John Mathew Site Safe PDA Auditing and Benchmarking Estimating - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

john mathew site safe pda auditing and benchmarking
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

John Mathew Site Safe PDA Auditing and Benchmarking Estimating - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

John Mathew Site Safe PDA Auditing and Benchmarking Estimating Ambush They couldnt hit us at this distance The final est imat e and last words of General John S edgwick before he was shot overlooking his parapet in 1864


slide-1
SLIDE 1

John Mathew Site Safe PDA Auditing and Benchmarking

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Estimating Ambush “They couldn’t hit us at this distance… ”

The final est imat e and last words of General John S edgwick before he was shot overlooking his parapet in 1864 during America’ s Civil War.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why Benchmarking?

  • Enables a fact-based philosophy of

decision-making and continuous improvement

  • Provides a framework for establishing

KPI’ s through comprehensive measures

  • Longitudinal analysis provides a

perspective on performance over time

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PDA Audit & Benchmarking Service

Audit Reports Benchmark Reports

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Audit Report

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Safety Improvement Report

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Company Summary Report

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Benchmark by Project Value

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Benchmark by Region

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Benchmark by Stage of Completion

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Benchmark Site by Site Performance

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Benchmark Site Specific Activities

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Benchmark Construction Activities Scaffold Safety

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Accessing Benchmarking Reports

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Accessing Benchmarking Reports

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Accessing Benchmarking Reports

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Provide a Pathway for Continuous Improvement

Charter Accreditation Performance Tiers Tier One: S afety S ystems Tier Two: S afety Behaviours Tier Three: S afety Leadership - 2009

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Define Key Performance Indicators of Best Practice in NZ Construction

Tier One – Site Specific Safety Plan

  • 1. Tender Documents
  • 2. S

afety Plans

  • 3. Hazard ID & Control
  • 4. S

afety Training

  • 5. S

ite S afety Meetings

  • 6. Toolbox Talks
  • 7. S

afety Audits

  • 8. Training Register
  • 9. Accident Register
  • 10. S

ubcontractor Monitoring

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Define Key Performance Indicators of Best Practice in NZ Construction

Tier Two – Safety Behaviours

  • 1. Facilities
  • 2. Housekeeping
  • 3. Personal Protective Equipment
  • 4. Excavation & Trenches
  • 5. Falsework/Formwork
  • 6. Welding & Gas Cutting
  • 7. Demolition
  • 8. Sun Exposure
  • 9. Noise
  • 10. Confined Space
  • 11. Cement & Concrete
  • 12. Asbestos
  • 13. Chemicals
  • 14. Fall Prevention
  • 15. Harness Use
  • 16. Ladders
  • 17. Scaffolds
  • 18. Elevated Work Platforms
  • 19. Equipment & Machinery & Tools
  • 20. Crane & Lifting Appliances
  • 21. Powder-Actuated Tools
  • 22. Electrical
  • 23. Environmental Issues
  • 24. Traffic Management
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Define Key Performance Indicators of Best Practice in NZ Construction

Tier Three – Safety Leadership

1. Organisational KPI’ s 2. Defined management responsibilities 3. Communicated responsibilities 4. Evidence of management participation 5. Performance feedback and recognition

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Recognise Companies Performing at a High Level

Tier 1 Performance Threshold ‐ 65%

100.00% 63.48% 30.80% 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% Max S core Average S core Min S core

Tier 2 Performance Threshold ‐ 80%

93.20% 80.48% 60.00% 0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% Max S core Average S core Min S core

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Audit Process

  • Initial Accreditation Audits

– 1-3 active sites = 2 audits – 4 or more active sites = 4 audits

  • Ongoing Accreditation Audits

– Up to $200 million = 4 audits – $200 million - $300 million = 6 audits – Over $300 million = 8 audits

  • NZIM Qualified Auditors
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Construction Safety KPIs

Construction S afety KPIs

0 % 2 0 % 4 0 % 6 0 % 8 0 % 10 0 %

Tendered Safety Requirements Site Specific Safety Plans Hazard ID and C ontrol Pas s port and Higher L evel Training Project Safety Meetings Tool Box Talks Self Ins pections Training Regis ters Accident Reporting Subcontractor Monitoring

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Client Application

  • Legal responsibility

– Take All Practicable S teps to ensure Contractors are not harmed

  • Benefits of S

afety – Best Value

– Efficiency, quality, relationships, problems, delays, accidents

  • Convenient method of pre-qualifying and

selecting Contractors

– S treamline the screening process