orphan m edicinal products
play

Orphan m edicinal products Activities of the Committee for Orphan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Orphan m edicinal products Activities of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) Presented by: Paolo Tomasi, European Medicines Agency Orphan designation Principles Designation criteria Incentives Procedure


  1. Orphan m edicinal products Activities of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) Presented by: Paolo Tomasi, European Medicines Agency

  2. Orphan designation • Principles – Designation criteria – Incentives – Procedure • Experience – Designations – Authorizations – Conclusions Orphans by Thomas Kennington Orphan medicinal products - COMP 2

  3. W hy is there a EU legislation to stim ulate developm ent of drugs for rare diseases? = for Ligneous conjunctivitis ~150 cases described Orphan medicinal products - COMP 3

  4. W hy is there a EU legislation to stim ulate developm ent of drugs for rare diseases? “Persons suffering from rare conditions should be entitled to the same quality of treatment as other patients” But… “ the pharmaceutical industry would be unwilling to develop the medicinal product under normal market conditions” As… “some conditions occur so infrequently that the cost of developing and bringing to the market a medicinal product (… ) would not be recovered by the expected sales” Orphan medicinal products - COMP 4

  5. Orphan Regulations in the EU Regulation ( EC) No 1 4 1 / 2 0 0 0 of the EP on Orphan Medicinal Products ( 1 6 / 1 2 / 1 9 9 9 ) • Criteria for designation • Committee (COMP) • Procedure • Incentives Com m ission Regulation ( EC) 8 4 7 / 2 0 0 0 of 2 7 / 0 4 / 2 0 0 0 • Criteria for designation • Similarity • Clinical superiority Com m ission Regulation ( EC) 7 2 6 / 2 0 0 4 of 2 0 / 1 1 / 2 0 0 5 • Mandatory centralised MA application for orphans Orphan medicinal products - COMP 5

  6. COMP ( Com m ittee for Orphan Medicinal Products) EMEA Com m ittee: 3 3 ( + 2 ) m em bers + chairperson • 1 member per Member State (N= 27) • 6 members nominated by the European Commission – 3 patient representatives – 3 members proposed by EMA • 2 non-voting members (Iceland and Norway) COMP tasks: • Opinions on designation • To advise Commission on establishment and development of a policy on orphan medicinal products • To assist EU Commission in liaising internationally and with patient support groups • To assist EU Commission on guidelines Orphan medicinal products - COMP 6

  7. Orphan Medicines Section ( EMA) I n the sector Hum an Medicines Special Areas • Head of Section: Jordi Llinares Garcia • 4 Scientific Administrators (physicians, pharmacists… ) • 3 Assistants Tasks: • coordination of procedures for the designation of orphan medicinal products: – Preparation of Summary Reports on applications – Scientific and Administrative secretariat of COMP • Coordination of the review of orphan designation criteria at the time of granting/ varying a marketing authorisation • coordination of the review of market exclusivity of authorised orphan medicine products 5 years from the granting of the marketing authorisation Orphan medicinal products - COMP 7

  8. Overview of orphan designation process DAY 90 DAY 1 DAY 60 Intent to Validation Evaluation file letter COMP COMP List of questions MEETING I MEETING II (oral explanation) “clockstop” Application Opinion submission (invalid applications) EU Decision Publication of public summary of opinion (lay language) on EMA website Orphan medicinal products - COMP 8

  9. Orphan designation • For medicinal products for human use • Procedure is free of charge • Can be requested at any stage of development, but before request for MA (even 1 day) • Sponsor can be either company or individual – Established in the EEA (EU, Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway) • European Commission Decision gives access to incentives • Centralised procedure for MA compulsory Orphan medicinal products - COMP 9

  10. Orphan designation: 3 criteria 1: “Prevalence” criterion 2: “Seriousness” criterion Prevalence Life-threatening or chronically debilitating ( ≤ 5 / 10,000) or Insufficient return on investment Life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic (costs > expected revenues) 3: “Significant Benefit” criterion NO OK Are there available “methods” for diagnosis / prevention / Significant treatment? YES benefit / current methods non satisfactory Orphan medicinal products - COMP 10

  11. Prevalence of designated orphan conditions ( m ust be < 5 / 1 0 ,0 0 0 ) 11% less than 1 in 10,000 36% between 1 and 3 in 10,000 more than 3 in 10,000 53% Orphan medicinal products - COMP 11 Data updated 21/ 09/ 2010

  12. I ncentives ( 1 / 3 ) Economic Economic / marketing: / marketing: • Fee reduction / exemption – Extended incentives for SMEs (post authorisation) • Market exclusivity (10 years) Product development: Product development: • Free protocol assistance (Scientific Advice for Orphan Medicinal products) Community marketing authorisation Community marketing authorisation National incentives (EC inventory) National incentives (EC inventory) Orphan medicinal products - COMP 12

  13. I ncentives: econom ic/ m arketing ( 2 / 3 ) • Fee reductions: – 50% market authorisation application – 100% protocol assistance – 100% post authorisation fees • 10-year market exclusivity – protection against: • similar products (structure/ mechanism of action • for the same indication – Four possible derogations: • Sponsor’s consent • Lack of supply • Clinical superiority of another similar product • Review after 5 years at MS request Orphan medicinal products - COMP 13

  14. I ncentives: product developm ent 3 / 3 Protocol assistance • Protocol assistance  scientific advice for orphans – Questions on quality-efficacy-safety – Questions on significant benefit (small) – Company position required differences – SAWP provides answers PA / SA – CHMP adopts answers – COMP involved if issues on benefit Orphan medicinal products - COMP 14

  15. Use of incentives fund Use of EU special contribution for orphan medicines ( 2 0 0 9 ) Post- a uthor isa tion pr oce dur e s I nspe ctions 4 % Ma r k e ting 4 % a uthor isa tions 2 9 % Pr otocol a ssista nce 6 3 % Orphan medicinal products - COMP 15 Data updated 21/ 09/ 2010

  16. Orphan designation is “com petitive” Designation can be granted for the same orphan indication, to two or more sponsors, even for similar or identical products First sponsor with MA for an orphan indication obtains exclusivity (for the therapeutic indication) Subsequent sponsor(s) for the same therapeutic indication - to break exclusivity: Clinical superiority Yes Products required similar? Significant benefit (CHMP) No still required as usual Orphan medicinal products - COMP 16

  17. Orphan applications 2 0 0 0 -2 0 0 9 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Total To tal No. of 72 83 80 87 108 118 104 126 119 164 applications 1061 1061 submitted Positive Opinions 26 64 43 54 75 88 81 97 86 113 727 727 Commission 14 64 49 55 72 88 80 98 73 106 699 699 Decisions Negative Opinions 0 1 3 1 4 0 2 1 1 2 15 15 Withdrawals 6 27 30 41 22 30 20 19 31 23 249 249 Orphan medicinal products - COMP 17

  18. Designations by therapeutic area immunology other 9% 12% musculoskeletal and nervous system 12% metabolism oncology 11% 43% antiinfectious cardiovascular and 4% respiratory 9% Orphan medicinal products - COMP 18 Data updated 21/ 09/ 2010

  19. Orphan conditions affecting children Adult ONLY 42% Both adult AND paediatric 50% Paediatric ONLY 8% Orphan medicinal products - COMP 19 Data updated 21/ 09/ 2010

  20. Orphan conditions affecting children 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Medical conditions affecting adults only Medical conditions affecting both children and adults Medical conditions affecting children only Orphan medicinal products - COMP 20

  21. Therapeutic areas of the 6 3 authorised orphan m edicinal products 3% 3% 11% 11% 10% 10% 38% 38% 16% 16% 22% 22% antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents metabolism blood musculoskeletal and nervous system cardiovascular others Orphan medicinal products - COMP 21

  22. Conclusions • 90-day procedure • 3 legislation requirements (rarity/ return, prevalence, no other treatments/ unsatisfactory/ benefit) • Designation is competitive • Orphan indication (at designation) is not necessarily the same as therapeutic indication at MA • Significant benefit to be: – Claimed at OD application stage, if authorised drugs exist (or satisfactory non-medicinal treatments); – Confirmed at MA with relevant data Orphan medicinal products - COMP 22

  23. Thank you for your Questions? attention Orphan medicinal products - COMP 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend