JHFC Project Shoji Tange Tange Shoji May 11, 2006 Japan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
JHFC Project Shoji Tange Tange Shoji May 11, 2006 Japan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Japanese Way The Japanese Way to Hydrogen Society to Hydrogen Society JHFC Project JHFC Project Shoji Tange Tange Shoji May 11, 2006 Japan Automobile Research Institute Positioning of JHFC Project JHFC Proj ect JHFC
JARI JARI ENAA ENAA NEF
MET METI I : Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry JARI JARI : Japan Automobile Research Institute ENAA ENAA : Engineering Advancement Association of Japan NEF NEF
:
New Energy Foundation
FCV Demonstration S tudy Hydrogen S tation Demonstration S tudy S tationary FC Demonstration S tudy
Positioning of JHFC Project
METI METI
JHFC Proj ect subsidized by METI JHFC Proj ect subsidized by METI
Test Vehicles
Hydrogen FCVs
Refueling Stations
Hydrogen S t at ions (CHG & LH)
Period of Implementation
2002 FY ~ 2005 FY (4 years)
Amount of Subsidies
2.0 Billion Yen ≒ $17 Million (2002 FY) 2.5 Billion Yen ≒ $20 Million (2003 FY) 2.0 Billion Yen ≒ $17 Million (2004 FY) 1.8 Billion Yen ≒ $16 Million (2005 FY)
Outline of JHFC Project
1.
To clearly show Energy-Saving Effect and Environmental Impact
- Energy Efficiency of FCVs compared with ICEV.
- Emissions & CO2 Reduction
2.
To acquire Data for Codes & Standards Development and Certification Practices
3.
To analyze Well to Tank, Tank to Wheel Efficiency based on Japanese Situation
4.
To raise Public Awareness regarding FCVs and Hydrogen Stations Objectives
Partners
<Automakers> 8 <Infra.Makers> 15
Suzuki Motors Corp. Suzuki Motors Corp. Toyota Motor Corp. Toyota Motor Corp. DaimlerChrysler AG DaimlerChrysler AG General Motors Corp. General Motors Corp. Toyota-made stack UTCFC-made stack Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa
JHFC Demonstration FCVs
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. Ballard-made stacks Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa Compressed hydrogen 35 MPa GM-made stack Toyota-made stack GM-made stack Ballard-made stacks Ballard-made stacks Toyota/Hino Motors, Ltd. Toyota/Hino Motors, Ltd. Liquid hydrogen
Yokohama-Daikoku (desulfurized gasoline reforming) Yokohama-Daikoku (desulfurized gasoline reforming) Kawasaki (methanol reforming) Kawasaki (methanol reforming) Sagamihara (water electrolysis) Sagamihara (water electrolysis) Re-locatable (off-site H2 cylinders) Re-locatable (off-site H2 cylinders) Senju (LPG reforming) Senju (LPG reforming) Hadano (kerosene reforming) Hadano (kerosene reforming) Ome (city gas reforming) Ome (city gas reforming) Ariake* (liquid hydrogen storage) Ariake* (liquid hydrogen storage) Yokohama-Tsurumi (off-site) Yokohama-Tsurumi (off-site)
* Collaboration with Tokyo Metropolitan Government
:constructed in 2002FY : constructed in 2003FY : constructed in 2004FY KANAGAWA AICHI TOKYO Yokohama-Asahi (naphtha reforming) Yokohama-Asahi (naphtha reforming) EXPO2005 / Seto-South (city gas reforming) EXPO2005 / Seto-South (city gas reforming) EXPO2005 / Seto-North (Off-site) EXPO2005 / Seto-North (Off-site)
Location - JHFC Hydrogen Stations
Specification - Hydrogen Stations
Nippon S teel Corporation Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation By Product( COG)
- Expo. S
eto North
⑫
Toho Gas Co., Ltd. Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation City Gas
- Expo. S
eto S
- uth
⑪
Tsurumi S
- da Co., Ltd.
