ITR: Billion-atom Multiscale Simulations on a Grid Priya Vashishta, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

itr billion atom multiscale simulations on a grid
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ITR: Billion-atom Multiscale Simulations on a Grid Priya Vashishta, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ITR: Billion-atom Multiscale Simulations on a Grid Priya Vashishta, Rajiv K. Kalia & Aiichiro Nakano Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations Dept. of Physics & Dept. of Computer Science, Louisiana State Univ. Email:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ITR: Billion-atom Multiscale Simulations on a Grid

Priya Vashishta, Rajiv K. Kalia & Aiichiro Nakano

Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations

  • Dept. of Physics & Dept. of Computer Science, Louisiana State Univ.

Email: {priyav, kalia, nakano}@bit.csc.lsu.edu URL: www.cclms.lsu.edu

September 1, 2002: Collaboratory for Multiscale Simulations Departments of Materials Science & Engineering, Physics, Computer Science, and Biomedical Engineering University of Southern California

CCLMS CCLMS CCLMS

NSF Division of Materials Research Computational Materials Theory Program Review Program Managers: Dr. Bruce Taggart & Dr. Daryl Hess Organizers: Dr. Duane Johnson & Dr. Jeongnim Kim June 20, 2002, Urbana, IL

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • 1. Multiscale simulation of lattice-mismatched

nanopixels & nanomesas

  • 2. Multimillion-atom molecular dynamics

simulation of semiconductor nanoparticles

  • 3. GRID computing with latency tolerant

algorithms

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Concurrent Computing Laboratory for Materials Simulations (CCLMS)

Faculty: Priya Vashishta, Rajiv Kalia and Aiichiro Nakano, Postdocs: Paulo Branicio, Bijaya Karki, Hideaki Kikuchi, Sanjay Kodiyalam, Maxim Makeev, Elefterios Lidorikis Dual-Degree Graduate Students: Gürcan Aral, Jabari Lee, Xinlian Liu, Zhen Lu, Brent Neal, Cindy Rountree, Ashish Sharma, Satyavani Vemparala, Weiqiang Wang, Cheng Zhang Undergraduate Students: DeAndra Hayes (Xavier), Paul Miller, Wei Zhao Visitors: Simon de Leeuw (Delft, The Netherlands), Ingvar Ebbsjö (Uppsala, Sweden), Hiroshi Iyetomi (Niigata, Japan), Shuji Ogata (Yamaguchi, Japan), José Rino (São Carlos, Brazil), Fuyuki Shimojo (Hiroshima, Japan) Systems Manager: Monika Lee Coordinator: Jade Ethridge

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1,024 CPU System being installed at LSU under the auspices of Louisiana IT initiative.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hybrid FE/MD Algorithm

  • FE nodes & MD atoms coincide in the handshake region
  • Additive hybridization

[0 1 1] [1 1 1]

_

HS

_

[1 1 1] [2 1 1]

Si/Si3N4 nanopixel

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Si(111)/Si3N4(0001) Nanopixel

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 [Å]

r

z (top to bottom) [nm] 5 10 15 20 Displacement [Å]

  • 0.5

Interface Hybrid full MD

r z y

0.5

Int. HS

Displacement from equilibrium positions

Si Si3N4

Hybrid FE/MD Full MD HS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

70 nm

Stress Domains in Si3N4/Si Nanopixels

Stress domains in Si due to an amorphous Si3N4 film

  • 2GPa

2GPa

Stress well in Si with a crystalline Si3N4 film due to lattice mismatch

Si Si3N4

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Epitaxially Grown Quantum Dots
  • A. Madhukar (USC)

Substrate-encoded size-reducing epitaxy

GaAs (001) substrate; <100> square mesas

10nm 101 GaAs AlGaAs QD QD 001 AlGaAs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Lattice-mismatched Growth of Epitaxial Quantum Dots on Patterned Substrates

InAs island formation on a flat GaAs(001) substrate >1.6 monolayer deposition

  • A. Madhukar (USC)

Self-limiting growth of 12 ML InAs on a patterned substrate

10 µm

GaAs mesa substrate [001] [010]

InAs GaAs GaAs 20nm

InAs delivery: 24ML, Base: 75nm Height: 11±1 ML

Strain relaxation suppresses 2D 3D transformation on a patterned substrate <100nm

30 25 20 15 10 5 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

InAs deposition (ML) InAs thickness (ML)

MESA SIZE ~ 750 Å

cr = 1.6ML cr = 12ML

GaAs/InAs: 7.2% lattice mismatch

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Validation of Interatomic Potentials—GaAs

X-ray static structure factor Phonon dispersion High-pressure phase transition

Si3N4

amorphous

SiC

10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40

Fr equency (m eV)

Γ Γ K X L X W L Experiment (Strauch & Dorner, '90) Theory

2.3 2.4 2.5 10 20 Ga-As Distance (Å) Pressure (GPa)

MD

10 20

Expt.

[Besson et al., '91]

1 2 2 4 6 8 10 MD Experiment q (Å-1)

Amorphous GaAs

[Udron et al., ‘91]

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Atomistic Stress in InAs/GaAs Square Mesa

  • In-plane lattice constant in InAs
  • verlayers exceeds the bulk value

at 12 ML self-limiting thickness

Vertical displacement in the first As layer above the interface

  • Domain formation in larger

mesas critical lateral size for 3D island formation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Colloidal Quantum Dots, Rods & Tetrapods

Applications

  • LED, display
  • Biological labeling
  • Pressure synthesis
  • f novel materials

High-pressure structural transformation in a GaAs nanocrystal

Collaborator: Paul Alivisatos (Chemistry, Berkeley)

[from Bawendi’s group at MIT]

17.5 GPa

Multiple domains

22.5 GPa

30 Å

Nucleation at surface

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Multiple Domains in a GaAs Nanocrystal

Nucleation & growth of high-pressure-phase domains

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Domain Fluctuations

Third domain’s growth fluctuates with time

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Shape Dependence of Transformation

Transformation is sensitive to the initial shape

Spherical Faceted Faceted Multiple domains Single domain Multiple domains

slide-16
SLIDE 16

GRID Computing for a One Billion Atom One Micron Nanopixel

  • One billion atom simulation for
  • ne micron (1000nm) nanopixel.

The simulation will be split in two parts - top 200 million atoms

  • n a 256 CPU system and the

remaining 800 million on a 1,024 CPU system for GRID

  • computing. In GRID computing,

quality of service (QoS) and latency issues serious, but not killers.

  • Main objective is to confirm the

nature of hexagonal pattern of stress domains at the interface. Si/Si3N4 nanopixel

slide-17
SLIDE 17

GRID Computing for an Ensemble of 64 Nanoclusters

  • Nanocrystals in Lennard-Jones liquid
  • Isothermal-Isobaric simulations
  • Nanocrystal: 20-60 Å
  • Pressure: 2.5-25 Gpa
  • 90% of the particles constitute

pressure medium.

  • 8 to 16 processors optimum for
  • ne nanocrystal.
  • In GRID computing, QoS and

latency issues not serious, syncronization needed at pressure change only.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Access Grid Technology for Education and Training of Underrepresented Groups

Access Grid

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Un de rg ra du a te Edu ca tio n & Tra in in g

Co m pu ta tio n a l S cie n ce Wo rks h o p fo r Un de rre pre s e n te d Gro u ps

  • 1 9 pa rticipa n ts fro m 1 1 in s titu tio n s —

Ha m pto n , Cla rk-Atla n ta , Mo re h o u s e , Ja cks o n S ta te , Mis s is s ippi S ta te , Te x a s S o u th e rn , Un iv . o f Te x a s – – Pa n Am e rica n , Xa vie r, Gra m blin g , S o u th e rn & Un iv . o f Lo u is ia n a in Mo n ro e

  • Activ itie s : Co n s tru ctio n o f a PC clu s te r fro m
  • ff-th e -s h e lf co m po n e n ts & u s in g th is pa ra lle l

m a ch in e fo r a lg o rith m ic a n d s im u la tio n e x e rcis e s .

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summary

CCLMS CCLMS CCLMS

  • 1. Multiscale simulation of lattice-mismatched

nanopixels & nanomesas

  • 2. Multimillion-atom molecular dynamics

simulation of semiconductor nanoparticles

  • 3. GRID computing with latency tolerant

algorithms

  • 4. Educational and training activities using

access grid

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Future: Biologically-inspired Nanostructures

NASA Information Power Grid Collaborators:

  • A. Madhukar (USC)

Paul Alivisatos (Berkeley) Collaborator: Jonathan Trent (NASA)

Protein-nanotube-based nanostructures Bio-inspired self-assembly of epitaxical & nanoparticle quantum dots