landscapes Thomas Hilker 1 Nicholas Coops 2 Forrest Hall 1 T Andrew - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

landscapes
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

landscapes Thomas Hilker 1 Nicholas Coops 2 Forrest Hall 1 T Andrew - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Scaling photosynthetic light-use efficiency from canopies to landscapes Thomas Hilker 1 Nicholas Coops 2 Forrest Hall 1 T Andrew Black 2 1 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 2 University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Scaling photosynthetic light-use efficiency from canopies to landscapes

Thomas Hilker1 Nicholas Coops2 Forrest Hall1 T Andrew Black2

1NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

2University of British Columbia

Vancouver, BC, Canada

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Monteith (1972,1977):

Remote sensing of Photosynthesis

PAR f GPP

PAR

Light-use efficiency term ε

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Photosynthetic Energy Pathways

  • 3. non-photochemical quenching (xanthophyll cycle)

H+H+H+ H+ H+ H+

antenna chlorophyll photons

  • 1. chlorophyll fluorescence

e- e- e- e- e-

  • 2. photochemical quenching

e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e- Hilker et al., Science of the Total Environment (2008)

3

A Cell’s Light Harvesting Complex (Size 0.2 μm) energy level

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Associated changes in reflectance

500 550 600

wavelength (nm) reflectance

0.2 0.3 0.4 531nm

531 570 531 570

PRI

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

moving sun moving observer

Effects of Structure on Remote Sensing of Photosynthesis

  • I. Physical effects

5

Figure: D. Culvenor

Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research(2008)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

shaded sunlit shaded

ε= low ε = high

Effects of Structure on Remote Sensing of Photosynthesis

  • II. Physiological effects

Hall et al. Remote Sensing of Environment (2008)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Amspec

7

Hilker et al., Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (2007) Hilker et al. Instrumentation Science and Technology (2010)

Automated Multi-Angular Spectroradiometer

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Amspec data

Hilker et al. Instrumentation Science and Technology (2010)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Hilker et al., Remote Sensing of Environment (2008)

Combining Structure and Function: Inferring Photosynthetic Efficiency

ε= low ε= high sunlit shaded sunlit

slide-10
SLIDE 10

not considering structure considering structure

RS of Photosynthetic Efficiency

1 2 3

  • 0.08
  • 0.06
  • 0.04
  • 0.02

r2=0.91 r2=0.87

gC MJ

  • 1

PRI sunlit shaded

10

Hilker et al., Remote Sensing of Environment (2008,2009)

Light-use efficiency (ɛ gCMJ-1) Light-use efficiency (ɛ gCMJ-1)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Calculating shadow fractions (αs) SOA DF-49

11

Hilker et al., Remote Sensing of Environment (2010)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Calculating shadow fractions (αs)

12

Hilker et al., Tree Physiology (2008)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Remote sensing of ε across sites

1st derivative of PRI (wrt αs) vs. ε

13

Hilker et al., Remote Sensing of Environment (2010)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scaling Up: CHRIS/Proba Satellite

14

Figure: UK Space Agency

Hall, Hilker et al., Remote Sensing of Environment (in press)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Scaling Up

15

Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research (in press)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Obtaining PRI and Shadow fractions from CHRIS/Proba

Reflectance for given overpass Corresponding Shadow fractions from spectral endmembers

16

Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research (in press)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Structural Differences of Test Sites

17

Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research (in press)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Satellite-derived Photosynthesis

18

Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research (in press)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Satellite-derived Photosynthesis

19

Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research (in press)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusions

  • 1. Consecration of structure is essential for

robust stand level sensing of function

  • 2. Structure can be obtained from multi-angle

spectral observations

  • 3. ΔPRI Δαs
  • 1 can be used to infer instantaneous

ε across different biomes

  • 4. This relationship can be upscaled to space

using an adequate sensor

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PhotosynSat: Photosynthesis from Space

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Thomas Hilker, PhD NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Biospheric Sciences Branch Code 614.4 Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA ☏: +1 301.286.8597 ฀: +1 301.614.6695 Mobile: +1 301.326.3743 Email: thomas.hilker@nasa.gov

For your attention! Questions?

Thank you!!

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Integrating Remote Sensing and Carbon Models

23

Satellite observations of GEP

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Carbo Europe: Long-term

monitoring of ecosystem change

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Eddy covariance/AMSPEC footprint

Flux footprint model: Chen et al. 2008 Hilker et al., Journal of Geophysical Research(2008)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

AMSPEC system

Range & Bandwidth: 400-1200 nm @ 10nm Sampling rate: ~ 5 sec sunrise to sunset Full Rotation: 15 minutes

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Sensitivity to shadow fractions NDRI PRI

Stand level ε=const

Hall et al., 2008, RSE

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conclusions for spaceborne PRI mission

  • A satellite design comparable

to MODIS can only work when correcting directional effects from the ground (for instance using an AMSPEC)

ε=ε3 ε=ε2 ε=ε1

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conclusions for spaceborne PRI mission

  • Along-track sensor
  • bserves PRI from

multiple angles for constant ε

  • Instantaneous ε can be

inferred from ΔPRI Δαs-1

ε=ε1=const

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Concept validation: CHRIS Proba

Operator: ESA (European Space Agency) Date of Launch: 22 October 2001 Orbit Height: 615 km Orbit Type: Sun-synchronous elliptical polar Repeat Cycle: approx. 7 days Resolution: 18 m (CHRIS) Swath Width: 14 km (CHRIS)

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Concept validation: CHRIS Proba

Band Cut-on Wavelength Cut-off Wavelength Central Wavelength Bandwidth 1 419.4 422 420.7 2.6 2 437 447.4 442 10.4 3 484.1 495.6 489.8 11.6 4 523.8 535.3 529.5 11.4 5 544.4 557.2 550.7 12.9 6 564 574.6 569.3 10.6 7 623.6 637.6 630.5 14 8 652.4 668.1 660.1 15.7 9 668.1 679 673.5 10.9 10 690.4 702.2 696.2 11.8 11 702.2 708.3 705.2 6.1 12 708.3 714.5 711.4 6.2 13 733.8 747.3 740.4 13.5 14 747.3 754.2 750.7 6.9 15 768.4 790.9 779.5 22.5 16 857 884.3 870.5 27.4 17 884.3 903.1 893.6 18.8 18 903.1 912.9 908 9.7

up to 5 acquisitions per overpass 12 overpasses (@4-5 angles) for the DF-49 site during 2009 (Mode 3)

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

For Assistance and Support with Amspec:

  • Zoran Nesic, UBC LFS
  • Dominic Lessard, UBC, LFS
  • Rick Ketler, UBC, LFS
  • Andrew Hum, UBC, LFS

For Sharing Data and Concepts:

  • Mike Wulder, NRCAN, CFS
  • Alexei Lyapustin, NASA GSFC
  • 32