb/d
Sandpiper (EEP, MPC)*
- 225/375 Mb/d (Early 2016 ISD)
EEP pipeline takeaway will reach 580 kbpd with next phase of expansion
*Marathon Petroleum Corp. will fund 37.5% of Project Sandpiper cost and assume a ~27% equity interest in the EEP North Dakota system, once the project enters service.
35
Market Access – Eastern Access
36
Superior Sarnia Chicago Patoka Toledo Montreal Westover Hardisty EEP/ENB Joint Funded ENB Funded 1 2 6 4 5 3 Cushing
1. Line 5 Expansion +50 Mb/d (In-Service) 2. Spearhead North Expansion +105 Mb/d (Line 62) (In-Service) 3. Line 6B Replacement +260 Mb/d (2014) 4. Line 9A Reversal +240 Mb/d (In-Service) 5. Line 9B Reversal +300 Mb/d (2014) 6. Toledo Pipeline Twin +80 Mb/d (In-Service)
1 2 3 4 5 6 Flanagan
Linking North American crude supply growth to eastern refining centers
37
Cushing Houston Chicago/ Flanagan Port Arthur
1 3 2 4 5 EEP/ENB Funded ENB Funded Refining center Heavy 43% Light 57% Western USGC Refining Processing Capability (~4,400 Mb/d)
Source: EIA and Enbridge’s internal estimates
Market Access – US Gulf Coast
37
Seaway Pipeline 400 Mb/d (In Service) Flanagan South Pipeline +600 Mb/d (2014) Seaway Pipeline Twin & Lateral +450 Mb/d (2014) Line 67 Expansion +350 Mb/d by 2015 (1) Line 61 Expansion +160 Mb/d by 2014
1 2 4
(1) Phase 1 of Line 67 in-service delayed, however, throughput impacts expected to be substantially mitigated by temporary system optimization actions.
Linking North American crude supply growth to USGC refining centers
3 5
Western Canada Supply Growth
38
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
Oil Sands Conventional Heavy Conventional Light & Medium Pentanes/Condensate
Forecast Western Canada Production
MMbpd
Source: CAPP – Crude Oil Forecast, Markets & Pipelines (June 2014)
Oil sands production projected to grow by an annual average of 170 kbpd through 2030
North American Crude Oil Supply Growth (2013 – 2025)
39
Bakken Eagle Ford Permian Basin Other
Niobrara
Oil Sands 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Heavy Light
Cardium, Viking, Duvernay
Sources: Enbridge Internal Forecast and External Forecasts
+ 7 MMbpd by 2025
MMbpd
US Refining Crude Coverage
40
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0
2013F 2015 2020 2025
US Production Waterborne Imports Imports from Canada
MMb/d
Sources: Enbridge Internal Forecast
North American Production Displaces Waterborne Imports
Operational Reliability & Project Execution
41
Industry Leadership
Integrity Management Leak Detection Capability and Control Systems Third Party Damage Avoidance and Detection Incident Response Capacity Employee and Contractor Occupational Safety Public Safety and Environmental Protection
Organizational commitment to being “best in class”
Operational Reliability Project Execution
Project Development
Proven track record: on-time & on-budget
Supply Chain Management Construction Experience Life Cycle Gating Control Regulatory & Permitting
Major Projects
Impact of Line 6B Incident
42
As of March 31, 2014 Booked in Q2 2014 Total to Date Total Costs $1,122 $35 $1,157 Less: Insurance Recoveries $547 $0 $547 Total Normalized $575 $35 $610 Estimated Costs*
* Includes $29.6 million in fines and penalties associated with the Line 6B incident. Due to the absence of sufficient information, we cannot provide a reasonable estimate of our liability for additional fines and penalties that could be assessed in connection of the Line 6B incident. As a result, except for the penalties disclosed herein, we have not recorded any liability for expected fines and penalties. Unaudited amounts, $ in millions. Represents life-to-date amounts pursuant to impact of the Line 6B incident.
Tax Considerations
43
* Form 1099 issued for tax year during which shares are disposed.
EEQ EEP Allocated Taxable Income Mutual Fund Limitations Unrelated Business Income Tax Schedule K-1 Form 1099 * State Filing Obligations