ireg 6 taipei 18 20 april 2012 24 characteristics alden
play

IREG6 Taipei, 1820 April, 2012 24 Characteristics Alden - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

IREG6 Taipei, 1820 April, 2012 24 Characteristics Alden & Lin, 2004 12 Characteristics Levin, Jeong & Ou, 2006 10 Characteristics Niland, 2005 9 Characteristics Liu et al,


  1. IREG‐6 Taipei, 18‐20 April, 2012

  2. • • • • •

  3. • 24 Characteristics �Alden & Lin, 2004� • 12 Characteristics �Levin, Jeong & Ou, 2006� • 10 Characteristics �Niland, 2005� 9 Characteristics �Liu et al, 2001� • 5 Characteristics �Altbach, 2003� • • … • 3 Categories �Salmi, 2009� – Concentration of talent – Abundant resources – Favorable governance

  4. • • •

  5. • Academic Ranking of World Universities �2003‐� • THE World University Rankings �2004‐2009, 2010‐� • QS World University Rankings �2004‐ � • Webmetrics Ranking �2004‐� • Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities �2007‐� • Professional Ranking of World Universities �2007‐� • University Ranking By Academic Performance �2010‐� • …

  6. • – Various bibliometric indicators do not give significantly different information on research quality • – Not always the higher, the better – Faculty‐to‐Student ratio, % of International Students • •

  7. • • Students: total N.| by level| foreign| degree • Academic Staff: total N.| by type| Ph.D| foreign • Finance: total income| by sources| research income

  8. • • • • •

  9. Number of Rank Range Percentage Respondents Top 100 36 36% 101‐200 30 30% 201‐300 34 34% 301‐400 29 29% 401‐500 25 25% 501� 77 12%

  10. • – Total Number of Students – Number of Undergraduate Students – Number of Master’s Students – Number of Doctoral Students – Percentage of Graduate Students – Percentage of International Students – Percentage of International Doctoral‐Level Students – Number of Alumni of Nobel Laureates and Fields Medalists �ARWU data�

  11. • – Total Number of Academic Staff – Ratio of Academic Staff to Students – Number of Academic Staff �Teaching Related� – Ratio of Academic Staff �Teaching Related� to Students – Number of Academic Staff �Research Only� – Percentage of Academic Staff �Teaching Related� with a Doctoral Degree – Percentage of International Academic Staff �Teaching Related� – Number of Staff of Nobel Laureates and Fields Medalists �ARWU data� – Number of Highly Cited Researchers �ARWU raw data�

  12. • – Total Amount of Institutional Income – Institutional Income per Student – Institutional Income from Public Sectors – Institutional Income from Student Tuition and Fees – Institutional Income from Donations and Gifts – Institutional Income from Institution’s Investments – Percentage of Institutional Income from Public Sectors – Total Amount of Research Income – Research Income per Academic Staff – Research Income from Public Sectors – Research Income from Industry – Research Income from Industry per Academic Staff �THE Score� – Percentage of Research Income from Public Sectors

  13. • – Number of SCIE and SSCI Papers �ARWU data� – SCIE and SSCI Papers per Academic Staff – Number of Nature and Science Papers �ARWU data� – Nature and Science Papers per Academic Staff – Normalized Average Citations per Paper �THE Score�

  14. • • – Academic Ranking of World Universities �ARWU� – THE World University Rankings �THE� • • •

  15. ARWU THE Level of Indicator Score Score Correlation Total Number of Students .05 ‐.04 N Number of Undergraduate Students .01 ‐.06 N Number of Master’s Students .04 ‐.10 N Number of Doctoral Students .54** .40** M % of Graduate Students .11 .17* N % of International Students .19** .30** N ‐ W % of International Doctoral Students .17* .24** N ‐ W Alumni of Nobel Laureates (ARWU data ) .71** .53** M ‐ S S: Strong �|r|�.7� M: Moderate �.4�|r|�.7� W: Weak �.2�|r|�.4� N: Negligible to very weak �|r|�.2�

  16. ARWU THE Level of Indicator Score Score Correlation Total Number of Academic Staff .46** .46** M Academic Staff : Students .36** .51** W ‐ M Number of Academic Staff (Teaching) .24** .25** W Academic Staff (Teaching) : Students .18** .28** N ‐ W Number of Academic Staff (Research Only) .64** .57** M .31** .27** W % of Academic Staff (Teaching) with a Doctorate % of Intl Academic Staff (Teaching) .10 .20* N ‐ W Staff of Nobel Laureates (ARWU Data) .73** .56** M ‐ S Number of HiCi Researchers (ARWU Data) .85** .70** S S: Strong �|r|�.7� M: Moderate �.4�|r|�.7� W: Weak �.2�|r|�.4� N: Negligible to very weak �|r|�.2�

  17. ARWU THE Level of Indicator Score Score Correlation Total Institutional Income .72** .64** M ‐ S Income per Student .53** .56** M Income from Public Sectors .62** .56** M Income from Student Tuition and Fees .49** .47** M Income from Donations and Gifts .59** .55** M Income from Institution’s Investments .62** .55** M % of Income from Public Sectors ‐ .13 ‐ .23** N ‐ W S: Strong �|r|�.7� M: Moderate �.4�|r|�.7� W: Weak �.2�|r|�.4� N: Negligible to very weak �|r|�.2�

  18. ARWU THE Level of Indicator Score Score Correlation Total Research Income .77** .67** M ‐ S Research Income per Academic Staff .50** .57** M Research Income from Public Sectors .75** .63** M ‐ S Research Income from Industry .50** .40** M Research Income from Industry per .08 .19* N Academic Staff (THE Score) .16* .14 N % of Research Income from Public Sectors S: Strong �|r|�.7� M: Moderate �.4�|r|�.7� W: Weak �.2�|r|�.4� N: Negligible to very weak �|r|�.2�

  19. ARWU THE Level of Indicator Score Score Correlation SCIE and SSCI Papers (ARWU Data) .85** .76** S SCIE and SSCI Papers per Academic Staff .50** .58** M Nature and Science Papers (ARWU Data) .88** .72** S Nature & Science Papers per Academic Staff .76** .67** M ‐ S Normalized Citations per Paper (THE Score) .66** .83** M ‐ S S: Strong �|r|�.7� M: Moderate �.4�|r|�.7� W: Weak �.2�|r|�.4� N: Negligible to very weak �|r|�.2�

  20. Top 100 as the  standard ARWU & THE  76 appeared in  Top 100 of both ARWU and THE 28 in GRUP 

  21. Level of Coefficient N Mean Min Max Correlation of variation Total Number of N 28 26097 7623 61710 0.43 Students Number of Doctoral M 28 3433 780 8389 0.53 Students % of Graduate N 28 .31 .14 .54 0.34 Students % of International W 25 .17 .04 .32 0.54 Students % of International N ‐ W 0.43 27 .30 .10 .61 Doctoral Students Nobel Alumni M ‐ S 28 3.0 .20 21.9 1.55 (ARWU data)

  22. Level of Coefficient N Mean Min Max Correlation of variation Total Number of AS M 26 3669 1497 6958 0.37 AS (Teaching) : N ‐ W 28 .09 .04 .25 0.49 Students Number of AS M 26 1438 365 3465 0.54 (Research Only) % of AS(Teaching) W 22 .83 .48 1.00 0.17 with a Doctorate % of International N ‐ W 24 .18 .03 .34 0.62 AS (Teaching) Nobel Staff M ‐ S 28 1.7 .00 11.8 1.66 (ARWU data) HiCi Researchers S 28 32 5 150 0.97 (ARWU data)

  23. Level of Coefficient N Mean Min Max Correlation of variation Total Income MS 28 1758 601 6059 0.71 (Millions of USD) Income per Student M 28 80 19 294 0.93 (Thousands of USD) Income from Public Sectors M 27 636 221 1341 0.47 (Millions of USD) Income from Student Tuition M 27 331 0 1004 0.78 (Millions of USD) % of Income from NW 27 .44 .12 .92 0.45 Public Sectors

  24. Level of Coefficient N Mean Min Max Correlation of variation Total Research Income MS 28 485 154 1150 0.51 (Millions of USD) Research Income per Academic Staff M 26 140 60 425 0.59 (Thousands of USD) Research Income from Public Sectors MS 27 400 144 961 0.54 (Millions of USD) % of Research Income N 27 .82 .62 .96 0.13 from Public Sectors

  25. Level of Coefficient N Mean Min Max Correlation of variation SCIE and SSCI Papers S 28 4339 2090 8200 0.35 (ARWU data) SCIE and SSCI Papers M 26 1.28 .59 2.38 0.33 per Academic Staff Nature & Science S 28 55 12 215 1.00 Papers (ARWU data) Nature & Science per M ‐ S 26 .02 .00 .08 1.06 Academic Staff Normalized Citations M ‐ S 28 84 57 100 0.14 per Paper (THE Score)

  26. • • •

  27. • 231 institutions • 21 indicators including ARWU indicators • Indicators and weights are decided by users

  28. • – 2012: 400� – 2013: 600� – 2/3 of ARWU Top 500 – 80% of ARWU Top 100 • – International comparability – Institution’s burden •

  29. http://www.ShanghaiRanking.com/

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend