K NOL L CRE E K WE ST UNI T 3 L OT 35 BUIL DING SE T BACK ADJUST ME NT Se c tions 20 & 29, St. Char le s T ownship Site Data: 1.046 Ac r e s, 15 F oot F r ont Yar d Building Se tbac k Adjustme nt T he Ar e a in Que stion is Zone d F
AIR PHOT O
SIT E PL AN
F INDINGS The Plat Officer has reviewed the request and finds the following: 1. The proposed building setback adjustment will not increase the density of the subdivision. 2. The building setback adjustment will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of the Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The building setback adjustment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 4. The owner has secured letters of support from all the adjacent property owners. Since there is no homeowners association for the subdivision, and there exists a recorded Declaration of Restrictions dated August 11, 1972, which requires a 60 foot setback, the owner has informed over fifty percent of the residents in this unit of the proposed building setback adjustment and has received a supportive response. Notwithstanding this recommendation, other residents in the subdivision are free to take legal action to enforce any portion of the recorded Declaration of Restrictions.
RE COMME NDAT ION RE COMME NDAT ION: T he Plat Offic e r r e c omme nds the De ve lopme nt Committe e appr ove this r e que st for a building se tbac k adjustme nt.
Kane County Water Resources Kane County Water Resources Kane County Water Resources Kane County Water Resources Cost Cost-Share C C t Sh t Share Projects Sh P P Projects j j t t Development Committee Presentation Development Committee Presentation May 15, 2012 May 15, 2012
South Park Area South Park Area South Park Area South Park Area Aurora Township – Final Engineering Contract
Revised Project Revised Project Plan Revised Project Revised Project Plan Plan Plan
Request for Qualifications Request for Qualifications Request for Qualifications Request for Qualifications ► 11 Sets of Qualifications were received Feb 14, ► 11 Sets of Qualifications were received Feb 14, 11 Sets of Qualifications were received Feb 14, 11 Sets of Qualifications were received Feb 14, 2012 2012 ► Qualifications were reviewed by Water Resource ► Qualifications were reviewed by Water Resource Qualifications were reviewed by Water Resource Qualifications were reviewed by Water Resource Staff Staff ► Scope Revisions made after discussion with City Scope Revisions made after discussion with City p p y y Staff and Engineer Staff and Engineer ► Recommend Award of Contract for completion of Recommend Award of Contract for completion of 75% final design plans to Engineering Enterprises 75% final design plans to Engineering Enterprises in an amount of $52,000 with joint funding from in an amount of $52,000 with joint funding from CDBG CDBG CDBG and Cost CDBG and Cost-Share d C d C t t Sh Sh Share
Recommend
More recommend
