Johns Hopkins Clinical Update Webinar Ben Ho Park, M.D., Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

johns hopkins clinical update webinar
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Johns Hopkins Clinical Update Webinar Ben Ho Park, M.D., Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Johns Hopkins Clinical Update Webinar Ben Ho Park, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Oncology Johns Hopkins University February 2015 This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact bpark2@jhmi.edu for permission to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Johns Hopkins Clinical Update Webinar

Ben Ho Park, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Oncology Johns Hopkins University February 2015

This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact bpark2@jhmi.edu for permission to reprint and/or distribute.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosure Information

  • I have the following financial relationships to

disclose though none are relevant to this seminar

  • Consultant for Novartis
  • Scientific Advisory Board Member for Horizon Discovery,

LTD

  • Royalties from Horizon Discovery, LTD
  • SAB for Loxo Oncology
  • Research contract with Genomic Health, Inc.
  • Research contract with Foundation Medicine

This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact bpark2@jhmi.edu for permission to reprint and/or distribute.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What’s new in breast cancer????

  • New studies affecting treatment options for pre-menopausal women

with ER positive disease

  • A newly approved therapy for post-menopausal women with ER

positive metastatic disease

  • Possible “new” therapies for triple negative breast cancers with early

stage disease

  • New therapies on the horizon
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ovarian suppression and aromatase inhibitors for premenopausal women with early stage ER positive breast cancer

  • Early stage patients are treated with surgery and/or radiation for local

disease

  • If ER positive, then women are likely to be recommended

endocrine/hormone therapy for 5 to 10 years

  • For premenopausal women, tamoxifen is still standard of care
  • For postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AI) have become

standard of care because they work a bit better

  • If we suppress ovarian production of estrogen, and then give AI, is

that better than tamoxifen?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial and Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (SOFT and TEXT)

  • Combined analysis of thousands of pre-menopausal women

undergoing endocrine therapy after surgery ± radiation for early stage ER positive breast cancer

  • Comparing ovarian suppression (OS; or surgery or radiation to
  • varies) with tamoxifen vs OS with AI (SOFT and TEXT) vs. tamoxifen

alone (SOFT)

  • About 5 years of follow up for these analyses.
  • Results are that OS with AI is slightly better at 5 years to reduce

recurrence in women

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Is this “the” new standard of care

  • Benefit of OS+AI is slight, and more obvious in higher risk women

who received chemotherapy

  • Side effect profiles are higher (osteoporosis; muscle/joint pain) in

women with OS+AI

  • No convincing overall survival data yet; too short of follow up
  • Therefore this is an option as “another” standard of care
  • Longer term follow up is key; 10 years of tamoxifen is better than 5,

but at 7 years this difference was not seen

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Palbociclib-Ibrance

  • Inhibits key proteins involved with “cell cycling” or cell proliferation

(cdk4/6)

  • Seems to be limited to ER positive disease – reasons are unclear
  • Studied mostly in ER positive metastatic disease and with AI

(letrozole)

  • PALOMA1, 2 and 3
  • Improvement in progression free survival (~10 months vs. ~20 months)
  • Side effects include low blood counts, fatigue
  • Very costly
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Palbociclib

  • Only for post-menopausal women (studied in this population with

letrozole)

  • Only for HER2 negative patients with ER/PR positive disease
  • Only for first line endocrine based therapy (for now)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Early stage triple negative disease

  • Breast cancers without ER/PR/HER2 receptors “triple negative breast

cancers; TNBC”, are more aggressive cancers, but tend to respond better to chemotherapies

  • Some studies in the neoadjuvant setting (chemotherapy before

surgery) suggest women with TNBC may respond better to platinum based chemotherapies (cisplatin, carboplatin)

  • Definitive large studies being planned to confirm this notion
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Early stage triple negative disease

  • If confirmed, it may be that for early stage TNBC, women will receive

three to four drugs after surgery, one of which is a platinum drug

  • Many oncologists are starting to use platinum based drugs before

surgery or after surgery for TNBC, but this is not standard of care (yet)

  • Some evidence suggests BRCA1 and 2 related cancers may have

better response to platinum based chemotherapy regimens

slide-11
SLIDE 11

New therapies on the horizon

  • Newer CDK inhibitors for ER positive disease
  • Combination of CDK inhibitors with tamoxifen, OS+AI
  • Vaccine approaches for TNBC
  • Newer HER2 directed therapies using pills and antibody based drug

delivery

  • Newer endocrine therapies that may overcome resistance to

mutations in estrogen receptor?

  • Immunotherapies or “checkpoint inhibitors” to try and “turn on” the

body’s immune system against cancer cells

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusions

  • There continues to be new therapies for all types and stages of breast

cancer

  • Research into how cancers arise and develop drug resistance has led

to these advances

  • Breast cancers are all different, so treating with individualized therapy

is the goal of the future

  • Thanks!