lax extensions of coalgebra functors
play

Lax Extensions of Coalgebra Functors Johannes Marti and Yde Venema - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lax Extensions of Coalgebra Functors Johannes Marti and Yde Venema ILLC, University of Amsterdam April 1, 2012 The Setting We work with set based coalgebras. Two states of coalgebras : X TX and : Y TY are


  1. Lax Extensions of Coalgebra Functors Johannes Marti and Yde Venema ILLC, University of Amsterdam April 1, 2012

  2. � � � � � The Setting We work with set based coalgebras. Two states of coalgebras ξ : X → TX and υ : Y → TY are behaviorally equivalent if there exists coalgebra morphisms that identify them. X Y � � � � g � f � � � � ξ υ � � � � � � � � � � TX Z TY � � � �������� � � � ζ � � Tf Tg � TZ

  3. Bisimilarity A relation lifting L for T maps R : X → Y to LR : TX → TY . R is an L-bisimulation between ξ : X → TX and υ : Y → TY if ( x , y ) ∈ R implies ( ξ ( x ) , υ ( y )) ∈ LR . Two states are L-bisimilar if an L -bisimulation connects them. L captures behavioral equivalence if L -bisimilarity and behavioral equivalence coincide. We assume that L ( R ◦ ) = ( LR ) ◦

  4. Example: Barr extension The Barr extension T of T maps R : X → Y to TR = { ( T π X ( ρ ) , T π Y ( ρ )) | ρ ∈ TR } where π X : R → X and π Y : R → Y are projections. T captures behavioral equivalence if T preserves weak-pullbacks

  5. Functors that do not preserve weak-pullbacks The neighborhood functor N = ˘ P ˘ P where ˘ P is the contravariant powerset functor. The monotone neighborhood functor M is N restricted to upsets. The restricted powerset functor P n X = { U ⊆ X | | U | < n } . There are relation liftings � M for M and � P n for P n that capture behavioral equivalence.

  6. � � � � � � � Result No relation lifting for N captures behavioral equivalence. Proof: ∅ g f � z 1 {{ x 2 }} x 1 y 1 ∅ f � z 2 {∅} x 2 � ��������� f x 3 {∅}

  7. Lax Extensions L is a lax extension of T if for all compatible R , R ′ , S and f : 1. R ′ ⊆ R implies LR ′ ⊆ LR , 2. LR ; LS ⊆ L ( R ; S ), 3. Tf ⊆ Lf . A lax extension L preserves diagonals if it satisfies Tf = Lf . Lax extension that preserves diagonals capture behavioral equivalence.

  8. Theorem A finitary functor T has a lax extension that preserves diagonals iff it has a separating set of monotone predicate liftings. A predicate lifting λ for T is a natural transformation: λ : T ⇒ ˘ P ˘ P = N . If λ is monotone its domain can be restricted: λ : T ⇒ M . A set Λ = { λ : T ⇒ N | λ ∈ Λ } of predicate liftings is separating if { λ X : TX ⇒ N X | λ ∈ Λ } is jointly injective for every set X .

  9. Proof of Theorem A finitary functor T has a lax extension that preserves diagonals iff it has a separating set of monotone predicate liftings. Left-to-right uses the Moss liftings introduced by Kurz and Leal. Right-to-left: For a set Λ = { λ : T ⇒ N | λ ∈ Λ } the initial lift M Λ of � � M along Λ is defined on R : X → Y as: ( ξ, υ ) ∈ � ( λ x ( ξ ) , λ Y ( υ )) ∈ � M Λ R iff M R for all λ ∈ Λ .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend