Prepared For: Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Prepared By: Kevin J. Atinsky, F.C.A.S., M.A.A.A. Chief Actuary Medical Mutual Insurance Company of Maine katinsky@medicalmutual.com September 14, 2009
Issues and Trends in Medical Professional Liability: Update on PIAA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Issues and Trends in Medical Professional Liability: Update on PIAA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Issues and Trends in Medical Professional Liability: Update on PIAA Financial Results Prepared For: Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Prepared By: Kevin J. Atinsky, F.C.A.S., M.A.A.A. Chief Actuary Medical Mutual Insurance Company of Maine
1
Disclosures
- Content of presentation is based on 2nd Quarter
2009 edition of The Physician Insurer, trade publication of the Physician Insurers Association
- f America (PIAA); article entitled “Industry
Update: Tilting Away from Further Improvement” by Kevin Atinsky and Chad Karls
- Source data based upon an analysis of a 49 PIAA
member company compilation of year-end financial statements provided by National Underwriter Data Services from Highline Data
2
Overview of Presentation
- Overview and highlights
- Update on PIAA financial results
- Top-line premium growth
- Operating performance
- Capitalization levels
- Concluding thoughts
3
Overview and Highlights
- Last year we posed, “Is this as good as it gets?”
- With one more year of unfolding, now seems probably so
- 2008 reflected record underwriting results
- Offset to some degree by investment fallout caused
by impairment in financial markets
- Maintained strong capitalization levels
- Caution that investment risk has increased
- Impacts “required” capital and thus relative adequacy
- Declaration of $200 million in policyholder
dividends in 2008 over $450 million past two years
- AIG warrants attention due to vast market presence
4
Direct Written Premium Growth
($Billions)
$0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 4.9% 26.1% 30.5% 19.2% 9.4% 2.5% (0.3)% (6.1)% (5.5)%
5
Direct Written Premium Growth
Notable Observations
- Last two years represent fairly sizable reductions
- 11% drop is largest two-year reduction in tracked history
- 7.5% reduction during 1990 and 1991
- 2.5% reduction during 1996 and 1997
- Modest rate reductions and increased use of credits
- Combined revenue impact of $600 million
- Notable that underwriting results have continued to
improve during this period
- Driven by favorable reserve development and
continuation of reduced claims frequency
6
Combined Ratio Components
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Loss & LAE Ratio Underwriting Expense Ratio Policyholder Dividend Ratio 123% 130% 129% 124% 108% 97% 89% 85% 77% 118%
7
One-Year Reserve Development to NEP
- 20.0%
- 12.3%
- 6.0%
7.3% 10.2% 2.7%
- 3.4%
- 11.3%
- 19.2%
- 28.5%
- 35%
- 30%
- 25%
- 20%
- 15%
- 10%
- 5%
0% 5% 10% 15% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
8
Operating Ratio Components
- 20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140%
- 20%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Combined Ratio Operating Ratio Investment Income Ratio Realized Capital Gains Ratio
9
Operating Performance
Notable Observations
- 2008 underwriting results one of best ever
- Key contributor was favorable reserve development
- Highlights importance of assessing reserve position
- Investments suffered from broader economic turmoil
- Investment gain ratio (to NEP) of 9% in 2008 compares to
recent historical results in the 20% to 25% range
- Despite poor investment results, the 2008 operating
results were nearly as good as 2007
10
Policyholder Surplus Growth
($Billions)
(2.1)% (5.4)% (6.8)% 5.0% 15.0% 14.7% 19.1% 16.8% 2.1% $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
11
NAIC RBC Ratio
588% 567% 506% 383% 376% 416% 495% 606% 735% 734% 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 600% 700% 800% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
12
Capitalization Levels
Notable Observations
- Following several years of double-digit growth,
surplus levels relatively flat during 2008
- Impacted by unrealized losses and stockholder dividends
- RBC, which normalizes for underlying risk, and is
used by regulators, was flat after large advancements
- In light of historical underwriting volatility, and
recent increase in investment risk, it seems as if the strengthened capital levels are essential
Concluding Thoughts
14
Concluding Thoughts
- Future financial results largely pinned on reserve
adequacy and sustainability of claims frequency
- In 2008, reserve releases totaled $1.2 billion
- Another critical area to monitor is investments
- Uncharacteristic to this industry
- 2009 will reveal important indicators as to the
future results in areas of reserve adequacy, claims frequency and investment outlook
- Forces skewed more towards deterioration, and