lamperti transform for multi type cbi
play

Lamperti transform for multi-type CBI Nicoletta Gabrielli (based on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lamperti transform for multi-type CBI Nicoletta Gabrielli (based on a joint work with J. Teichmann) University of Z urich Department of Banking and Finance nicoletta.gabrielli@bf.uzh.ch October 23, 2014 N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014


  1. Lamperti transform for multi-type CBI Nicoletta Gabrielli (based on a joint work with J. Teichmann) University of Z¨ urich Department of Banking and Finance nicoletta.gabrielli@bf.uzh.ch October 23, 2014 N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 1 / 38

  2. Structure of the talk Introduction 1 Real valued CB and Lamperti transform Extension to real valued CBI What is a multi–type CBI 2 Definitions Some additional results Lamperti transform for multi–type CBI 3 Multi–type CB and their time–change representation Extension to multi–type CBI Sketch of the proof N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 2 / 38

  3. Outline Introduction 1 Real valued CB and Lamperti transform Extension to real valued CBI What is a multi–type CBI 2 Definitions Some additional results Lamperti transform for multi–type CBI 3 Multi–type CB and their time–change representation Extension to multi–type CBI Sketch of the proof

  4. Branching processes Let (Ω , ( X t ) t ≥ 0 , ( F ♮ t ) t ≥ 0 , ( P x ) x ∈ R ≥ 0 ) be a time homogeneous Markov process. The process X is said to be an branching process if it satisfies the following property: Branching property For any t ≥ 0 and x 1 , x 2 ∈ R ≥ 0 , the law of X t under P x 1 + x 2 is the same , where each X ( i ) has the same distribution as as the law of X ( 1 ) + X ( 2 ) t t X under P x i , for i = 1 , 2. N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 4 / 38

  5. Fourier–Laplace transform characterization There exists a function Ψ : R ≥ 0 × C ≤ 0 → C such that E x � � = e x Ψ( t , u ) , e uX t for all x ∈ R ≥ 0 and ( t , u ) ∈ R ≥ 0 × C ≤ 0 . On the set Q = R ≥ 0 × C ≤ 0 , the function Ψ satisfies the equation ∂ t Ψ( t , u ) = R (Ψ( t , u )) , Ψ( 0 , u ) = u . The branching mechanism The function R has the following L´ evy-Khintchine form � ∞ � � R ( u ) = β u + 1 e u ξ − 1 − u ξ ✶ {| ξ |≤ 1 } 2 u 2 α + M ( d ξ ) , 0 where β ∈ R , α ≥ 0 and M is a L´ evy measure with support in R ≥ 0 . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 5 / 38

  6. L´ evy processes A time homogeneous Markov process Z is a L´ evy process if the following three conditions are satisfied: L1) Z 0 = 0 P -a.s. L2) Z has independent and stationary increments, i.e. for all n ∈ N and 0 ≤ t 0 < t 1 < . . . < t n + 1 < ∞ (independence) the random variables { Z t j + 1 − Z t j } j = 0 ,..., n are independent, (stationarity) the distribution of Z t j + 1 − Z t j coincides with the distribution of Z ( t j + 1 − t j ) , L3) (stochastic continuity) for each a > 0 and s ≥ 0 , lim t → s P ( | Z t − Z s | > a ) = 0 . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 6 / 38

  7. Relation with infinitely divisible distributions If Z is a L´ evy process, then, for any t ≥ 0, the random variable Z t is infinitely divisible. The Fourier transform of a L´ evy process takes the form: E 0 � e � u , Z t � � = e t η ( u ) , u ∈ i R � � � η ( u ) = β u + 1 e u ξ − 1 − u ξ ✶ {| ξ |≤ 1 } 2 u 2 α + M ( d ξ ) , where β ∈ R , α ≥ 0 and M is a L´ evy measure in R . The Fourier transform can be extended in the complex domain and the resulting Fourier–Laplace transform is well defined in U := { u ∈ C | η ( R e ( u )) < ∞} . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 7 / 38

  8. Lamperti transform Theorem [Lamperti, 1967] Let Z be a L´ evy process with no negative jumps with L´ evy exponent R , i.e. E 0 � � e uZ t = e tR ( u ) , u ∈ U . Define, for t ≥ 0 � � � s dr s > 0 | X t = x + Z θ t ∧ τ − θ t := inf > t . Z r 0 0 Then X is a CB process with branching mechanism R . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 8 / 38

  9. Lamperti transform Theorem 2 in [Caballero et al., 2013] Let Z be a L´ evy process with no negative jumps with L´ evy exponent R , i.e. E 0 � � = e tR ( u ) , e uZ t u ∈ U . The time–change equation X t = x + Z � t 0 X r dr admits a unique solution, which is a CB process with branching mechanism R . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 9 / 38

  10. Outline Introduction 1 Real valued CB and Lamperti transform Extension to real valued CBI What is a multi–type CBI 2 Definitions Some additional results Lamperti transform for multi–type CBI 3 Multi–type CB and their time–change representation Extension to multi–type CBI Sketch of the proof

  11. Add immigration A CBI-process with branching mechanism R and immigration mechanism F is a Markov process Z taking values in R ≥ 0 satisfying there exist functions φ : R ≥ 0 × U → C and Ψ : R ≥ 0 × U → C such that E x � � e uX t = e φ ( t , u )+ x Ψ( t , u ) , for all x ∈ R ≥ 0 and ( t , u ) ∈ R ≥ 0 × U . On the set Q = R ≥ 0 × U , the functions φ and Ψ satisfy the following system : ∂ t φ ( t , u ) = F (Ψ( t , u )) , φ ( 0 , u ) = 0 , ∂ t Ψ( t , u ) = R (Ψ( t , u )) , Ψ( 0 , u ) = u . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 11 / 38

  12. Add immigration The immigration mechanism The function F has the following L´ evy-Khintchine form � ∞ � � e u ξ − 1 F ( u ) = bu + m ( d ξ ) , 0 with b ≥ 0 and m is a L´ evy measure on R ≥ 0 such that � ( 1 ∧ ξ ) m ( d ξ ) < ∞ . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 12 / 38

  13. Lamperti transform for CBI Theorem 2 in [Caballero et al., 2013] Let Z ( 1 ) be a L´ evy process with no negative jumps and Z ( 0 ) an independent subordinator such that E 0 � � = e tR ( u ) and E 0 � � e uZ ( 1 ) e uZ ( 0 ) = e tF ( u ) , u ∈ U . t t The time–change equation X t = x + Z ( 0 ) + Z ( 1 ) � t t 0 X r dr admits a unique solution, which is a CBI process with branching mechanism R and immigration mechanism F . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 13 / 38

  14. Outline Introduction 1 Real valued CB and Lamperti transform Extension to real valued CBI What is a multi–type CBI 2 Definitions Some additional results Lamperti transform for multi–type CBI 3 Multi–type CB and their time–change representation Extension to multi–type CBI Sketch of the proof

  15. Definition Let (Ω , ( X t ) t ≥ 0 , ( F ♮ t ) t ≥ 0 , ( P x ) x ∈ R m ≥ 0 ) be a time homogeneous Markov process. The process X is said to be a multi–type CBI if it satisfies the following property: See [Duffie et al., 2003, Barczy et al., 2014] There exist functions φ : R ≥ 0 × U → C and Ψ : R ≥ 0 × U → C m such that E x � e � u , X t � � = e φ ( t , u )+ � x , Ψ( t , u ) � , for all x ∈ R m ≥ 0 and ( t , u ) ∈ R ≥ 0 × U , with U = C m ≤ 0 . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 15 / 38

  16. Generalized Riccati equations On the set Q = R ≥ 0 × U , the functions φ and Ψ satisfy the following system of generalized Riccati equations: ∂ t φ ( t , u ) = F (Ψ( t , u )) , φ ( 0 , u ) = 0 , ∂ t Ψ( t , u ) = R (Ψ( t , u )) , Ψ( 0 , u ) = u . L´ evy–Khintchine form for the vector fields The functions F and R k , for each k = 1 , . . . , m , have the following L´ evy-Khintchine form � � � e � u ,ξ � − 1 F ( u ) = � b , u � + m ( d ξ ) , R m ≥ 0 \{ 0 } � � � R k ( u ) = � β k , u � + 1 e � u ,ξ � − 1 − u k ξ k ✶ {| ξ |≤ 1 } 2 u 2 k α k + M k ( d ξ ) . R m ≥ 0 \{ 0 } N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 16 / 38

  17. Admissible parameters The set of parameters satisfies the following restrictions b , β i ∈ R m , i = 1 , . . . , m , α i ≥ 0, m , M i , i = 1 , . . . , m , L´ evy measures. drift b ∈ R m ≥ 0 , ( β i ) k ≥ 0 , for all i = 1 , . . . , m and k � = i , jumps � supp m ⊆ R m ≥ 0 , and ( | ξ | ∧ 1 ) m ( d ξ ) < ∞ , supp M i ⊆ R m ≥ 0 , for all i = 1 , . . . , m and � � � ( | ( ξ ) − i | + | ξ i | 2 ) ∧ 1 M i ( d ξ ) < ∞ . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 17 / 38

  18. Outline Introduction 1 Real valued CB and Lamperti transform Extension to real valued CBI What is a multi–type CBI 2 Definitions Some additional results Lamperti transform for multi–type CBI 3 Multi–type CB and their time–change representation Extension to multi–type CBI Sketch of the proof

  19. Remarks N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 19 / 38

  20. Remarks It is possible to define m + 1 independent L´ evy processes Z ( 0 ) , Z ( 1 ) , . . . , Z ( m ) taking values in R m with L´ evy exponents F , R 1 , . . . , R m . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 19 / 38

  21. Remarks It is possible to define m + 1 independent L´ evy processes Z ( 0 ) , Z ( 1 ) , . . . , Z ( m ) taking values in R m with L´ evy exponents F , R 1 , . . . , R m . In [Kallsen, 2006] it has been proved that the time change equation m � X t = x + Z ( 0 ) Z ( k ) + t ≥ 0 , (*) ds , � t t 0 X ( k ) s k = 1 admits a weak solution, i.e. there exists a probability space containing two processes ( X , Z ) such that (*) holds in distribution. N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 19 / 38

  22. Remarks It is possible to define m + 1 independent L´ evy processes Z ( 0 ) , Z ( 1 ) , . . . , Z ( m ) taking values in R m with L´ evy exponents F , R 1 , . . . , R m . In [Kallsen, 2006] it has been proved that the time change equation m � X t = x + Z ( 0 ) Z ( k ) + t ≥ 0 , (*) ds , � t t 0 X ( k ) s k = 1 admits a weak solution, i.e. there exists a probability space containing two processes ( X , Z ) such that (*) holds in distribution. Moreover X has the distribution of a multi–type CBI with immigration mechanism F and branching mechanism ( R 1 , . . . , R m ) . N. Gabrielli (UZH) October 23, 2014 19 / 38

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend