Learning Outcomes Compare and contrast CDIO, design thinking and - - PDF document

WORKSHOP ON DELIVERING & ASSESSING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT

Lim Cheng Siong, PhD

lcsiong@utm.my

Fauzan Khairi Che Harun, PhD

fauzan@utm.my

f or NEW ACADEMIA LEARNING INNOVATION (NALI)

22-23 MAY. 2017

Learning Outcomes

• Compare and contrast CDIO, design thinking

and integrated design project

• Identify the key requirements in integrated

design project

• Implementing design thinking in integrated

design project

2

CDIO

• CDIO: Conceive — Design — Implement —

Operate.

• It was conceived at the M assachusetts

Institute of T echnology in the late 1990s.

• M IT and three Swedish universities formally

founded the CDIO Initiative => cdio.org

3

CDIO

4

http:/ / cdio.org/

CDIO

5

STANDARD DESCRIPTION 1 CDIO as Context 2 CDIO Syllabus Outcomes 3 Integrated Curriculum 4 Introduction to Engineering 5 Design-Build Experiences 6 CDIO Workspaces 7 Integrated Learning Experiences 8 Active Learning 9 Enhancement of Faculty CDIO Skills 10 Enhancement of Faculty Teaching Skills 11 CDIO Skills Assessment 12 CDIO Program Evaluation

CDIO

• CDIO is an educational framework for

producing the next generation of engineers.

• Complementing to OBE
• Example of implementation for SKEM :

– Performed CDIO analysis for SKEM program – Introduction for IO in Intro2EE for 1st year SKEM

students

– M issing knowledge in C-D-I-O is covered before

the students can implement capstone project

6

Integrated Design Project

• Integrated design project (IDP) is also known

as capstone project

• IDP is a final year engineering design project.
• Can be introduced in 3rd or final year as 1- or

2-semester project

• Required by Engineering

Accreditation Council (EAC) for engineering program.

7 Source: myemail.constantcontact.com

Integrated Design Project

8

Integrated Design Project

• Design (integrated/capstone) project

1. Industry, research or community based project 2. Project management 3. Prototype 4. Design thinking 5. M ultidisciplinary

9 Source: myemail.constantcontact.com

Integrated Design Project

• Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical-

M echatronics), FKE, UTM

– Capstone project for SKEM program since 2013 – EAC visit was in mid of 2013

10

Integrated Design Project

• 70% of Instrumentation and M easurement

course (3rd year, 3 credits) as capstone project – Problem: heavy load to lecturer – Output: M iniature system, presentation, report – EAC report: listed as concern

• Same faculty but other engineering programs

without capstone project – EAC report: listed as major

11

Capstone Project

Capstone project benchmarking by one of local university

12

13 14

15

Integrated Design Project

• Design (integrated/capstone) project

1. Industry, research or community based project –

Industry and community based projects

–

End users survey

–

End users are invited as panel

2. Project management –

Facilitator and student project files, final report

–

Tight management: Scope within RM 500 and 12 weeks

3. Prototype – Conceptual and working prototype

16

Integrated Design Project

• Design (integrated/capstone) project
• 4. M ultidisciplinary

– Prior knowledge: intro2EE, tech. drawing, C

programming, electronics, circuit design, control, embedded system, uP , PLC etc.

– Each group is formed by the members from

various programs

• 5. Design thinking

– CDIO + IDEO design method

17

Sharing

• IDEO design video
• Capstone Project SKEM 2015 (Since 2013)
• Capstone project FKE 2016 onward

– SKEM , SKEE, SKEL

• Electrical Engineering Capstone Showcase

(EECS) 2017

18

Design Thinking Framework Conceive

C

Design

D

Implement

I

Operate

O

Understand

Empathize Define

Create

Ideate

Deliver

Prototype Test

Engineering Design

Capstone Project FKE

Ahmad, M . N. Capstone Project Design for SKEM and SKEI. Presentation Slide. Universiti Teknologi M alaysia; 2015.

Design Thinking (C-D) Build (D-I)

Conceptual Prototype

• Project

management

• Assembling
• Programming

User’s Need

Working Prototype

Project Intent

Test & Documentation (I-O)

• Report writing
• Oral presentation
• Testing
• Fine tuning

4 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks

Survey, interview, design statement, design concept, prototype Hardware and software development

Capstone Project FKE

21

Capstone Project FKE

EECS 2017

22

Design Thinking

• Video: ABC Nightline - IDEO Shopping Cart
• Design Thinking Bootcamp at Genovasi, 2-4

July, 2013.

23

Design Thinking

24

Design Thinking

“Design thinking is a human-centered approach to innovation that draws from the designer's toolkit to integrate the needs of people, the possibilities of technology, and the requirements for business success.”

(Tim Brown, president and CEO, IDEO)

25

Design Thinking

26 Ahmad, M . N. Capstone Project Design for SKEM and SKEI. Presentation Slide. Universiti Teknologi M alaysia; 2015.

Electronic Device for UTM Security Enhancement Project

27

Electronic Device for UTM Security Enhancement Project

28

Design Sheet

• Please refer the distributed design sheet

29

Empathize and Define

30

Group Activities 1

• Based on the given project theme, your group is

required to:

– Prepare interview script with a minimum of 10

interview questions for in-depth study of user’s problems and needs.

– Identify and interview a minimum of 10 real users.

Encouraged to use a voice recorder / smartphone.

– Perform on-site observation (People, Object,

Environment, M essage, Service). Encouraged to use a camera / camcorder / smartphone.

31

Group Activities 1

• Expected outcome:

32

Empathize and Define

33

Group Activities 2

• Perform data extraction (by each member)

– Identify the background of the user and his / her problems

and needs. Write using minimum words on a sticker. Sketching is highly encouraged.

– Also extract any important information from observation. – 1 sticker = 1 point or finding

Note: duplicated point by members for the same end user => choose only 1 point

• Some of discussion tips

– One conversation at a time – Be visual – Go for quantity

34

Empathize and Define

35

Group Activities 3

• Perform data clustering

– Y

• u can group the similar problems / needs into the same

cluster.

– Y

• u must be clear on the identified problems / needs and

the background of the users (male vs. female, parents vs. children, managers vs. workers etc.)

36

Empathize and Define

37

Group Activities 4

• From the clustered data, vote for 3 needs* that will

give high degree of satisfaction to your end users and make your product unique and sell like hotcakes. Then produce in 2 mahjong papers for:

– a personification (users’ profile with pain points

and 3 needs) from the clustered data

– A design statement based on the developed

personification

* 3 needs is enough for a capstone project

38

Personification

PROFILE

• Age: 30+
• Very busy career man
• Very ambitious at work
• Highly educated in his profession
• Spending a lot of time on work & family
• Less interested in taking sports (physical activities)
• Imbalance between career, family and physical

activities

• Priority on job with endless tasks

PAIN POINTS

• Unfit physically: tired

and body pain

• Forced to join
• rganization sport

activities

NEEDS

• Group motivation – group with same skills level, good coach / leader
• Easily accessible sport facilities and health support system – save time

and hassle free

• M onitoring health progress – good tracking system

Super J

• hn

Design Statement

How we may help Super John to have easily accessible sport facilities together with support system while enjoying physical activities with friends?

Super J

• hn

Design Statement

• How we may help <USER> to <NEED> +

<INSIGHT>

• How we may help Super John to have easily

accessible sport facilities while enjoying physical activities?

• How we may help M at Lebah to monitor

beehive from anywhere at anytime?

• How we may help Si Zerror to make group

studying more exciting?

Design Statement

• From

the personification, produce in 1 mahjong paper for:

– A design statement based on <USER>, <NEED>

and <INSIGHT>

42

Personification and Design Statement

• Application of personification and design

statement – individually look into the technology and theory

for the potential solutions (X5) catering specific need / pain point

– Preferred: creative, effective and low cost

solutions

Ideate

44

Design Discussion vs. M eeting with Boss

Source: www.stratum-international.com

IDEO 7 Brainstorming Rules

• 1. Defer judgment – for now, suspend critique.
• 2. Encourage wild ideas – breakout ideas are right next

to the absurd ones.

• 3. Build on the ideas of others – listen and add to the

flow of ideas.

• 4. Stay focused on the topic – focus on target / scope.
• 5. One conversation at a time – maintain momentum

as a group.

• 6. Be visual – use stick-a-note to draw ideas.
• 7. Go for quantity – best way to have a good idea is to

have lots of ideas.

Group Activities 5

ideas in minutes NEW

• Option

/ Feature from each reviewed (X3) project.

• One sticker one feature.

Sketching is highly encouraged.

Solution Sub-function

Group Activities 5

ideas in minutes DERIVED

• How to improve your team

member’s proposed options (X3)?

• If the idea is duplicated, the

2nd person has to come out with a new idea.

Solution Sub-function

Ideate

53

Group Activities 5

ideas in minutes COM BINED

• Choose two potential options

to be combined?

• If the idea is duplicated, the

2nd person has to come out with a new idea.

M orphological M atrix

Generate Concept Solution

ideas in minutes COM BINED

• How

to combine the proposed features to become a complete solution?

• Individually

sketch your proposed solution on an A4 paper. Encouraged to have different combination

• f

features than other members.

STEEP Analysis

S

• cial/ cultural

Technology Economic Environment Political/ legal

STEEP Analysis

STEEP Analysis

minutes STEEP ANAL YSIS

• Perform

STEEP analysis

• n

your proposed concept solution.

• Add into your sketch in A4

paper.

Solution

• Present your solution to the

team. (3 minutes X 4 members)

• Choose the best solution by

voting.

• Further improve the features

if needed.

Bill of materials

• BOM is a listing of all of the raw materials,

parts, subassemblies, and assemblies needed to produce one unit of a product.

Bill of materials

• Break

your team’s solution into main parts.

• M embers do round table for

each main part identification.

• Sketch the product structure

tree on a new A4 paper.

Bill of materials Task assignment

• Identify the person in charge and time

(start and end) required for the task (programming, soldering, 3D printing, welding, machining etc.) to complete the identified components.

• Individual contribution

– 8 weeks X 6 hour = 48 hour

• Design-Implement

– 6 weeks X 6 hour X 4 members = 144 hour

• Operate (On-site installation)

– 1 week X 6 hour X 4 members = 24 hour

• Poster, EECSand long report

– 1 week X 6 hour X 4 members = 24 hour

Project planning

• For any solution (project), the scope of the solution

must also fulfill the given time frame and budget.

67

Summary

• Learning Outcomes

– Compare and contrast CDIO, design thinking and

capstone project

– Identify the key requirements in capstone project – Implementing design thinking in capstone project

68

Summary

• Prepare a piece of paper and write down your

comment on today workshop based on 2B: – Best part – Blur part

69

M aterials for Prototyping

• polystyrene board x2x10=x20
• polystyrene cutter x10
• 4 rim of different color A4 papers
• empty A4 paper box x10
• scissors x10
• Glue x10
• M asking tape (x3 paper type, x3 transparent type)
• rubber band x60 pcs
• stick used to make satay or flower x60 pcs

70

Prototype and T est

71

Group Activities 6

• Complete

the concept sketch

• f

your proposed solution.

72

Prototype and T est

73

Group Activities 7

• Build a conceptual prototype to better presenting

your proposed solution to the end users.

74

Health Profile Rewards Network Facilities

Group Activities 7

• Y
• ur group is allowed to use any extra material

besides the provided materials such as: – Polystyrene board – 4 different color of A4 papers – Empty A4 paper box – Glue – M asking tape (paper type, transparent type) – Scissors – Etc

• Be careful when using the cutter / knife / scissor.

Don’t cut your finger or table cover.

75

Prototype and T est

76

Co-creation

• Co-creation

is a strategy to bring together the designers and the end users in order to jointly produce a mutually valued outcome.

• Presenting and demo your conceptual prototype to
• ther groups.
• Note that a video can be better used to demonstrate

the conceptual prototype in real live situation.

77

Engineering Design – Implement – Operate

• After

completing the Understand-Create-Deliver (User-Centered-Design) process, the project can be proceed with the standard engineering design, implement and operate.

78

Design Thinking Framework Conceive

C

Design

D

Implement

I

Operate

O

Understand

Empathize Define

Create

Ideate

Deliver

Prototype Test

Engineering Design

Capstone Project

Ahmad, M . N. Capstone Project Design for SKEM and SKEI. Presentation Slide. Universiti Teknologi M alaysia; 2015.

Conclusion

• Capstone project is not just for the sack of EAC.
• From my observation, the students involved in

capstone project are more confident in doing FYP .

• The students learnt about important of team

working and design thinking in solving a project with limited resources (time frame vs. budget vs. scope).

80

Thank you

81