laboratory stewardship
play

Laboratory Stewardship: Demonstrating the Value of Clinical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Laboratory Stewardship: Demonstrating the Value of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Andrew Fletcher, MD, MBA, CPE Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 2 Background 3 most significant causes 13


  1. Laboratory Stewardship: Demonstrating the Value of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Andrew Fletcher, MD, MBA, CPE

  2. Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 2

  3. Background 3 most significant causes 13 billion tests performed of patient harm: • Ordering the wrong test 70% decisions based • Failing to retrieve a test result 10 – 30% unnecessary • Misinterpreting a test result 3

  4. Radiology Utilization Management Blood Utilization Trends in Healthcare Laboratory Stewardship Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacy Utilization Management 4

  5. Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 5

  6. Creating Successful Laboratory Stewardship 1/3 Success Factors of labs have a stewardship program Data Analysis 1/2 Formal Governance of those labs have a productive Evidence-Based Recommendations and progressing committee IT Engagement and Support Project Management Measurement and Reporting 6

  7. NCLS Publication http://jalm.aaccjnls.org/content/2/2/259 7

  8. Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 8

  9. Interventions Three Initial Areas of Focus: 1. Test Consolidation How many reference labs do you use? 2. Reference Test Formulary Creation & implementation 3. In-House Testing Daily recurring labs Inappropriate test intervals 9

  10. Test Consolidation How many reference laboratories do you use? 1. Is there a primary vendor? 2. Why are tests sometimes not consolidated? • Physician request • Patient request • Insurance requirement • Easier process for lab staff Free Phenytoin at Lab X $106 Free Phenytoin at Primary Lab Vendor $13 10

  11. Interventions Three Initial Areas of Focus: 1. Test Consolidation How many reference labs do you use? 2. Reference Test Formulary Creation & implementation 3. In-House Testing Daily recurring labs Inappropriate test intervals 11

  12. Test Formulary Review Eliminate Review all sendout test listing in remaining testing menu if test on menu performed in 1 ordered <4 to see if year times in 1 year reasonable 12

  13. POE Optimization 13

  14. Interventions Three Initial Areas of Focus: 1. Test Consolidation How many reference labs do you use? 2. Reference Test Formulary Creation & implementation 3. In-House Testing Daily recurring labs Inappropriate test intervals 14

  15. Intervention Methods Proactive Reactive • Appropriate order sets • Duplicate alerts • Order management • Formulary restriction alerts • Preference list management • Best Practice Alerts • Physician education • Physician education • Physician report cards 15

  16. Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 16

  17. Laboratory Stewardship Potential Annual Hospital Total Charges % Savings 195-bed hospital (Northeast) $19,600,111 $4,128,087 21% 419-bed hospital (Upper $94,511,717 $12,804,082 14% Midwest) Children’s hospital (Upper $12,635,262 $1,266,516 10% Midwest) 237-bed hospital (South) $43,047,787 $10,698,392 25% 161-bed hospital (Southwest)* $77,926,758 $9,942,054 13% 645-bed hospital (Southwest)* $211,943,118 $37,916,511 18% 199-bed hospital (Southwest)* $70,251,035 $15,813,898 23% 535-bed hospital (Southwest)* $144,127,890 $27,008,611 19% 208-bed hospital (Southwest)* $56,348,672 $10,973,516 19% 338-bed hospital (Southwest)* $78,046,058 $13,476,036 17% 18% Average This sampling of 10 engagements represent an average of 18% annual savings we found from the utilization analysis reports. These are typically the highest opportunities within the hospital, but other smaller opportunities likely exist. *All part of one system that collectively also averaged 18% in savings for over $638.6M in total charges 17

  18. Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 18

  19. 70% of medical decisions are influenced by laboratory 13 billion data laboratory tests performed annually 3% in the U.S. of U.S. healthcare expenditures spent on laboratory services 19

  20. Downstream Impact • Case Management − Length of stay − Denials of payments • Pharmacy − Expensive biologic agents − Pharmacogenomics • Radiology 20

  21. Troponin orders and Chest Pain LOS 21

  22. Troponin I 4000 3500 3,587 2,965 3500 3000 3000 2500 2500 2000 2000 1500 4,410 1500 1000 1000 500 500 0 0 0 0.0 0.5 0.5 1 1.0 1.5 1.5 2 2.0 2.5 2.5 3 3.0 3.5 3.5 4 4.0 4.5 4.5 5 5.0 5.5 5.5 6 6.0 6.5 6.5 7 7.0 7.5 7.5 8 8.0 8.5 8.5 9 9.0 9.5 9.5 10 10.0 10.5 10.5 11 11.0 11.5 11.5 12 12+ 12+ Improve the time-to-decision by Identify order Modify the repeat time mechanisms that drive improving the test interval by up to be 3-6 hours after the repeat interval to 3 hours 22

  23. Downstream Impact on Pharmacy Expensive Biologic Agents • TNF antagonists − Infliximab (Remicade) − Adalimumab (Humira) • Hepatitis C antiviral agents − NS5A/NS3A inhibitors 23

  24. Pharmacogenetics Coagulation Clopidogrel (Plavix) • CYP2C19 Warfarin (Coumadin) • CYP2C9 and VKORC1 24

  25. Drug % of Patients Primary gene ARUP Employee Health 9.15% Hydrocodone CYP2D6 8.31% Omeprazole CYP2C19 7.55% Ondansetron CYP2D6 6.49% Bupropion ANKK1 Clinic Project 6.02% Sertraline CYP2C19 6.00% Oxycodone CYP2D6 5.06% Citalopram CYP2C19 4.92% Metformin ATM 4.86% Fluoxetine CYP2D6 • Based on pharmacy claims data for ~5000 4.14% Trazodone CYP3A4 3.98% Atorvastatin CYP3A4 patients, 83% of actionable drug-gene 3.72% Codeine CYP2D6 3.30% Escitalopram CYP2C19 interactions relate to the CYPs. 3.08% Amphetamine COMT 2.96% Tramadol CYP2D6 2.74% Diclofenac CYP2C9 • Implementing the CYP panel because drug- 2.16% Clonazepam CYP3A4 2.16% Alprazolam CYP3A4 gene interactions are of the HIGHEST levels of 2.14% Duloxetine CYP2D6 1.94% Simvastatin SLCO1B1 evidence. 1.80% Meloxicam CYP2C9 1.70% Quetiapine CYP3A4 1.60% Methylphenidate MTHFR • Inviting ~400 patients to obtain PGx testing with 1.46% Buspirone CYP3A4 1.30% Tamsulosin CYP2D6 enrolment anticipated to begin in May 2019. 1.30% Amitriptyline CYP2D6 1.28% Venlafaxine CYP2D6 1.28% Propranolol CYP2D6 1.28% Ketoconazole CYP3A4 1.12% Diazepam CYP2C19 1.04% Metoprolol CYP2D6 0.92% Pantoprazole CYP2C19 25

  26. CT PE Protocol 26 26

  27. 27

  28. D-Dimer and CT PE Protocol 28 28

  29. Percent of Patient Contacts Getting CT PE Scans • Average percent of patients receiving CT PE scan in months prior to Aug 2015 (n=7) = 4.58% Average percent of patients receiving CT PE scan in months after Aug 2015 (n=15) = 3.14% • (two sample t-test, p<0.05) 29

  30. Agenda Background Stewardship Committee Interventions Result Downstream Impact 30

  31. Laboratory Stewardship: Demonstrating the Value of Clinical Laboratory Medicine Andrew Fletcher, MD, MBA, CPE

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend