Land and Water Introduction and overview The fundamental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Natural resources economics M1

Land and Water

Chapter One

2

Introduction and overview The fundamental distinction between resources

Renewable resources

Provide an infinite duration flow of services 'correctly' managed (in a sustainable way) Examples : land, water, wind, solar energy, forests, crops and cattle, biological resources Available resource flow submited to some 'limits': Physical limits Technical limits Cultural and religious constraints Political and institutional limits (transboundary sharing of rivers)

The fundamental distinction between resources Non renewable (or exhaustible) resources

Provide only a finite duration flow of services Examples : coal, oil, iron, copper, and other mineral resources Combine limits upon the flow of services and upon the stock of services (of limited size)

Two important remarks

A distinction economically based (concept of 'service') A common characteristic: the existence of 'limits'

Makes room for 'scarcity' considerations Introduces the concept of 'opportunity cost' associated with these 'limits' Equivalence between 'opportunity cost' and 'resource rent'

4

Overview of Chapter One Principles of Land Economics

Economics of land use : the concept of 'rent'

A starter : a Leontiev example Land rent when inputs are subsituable Land of differing qualities : the 'Ricardian rent' Von Thunen like land rent Land as a capital good Appendix : The concept of present value

5

Overview of Chapter One Water economics

Water problems in the world today Water as a resource Water quality

A 'damage function' approach An 'environmental benefits' approach

Water scarcity rents Sharing a river Appendix : water issues in France

6

Land economics An elementary model

An agricultural good produced from land and labour Limited supply of land Land and labour of homogeneous quality Price of the consumption good : p Wage rate : w The landlord demand for labour and supply of consumption good 'small' with respect to the market (exogeneous prices) QF A , L  A

7

A Leontiev example The technology is of the Leontiev class:

Efficient use of inputs requires: The landlord profit as a function of land use: A necessary condition for economic activity: Under this condition all the available land is put in use. F  A, L=minaL L ,aA A aL L=a A A  A= paA A−w aL a A A=a A p− w a L  A pw/aL

8

Land rent in the Leontiev case

Increase of profit with land availability increase ('marginal' rent): Operating cost: The total land rent is identical to the total profit. =aA p−w/aL C= aA a L w  A

9

Land rent in the Leontiev case

Fig1 : Land rent in the Leontiev example

Slope : w aA/aL

a A p w aA/aL  A

Rent Cost Unit cost function C/A

10

Land rent when inputs are substituable No subsituability in the Leontiev case With substituability, the land rent becomes a function

• f the land plot size

Questions:

How the landlord can determine the profit maximizing level of workers ? What would be the level of the land rent ?

11

Land rent as a difference between average and marginal productivity

Average productivity (production per capita) Marginal productivity in value : APL= pF A , L/ L MPL= p ∂ F A , L ∂ L

Fig 2 : Land rent as a difference between average and marginal productivity AP MP

L w

Rent Cost

Ouput in value pQ Labour

12

The profit maximizing landlord

Gamma appears as the marginal rent of land It is also the 'marginal opportunity cost' of the land constraint It is also the marginal willingness to pay (WTP) of the landlord for

• ne extra unit of land (the land 'value')

Max= pF  A, L−wL s:t A A

The Lagrangian of this problem is:

L= p F A , L−wL A−A

And the first order conditions give:

p∂ F  A, L/∂ L=w p∂ F  A, L/∂ A=

13

From marginal rent to total rent

=A≡ pF A ,LA−w L A

The marginal profit in terms of land is given by :

d  A/d A= p∂ F A ,L/∂ A p∂ F A, L/∂ L−wdL/dA

But the necessary conditions implies that p∂ F A ,L/∂ L=w , hence:

d  A/d A= p∂ F A ,L/∂ A=≡A

Integrating over [0, 

A] , we get : = A=∫0

 A

d A/dAdA=∫0

 A

Ad A≡ A

NB : A consequence of the envelope theorem which states that: d V /d =∂V /∂ , where V stands for the value function of the optimization program (the profit  in our case),  is some parameter (here A ).

14

Marginal land rent as a function of land size

Totally differentiating :

pF AA , L=⇒ pF AAA , LdAF AL A, LdL/dAdA=d 

Differentiating the optimality condition with respect to labour:

pF LA , L=w⇒ pF LAA, LdAF L LA , LdL/dAdA=0

gives:

dL A/dA=−F ALA, L/ F L L A, L .

Plugging into the above:

d A d A = pF A A−F AL F AL F L L = p F L L F AA F L L−F AL

2 

Joint strict concavity assumption :

F L L0 F A A0 F L L F AA−F AL

2 0

Implies that:

d A dA 0

15

Conclusion

For a land of homogeneous quality:

• The total land rent is equal to the profit of the landlord, that is the difference between

sales and the labour cost.

• When the labour and land inputs are substitutable, the land rent depends upon the

size of the land plot.

• The marginal land rent is the extra profit (or marginal profit) over an extra land unit

above the landlord property.

• The marginal land rent is equal to the marginal opportunity cost of land, that is the

Lagrange multiplier associated to the land constraint.

• The total rent is equal to the total opportunity cost, that is the integral of the

marginal opportunity costs over the land size range.

• If the production technology exhibits marginal decreasing returns on inputs, that is if

the production function is jointly concave in the land and labour inputs, then the marginal rent is a decreasing function of the size of the land plot.

16

Lands of differing 'qualities' The concept of Ricardian Rent

A family of land plots of differing 'qualities' 'Quality' is here identified to the productivity of labour The technolgy is of the linear class: Ranking by labour productivity index : Total profit on plot Ai: Unit rent on plot Ai: In the linear case : unit rent (or average rent) = marginal rent F A={A1 , A2,... , Ai ,... , AI} ai labour units  1 output unit on plot Ai i= pQi−wLi= p−w aiQi p−w ai a1a2...ai...a I

17

Ricardian rents in the linear case

Fig 4 : The ranking of the Ricardian rent

p-w a1 p-w a2 p-w aM p-w aM+1 Rent A1 A2 AM AM+1

18

Ricardian rents

The plot AM is called the marginal land The marginal land is the least productive land plot earning a positive profit In the linear case, the marginal land rent (or here the unit rent) does not depend upon the land size The marginal land rents are ranked in order of marginal productivities of land The total land rents may be ranked in totally different order (depending of the land sizes) The meaningful economic concept is those of marginal land rent

19

Ricardian rent (general case)

A family of technological constraints A corresponding family of marginal land rents: The technology is assumed concave in (A,L) The marginal land rents are hence decreasing functions of A The marginal land rents are ranked by strictly decreasing order: {F iL , Ai i∈{1,... , I}} {iA, AAi , i∈{1,... , I }} iAii10 , i∈{1,... , I}

20

The ranking of ricardian rents

Fig 5 : An example of ranking of the marginal rents

 A A1

A2 A3 Marginal rent Land A1 A2 A3 AM

21

Conclusion

For lands of differing qualities:

• Lands with different labour productivity exhibit the so-called 'differential'

rents of 'Ricardian rents' property. That is land with higher labour productivity have higher marginal land rents.

• With linear technologies, the ranking of the marginal and unit rents are

identical and determined by the ranking of the labour productivity coefficients.

• Under more general technological assumptions, the marginal and total rents

will depend upon the respective sizes of the land plots. The ranking of marginal rents and total rents may be completely different.

• The concept of marginal Ricardian rent provides the sound economic basis

to the determination of the economic value of land.

• The marginal land rent is the WTP of the land owner to get on extra unit of

land of the same 'quality'.

22

Von Thunen like land rents Introduce the idea of distance to some 'centre' First developed by Von Thunen to explain land prices differentials The very basic model of housing price determination The spatial land model:

Fig 6 : a simple spatial land model

 A x A

23

Spatial land rents The model (continued)

x(A) : distance form the centre of the point A T(Q,x(A)) = c x(A) Q : transportation cost of output from A The technology is of the Leontiev class Under efficiency : The profit at the distance x from the centre: Q=mina L L ,aA Q=aA , L=a A/aL x= pQ−wL−T Q , x= pa A−w a A/aL−cxa A=a A p−w/a L−cx

24

Differential rents in the spatial model

Fig 7 : Differential land rent in a spatial model

a A p−w/al a A p−w/al−aAc x

x  A Distance x Rent

25

Land specialization Two activities with different marginal spatial rents:

Fig 8 : specialization of land use and land pricing

 X Rent Q1 Q2 X Distance x

26

Specialization of activities

In the Leontiev case, the unit rents are equal to the marginal rents (as a function of the distance) The highest unit rents are the most profitable activities The curves Q1 and Q2 also stand for the spot demand functions The marginal rents are the spot land prices (hiring prices) The land spot price as a distance function is the upper contour of the marginal land rents. On actual land markets, the price depends upon transaction costs

27

Actual land markets High level of transaction costs:

28

Conclusion

Lands plots may be differing by their access costs (or distance costs) from some location in space (the 'centre' ):

• The land rent in this case is a decreasing function of the distance between

the land plot and the 'centre'

• The distance cost introduces the same differential element between rents

as observed in ranked land quality models (the so-called Ricardian rent models)

• When multiple activities may be undertaken on the land, the activities should

be ranked by decreasing order with the distance from the centre. That is highest rent activities should occur besides the centre and less profitable activities should occur farther in distance from the centre.

• The equilibrium spot land price upon the land market should be equal to the

marginal land rent and decrease with the distance from the centre.

29

Land as a capital Land 'rent' is usually identified to a flow of wealth from land property Pricing land as an asset : the concept of present value

A rent flow from a land plot over an infinite duration: The present value of the rent flow: With i the interest rate. The present value gives the land price as an asset in a perfect land market equilibrium. {r0,r1,... ,rt ,....} V =∑

t=0 ∞

[ 1 1i

t ]rt

30

Price dispersion around a city

31

Conclusion

The land price of the land, as an asset (capital good), should be equal in a perfect equilibrium without transaction costs to the present value of the perpetual flow of rents obtained from an efficient exploitation of the land plot

32

Appendix : The concept of present value

A property right over a money amount R to be received in 10 years What is the smallest amount of money v you would accept now if you decide to sell this property right ? Assume you invest this money amount on the capital market at an interest rate i:

After one year get : v1 = v + iv = (1+i)v After two years get: After 10 years get: The money amount v must make you indifferent between getting R in 10 years or receiving the capitalized value of v in 10 years, that is:

v2=v1i v1=1iv1=1i

2v

v10=1i

10 v

R=v10 ⇒ v= R 1i

10

33

Appendix : the concept of present value

Now, let us consider an asset producing an infinte stream of money amounts : To each money amount, compute the present money equivalent: The money amount V making someone indifferent between receiving the flow of money amounts and selling the asset today is the sum of these present money equivalents. V is the present value of the infinite stream of money {R0, R1,... , Rt ,...} vt= Rt 1i

t

V =∑

t=0 ∞

Rt 1i

t

{R0, R1,... , Rt ,...}