Iwatani International Corporation By Product( S
- da)
Yokohama-Tsurumi
⑩
Babcock-Hitachi K.K. City Gas Ome( Mobile)
⑨
Kurita Water Industries Ltd. S inanen Co., Ltd. Itochu Enex. Co., Ltd. Electrolysis S agamihara
⑧
Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. Kerosene Hadano
⑦
Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation Compressed Hydrogen Kasumigaseki
(
Relocatable)
⑥
Japan Air Gases, Ltd. Methanol Kawasaki
⑤
S howa S hell S ekiyu K.K. Iwatani International Corporation Liquid Hydrogen Ariake
④
Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. Taiyo Nippon S anso Corporation LPG, City Gas S enj u
③
Nippon Oil Co., Ltd. Naphtha Yokohama-Asahi
②
Cosmo Oil Co., Ltd. Desulfurized - Gasoline Yokohama-Daikoku
①
COMPAINES IN CHARGE HYDROGEN SOURCE FACILITY NAME
Designated Route on Public Road
Tokyo Tokyo Chiba Chiba
Yokohama Yokohama Daikoku Daikoku Station Station (JHFC Park) (JHFC Park) Kawasaki Kawasaki Station Station Ariake Ariake Station Station Senju Senju Station Station
Kanagawa Kanagawa
1 1 2 2 6 6 3 3 5 5 4 4 7 7
Tokyo Tokyo Bay Bay
Sagamihara Sagamihara Station Station 8 8 9 9 12 12 11 11 Yokohama Yokohama Asahi Station Asahi Station Yokohama Yokohama Turumi Turumi Station Station Hadano Hadano Station Station
Public Road
Oume Oume Station Station 10 10
Highway
Driving Test Result-Energy Consumption
Gasoline equivalent fuel economy [km/L gas.eq.]
A v e r a g e v e h i c l e speed [ k m / h ] 2 4 6 8 1 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 HEV Average Line
(number of data =1882)
FCV's Group : FCHV, X-Trail, FCV, FCX, HydroGen3, F-Cell, Mitsubishi FCV, wagonR-FCV ICV's Group : Kluger, X-Trail, CR-V, Astra, A-Class, Grandis, Wagon R HEV's Group : Prius, former Prius, Estima Hybrid, Tino Hybrid, Insight
(including vehicles carrying secondary batteries, etc.) FCV - ICV – HEV Comparison Result (without vehicle weight modification)
Gasoline density : 0.729 kg/L Gasoline energy (LHV) : 45.1 MJ/kg Hydrogen energy (LHV) : 120 MJ/kg Average weight of FCV : 1717.1 kg Average weight of ICV : 1348.6 kg Average weight of HEV : 1335.9 kg
ICV Average Line
(number of data=1807)
Compared with ICV and HEV, FCV showed better fuel economy.
- Apr. 2004 – Dec. 2005
FCV Average Line
(number of data=2856) Test Route: Designated Air Conditioner: ON
10-15 Mode Test Result
FCV indicated superior energy consumption rate per vehicle weight
■A l l t h e s e d a t a i n c l u d e m
- d
i f i c a t i
- n
b y v e h i c l e w e i g h t
I C V G r
- u
p : T
- y
- t
a C r u g a r , N i s s a n X
- T
R A I L 、 H
- n
d a C R -V , O p e l Z a f i l a , M i t s u b i s h i G r a n d i s , S u z u k i W a g
- n
R H E V G r
- u
p : T
- y
- t
a P r i u s , O l d P r i u s , E s t i m a H y b r i d , N i s s a n T i n
- H
y b r i d , H
- n
d a I n s i g h t F C V G r
- u
p : T
- y
- t
a F C H V , N i s s a n X
- T
R A I L F C V , H
- n
d a F C X , G M H y d r
- G
e n 3 , D a i m l e r C h l y s l e r F
- C
e l l , , M i t s u b i s h i F C V , S u z u k i W a g
- n
R
- F
C V ※J A R I“ 2 3 F Y F u e l C e l l V e h i c l e I n v e s t i g a t i
- n
R e p
- r
t “ P . 2 4 1
- 2
6 4 , 2 4 1 2 3 4
G a s
- l
i n e D e n s i t y : . 7 2 9 k g / L G a s
- l
i n e E n e r g y ( L H V ) : 4 5 . 1 M J / k g H y d r
- g
e n E n e r g y ( L H V ) : 1 2 M J / k g F C V a v e r a g e d v e h i c l e w e i g h t : 1 7 1 7 k g
E n e r g y c
- n
s u m p t i
- n
r a t e ( k m / L g a s
- l
i n e e q u i v a l e n t )
1 . 2 1 1 . 1
A v e r a g e T
- p
R u n n e r A v e r a g e T
- p
R u n n e r
2 . 7 2 5 .
A v e r a g e A v e r a g e T
- p
T
- p
R u n n e r R u n n e r
2 3 . 8 3 1 . 2 9 . 9 3 7 . 3 4 .
5 5 % 6 %
I C V G r
- u
p H E V G r
- u
p F C V G r
- u
p S i m u l a t i
- n
R e s u l t *
F C S t a c k M a x . E f f i c i e n c y 5 % 5 5 %
Term
- Aug. 2003 - Dec.2004
Vehicle FCHV-BUS2 (1 unit) Route 2 routes of 15 to 20 km 4 to 5 round-trips per day Term
- Aug. 2003 - Dec.2004
Vehicle FCHV-BUS2 (1 unit) Route 2 routes of 15 to 20 km 4 to 5 round-trips per day
Tokyo Tokyo Station Station
Tokyo Tokyo Bigsight Bigsight
Monzen Monzen-
- Nakacho
Nakacho 2 k m 2 k m
Tokyo Tokyo
Ariake Ariake H H2
2 Station
Station
Service Route
Fuel Cell Bus Service in Tokyo
Ariake H Ariake H2
2
Station Station Route: Higashi 16 Route: Umi 01 Tokyo Tokyo Teleport Teleport
FC Bus Test Result-Energy Consumption
E n e r g y C
- n
s u m p t i
- n
R a t e ( k m / k g , d i e s e l e q u i v a l e n t ) A t m
- s
p h e r i c T e m p .( ℃) A u g S e p O c t N
- v D
e c J a n F e b M a r A p r M a y J u n J u l A u g S e p O c t N
- v D
e c 2 3 / 2 4 / 1 2 1 8 6 4 2 3 2 5 2 1 5 1 5
R
- u
t e : H i g a s h i 1 6 T e m p .
( A v e r a g e B u s S p e e d : 1 2 k m / h )
R
- u
t e : U m i 1
( A v e r a g e B u s S p e e d : 1 4 k m / h )
Term Mar.25 - Sep.25, 2005 Vehicle FCHV-BUS (8 units) Route Nagakute - Seto 4.4 km Operation 9:00 – 18:00 (8min. interval) Term Mar.25 - Sep.25, 2005 Vehicle FCHV-BUS (8 units) Route Nagakute - Seto 4.4 km Operation 9:00 – 18:00 (8min. interval)
FC Bus Service Route at Aichi Expo
Toyota / Hino FCHV-Bus
Nagakute Bus Terminal S eto Bus Terminal
Nagakute Area S eto Area
H2 S tation Corporate Pavillion Central Zone
FCV Test Result – Range & Refueling
* Hydrogen was not refueled for only driving.
8 3 5 k g
- 1. Driving Range
- 1. Driving Range
- 2. Hydrogen Refueling Quantity
- 2. Hydrogen Refueling Quantity
Range Hydrogen Refueling
F C B u s e s
200000 300000 100000 3 1 7 1 3 k m 1 4 7 8 3 k m 10000
D e m
- &
G e n e r a l U s e F C V s F C B u s e s
1 4 9 8 k g
D e m
- &
G e n e r a l U s e F C V s D e m
- F
C V s
8 4 3 3 9 k m 15000 5000
D e m
- F
C V s1
3 9 8 k g
Period: Dec.2002~Dec.2005
Energy Efficiency of On-Site Hydrogen Station
- Energy efficiency : calculated from charge tank to fuel tank
- Energy of Electricity : 3.6 MJ/kWh
62.5 (66.7) 60.7 (65.2) 58.7 (63.8) 54.6 (61.1) 65.0 (68.8) 60.4 (66.2) 58.7 (64.1) Energy efficiency LHV (HHV) % methanol Kawasaki naphtha Yokohama Asahi kerosene Hadano LPG Senju city gas city gas Seto South desulfurized gasoline Yokohama Daikoku Reforming Fuel Locations
3
FCHV current: "hydrogen station" and "FCHV" data are calculated by using JHFC demonstration top, while other data are calculated by published top. FCHV future: calculated by using FC Stock Sys future efficiency 60% and published top. Electric power sources: Japan Mix Japan Mix
"Well to Wheel" Calculation Results Summary (Efficiency)
Unit: MJ/km CNG FCHV future BEV Diesel HV Diesel Gasoline HV Gasoline FCHV current Input primary energy per 1km driving (10・ 15 Mode) Vehicles Type 0 1 2
FCV Caravan Sep. 8~10, 2005
Shizuoka Hadano Ariake Aich Expo Hamamatsu
2005FY JHFC Seminar
Seminar
- JHFC Project Activity Reports
- Keynote Address
- Special Address
- Panel Discussion
FCV and Hydrogen Station Poster Sessions Date: March 6. 2006 Venue: Tokyo Big Sight, Conference Room
Public Awareness
7.8 11.1 15.5 12.8 13 16.7 13.5 20.8 36.6 40.3 41.3 42.7 31.8 29.8 26 40.5
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005
Q: Do you know FCV ? Q: Do you know FCV ?
70.3% 68.2% 57.3%
Well Known Known Have Heard Don’t know
74.0%
JHFC2 Project
The world’ s first leased FCVs were delivered to the Government
- n Dec. 2, 2002.
Start : in 2006FY Start : in 2006FY Period of Implementation : 2006FY Period of Implementation : 2006FY ~
~ 2010FY
2010FY
( (
5 Years 5 Years )
)
Budget : 1.4BYen Budget : 1.4BYen ≒
≒$ $12M
12M(
(
2006FY 2006FY)
)
The world’ s first vehicle type certification was acquired from MLIT
- n June 17, 2005.