learnability based syntactic annotation design
play

Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design Roy Schwartz, Omri - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design Roy Schwartz, Omri Abend and Ari Rappoport The Hebrew University In proceedings of COLING 2012 Overview In many cases, there is more than one plausible way to annotate syntactic structures


  1. Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design Roy Schwartz, Omri Abend and Ari Rappoport The Hebrew University In proceedings of COLING 2012

  2. Overview • In many cases, there is more than one plausible way to annotate syntactic structures – A single annotation must be selected • We propose learnability as a selection criterion – A principled learnability-based methodology – Use parsers for annotation design • Selecting the more learnable annotation may result in up to 35.3% error reduction in parsing performance Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 2 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  3. Different Syntactic Formalisms Example • I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 3 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  4. Different Syntactic Formalisms Example • I want to eat the apple PRP VBP TO VB DT NN I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 3 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  5. Different Syntactic Formalisms Example • I want to eat the apple PRP VBP TO VB DT NN I want to eat the apple (S (NP I) (VP (VP want ) (VP to (VP eat (NP the apple) ) ) ) ) I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 3 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  6. Different Syntactic Formalisms Example • I want to eat the apple PRP VBP TO VB DT NN I want to eat the apple (S (NP I) (VP (VP want ) (VP to (VP eat (NP the apple) ) ) ) ) I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 3 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  7. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  8. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  9. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  10. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  11. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  12. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  13. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  14. Disagreement within the same Formalism I want to eat the apple Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) I want to eat the apple Annotation I want to eat the apple scheme I want to eat the apple Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 4 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  15. Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) • VSSs are very frequent – More than 40% of the tokens in PTB participate in at least one VSS* * Schwartz et al., ACL 2011 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 5 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  16. Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) • VSSs are very frequent – More than 40% of the tokens in PTB participate in at least one VSS* • Evaluation Problems – Different parsers train and evaluate against different annotation schemes • Selecting one alternative over the other in a VSS can affect the performance of a specific parser** * Schwartz et al., ACL 2011 ** Nilsson et al., ACL 2006 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 5 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  17. Performance Differences • Learning the correct annotation for a VSS is easy – Usually the direction of a single edge the DT apple NN Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 6 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  18. Performance Differences • Learning the correct annotation for a VSS is easy – Usually the direction of a single edge • An annotation scheme is learned as a whole – Not each VSS alone • There are second order effects – The way in which the VSS attaches to the rest of the sentence – These can lead to performance differences the DT apple NN Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 6 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  19. Example Performance Differences Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  20. Example Performance Differences Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  21. Example Performance Differences Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  22. Example Performance Differences Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  23. Example Performance Differences Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  24. Example Performance Differences MST parser (McDonald et al. 2005) Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  25. Example Performance Differences MST parser (McDonald et al. 2005) Predictable? Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  26. Example Performance Differences MST parser (McDonald et al. 2005) Predictable? Parser specific? Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  27. Example Performance Differences MST parser (McDonald et al. 2005) Predictable? Parser specific? Magnitude? Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 7 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  28. Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 8 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  29. Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) Selecting one Annotation is Required Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 8 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  30. Varying Syntactic Structures (VSS) Selecting one Selection Can Affect Annotation is Required Parsing Performance Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 8 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  31. Our Solution: Learnability • A straightforward selection criterion – Namely, how easy it is to learn a given annotation scheme using statistical tools • Learnability is justified practically – Training on more learnable schemes results in more accurate parsers • This criterion is only applied on linguistically plausible annotations Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 9 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  32. Learnability • Learnability is widely used theoretically – Learnability using distributional methods has been used as an important consideration in designing the phrase structure formalism* – It is also used recurrently in cognitive science** * Chomsky 2006 ** Chater and Vitányi 2003, Perfors et al. 2011 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 10 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  33. Learnability-based Methodology 1 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 11 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  34. Learnability-based Methodology 1 Standard Parsing Evaluation parser 1 parser 2 parser 3 corpus annotation scheme result 2 result 3 result 1 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 11 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  35. Learnability-based Methodology 1 Standard Parsing Evaluation parser 1 parser 2 parser 3 corpus annotation scheme result 2 result 3 result 1 parser * Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 11 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  36. Learnability-based Methodology 1 Standard Parsing Evaluation Our Approach parser 1 parser 2 parser 3 parser corpus corpus annotation scheme scheme 1 scheme 2 scheme 3 result 2 result 3 result 1 result 2 result 3 result 1 parser * Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 11 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  37. Learnability-based Methodology 1 Standard Parsing Evaluation Our Approach parser 1 parser 2 parser 3 parser corpus corpus annotation scheme scheme 1 scheme 2 scheme 3 result 2 result 3 result 1 result 2 result 3 result 1 parser * scheme * Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 11 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  38. Learnability-based Methodology 2 parser 1 corpus scheme 1 scheme 2 scheme 3 result 1 result 2 result 3 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 12 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

  39. Learnability-based Methodology 2 parser 1 corpus scheme 1 scheme 2 scheme 3 result 1 result 2 result 3 * scheme 1 Learnability-based Syntactic Annotation Design @ 12 Schwartz, Abend and Rappoport, COLING 2012

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend