kansas city 8 hour ozone maintenance plan
play

Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Thomas Gross Tiffany - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Thomas Gross Tiffany Campbell Kansas Department of Missouri Department of Health and Environment Natural Resources Bureau of Air and Radiation Air Pollution Control Program November 14, 2006


  1. Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Thomas Gross Tiffany Campbell Kansas Department of Missouri Department of Health and Environment Natural Resources Bureau of Air and Radiation Air Pollution Control Program November 14, 2006

  2. Overview � Ground level ozone � KC Region ozone history � Form of standard � Future steps � Contingency measures 2

  3. Ground Level Ozone � Identical to upper atmosphere ozone � Caused by chemical reaction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and NOx � Concentrations higher when conditions are hot, sunny with light winds � VOCs and NOx from cars, trucks, small businesses, utilities & large industry � Can trigger breathing problems, particularly in those with respiratory conditions 3

  4. KC Region Ozone History � From mid-1970s through early 1990s, KC exceeded 1-hour ozone standard � In 1992, area was redesignated attainment for 1- hour ozone standard � KC violated 1-hour ozone standard in mid-1990s � KC has met the 1-hour standard in 2000s � EPA issued 8-hour standard in 1997--- 084 ppm (84 ppb) � KC designated attainment for 8-hour standard in May, 2005 4

  5. 8-Hour Ozone Standard Determination � Design Value for a Metropolitan Statistical Area is the highest value from any site � Three year average of the fourth highest daily maximum � Violation occurs if three-year average exceeds 84 ppb � Kansas City would have violated standard in mid-80s, 90s, 2000 & 2002 5

  6. Variables in the KC Ozone Equation � Weather � Emission Reductions/Increases � Clean Air Interstate Rule � Tier 2 Vehicle and fuels rule � Heavy Duty Diesel rule � Regional Haze rule � Voluntary programs � Flint Hills burning emissions 6

  7. Consequences of Nonattainment Designation � RACT rules � LAER review for NSR permits � Transportation plan conformity with SIP � Curtails economic development � State Implementation Plan revision � Additional inventory and modeling work � Potential sanctions for failure to meet standard � Citizens breathing polluted air 7

  8. MISSOURI KANSAS CALDWELL CLINTON PLATTE RAY CLAY LEAVENWORTH WYANDOTTE LAFAYETTE JACKSON JOHNSON CASS FRANKLIN MIAMI BATES LINN MISSOURI KANSAS

  9. 8-Hour Ozone Design Values Kansas City 0.100 0.098 0.096 0.096 0.094 0.094 0.094 0.093 0.092 0.092 0.091 0.090 0.090 0.089 0.089 0.088 0.088 PPM 0.088 0.086 0.086 0.085 0.084 0.084 0.083 0.084 0.083 0.084 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.082 0.080 0.078 2004-2006 Design Value Not Finalized 0.076 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 Period

  10. Are We Critical Yet? 8-Hour Ozone Monitoring Data for Kansas City Site 4th High (ppm) Design Value Critical Value 2004 2005 2006* 04-06* 2007** JFK 0.063 0.079 0.081 0.074 0.094 Heritage Park 0.066 0.081 0.076 0.074 0.097 Leavenworth 0.067 0.077 0.073 0.072 0.104 Liberty 0.071 0.088 0.092 0.083 0.074 Rocky Creek 0.069 0.087 0.087 0.081 0.080 Richards Gebauer-South 0.061 0.081 0.078 0.073 0.095 Trimble 0.071 0.087 0.083 0.080 0.084 Watkins Mill 0.067 0.079 0.091 0.079 0.084 *2006 data are current through 8/15/06 and have not gone through final QA/QC *2006 data are current through 8/15/06 and have not gone through final QA/QC **4th high must be equal to or lower than this value for the three-year average (design value) <= 0.084 ppm. **4th high must be equal to or lower than this value for the three-year average (design value) <= 0.084 ppm.

  11. Kansas City 8-Hour Ozone Exceedances 35 30 29 28 27 27 25 25 20 # of Exceedances # of Active Sites 15 9 9 10 8 8 6 6 6 *2006 data through 5 8/16/06 has not 5 been finalized 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006* 11 Year

  12. Emissions Source Categories � Point: Permitted sources of pollutant emissions. � Area: Sources below the permit cutoffs: dry cleaners, auto body painting, house painting and solvent use. � Mobile On-road and Off-road : autos, trucks, planes, trains, construction, farm equipment & lawn and garden equip. 12

  13. 2002 Typical Ozone Season Day VOC Emissions Non-road Mobile Area 21% 33% EGU 0.3% Mobile Point 35% 11% 227.71 tons/day 13

  14. 2002 Typical Ozone Season Day NOx Emissions Non-road Area Mobile 5% 20% EGU 26% Point 4% Mobile 45% 319.89 tons/day 14

  15. Clean Air Action Plan � Coordinated by MARC � Developed in 2004 � Comprehensive voluntary plan for reducing emissions � Targets both stationary and mobile sources � Contains short, intermediate and long term emission reduction measures 15

  16. Current Area and Mobile Source Activities � Low RVP gasoline � Gasoline tank truck vapor testing � Ozone alerts � Bus RideShare � AirQ workplace initiative � Gas cap testing programs � Employee carpool incentive programs � Solvent metal cleaning rule � Technical Seminars � Lawn and Garden � Printing � Painting � Solvent metal cleaning 16

  17. Effectiveness of VOC and NO x Controls Estimated location of highest 8-hr ozone concentration VOC controls effective NOx controls effective Both controls effective

  18. Future Activities � Episode of photochemical modeling � Continued implementation of voluntary strategies � 8-hour maintenance plan submission � Due to EPA on June 15, 2007 � Public Hearing process in Missouri will begin in March 2007 18

  19. Maintenance Plan Contingency Measures � Primary focus on NO x reductions � Phased approach � First trigger at 85 ppb � Large NO x sources in planning area first � Second trigger at 88 or 90 ppb or trend based � VOC reductions concurrent with Phase 1 and 2 NO x reductions � Idling reduction 19

  20. Kansas City NO x Point Sources � Wall Fired Utility Boilers � Cyclone Fired Utility Boilers � Natural Gas Fired Furnaces � Natural Gas Compressor Station Engines � Cement Kilns � Cogenerating Facilities 20

  21. Proposed Kansas Phase I Controls � Phase I: Reduce NOx emissions from point sources > 1000 tons of actual emissions/ year in Wyandotte and Johnson Counties � Wall-fired EGUs in planning area � Furnaces � Diesel Idle Reduction � Diesel engine computer chip reflash 21

  22. Proposed Missouri Phase I -Controls � EGUs under CAIR that implement controls early � Ethanol mandate waiver in maintenance area during the ozone season � Diesel idle reduction 22

  23. Phase II - Missouri and Kansas � Selections made from a menu of control measures � Based on most beneficial controls according to modeling and inventory growth determinations 23

  24. Proposed Kansas Phase II Controls � 100 ton NOx sources � Cyclone EGUs in planning area � Furnaces � EGU units and RICE units outside of planning area that contribute to KC ozone problem 24

  25. Phase II - Missouri Point Source Controls � Reductions in NOx emissions from all point sources >100 tons of actual emissions in Clay, Platte and Jackson Counties � EGUs and cogenerators not included in CAIR � Other large NOx point sources � Lower major source VOC threshold to 75 tpy � Emissions offsets of 1.1:1.0 25

  26. Phase II - Missouri Area and Mobile Source Controls � VOC controls for Architectural and Maintenance coatings � Gas cap testing program � Eliminate the 1 psi waiver for 10% ethanol fuel in the maintenance area during the ozone season � ??Voluntary diesel chip reflashing?? 26

  27. Comments / Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend