LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of Luminous Stars in M31 and M33 John C. Martin & Logan Kimball University of Illinois Springfield Check Out Bill Reas Paper Cookbook for Mira Spectroscopy with a filter wheel
A Survey of Luminous Stars in M31 and M33
John C. Martin & Logan Kimball
University of Illinois Springfield
Check Out Bill Rea’s Paper
Cookbook for Mira Spectroscopy with a filter wheel (SA100 or SA200) grating 2019, JAAVSO Vol 47, No 1
Intro & Thanks
- I am:
– John C. Martin – Observatory Director & Associate Professor
- University of Illinois Springfield
- Thanks to:
– National Science Foundation – UIS Barber Endowment – Collaborators
- Roberta Humphreys
- Kris Davidson
- Michael Gordon
- UIS Observatory Volunteers
Henry R. Barber Research Observatory
Volunteers:
Jim O’ Brien, Jennifer Hubbell-Thomas, Kevin Cranford, Greg Finn, John Lord, Mary Sheila Tracy, Logan Kimball, Eric Schlaf, Keith Gibbs, Steve Verhulst, Bruce Patterson
Problem: Stars Live too Long
Star lifetimes >> Human lifetimes We get a snapshot in time and have to connect the dots to interpret what we see. We must worry about bias due to our point of view!
Star Evolution
Relative Number of Stars 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Stellar Mass (in M☉ 2 0.5 10 150
1 star 10 stars 50 stars 500 stars
0.08
High Mass vs Low Mass
Stars < 2 M¤
- P-P Chain Fusion
- Radiative Core
- Convective Envelope
Stars > 2 M¤
- CNO Cycle Fusion
- Convective Core
- Radiative Envelope
Difference in Life:
Predictions for a 25 M☉ star
Duration Core Hydrogen fusion 7 million years Core Helium fusion 700 thousand years Carbon Fusion 600 years Core Neon Fusion 1 year Core Oxygen Fusion 6 months Core Silicon Fusion <1 day
Issues Close To Home
Dust!
M31 Andromeda Galaxy M33 Triangulum Galaxy
73 targets 131 targets 6+ years = longest dedicated survey of these two galaxies
B[e]sg Luminosity (x Solar) Temperature (Kelvin)
10,000 5,000 2,500 20,000 40,000 10+4 10+5 10+6
Hyashi Limit
10M☉ 50M☉
Red Super Giants
25M☉ SN Impostors
WR Yellow Super Giants
Yellow Void (Warm Hypergiants)
Humphreys – Davidson Limit
Quiescent LBVs
Classified Targets
M31
Type Number Of/late-WN 5 OB Supergiants 12 B[e]sg 11 Warm Hypergiants 4 Yellow Supergiants 12 LBV 5 Candidate LBV 5 Peculiar/Unknown 11
M33
Type
Number
Of/late-WN
10
OB Supergiants
36
B[e]sg
8
Warm Hypergiants
6
Yellow Supergiants
23
LBV
4
Candidate LBV
19
Peculiar/unknown
13
Classification done by collaborators at UMN using spectra from Large Binocular Telescope (LBT)
Photometric Survey Overview
- Images
– 20’x20’, limiting mag ~ 19.5 – Four filters, BVRI
- Always image V and at least one other
– Cadence of at least once per year
- Photometry
– DAOphot PSF fitting
- Aided by Massey LGGS catalog
– APASS photometric system – Color transformed
Images
- 647 images total
– M31 = 463 – M33 = 183
- Four Filters
– V @ every epoch – R from 2012 – present – B from 2013 – present – I from 2015 – present
Start B Start I Start V and R
Astrodon high-throughput Johnson-Cousins Filters B has NO red leak
Check Stars
Photometric Uncertainty
Target Curation
V-073136 (J013342.52+303258.6)
- OB-Supergiant in M33
- V ~ 17.48 (B-V) ~ 0.28
Target Notes:
Many LGGS stars >3 mag fainter within 5 arcsec. Normally resolved from LGGS star J013342.26+303301.6 approaching comparable brightness 4.4 arcsec NW.
V B I
5” 5” 5” 10”
Variability From Correlation
- If star is variable, bands change in phase
- 4 bands = 6 pairs
- Calculate R2 correlation coefficient
R2 V B R B 0.92 (11) R 0.98 (8) 0.81 (6) I 0.97 (7) 0.97 (3)
- .– (1)
M31-004507.65 (YSG)
Variability From Correlation
- Certain =
– At least two band pairs (N > 5) and (R2 > 0.60)
- Likely =
– At least one band pair (N > 5) and (R2 > 0.60)
R2 V B R B 0.23 (11) R 0.03 (8) 0.39 (4) I 0.00 (6)
- .-- (2)
- .– (2)
M31-004033.80 (OBsg)
Welch & Stetson (1993)
- Calculate statistics between 2 bands
– I = measure correlation
- Expectation value = 0 for non-variable
- Negative if inverse correlation
– R = measure ratio between band fluctuations
- Depends on type of variable
̅ 𝑤 = $ ∑ 𝑤! 𝜏",!
$
𝑥 𝜀𝑤! = 𝑤! − ̅ 𝑤 𝜏",!
𝐽 = 1 𝑜 𝑜 − 1 &
!"# $
𝜀𝑐!𝜀𝑤! 𝑆 = + ∑ 𝜀𝑐! ∑ 𝜀𝑤!
𝑥 = ' 1 𝜏!,#
$
Welch & Stetson (1993)
For B & V
Welch & Stetson (1993)
Variability 2012-16
Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 16 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0% OB Supergiants 48 5 (10%) 1 (2%) 12% Yellow Supergiants 35 6 (17%) 4 (11%) 28% Warm Hypergiants 10 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 20% B[e] Supergiants * 11 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 18% Classical LBV 9 7 (78%) 1 (11%) 89% Candidate LBV 23 2 (9%) 1 (4%) 13%
* Sample adjusted for bias
(Martin & Humphreys, 2017, AJ, 154, 81)
Variability (current)
Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 16 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 6% OB Supergiants 48 5 (10%) 2 (5%) 15% Yellow Supergiants 35 6 (17%) 9 (26%) 43% Warm Hypergiants 10 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 30% B[e] Supergiants * 11 2 (18%) 2 (18%) 36% Classical LBV 9 8 (89%) 0 (0%) 89% Candidate LBV 23 4 (17%) 2 (9%) 26%
* Sample adjusted for unbiased comparison
- w/ 2 more years 30% more variables identified
Limitations
- Precision ~ 0.1 mag
– Brighter stars = lower error per obs
- Comparison ensemble
– Room for improvement
- Field Crowding
– Greater issue in M33 than M31
- Time scales sampled
– ranging weeks to years
Variability (mv < 18.5)
Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 12 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 8% OB Supergiants 44 5 (11%) 2 (4%) 16% Yellow Supergiants 33 6 (18%) 9 (28%) 46% Warm Hypergiants 8 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 38% B[e] Supergiants 8 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 38% Classical LBV 9 8 (89%) 0 (0%) 89% Candidate LBV 19 4 (21%) 1 (5%) 26%
Candidate LBVs
Class N N w/ mv < 18.5 Variable? mv < 18.5 Fe Emission Stars 10 7 1 (14%) Of/late-WN 8 7 0 (0%) OB Supergiants 3 3 3 (100%) Yellow Supergiants 2 2 1 (50%)
- Incidence of variability in OB Supergiants = 16%
- Incidence in OB Supergiant LBV-Candidates = 100%
Exceptional Example
M31-004341.8 (Of/late-WN)
R2 V B R B 0.83 (16) R 0.70 (11) 0.71 (8) I 0.39 (13) 0.56 (3)
- .– (1)
One LGGS star 2 magnitudes fainter 4 arcseconds to S does not interfere significantly with PSF fit. Seven other LGGS stars >3.5 magnitudes fainter within 5 arcseconds.
Exceptional Example
Period = 160 days Amplitude = 0.0625 mag Model includes 3 harmonics
Red Supergiants
- Candidates identified in M31
– Down to Mv~ -4.5 (15 M☉)
- Captured serendipitously in our survey
- None have “disappeared”
- Potential for similar analysis with them
Results
- Longest dedicated survey of M31 & M33
– Published 4-year photometry catalog
- Through year 6 on the web.
- Baselines in BVRI for (182) luminous stars
– Additional value to be mined from images
- 30% more variables detected
– Ability to distinguish improving w/ more data – Difference in variability between classes
http://go.uis.edu/m31m33photcat
Additional Opportunities
- Faint limit ~ 19.5
– Abs Mag ~ -4.5 in M31 & M33 – Main sequence ~ 30 M☉ – RSG ~ 15 M☉
- Phot error < 0.1 mag
- Possibilities: