lax to ind redeye boeing 727 photo bombs m33 a survey of
play

LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of Luminous Stars in M31 and M33 John C. Martin & Logan Kimball University of Illinois Springfield Check Out Bill Reas Paper Cookbook for Mira Spectroscopy with a filter wheel


  1. LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33

  2. A Survey of Luminous Stars in M31 and M33 John C. Martin & Logan Kimball University of Illinois Springfield

  3. Check Out Bill Rea’s Paper Cookbook for Mira Spectroscopy with a filter wheel (SA100 or SA200) grating 2019, JAAVSO Vol 47, No 1

  4. Intro & Thanks • I am: – John C. Martin – Observatory Director & Associate Professor • University of Illinois Springfield • Thanks to: – National Science Foundation – UIS Barber Endowment – Collaborators • Roberta Humphreys • Kris Davidson • Michael Gordon • UIS Observatory Volunteers

  5. Henry R. Barber Research Observatory Volunteers: Jim O’ Brien, Jennifer Hubbell-Thomas, Kevin Cranford, Greg Finn, John Lord, Mary Sheila Tracy, Logan Kimball, Eric Schlaf, Keith Gibbs, Steve Verhulst, Bruce Patterson

  6. Problem: Stars Live too Long Star lifetimes >> Human lifetimes We get a snapshot in time and have to connect the dots to interpret what we see. We must worry about bias due to our point of view!

  7. Star Evolution 150 1 star Stellar Mass (in M ☉ 10 10 stars 2 50 stars 0.5 500 stars 0.08 0.01 0.1 1 100 10 Relative Number of Stars

  8. High Mass vs Low Mass Difference in Life: Stars < 2 M ¤ Stars > 2 M ¤ • P-P Chain Fusion • CNO Cycle Fusion • Radiative Core • Convective Core • Convective Envelope • Radiative Envelope

  9. Predictions for a 25 M ☉ star Duration Core Hydrogen fusion 7 million years Core Helium fusion 700 thousand years Carbon Fusion 600 years Core Neon Fusion 1 year Core Oxygen Fusion 6 months Core Silicon Fusion <1 day

  10. Issues Close To Home Dust!

  11. M31 M33 Andromeda Triangulum Galaxy Galaxy 131 targets 73 targets 6+ years = longest dedicated survey of these two galaxies

  12. SN Impostors Quiescent LBVs Humphreys – Davidson Limit Yellow Void (Warm Hypergiants) 10 +6 WR Luminosity (x Solar) 50M ☉ Hyashi Limit B[e]sg Yellow Super Red Super Giants Giants 10 +5 25M ☉ 10M ☉ 10 +4 20,000 40,000 10,000 5,000 2,500 Temperature (Kelvin)

  13. Classified Targets Classification done by collaborators at UMN using spectra from Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) M31 M33 Type Number Type Number Of/late-WN 5 Of/late-WN 10 OB Supergiants 12 OB Supergiants 36 8 B[e]sg 11 B[e]sg Warm Hypergiants 4 Warm Hypergiants 6 Yellow Supergiants 12 Yellow Supergiants 23 LBV 5 LBV 4 19 Candidate LBV 5 Candidate LBV Peculiar/Unknown 11 Peculiar/unknown 13

  14. Photometric Survey Overview • Images – 20’x20’, limiting mag ~ 19.5 – Four filters, BVRI • Always image V and at least one other – Cadence of at least once per year • Photometry – DAOphot PSF fitting • Aided by Massey LGGS catalog – APASS photometric system – Color transformed

  15. Images • 647 images total – M31 = 463 – M33 = 183 Start V and R Start B • Four Filters Start I – V @ every epoch – R from 2012 – present – B from 2013 – present – I from 2015 – present Astrodon high-throughput Johnson-Cousins Filters B has NO red leak

  16. Check Stars

  17. Photometric Uncertainty

  18. Target Curation V-073136 (J013342.52+303258.6) 10” • OB-Supergiant in M33 • V ~ 17.48 (B-V) ~ 0.28 Target Notes: Many LGGS stars >3 mag fainter within 5 arcsec. Normally resolved from LGGS star J013342.26+303301.6 approaching comparable brightness 4.4 arcsec NW. 5” 5” 5” I V B

  19. Variability From Correlation • If star is variable, bands change in phase • 4 bands = 6 pairs • Calculate R 2 correlation coefficient M31-004507.65 (YSG) R 2 V B R B 0.92 (11) R 0.98 (8) 0.81 (6) I 0.97 (7) 0.97 (3) -.– (1)

  20. Variability From Correlation • Certain = – At least two band pairs (N > 5) and (R 2 > 0.60) • Likely = – At least one band pair (N > 5) and (R 2 > 0.60) M31-004033.80 (OBsg) R 2 V B R B 0.23 (11) R 0.03 (8) 0.39 (4) I 0.00 (6) -.-- (2) -.– (2)

  21. ̅ Welch & Stetson (1993) • Calculate statistics between 2 bands – I = measure correlation • Expectation value = 0 for non-variable • Negative if inverse correlation – R = measure ratio between band fluctuations • Depends on type of variable ∑ 𝑤 ! 𝜀𝑤 ! = 𝑤 ! − ̅ 𝑤 𝑥 = ' 1 $ 𝜏 ",! $ $ 𝜏 !,# 𝑤 = 𝜏 ",! 𝑥 $ 1 ∑ 𝜀𝑐 ! ∑ 𝜀𝑤 ! 𝐽 = 𝑜 𝑜 − 1 & 𝜀𝑐 ! 𝜀𝑤 ! 𝑆 = + !"#

  22. Welch & Stetson (1993) For B & V

  23. Welch & Stetson (1993)

  24. Variability 2012-16 Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 16 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0% OB Supergiants 48 5 (10%) 1 (2%) 12% Yellow Supergiants 35 6 (17%) 4 (11%) 28% Warm Hypergiants 10 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 20% B[e] Supergiants * 11 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 18% Classical LBV 9 7 (78%) 1 (11%) 89% Candidate LBV 23 2 (9%) 1 (4%) 13% (Martin & Humphreys, 2017, AJ, 154, 81) * Sample adjusted for bias

  25. Variability (current) Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 16 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 6% OB Supergiants 48 5 (10%) 2 (5%) 15% Yellow Supergiants 35 6 (17%) 9 (26%) 43% Warm Hypergiants 10 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 30% B[e] Supergiants * 11 2 (18%) 2 (18%) 36% Classical LBV 9 8 (89%) 0 (0%) 89% Candidate LBV 23 4 (17%) 2 (9%) 26% * Sample adjusted for unbiased comparison • w/ 2 more years 30% more variables identified

  26. Limitations • Precision ~ 0.1 mag – Brighter stars = lower error per obs • Comparison ensemble – Room for improvement • Field Crowding – Greater issue in M33 than M31 • Time scales sampled – ranging weeks to years

  27. Variability (m v < 18.5) Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 12 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 8% OB Supergiants 44 5 (11%) 2 (4%) 16% Yellow Supergiants 33 6 (18%) 9 (28%) 46% Warm Hypergiants 8 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 38% B[e] Supergiants 8 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 38% Classical LBV 9 8 (89%) 0 (0%) 89% Candidate LBV 19 4 (21%) 1 (5%) 26%

  28. Candidate LBVs Class N N w/ Variable? m v < 18.5 m v < 18.5 Fe Emission Stars 10 7 1 (14%) Of/late-WN 8 7 0 (0%) OB Supergiants 3 3 3 (100%) Yellow Supergiants 2 2 1 (50%) • Incidence of variability in OB Supergiants = 16% • Incidence in OB Supergiant LBV-Candidates = 100%

  29. Exceptional Example M31-004341.8 (Of/late-WN) One LGGS star 2 magnitudes fainter 4 arcseconds to S does not interfere significantly with PSF fit. Seven other LGGS stars >3.5 magnitudes fainter within 5 arcseconds. R 2 V B R B 0.83 (16) R 0.70 (11) 0.71 (8) I 0.39 (13) 0.56 (3) -.– (1)

  30. Exceptional Example Period = 160 days Amplitude = 0.0625 mag Model includes 3 harmonics

  31. Red Supergiants • Candidates identified in M31 – Down to M v ~ -4.5 (15 M ☉ ) • Captured serendipitously in our survey • None have “disappeared” • Potential for similar analysis with them

  32. Results • Longest dedicated survey of M31 & M33 – Published 4-year photometry catalog • Through year 6 on the web. • Baselines in BVRI for (182) luminous stars – Additional value to be mined from images • 30% more variables detected – Ability to distinguish improving w/ more data – Difference in variability between classes http://go.uis.edu/m31m33photcat

  33. Additional Opportunities • Faint limit ~ 19.5 – Abs Mag ~ -4.5 in M31 & M33 – Main sequence ~ 30 M ☉ – RSG ~ 15 M ☉ • Phot error < 0.1 mag • Possibilities: – Novae – Un-Nova (disappearing RSG) – The BIG one. http://go.uis.edu/m31m33photcat

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend