Japanese Orphan Drug Designation An agency of the European Union 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

japanese orphan drug designation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Japanese Orphan Drug Designation An agency of the European Union 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Japanese Orphan Drug Designation An agency of the European Union 2 I ntro duc tio n Medicines and medical devices for patients with rare diseases are clinically very important. However, the lack of the attraction for developing these


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An agency of the European Union

Japanese Orphan Drug Designation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

I ntro duc tio n

Medicines and medical devices for patients with rare diseases are clinically very important. However, the lack of the attraction for developing these medicinal products due to the small numbers of targeting patients makes it difficult to precede favourable research and development. So, In order to support the patients with rare diseases, it is necessary to establish proper measures to promote research and development for orphan medicinal products. Under these circumstances, Orphan system was established in Japan by amending the Pharmaceutical Affaires Law in April 1993, and entered into force in 1st October in the same year.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Re la te d le g isla tio ns & Guide line s

 The Pharmaceutical Affaires Law (PAL)

  • Chapter 9-3: Designation etc. of Orphan Drugs and Orphan

Medical Devices

  • Stipulation of overall and general Orphan system

 Enforcement Regulation of the PAL

  • Chapter 9: Designation etc. of Orphan Drugs and Orphan

Medical Devices.

  • Criteria, Application form etc.

 Notification by Director General of Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau

  • II. Designation etc. of Orphan Drugs and Orphan Medical

Devices

  • Guideline, Detailed description of application, procedure

and criteria etc.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Crite ria fo r Orpha n De sig na tio n in Ja pa n

1 ) The num ber of Patients (similar to Prevalence in EU) Patients is less than 5 0 ,0 0 0 in Japan ( less than 3 .9 / 1 0 ,0 0 0 population) 2 ) High priority in health care needs a) No alternative drugs and/ or medical interventions are available (similar to “unmet needs” in EU) b) Extremely higher efficacy and/ or safety compare to already approved products (similar to “significant benefit” in EU in some extent) 3 ) High Possibility of Developm ent Theoretical bases for the application & feasible development plan

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

I nc e ntive s fo r Orpha n De sig na tio n

1) Administrative and Scientific Advices 2) Preferential protocol assistance & priority review 3) Grant aid for research expenses 4) Authorisation for tax deduction 5) Reduction of application fee 6) Extension of re-examination period

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Daisuke Tanaka, MHLW 7

Pro c e sse s o f Orpha n De sig na tio n -1-

MHL W

Spo nso r

PAF SC

Ne w Drug 1 Ne w Drug 2 Me d. De v & Dia g no stic s

(1) Application of pre-

submission meeting

(2) Pre-submission

meeting Pre f. Go ve rno r Ge ne ra l Pub lic

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Daisuke Tanaka, MHLW 8

Pro c e sse s o f Orpha n De sig na tio n -2-

MHL W

Spo nso r

Pre f. Go ve rno r Ge ne ra l Pub lic

(3)-1 Submission

  • f application

(3)-2 Validation of Application

PAF SC

Ne w Drug 1 Ne w Drug 2 Me d. De v & Dia g no stic s

(4)-1 Send the

application for review

(4)-3 Review Report (4)-2 Review & Evaluation (5)-1 Refer to the

PAFSC

(5)-3 Recommendation (5)-2 Discussion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Daisuke Tanaka, MHLW 9

Pro c e sse s o f Orpha n De sig na tio n -3-

MHL W

Spo nso r

PAF SC

Ne w Drug 1 Ne w Drug 2 Me d. De v & Dia g no stic s

Pre f. Go ve rno r Ge ne ra l Pub lic

(6)-1 Administrative works (6)-2 Notification (by Gov.

Gazette & Document)

(6)-2 Notification Post designation I ncentives requests etc

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Daisuke Tanaka, MHLW 10

Pro c e sse s o f Orpha n De sig na tio n -Re vie w-

MHL W

Spo nso r

PAF SC

Ne w Drug 1 Ne w Drug 2 Me d. De v & Dia g no stic s

Pre f. Go ve rno r Ge ne ra l Pub lic

review Discuss Validation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Daisuke Tanaka, MHLW 11

Pro c e sse s o f Orpha n De sig na tio n -Re vie w-

MHL W

Spo nso r

PAF SC

Ne w Drug 1 Ne w Drug 2 Me d. De v & Dia g no stic s

Ge ne ra l Pub lic

Discuss Rapporateur Co- rapporateur The COMP

Public Assessment Report

review Validation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Diffe re nc e b e twe e n E U & Ja pa n

 No specific Division/ Section, Committee in Japan.  “High possibility of Development” is one of the designation criteria in Japan.  Designated products are automatically obtained Priority Review in Japan.  No specific “Time clock” is set in Japan.  1 step procedure in Japan whilst 2 step procedure in EU (Re-evaluation of orphan status at the licencing)