lecture 6 analysis on compact riemann surfaces
play

Lecture 6 Analysis on compact Riemann surfaces: meromorphic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lecture 6 Analysis on compact Riemann surfaces: meromorphic functions, differential forms and the RiemannRoch Theorem April 21, 2020 1 / 9 Meromorphic functions X Riemann surface A meromorphic function is a homomorphic map f : X P 1 p C


  1. Lecture 6 Analysis on compact Riemann surfaces: meromorphic functions, differential forms and the Riemann–Roch Theorem April 21, 2020 1 / 9

  2. Meromorphic functions X Riemann surface A meromorphic function is a homomorphic map f : X Ñ P 1 p C q . Equivalent description: p U i , z i q i P I atlas of coordinate charts X “ Ť z i : U i – z i p U i q Ă C i P I U i , w ij “ z i ˝ z ´ 1 : z j p U i X U j q Ñ z j p U i X U j q transition maps j f Øt f i p z i qu i P I f i p z i q : “ f ˝ z ´ 1 : z i p U i q Ñ P 1 p C q i f i p w ij p z j qq “ f j p z j q M p X q “ t f : X Ñ P 1 p C qu field of meromorphic functions 2 / 9

  3. Meromorphic functions & compactness X is compact ñ a non-constant f : X Ñ P 1 p C q has a well-defined degree d : f assumes every value exactly d times counting multiplicities ` 1 ˘ d “ ř P P f ´ 1 p c q ν P p f ´ c q , @ c P C “ ř P P f ´ 1 p8q ν P f Div p X q “ t ř j n j P j u free abelian group deg p ř j n j P j q “ ř j n j , Div p X q Ñ Z div p f q : “ ř P P X ν P p f q P P Div p X q divisor of f div p f ¨ g q “ div p f q ` div p g q div : M p X q ˆ Ñ Div p X q homomorphism (we put div p const q “ 0) Observe: principal divisors have degree 0. deg p div p f qq “ # of zeroes ´ # of poles (counting multiplicities!) “ d ´ d “ 0 3 / 9

  4. Differential forms p U i , z i q i P I atlas of coordinate charts on X X “ Ť z i : U i – z i p U i q Ă C i P I U i , w ij “ z i ˝ z ´ 1 : z j p U i X U j q Ñ z j p U i X U j q transition maps j A differential form ω on X is a collection of meromorphic functions ω “ t g i p z i qu i P I satisfying g j p z j q “ g i p w ij p z j qq w 1 ij p z j q , @ i , j . This transition or glueing rule comes from differential calculus: ˇ z i “ w ij p z j q “ g i p w ij p z j qq w 1 g i p z i q dz i ij p z j q dz j “ g j p z j q dz j . ˇ ˇ Ω p X q “ t diff . forms u is an M p X q -vector space of dimension 1. 4 / 9

  5. Divisors of differential forms ω “ t g i p z i qu i P I g j p z j q “ g i p w ij p z j qq w 1 ij p z j q @ P P X ν P p ω q : “ ν z i p P q p g i q @ i : P P U i w 1 ij p z j q ‰ 0 ñ ν P p ω q is well-defined div p ω q : “ ř P P X ν P p ω q P P Div p X q Ω p X q “ t diff . forms u is an M p X q -vector space of dimension 1 ñ divisors of differential forms belong to one linear equivalence class Div p X q{ div p M p X q ˆ q , called the canonical class . When X is compact: § deg p div p ω qq “ 2 g ´ 2 § dim C t ω : div p ω q ě 0 u “ g (holomorphic diff. forms) These facts are consequences of the Riemann–Roch Theorem. 5 / 9

  6. Riemann–Roch Theorem ÿ D “ n i P i P Div p X q L p D q “ t f P M p X q ˆ : div p f q ` D ě 0 u Y t 0 u ν P i p f q ě ´ n i @ i , ν P p f q ě 0 , P ‰ P i Exercises: § L p D q – L p D ` div p g qq for any g P M p X q ˆ § X compact ñ L p D q “ t 0 u when deg p D q ă 0 § X compact ñ ℓ p D q : “ dim C L p D q ă 8 Theorem. Assume that X is compact. Let K : “ div p ω q for some 0 ‰ ω P Ω p X q . Then for all D P Div p X q ℓ p D q “ deg p D q ` 1 ´ g ` ℓ p K ´ D q . 6 / 9

  7. Residues of differential forms & compactness ω “ t g i p z i qu i P I g j p z j q dz j “ g i p w ij p z j qq w 1 ij p z j q dz j “ g i p z i q dz i ñ residues are well-defined P g j p z j q dz j @ j : P P U j (here i “ ?´ 1) 1 ű @ P P X Res P p ω q : “ 2 π i Lemma. If X is compact, then for any ω P Ω p X q one has ř P Res P p ω q “ 0. As an application, one can get another proof of existence of degree (valence) for meromorphic functions. It is sufficient to show that for a non-constant f P M p X q one has deg p div p f qq “ 0. ` df ˘ Note that Res P “ ν p p f q , thus f ˆ df ˙ ÿ ÿ deg p div p f qq “ ν P p f q “ Res P “ 0 . f P P 7 / 9

  8. Example from modular forms Γ Ă SL 2 p Z q of finite index A modular ( resp. cusp) form of weight k for Γ is a function f : H Ñ C satisfying: (i) f is holomorphic (ii) p f | k h qp z q “ f p z q for every h P Γ (iii) f is bounded (resp. vanishing) at cusps, that is for every g P SL 2 p Z q |p f | k g qp z q| “ O p 1 q (resp. o p 1 q ) as Im p z q Ñ `8 ˆ a b ˙ Recall: right action of g “ in weight k c d ˆ az ` b ˙ 1 p f | k g qp z q “ p cz ` d q k f cz ` d 8 / 9

  9. Example from modular forms Let f p z q be a modular form of weight 2 for Γ. Then f p z q dz is Γ-invariant: ˙ 1 ˆ aw ` b ˙ ˆ aw ` b ˇ f p z q dz “ f dw ˇ cw ` d cw ` d ˇ z “ aw ` b cw ` d ˆ aw ` b ˙ dw “ f p cw ` d q 2 “ f p w q dw cw ` d ñ f p z q dz descends to a holomorphic differential form ω f P Ω p Y q on Y p Γ q “ Γ z H . Near cusps: q “ exp p 2 π iz h q is a local coordinate near r8s P X p Γ q dq “ 2 π i h exp p 2 π iz h dq h q dz ñ dz “ 2 π i q 2 π i f p q q dq h ω f “ q P Ω p X p Γ qq ! 9 / 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend