learning objectives
play

Learning Objectives 1. I de ntify the pre va le nc e o f Co lo - PDF document

10/24/2016 Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dyssynchrony Christine Yo shina g a -I ta no , Ph.D. Unive rsity o f Co lo ra do , Bo ulde r De pa rtme nt o f Spe e c h, L a ng ua g e & He a ring Sc ie nc e s Alb e rt Me hl, M.D. K a ise r Pe


  1. 10/24/2016 Auditory Neuropathy/Auditory Dyssynchrony Christine Yo shina g a -I ta no , Ph.D. Unive rsity o f Co lo ra do , Bo ulde r De pa rtme nt o f Spe e c h, L a ng ua g e & He a ring Sc ie nc e s Alb e rt Me hl, M.D. K a ise r Pe rma ne nte , Co lo ra do Cha pte r Cha mpio n Vic kie T ho mpso n, Ph.D. Unive rsity o f Co lo ra do Me dic a l Ce nte r Ma rio n Do wns Ce nte r E HDI Sta te Co o rdina to r K ristin Uhle r, Ph.D. Unive rsity o f Co lo ra do De nve r Me dic a l Ca mpus Childre n’ s Ho spita l • T he a utho rs ha ve no c o nflic t o f inte re sts to disc lo se Learning Objectives • 1. I de ntify the pre va le nc e o f Co lo ra do c hildre n ide ntifie d with a udito ry ne uro pa thy/ a udito ry dyssync hro ny (AN/ AD) a fte r unive rsa l ne wb o rn he a ring sc re e ning . • 2. De sc rib e the c ha ra c te ristic s o f c hildre n with AN/ AD: NI CU ve rsus we ll-b a b y, unila te ra l ve rsus b ila te ra l (N==67) • 3.De sc rib e the de ve lo pme nta l o utc o me s o f a po pula tio n o f a Co lo ra do po pula tio n o f c hildre n with b ila te ra l AN/ AD (N=37) • 4. I de ntify c ha ra c te ristic s o f c hildre n with AN/ AD a nd CI suc c e ss a nd c hildre n with AN/ AD a nd CI s who a re una b le to de ve lo p spo ke n la ng ua g e . 1

  2. 10/24/2016 2002 ‐ 2009 State of Colorado • I nc ide nc e o f HL in 610,829 infa nts sc re e ne d fro m a b irth po pula tio n o f 626,701 • T he sc re e ning ra te wa s 97.5% a nd the fo llo w-thro ug h ra te ra ng e d fro m 83 to 89% • 873 infa nts we re dia g no se d with SNHL in this time pe rio d • 67 infa nts we re dia g no se d with AN • Of c hildre n with SNHL the inc ide nc e o f AN wa s 8.7% • Pre va le nc e o f AN wa s a b o ut 1 in 10,000 • Pre va le nc e o f SNHL wa s 1.6 pe r 1000 2

  3. 10/24/2016 Children with AN • 21% we re Unila te ra l AN (14/ 67) • 79% or 53 we re bila te ra l (53/ 67) NICU (Newborn Intensive Care Unit • 60 we re b o rn in the NI CU (90%) • Most infa nts from NICU ha ve bila te r a l AN o 11 we re unila te ra l (18%) o 49 we re b ila te ra l (82%) Well baby nursery • 7 we re b o rn in the we ll- b a b y nurse ry (10%) o 3 we re unila te ra l (43%) o 4 we re b ila te ra l (57%) 3

  4. 10/24/2016 Developmental data about ANSD • 39 o f the c hildre n in this b irth c o ho rt ha ve de ve lo pme nta l da ta in the b irth thro ug h thre e a g e ra ng e • 2 o f the 11 (18%) a re c hildre n with unila te ra l UANSD • 37 o f 53 c hildre n ha ve b ila te ra l ANSD (70%) Proportion of Children with significant cognitive disability (32%) • 32% (12/ 37) ha ve sig nific a nt c og nitive disa bility in a ddition to he a r ing loss o Almo st 1 in e ve ry 3 c hildre n o 9 o f the se 12 c hildre n o r 75% ha ve sig nific a nt c o g nitive a nd ne uro lo g ic a l invo lve me nt with de ve lo pme nta l q uo tie nts ra ng ing fro m 10 to 55 (9/ 37 o r 1 in 4) o 3/ 4 o f the c hildre n with c o g nitive disa b ility ha ve se ve re / pro fo und invo lve me nt a nd multiple o the r issue s Additional disabilities including cognitive disabilities ‐ 57% • 9 a dditio na l c hildre n ha d no rma l c o g nitive de ve lo pme nt b ut o the r disa b ilitie s inc luding visio n, mo to r/ o rtho pe dic , se ve re he a lth issue s • 57% (21/ 37) of the popula tion of c hildre n with bila te ra l AN ha ve a dditiona l disa bilitie s a nd the va st pro po rtio n o f the se issue s a re se ve re / pro fo und c o g nitive de la ys, in ma ny c a se s a lso ne uro lo g ic a l issue s. 4

  5. 10/24/2016 Normal cognitive function – 68% • 25 of 37 or 68% of the c hildre n ha d c og nitive de ve lopme nta l quotie nts within the norma l r a ng e . • 9/ 37 ha d no rma l c o g nitive q uo tie nts a nd a dditio na l disa b ilitie s (24%) • 9/ 25 Nine c hildre n o f the 25 with c o g nitive de ve lo pme nta l q uo tie nts in the no rma l ra ng e o r 36% o f c hildre n with no rma l c o g nitio n ha d a dditio na l disa b ilitie s Language Quotients • 21/ 37 c hildre n ha d la ng ua g e q uo tie nts within the no rma l ra ng e Re c a ll tha t 25/ 37 c hildre n ha d no rma l c o g nitive q uo tie nts • 57% of the c hildre n ha d la ng ua g e quotie nts within the norma l ra ng e • Re c a ll tha t 57% o f the c hildre n ha d he a ring lo ss plus a dditio na l disa b ilitie s • 37% o f the se c hildre n with a dditio na l disa b ilitie s ha d c o g nitive disa b ilitie s • Appro xima te ly 16% o f the c hildre n with no rma l c o g nitive sc o re s did no t ha ve la ng ua g e q uo tie nts in the no rma l ra ng e - Hispanic/Latino • 32% (12/ 37) c hildre n ide ntify a s Hispa nic / L a tino • 83% or 10 of the se 12 c hildre n a re Spa nish- spe a king in the home indic a ting tha t o ne o f e ve ry fo ur c hildre n with b ila te ra l AN in the sta te o f Co lo ra do is b o rn into a fa mily tha t do e s no t spe a k E ng lish a s a na tive la ng ua g e . 5

  6. 10/24/2016 Gender • 35% a re fe ma le (13/ 37) • 65% a re ma le (24/ 37) • T he inc ide nc e o f b ila te ra l AN wa s two time s g re a te r fo r ma le s tha n fo r fe ma le s. Cochlear Implants • 4/ 37 o r 10.8% o f the c hildre n re c e ive d a c o c hle a r impla nt/ s • 5/ 37 we re no t a mplifie d – 14% • 28 or 76% use d he a ring a ids Early Intervention Services • All 37 fa milie s re c e ive d we e kly e a rly inte rve ntio n se rvic e s fro m a n e a rly inte rve ntio n pro vide r with e ithe r a de a f e duc a tio n, spe e c h/ la ng ua g e pa tho lo g y o r a n a udio lo g y de g re e . 6

  7. 10/24/2016 Sign Language • 31 o f 38 fa milie s c ho se to re c e ive we e kly sig n la ng ua g e instruc tio n fro m a de a f o r ha rd o f he a ring na tive / flue nt sig n la ng ua g e instruc to r (82% ) • 1 o f the c hildre n use d Cue d Spe e c h PHYSIOLOGY – Gardner ‐ Berry, 2012 • N=142 CI s o ve r 10 ye a r pe rio d • Sydne y Co c hle a r I mpla nt Ce nte r, • 16% ha d a bnorma litie s on the ir CT sc a ns, whic h inc lude d Mo ndini de fo rmitie s, wide inte rna l a udito ry me a tus, dyspla stic a pic a l turn, a nd a b no rma l ve stib ule a nd la te ra l se mi-c irc ula r c a na ls. • 20% of the c hildre n with bila te ra l AN a nd 6% of the c hildr e n with unila te r a l AN ha d c ompr omise d a uditory ne rve s. • A tota l of 43% of the c hildr e n ha d disa bilitie s in a ddition to HL . The Infant Monitor of vocal Production ( IMP IMP ) Ro b yn Ca ntle Mo o re , PhD RI DBC Re nwic k Ce ntre / Unive rsity o f Ne wc a stle Sydne y, Austra lia . 7

  8. 10/24/2016 IMP IMP Précis • Crite rio n re fe re nc e d instrume nt • Clinic a l e va lua tio n & pa re nt e duc a tio n to o l • Suc c e ssive me a sure o f infa nt, pre -ling uistic vo c a l c o mpe te nc e • Dia g no stic a id to ha b ilita tio n pro g ra mming Typical infant vocal development Universal speech perception Phonetic contrasts all languages Language specific speech perception Language specific Language specific sound combinations vowels Native language consonants Perception * Visual attention shift to mouth seeks redundant audio-visual speech cues Social attention Visual-social attention to eyes shift back to eyes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MONTHS Production First words Language specific speech production ‘Canonical babbling’ Vowel-like sounds Non-speech sounds Universal speech production ( Kuhl, 2004; Lewkowicz & Hansen ‐ Tift, 2012 * First words Kuhl (2004) Stages of Language specific speech production Infant Vocal ‘Canonical babbling’ Production Vowel-like sounds Non-speech sounds Adapted from: Oller (2000) Nathani, Ertmer, & Stark (2006) 8

  9. 10/24/2016 IMP IMP probe ‐ questions Interpreting the IMP IMP TYPICAL IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 102 “Lily”” 11.5 Innate Transition to A-P Integrity of A-P Loop Loop 9

  10. 10/24/2016 IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 102 IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 36 “Mary”” 9 Innate Transition to A-P Integrity of A-P Loop Loop IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 36 “Mary” 9 10

  11. 10/24/2016 IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 35 “Ian” 1 7 19 19 14 14 Innate Transition to A-P Integrity of A-P Loop Loop IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 35 “Ian” 1 7 IMP IMP : infant (ANSD) Case Study 135 “Cameron” 1 1 Innate Transition to A-P Integrity of A-P Loop Loop 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend