LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lax to ind redeye boeing 727 photo bombs m33 a survey of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33 A Survey of Luminous Stars in M31 and M33 John C. Martin & Logan Kimball University of Illinois Springfield Check Out Bill Reas Paper Cookbook for Mira Spectroscopy with a filter wheel


slide-1
SLIDE 1

LAX to IND redeye (Boeing 727) photo bombs M33

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A Survey of Luminous Stars in M31 and M33

John C. Martin & Logan Kimball

University of Illinois Springfield

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Check Out Bill Rea’s Paper

Cookbook for Mira Spectroscopy with a filter wheel (SA100 or SA200) grating 2019, JAAVSO Vol 47, No 1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Intro & Thanks

  • I am:

– John C. Martin – Observatory Director & Associate Professor

  • University of Illinois Springfield
  • Thanks to:

– National Science Foundation – UIS Barber Endowment – Collaborators

  • Roberta Humphreys
  • Kris Davidson
  • Michael Gordon
  • UIS Observatory Volunteers
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Henry R. Barber Research Observatory

Volunteers:

Jim O’ Brien, Jennifer Hubbell-Thomas, Kevin Cranford, Greg Finn, John Lord, Mary Sheila Tracy, Logan Kimball, Eric Schlaf, Keith Gibbs, Steve Verhulst, Bruce Patterson

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Problem: Stars Live too Long

Star lifetimes >> Human lifetimes We get a snapshot in time and have to connect the dots to interpret what we see. We must worry about bias due to our point of view!

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Star Evolution

Relative Number of Stars 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Stellar Mass (in M☉ 2 0.5 10 150

1 star 10 stars 50 stars 500 stars

0.08

slide-9
SLIDE 9

High Mass vs Low Mass

Stars < 2 M¤

  • P-P Chain Fusion
  • Radiative Core
  • Convective Envelope

Stars > 2 M¤

  • CNO Cycle Fusion
  • Convective Core
  • Radiative Envelope

Difference in Life:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Predictions for a 25 M☉ star

Duration Core Hydrogen fusion 7 million years Core Helium fusion 700 thousand years Carbon Fusion 600 years Core Neon Fusion 1 year Core Oxygen Fusion 6 months Core Silicon Fusion <1 day

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Issues Close To Home

Dust!

slide-12
SLIDE 12

M31 Andromeda Galaxy M33 Triangulum Galaxy

73 targets 131 targets 6+ years = longest dedicated survey of these two galaxies

slide-13
SLIDE 13

B[e]sg Luminosity (x Solar) Temperature (Kelvin)

10,000 5,000 2,500 20,000 40,000 10+4 10+5 10+6

Hyashi Limit

10M☉ 50M☉

Red Super Giants

25M☉ SN Impostors

WR Yellow Super Giants

Yellow Void (Warm Hypergiants)

Humphreys – Davidson Limit

Quiescent LBVs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Classified Targets

M31

Type Number Of/late-WN 5 OB Supergiants 12 B[e]sg 11 Warm Hypergiants 4 Yellow Supergiants 12 LBV 5 Candidate LBV 5 Peculiar/Unknown 11

M33

Type

Number

Of/late-WN

10

OB Supergiants

36

B[e]sg

8

Warm Hypergiants

6

Yellow Supergiants

23

LBV

4

Candidate LBV

19

Peculiar/unknown

13

Classification done by collaborators at UMN using spectra from Large Binocular Telescope (LBT)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Photometric Survey Overview

  • Images

– 20’x20’, limiting mag ~ 19.5 – Four filters, BVRI

  • Always image V and at least one other

– Cadence of at least once per year

  • Photometry

– DAOphot PSF fitting

  • Aided by Massey LGGS catalog

– APASS photometric system – Color transformed

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Images

  • 647 images total

– M31 = 463 – M33 = 183

  • Four Filters

– V @ every epoch – R from 2012 – present – B from 2013 – present – I from 2015 – present

Start B Start I Start V and R

Astrodon high-throughput Johnson-Cousins Filters B has NO red leak

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Check Stars

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Photometric Uncertainty

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Target Curation

V-073136 (J013342.52+303258.6)

  • OB-Supergiant in M33
  • V ~ 17.48 (B-V) ~ 0.28

Target Notes:

Many LGGS stars >3 mag fainter within 5 arcsec. Normally resolved from LGGS star J013342.26+303301.6 approaching comparable brightness 4.4 arcsec NW.

V B I

5” 5” 5” 10”

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Variability From Correlation

  • If star is variable, bands change in phase
  • 4 bands = 6 pairs
  • Calculate R2 correlation coefficient

R2 V B R B 0.92 (11) R 0.98 (8) 0.81 (6) I 0.97 (7) 0.97 (3)

  • .– (1)

M31-004507.65 (YSG)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Variability From Correlation

  • Certain =

– At least two band pairs (N > 5) and (R2 > 0.60)

  • Likely =

– At least one band pair (N > 5) and (R2 > 0.60)

R2 V B R B 0.23 (11) R 0.03 (8) 0.39 (4) I 0.00 (6)

  • .-- (2)
  • .– (2)

M31-004033.80 (OBsg)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Welch & Stetson (1993)

  • Calculate statistics between 2 bands

– I = measure correlation

  • Expectation value = 0 for non-variable
  • Negative if inverse correlation

– R = measure ratio between band fluctuations

  • Depends on type of variable

̅ 𝑤 = $ ∑ 𝑤! 𝜏",!

$

𝑥 𝜀𝑤! = 𝑤! − ̅ 𝑤 𝜏",!

𝐽 = 1 𝑜 𝑜 − 1 &

!"# $

𝜀𝑐!𝜀𝑤! 𝑆 = + ∑ 𝜀𝑐! ∑ 𝜀𝑤!

𝑥 = ' 1 𝜏!,#

$

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Welch & Stetson (1993)

For B & V

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Welch & Stetson (1993)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Variability 2012-16

Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 16 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0% OB Supergiants 48 5 (10%) 1 (2%) 12% Yellow Supergiants 35 6 (17%) 4 (11%) 28% Warm Hypergiants 10 0 (0%) 2 (20%) 20% B[e] Supergiants * 11 1 (9%) 1 (9%) 18% Classical LBV 9 7 (78%) 1 (11%) 89% Candidate LBV 23 2 (9%) 1 (4%) 13%

* Sample adjusted for bias

(Martin & Humphreys, 2017, AJ, 154, 81)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Variability (current)

Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 16 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 6% OB Supergiants 48 5 (10%) 2 (5%) 15% Yellow Supergiants 35 6 (17%) 9 (26%) 43% Warm Hypergiants 10 2 (20%) 1 (10%) 30% B[e] Supergiants * 11 2 (18%) 2 (18%) 36% Classical LBV 9 8 (89%) 0 (0%) 89% Candidate LBV 23 4 (17%) 2 (9%) 26%

* Sample adjusted for unbiased comparison

  • w/ 2 more years 30% more variables identified
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Limitations

  • Precision ~ 0.1 mag

– Brighter stars = lower error per obs

  • Comparison ensemble

– Room for improvement

  • Field Crowding

– Greater issue in M33 than M31

  • Time scales sampled

– ranging weeks to years

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Variability (mv < 18.5)

Class N Certain Likely Total Of/late-WN 12 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 8% OB Supergiants 44 5 (11%) 2 (4%) 16% Yellow Supergiants 33 6 (18%) 9 (28%) 46% Warm Hypergiants 8 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 38% B[e] Supergiants 8 2 (25%) 1 (13%) 38% Classical LBV 9 8 (89%) 0 (0%) 89% Candidate LBV 19 4 (21%) 1 (5%) 26%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Candidate LBVs

Class N N w/ mv < 18.5 Variable? mv < 18.5 Fe Emission Stars 10 7 1 (14%) Of/late-WN 8 7 0 (0%) OB Supergiants 3 3 3 (100%) Yellow Supergiants 2 2 1 (50%)

  • Incidence of variability in OB Supergiants = 16%
  • Incidence in OB Supergiant LBV-Candidates = 100%
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Exceptional Example

M31-004341.8 (Of/late-WN)

R2 V B R B 0.83 (16) R 0.70 (11) 0.71 (8) I 0.39 (13) 0.56 (3)

  • .– (1)

One LGGS star 2 magnitudes fainter 4 arcseconds to S does not interfere significantly with PSF fit. Seven other LGGS stars >3.5 magnitudes fainter within 5 arcseconds.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Exceptional Example

Period = 160 days Amplitude = 0.0625 mag Model includes 3 harmonics

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Red Supergiants

  • Candidates identified in M31

– Down to Mv~ -4.5 (15 M☉)

  • Captured serendipitously in our survey
  • None have “disappeared”
  • Potential for similar analysis with them
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Results

  • Longest dedicated survey of M31 & M33

– Published 4-year photometry catalog

  • Through year 6 on the web.
  • Baselines in BVRI for (182) luminous stars

– Additional value to be mined from images

  • 30% more variables detected

– Ability to distinguish improving w/ more data – Difference in variability between classes

http://go.uis.edu/m31m33photcat

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Additional Opportunities

  • Faint limit ~ 19.5

– Abs Mag ~ -4.5 in M31 & M33 – Main sequence ~ 30 M☉ – RSG ~ 15 M☉

  • Phot error < 0.1 mag
  • Possibilities:

– Novae – Un-Nova (disappearing RSG) – The BIG one.

http://go.uis.edu/m31m33photcat